IN- VITRO EVALUATION OF ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF CURCUMA CAESIA ROXB.
HTML Full TextIN- VITRO EVALUATION OF ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF CURCUMA CAESIA ROXB.
Mohit Mangla*, Mohd. Shuaib, Jainender Jain and Minakshi Kashyap
Department of Pharmacy, Ram-eesh Institute of Voc. & Tech. Education 3, Knowledge Park -1, Greater Noida (UP), India
ABSTRACT
This study was undertaken to examine the antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of rhizomes of Curcuma caesia using DPPH free radical scavenging assay. The IC50 (The concentration of sample required to scavenge 50% of DPPH free radical) was calculated by plotting graph between % inhibition vs concentration. The Butylated Hydroxytoluene was used as standard antioxidant in comparison to methanolic extract of Curcuma caesia. The IC 50 value of extract and Butylated Hydroxytoluene was found to be 862.35 µgm and 46.25 µgm for 2 ml of 500 µM concentration of DPPH. This suggests that methanolic extract of Curcuma caesia had moderate IC 50 value as compared to Butylated Hydroxyltoluene.
Keywords:
Curcuma caesia, Butylated Hydroxytoluene, DPPH, Antioxidant Activity, IC50 |
INTRODUCTION: The genus CURCUMA is a well known spice of India. It is also called haldi and more than 200 species and subspecies of it is found all across the world. One of which is Curcuma caesia Family: Zingiberaceae. It is also known as “Kali Haldi”. It is an erect rhizomatous herb with large leaves. Fresh rhizomes are aromatic with intense camphoraceous odor and are applied externally to sprain and bruises 1. Almost all species of Curcuma contains antioxidant activity and the pharmacological effects and prospects for future clinical use had been tried so far 2. Antioxidants or inhibitors of oxidation are the compounds which retard or prevent the oxidation in general and prolong the life of oxidizable matter 3.
Antioxidants can interfere with the oxidation process by reacting with free radicals, chelating catalytic metals and also by acting as reactive species scavenger. The antioxidants activities of the individual compounds may depends on structural factors, such as number of phenolic, hydroxyl or methoxyl groups and other structural features 4. Among the antioxidative compounds vitamin C, E, A, Selenium, Carotenoids, Ascorbic acid shows very strong intensity of antioxidative activities 5. Antioxidant determinations by the use of stable free radical were earliest being done in 1958 by Blois 6.
A free radical is a compound with one or more unpaired electrons in its outer orbital 7. Such unpaired electrons make these species very unstable and therefore quite reactive with other molecules due to the presence of unpaired electrons and try to pair their electrons and generate a more stable compound 8. The molecule of 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) is characterized as a stable free radical by virtue of the delocalization of the spare electron over the molecule as a whole, so that molecules do not dimerise, as would be the case with most other free radicals. The delocalisation also gives rise to the deep violet colour, characterised by an absorption band in ethanol solution centred at about 517 nm. When a solution of DPPH is mixed with that of a substance that can donate a hydrogen atom, then this gives rise to the reduced form with the loss of this violet colour (although there would be expected to be a residual pale yellow colour from the picryl group still present). Representing the DPPH radical by Z* and the donor molecule by AH, the primary reaction is;
Z*+ AH = ZH + A*................................................[1]
Where, ZH is the reduced form and A* is free radical produced in this first step. This latter radical will then undergo further reactions which control the overall stoichiometry, that is, the number of molecules of DPPH reduced (decolorized) by one molecule of the reductant. The reaction [1] is therefore intended to provide the link with the reactions taking place in an oxidising system, such as the autoxidation of a lipid or other unsaturated substance; the DPPH molecule Z* is thus intended to represent the free radicals formed in the system whose activity is to suppressed by the substance AH 9.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of Rhizomes of Curcuma caesia and calculate its IC50. The comparison of IC 50 of Curcuma caesia with IC50 of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (Standard Antioxidant).
