IN-VITRO ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF VARIOUS EXTRACTS OF BARK OF FICUS RACEMOSA LINN. (MORACEAE)
HTML Full TextIN-VITRO ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF VARIOUS EXTRACTS OF BARK OF FICUS RACEMOSA LINN. (MORACEAE)
Saurabh Rajvaidhya * 1 and V. V. Byahatti 2
Moulana Azad Institute of Pharmacy, Jodhpur - 342008, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Pharmacognosy, K.L.E’s College of Pharmacy, Hubli - 580031, Karnataka, India.
ABSTRACT: The plant Ficus racemosa L., is a woody large deciduous tree distributed all over India, and grows in the evergreen forest, moist localities, along with the sides of ravines and banks of streams belonging to the family Moraceae, locally know as Attimara and Hindi known as Gular. Ethnobotanically the bark used for anti-diabetic, wounds, useful in asthma and piles recommended in uropathy and treatment of menorrhagia. Biological activities like anti-inflammatory, anti-diarrhea, anti-diuretic, antibacterial, hepatoprotective, were reported. The present study finds outs the scientifical evidence of bark of Ficus racemosa L. for its antioxidant property using different screening models. The different extract of bark was obtained by successive extraction with petroleum ether (40-60 ºC), butanol, ethyl acetate, alcohol by Soxhlet method. These extracts were taken for an in-vitro antioxidant study, were carried out by using in-vitro antioxidant screening models like DPPH radical scavenging activity and total phenolic contents (TPC). The few successive plant extracts showed significant dose-dependent activity by using various in-vitro antioxidant models. Antioxidant activity of bark showed a greater free radical sequestering activity. In the present study, ethanol extract showed a greater antioxidant activity was found to be 100 µg/mL expressed as significant antioxidant activity of Ficus racemosa L. This might be due to the presence of phyto-compounds flavonoids, phenols, saponins, steroids, tannins and terpenoids present in the preliminary phytochemical screening.
Keywords: |
Ficus racemosa Linn. bark, Antioxidant, DPPH, Flavonoids, Total phenolic content
INTRODUCTION: In general, the effect of anti-oxidants is to break up the chains formed during the propagation process by providing a hydrogen atom or an electron to the free radical and receiving the excess energy possessed by the activated molecule 1.
Anti-oxidants may offer resistance against the oxidative stress by scavenging the free radicals, inhibiting the lipid peroxidation and by other mechanisms and thus prevent disease 2.
It has also been proposed that antioxidant activity of plant origin components can be mainly ascribed to the presence of phenolic compounds 3. Phenolic compounds are not evenly distributed in plant parts; they are present at elevated amounts in the outer parts of the fruits, leaves, and barks 4. Tree bark is usually rich in compounds with medicinal properties, and many cultures use it for centuries. Asians, Polynesian, and American indigenous people used bark components to treat heart failure among other medicinal applications 5. Following the great success of Taxol (a chemotherapic anticancer drug), there has been a massive search by ethnobotanists and biochemists for bark components, leading to the discovery of some useful products 6.
Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathology of many diseases such as inflammatory conditions, cancer, wound healing diabetes asthma and, aging 1. Free radicals induced by per-oxidation have gained much importance because of their involvement in several pathological conditions such as atherosclerosis, ischemia, liver disorder, neural disorder, metal toxicity, drugs toxicity and pesticide toxicity 7. Together with other derivatives of oxygen, they are inevitable by-products of biological redox reactions of biological cycles8. Anti-oxidants are added as redox systems possessing higher oxidative potential than the drug that they are designed to protect or as chain inhibitors of radical inducted decomposition of oxidants.
In general, the effect of antioxidants is to break up the chains formed during the propagation process by providing a hydrogen atom or an electron to the free radical and receiving the excess energy possessed by the activated molecule to reduce oxidation1. Anti-oxidants may offer resistance against the oxidative stress by scavenging the free radicals, inhibiting the lipid peroxidation and by other mechanisms and thus prevent disease and increase healing 2. The natural antioxidants may have free-radical scavengers, reducing agents, potential complexes of pro-oxidant metals, quenches of singlet oxygen or hydrogen providers, etc. 9 The antioxidants can interfere with the oxidation process by reacting with free radicals by reducing those 10.
Recently interest has increased considerably in finding natural occurring antioxidants for use in foods or medicinal materials to replace synthetic antioxidants which are being restricted due to their side effects such as carcinogenicity and drug interactions 11. The food industry uses natural anti-oxidants as a replacement of conventional synthetic anti-oxidants, to avoid their side effects 12. The plant Ficus racemosa L., is a woody evergreen belonging to the family Moraceae, locally knows as Attimara and in Hindi known as Gular. Ethnobotanically, root, and sap of root, bark, leaves, and fruits, latex are used for various medicinal uses. Roots used in dysentery, diarrhea hydrophobia and fluid obtained from it by incision is administered as a powerful tonic. Leaves are used in bronchitis, antihypertensive and inflammation, lymphadenitis, in sprains and fibrositis. Ripe fruits used to check leprosy, menorrhagia or excessive bleeding during menstruation, nose bleeding and for expelling intestinal worms. Biological activities such as antimicrobial studies and preliminary phytochemical studies reported that the presence of various classes of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, phenols, saponins, steroids, tannins and terpenoids 13, this report confirmed antioxidant potential of bark of Ficus racemosa L. After the scrutiny of literature, so far no work has been carried out regarding anti-oxidant activity of fruits of selected plant. Hence, in the present study, the antioxidant activity of bark of Ficus racemosa L. was done 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection of Plant Material: The stem bark of Ficus racemosa Linn. was collected from the Botanical Garden, Karnataka University, Dharwad (Karnataka State) and authenticated by Dr. G.R Hegde, Professor, and Head, P.G. Department of Botany, Karnataka University, Dharwad. A voucher specimen (no. 04PG0356, Saurabh Rajvaidhya) has been deposited in the PG Pharmacognosy laboratory of the college for future reference.
Preparation of the Plant Extracts: The collected bark materials were shade-dried and coarsely powdered using a pulverizer. The coarse powders were subjected to successive extraction with organic solvents of increasing polarity such as petroleum ether (40-60 ºC), butanol, ethyl acetate, alcohol by Soxhlet method, and water extract by maceration of the mark of successive extract. The extracts were collected and distilled off on a water bath at atmospheric pressure, and the last trace of the solvents was removed in vacuum and stored at 4 ºC. The resulted extracts were used for the in-vitro antioxidant activity.
Inhibitory Effects on 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Assay: DPPH is a free radical which when dissolved in ethanol has a blue-violet color. When it reacts with the reducing agent, the solution loses color indicates radical scavenging activity of test material 20. 3 ml of 60 µM DPPH in ethanol was added to different concentrations of extracts (10-1000 µg/mL) and then incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Absorbance was read at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer (Simtronics, India). The percentage of DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated by comparing the absorbance values of control not treated with the extract. Ascorbic acid used as a positive control. All determinations were performed three times, and the results were expressed as a mean ± S.E.M.
Total Phenolic Assay: The amount of total phenolic was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent method 21. One milliliter of extracts was taken into test tubes and mixed with 1 ml 95% ethanol, 5 ml distilled water and 0.5 ml 1N Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. After 5 min, 1 ml of 5% Na2CO3 was added, and the reaction mixture was allowed to stand for 60 min before the absorbance at 725 nm was measured.
A standard curve was established for each assay using 50-500 µg of gallic acid in 95% ethanol and expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) (milligram of a gallic acid equivalent/gram of various extracts). All determinations were performed three times, and the results were expressed as a mean ± S.E.M.
RESULTS: All the extract showed concentration-dependent activity in various extracts. The results of anti-oxidant activity were given here as follows in Table 1.
Inhibitory Effects on 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Assay: S. petroleum ether extract showed maximum activity was observed as 61.54 ± 0.72 at 1000 µg/mL followed by 22.65 ± 0.61 at 100 µg/mL and 14.37 ± 1.21 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively. S. butanol extract showed maximum activity as 69.36 ± 0.80 at 1000 µg/mL followed by 28.28 ± 0.78 at 100 µg/mL & 18.60 ± 0.74 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively.
S. ethyl acetate extract showed maximum activity as 82.31 ± 0.80 at 1000 µg/mL followed by 38.18 ± 0.70 at 100 µg/mL and 26.50 ± 0.42 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively. S. ethanol extract showed maximum activity as 91.68 ± 0.95 at 1000 µg/mL and followed by 52.26 ± 1.03 at 100 µg/mL and 28.82 ± 2.24 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively. All the values were compared with the control ascorbic acid was observed as 97.22 ± 1.54 at 1000 µg/mL and followed by 69.43 ± 2.80 at 100 µg/mL & 36.46 ± 1.43 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively Fig. 1.