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Collection of Plant Material: The rhizomes of Curcuma caesia were collected on 1st November from Jabalpur under the guidance of Dr. JL Shrivastava, Biodiversity Scientist in Biodiversity Branch at State Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur (MP).
Preparation of Extract: The rhizomes were cut into pieces and air dried at room temperature. The dried rhizomes were coarsely powdered and successfully extracted with methanol using Soxhlet extractor at a temperature of 55-60 0C for a period of 7-8 hrs 11. The crude extract obtained was further dried over water bath.
Preparation of Reagents and Dilutions (Curcuma extract & Butylated Hydroxytoluene): The 500µM Solution of DPPH was made by using 23 mg of DPPH (Assay 85%) of Hi Media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. CAS No. 1898-66-4. TRIS [2-amino-2 (hydroxy methyl) propane1-3di-ol] Buffer pH 7.4 was made by adding 0.605gm of TRIS Buffer 7.4 of Qualigens Fine Chemicals in 30 ml of water and adding 0.33 ml of Concentrated HCl, Diluted to 100 ml with Distilled water. The use of TRIS buffer was to prevent the sudden pH change during the preparation of test dilutions 10. Various dilutions of Methanolic extract of rhizomes of Curcuma caesia was being made with concentration of 125, 250, 375, 500, 625, 750, 875, 1000, 1125 & 1250 µgm per 0.5 ml methanol were prepared. Various dilutions of Butylated Hydroxytoluene of Rankem RFCL Limited, (Assay NLT 99 %) were made with Concentration of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 & 50 µgm per 0.5 ml of methanolic solution of Butylated Hydroxytoluene.
Measurement of Antioxidant Activity: The Antioxidant activity was determined on basis of free radical scavenging activity of stable 1, 1 Di Phenyl-1-2 picryl Hydrazyl (DPPH). In 5 ml Volumetric Flasks added 2 ml of DPPH solution + 0.5 ml of TRIS Buffer + 2 ml of Methanol + 0.5 ml of Prepared Dilutions (Methanolic extract dilutions of Curcuma caesia or Methanolic Butylated Hydroxytoluene dilutions).
Also the Control Absorbance (of DPPH) was taken by replacing 0.5 ml of prepared dilutions with methanol. The absorbance of all the furthermade dilutions made in 5 ml volumetric flasks were taken after 30 minutes at λ max 517 nm using methanol as blank. The percentage inhibition was calculated using:
% Inhibition = (AC – AS) x 100;
AC
Where, Ac is absorbance of control; as is the absorbance of sample. IC50 value (a concentration at 50% inhibition) was determined from the curve between percentage inhibition and concentration. All determinations were done in triplicate and the IC50 value was calculated by using the equation of line 12.
RESULT: In the present study it has been showed that Curcuma caesia had moderate antioxidant activity as compared to that of standard Butylated Hydroxytoluene. The Ac, Absorbance of Control was found to have absorbance 2.346 at 517 nm. The As, Absorbance of Sample (Curcuma extract and Standard Butylated Hydroxytoluene) were taken in triplicate. With the increase of concentration, the decrease of absorbance value and the calculated % Inhibition has shown with the help of tables.