Total Phenol Assay: Petroleum ether extract showed maximum activity was observed as 72.51 ± 1.04 at 1000 µg/mL followed by 53.11 ± 0.65 at 100 µg/mL and 15.34 ± 0.41 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively. S. butanol extract showed maximum activity as 78.21 ± 1.36 at 1000 µg/mL followed by 60.12 ± 1.23 at 100 µg/mL and 21.24 ± 1.54 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively. S. ethyl acetate showed maximum activity as 82.57 ± 1.88 at 1000 µg/mL followed by 61.32 ± 1.23 at 100 µg/mL and 23.72 ± 1.34 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively.
S. ethanol extract showed maximum activity as 92.43 ± 1.60 at 1000 µg/mL and followed by 64.61 ± 1.89 at 100 µg/mL & 24.80 ± 2.00 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively. All the values were compared with the control gallic acid was observed as 98.44 ± 0.42 at 1000 µg/mL and followed by 71.35 ± 1.27 at 100 µg/mL & 32.13 ± 1.45 at 10 µg/mL concentrations respectively Fig. 2.
TABLE 1: DPPH RADICAL SCAVENGING ACTIVITY OF VARIOUS EXTRACTS OF BARK OF FICUS RACEMOSA L.
DPPH assay (Inhibition %) | ||||||||||||
Extracts | S. Petroleum ether extracts (µg/mL) | S. Butanol extracts
(µg/mL) |
S. Ethyl acetate extracts
(µg/mL) |
S. Ethanol extracts
(µg/mL) |
||||||||
10 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | |
Bark | 14.3
±1.21 |
22.65
±0.61 |
61.54
±0.72 |
18.60
±0.74 |
28.28
±0.78 |
69.36
±0.80 |
26.50
±0.42 |
38.18
±0.70 |
82.31
±0.80 |
28.82
±2.24 |
52.26
±1.03 |
91.68
±0.95 |
Control | 36.46
±1.43 |
71.35
±1.27 |
97.22
±1.54 |
36.46
±1.43 |
71.35
±1.27 |
97.22
±1.54 |
36.46
±1.43 |
71.35
±1.27 |
97.22
±1.54 |
36.46
±1.43 |
71.35
±1.27 |
97.22
±1.54 |
FIG. 1: DPPH RADICAL SCAVENGING ACTIVITY OF VARIOUS EXTRACTS OF BARK OF F. RACEMOSA L.
FIG. 2: TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT OF VARIOUS EXTRACTS OF BARK OF FICUS RACEMOSA L.
TABLE 2: TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT OF VARIOUS EXTRACTS OF BARK OF FICUS RACEMOSA L.
Total Phenol assay (Inhibition %) | ||||||||||||
Extracts | S. Petroleum ether extracts
(µg/mL) |
S. Butanol extracts
(µg/mL) |
S. Ethyl acetate extracts
(µg/mL) |
S. Ethanol extracts
(µg/mL) |
||||||||
10 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 1000 | |
Bark | 15.34
±0.41 |
53.11
±0.65 |
72.51
±1.04 |
21.24
±1.54 |
60.12
±1.23 |
78.21
±1.36 |
23.72
±1.34 |
61.32
±1.23 |
82.57
±1.88 |
24.80
±2.00 |
64.61
±1.89 |
92.43
±1.60 |
Control | 32.13
±1.45 |
71.35
±1.27 |
98.44
±0.42 |
32.13
±1.45 |
71.35
±1.27 |
98.44
±0.42 |
32.13
±1.45 |
71.35
±1.27 |
98.44
±0.42 |
32.13
±1.45 |
71.35
±1.27 |
98.44
±0.42 |
All the values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.
DISCUSSION: Plants produce a significant amount of anti-oxidants to prevent the oxidative stress caused by photons, oxygen, and other biological reactions; they represent a potential source of new compounds with antioxidant activity 22. High levels of free radicals or active oxygen species create oxidative stress, which leads to a variety of biochemical and physiological lesions and often results in a metabolic impairment, improper functioning and cell death 23. There is continuing interest on the screening of medicinal plants with a view to determining new sources of natural anti-oxidants to avoid the side effect of synthetic one 24, 25. Thus, continued research is being undertaken all over the world on different plant species and their therapeutic principles for the above mentioned purpose 26. Several Indian medicinal plants have been extensively used slowing the process of aging and related disorders.
Several such plants have already been highlighted for their antioxidant activity and other related activity such as Emblica officinalis, Curcuma longa, Mangifera indica, Sandalum album, Withania somnifera, etc. 27 Active principles have been isolated from various plants, e.g. Mangiferin, from Mangifera indica L.; emblicanin A & B, two tannins from Phyllanthus emblica L. 28 and curcumin, and curcuminoids well-known compounds isolated from C. longa L. 29. Ficus racemosa L., an important Indian medicinal plant, different extracts of bark was tested for the first time in the present study, for their free radical scavenging activity and total phenol content method in-vitro. The Ficus racemosa L., bark showed a greater free radical sequestering activity.
However, in general flavonoid and phenolic class of compound was observed in the extract which possesses greater anti-oxidant activity. In the present study, S. ethyl acetate and S. ethanol extract showed a greater antioxidant activity which may be attributed to the presence of flavonoid compound quercetin. The compound quercetin is well known antioxidant 30, 32. Also, these results indicate that all the extracts have a noticeable effect on the scavenging of free radicals.
This activity also increases with increasing concentration. The extracts of this plant can be regarded as promising candidates for a plant-derived antioxidant compound. This study reveals that Ficus racemosa L., offer an interesting source of new anti-oxidative plant extracts being a potential for their use in different fields (foods, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals). Future studies will be aimed at investigating the effects of S. ethyl acetate and S. ethanol extract of bark on the regulation of cellular mechanisms and upon isolating and identifying the substances responsible for the antioxidant effects of the plant extracts.
CONCLUSION: From the above results, it can be concluded that S. ethyl acetate and S. ethanol extract extracts of the bark of Ficus racemosa L., showed the most potent in-vitro antioxidant activity with high percentage inhibition. This may be attributed due to the presence of secondary plant metabolites such as flavonoids, phenols, saponins, steroids, tannins and terpenoids which probably play a role as an effective free radical scavenger and effective antiasthmatic, hepatoprotective and antitumoral agent.
This study supports the contention that traditional medicines remain a valuable source in the potential discovery of natural product pharmaceuticals. Significant antioxidant activity showed by Ficus racemosa L., provides scientific validation for the traditional use of these plants. Further work on isolation and identification of active compounds and its efficacy needs to be done.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Authors are grateful to KLE’S COP, Hubli, Karnataka, India -580031, for providing necessary facility to carry out the study.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Lachman L, Lieberman HA, and Kanig JL: The theory and practice of industrial Momordica charantia (bitter gourd). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2003; 67: 2512-2517.
- Youdim KA and Joseph JA: A possible emerging role of phytochemicals in improving age-related neurological dysfunctions- a multiplicity of effects. Free Rad Biol Med 2001; 30: 583.
- Heim KE, Taigliaferro AR and Bobilya DJ: Flavonoid antioxidants: Chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 2002; 13: 572-584.
- Duncan KW: Fighting free radicals. In The Enzogenol Story. Christchurch and Auckland, New Zealand: The Pacific Scientific Press 1998; 12: 175-185.
- Kahkonen MJ, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja, K and Kujala TS: Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 1999; 47: 3954-3962.
- Wansi JD, Wandji J, Meva LM, Waffo AFK, Ranjit R and Khan SN: A-glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant acridone alkaloids from the stem bark of Oriciopsis glaberrima (Rutaceae). Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2006; 54(3): 292-296.
- Pandey S, Sharma, Chaturved P and Tripathi B: Protective effect of Rubia cardifoliaon lipid peroxide formation in isolated rat mice. Indian J Exp Biol 1994; 32: 180.
- Arora A, Sairam RK and Srinivasa GC: Oxidative stress and antioxidant system in plants. Curr Sci 2002; 82: 122.
- Ebadi M: Pharmacodynamic basis of Herbal medicines. CRC Press, Washington DC 2002; 02: 134-140.
- Gupta M, Mazumdar UK, Gomathi P and Kumar RS: Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of Ervatamia coronaria Leaves. Iranian J Pharma Res 2004; 2: 119-127.
- Kumaran A and Karunakaran JR: In-vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India. LWT-Food Sci Tech 2007; 40: 344-352.
- Govindarajan R, Rastogi S, Madhavan V, Shirwaikar A, Rawat AS, Mehrotra S and Pushpangadan P: Studies on the antioxidant activities of Desmodium gangeticum. Biol Pharm Bull 2003; 26: 1424-1427.
- Vimalavady A, Kadavul K and Tangavelou AC: Phyto-chemical screening and antimicrobial activity on the fruits of Hugonia mystax (Linaceae). Int J Phar Pharm Sci 2012; 3(4): 1178-1183.
- Yoganarasimhan SN: Medicinal plants of India, Karnataka: interline publishing Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore and Dehradun 2000; 01: 344-349.
- Annoy: The wealth of India (A dictionary of India raw material & industrial products, raw material, New Delhi: council of scientific & industrial research New Delhi 1956; 4f-g: 34-37.
- Sumy E, Ved D and Krishanan R: Tropical Indian medicinal plants propagation method, Published FRLHT (Foundation for the revitalization of local health tradition), Bangalore, Karnataka 2000; 1013-1017.
- Longman orient: India medicinal plants (a compendium of 500 species), Longman Pvt. Ltd., Chennai 2002; 5: 224-228.
- Kirtikar Lt Colonel KR and Basu: Major BD. Indian medicinal plants, Dehradun: International book distribution, Uttaranchal 1987; 4(2): 567-569.
- Yoganarasimhan SN: Medicinal plants of India. Tamil Nadu: Interline Publishing Ltd. Bangalore and Dehradun, India 2000; 2: 484-487.
- Burits M and Bucar F: Antioxidant activity of Nigella sativa essential oil. Phytother Res 2000; 14: 323-328.
- Rajeshwar Y, Gupta M and Mazumdar UK: Antitumor activity and in-vivo antioxidant status of Mucuna pruriens (Fabaceae) seeds against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in Swiss albino mice. Iranian J Pharmacol Ther 2005; 4: 46-53.
- Brighente IMC, Dias M, Verdi LG and Pizzolatti MG: Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of some Brazilian species. Pharm Biol 2007; 45: 156-161.
- Ames BN: Micronutrients prevent cancer and delay aging. Toxicol Lett 1998; 102-103: 5-18.
- Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS and Heinonen M: Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agri Food Chem 1999; 47(10): 3954-3962.
- Mensor, Luciana L, Fabio S, Menezes, Leitao GG, Reis AS, Santos TCD, Coube CS and Leitao SG: Screening of Brazilian plant extracts for antioxidant activity by the use of DPPH free radical method. Phytother Res 2001; 15: 127-130.
- Auddy B, Ferreira M, Blasina F, Lafon L, Arredondo F, Dajas F, Tripathi PC, Seal T and Mukherjee B: Screening of antioxidant activity of three Indian medicinal plants, traditionally used for the management of neurodegenerative J Ethnopharmacol 2003; 84: 131-138.
- Scartezzini P and Speroni E: Review on some plants of Indian traditional medicine with antioxidant activity. J Ethnopharmacol 2000; 71: 23-43.
- Ghosal S, Rao G, Sarvana V, Mishra NM and Dipak R: A possible chemical mechanism of the bioactivities of mangiferin. Indian J Chem 1996; 35: 561.
- Ammon HP and Wahl MA: Pharmacology of Curcuma longa. Planta Med 1991; 57: 1-7.
- Yokozawa T, Dong E, Nakagawa T, Kashiwagi H, Nakagawa H and Takeuchi T: In-vitro and in-vivo studies on the radical-scavenging activity of tea. J Agri Food Chem 1998; 46: 2143-2150.
- Choi WS, Park BS, Ku SK and Lee SE: Repellent activities of essential oils and monoterpenes against Culex pipiens J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2002; 18: 348-351.
- Torres R, Faini F, Modak B, Urbina F, Labbe C and Juan: Antioxidant activity of coumarins and flavonols from the resinous exudate of Haplopappus multifolius. Phyto-chemistry 2006; 67: 984-987.
How to cite this article:
Rajvaidhya S and Byahatti VV: In-vitro antioxidant activity of various extracts of bark of Ficus racemosa Linn. (Moraceae). Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2019; 10(3): 1534-39. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(3).1534-39.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.