TABLE 1: VALUES OF ABSORBANCE AND % INHIBITION WITH INCREASE IN CONCENTRATION OF METHANOLIC EXTRACT OF RHIZOME OF CURCUMA CAESIA
Concentration (µgm) | Absorbance | % Inhibition |
125 | 1.784 + 0.04 | 23.96 |
250 | 1.710 + 0.05 | 27.10 |
375 | 1.539 + 0.02 | 34.39 |
500 | 1-423 + 0.01 | 39.32 |
625 | 1.328 + 0.02 | 43.36 |
750 | 1.228 + 0.01 | 47.64 |
875 | 1.135 + 0.00 | 51.60 |
1000 | 1.062 + 0.01 | 54.71 |
1125 | 0.969 + 0.03 | 58.69 |
1250 | 0.885 + 0.01 | 62.27 |
FIG. 1: GRAPH BETWEEN CONCENTRATION (µgm) VS % INHIBITION OF METHANOLIC EXTRACT OF RHIZOME OF CURCUMA CAESIA
X Axis = Concentration in µgm; Y Axis = % Inhibition; from the equation, When Y=50, X= 862.35
TABLE 2: VALUES OF ABSORBANCE AND % INHIBITION WITH INCREASE IN CONCENTRATION OF METHANOLIC SOLUTION OF BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENE (STANDARD ANTIOXIDANT)
Concentration(µgm) | Absorbance | % Inhibition |
5 | 2.163 + 0.01 | 7.78 |
10 | 1.996 + 0.04 | 14.91 |
15 | 1.792 + 0.06 | 23.58 |
20 | 1-601 + 0.02 | 31.75 |
25 | 1.531 + 0.09 | 34.72 |
30 | 1.375 + 0.00 | 41.36 |
35 | 1.211 + 0.01 | 48.36 |
40 | 1.111 + 0.00 | 52.62 |
45 | 0.945 + 0.01 | 59.69 |
50 | 0.892 + 0.01 | 61.94 |
FIG. 2: GRAPH BETWEEN CONCENTRATION (µgm) VS % INHIBITION OF METHANOLIC SOLUTION OF BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENE (STANDARD ANTIOXIDANT)
X Axis = Concentration in µgm; Y Axis = % Inhibition; from the equation, it When Y=50, X= 46.25
From the above graph plot equations it has been calculated that:
862.35 µgm of Methanolic Extract of Rhizome of Curcuma caesia scavenge 50% 2 ml of 500µM concentration of DPPH solution. 46.25 µgm of Methanolic solution of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (Standard Antioxidant) scavenge 50% 2 ml of 500µM concentration of DPPH solution.
DISCUSSION: Polyphenolic compounds like flavonoids and phenolic acids, commonly found in plants, have been reported to have multiple biological effects, including antioxidant activity 13. Various antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyltoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole, ascorbic acid, tertbutylhydroquinone have been used as antioxidant in food for years but their safety for long has been questioned. Although, the methanolic extract of Rhizome of Curcuma caesia has moderate antioxidant activity but a search for novel natural antioxidant with effectiveness like Butylated hydroxytoluene will be continue.
REFERENCES:
- The Wealth of India: A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials & Industrial Products. National Institute of Science Communication, N. Delhi, Vol. II, 2001; 264.
- Miquel J, Bernd A, Sempere JM, Diaz-Alperi J and Ramirez A: The curcuma antioxidants: pharmacological effects and prospects for future clinical use, Arch Gerontol Geriatrics 2002; 34: 37-46.
- Kalia AN: A Text Book of Industrial Pharmacognosy. CBS Publishers & Distributors, First Edition 2005, 204-205.
- Patt DE and Hudson BJF: Natural antioxidants not exploited commercially. In: food antioxidants, Elsevior Applied Science 1990; 171-191.
- Dekkers JC, Doornen LJP and Han CG: The Role of Antioxidant Vitamins and Enzymes in the Prevention of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage, Sports Medicine 1996; 21: 213-238.
- Blois, M.S. : Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical, Nature 1958; 181: 1199-1200.
- Jesberger JA and Richardson JS: Oxygen free radicals in brain dysfunction, Internaeional Journal of Neuroscience; 1991, 57: 1-17.
- Kaczmarski M, Wojicicki J, Samochowiee L, Dutkiewicz T and Sych Z: The influence of exogenous antioxidants and physical exercise on some parameters associated with production and removal of free radicals, Pharmazie 1999; 54: 303-306.
- Molyneux P: The use of stable free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) for estimating antioxidant activity, Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology 2004; 26(2): 211-219.
- Indian Pharmacopoeia, The controller of publications, Delhi, Vol II, 2006; A-25.
- Bhuiyan MAR, Hoque MZ and Hossain SJ: Free Radical Scavenging Activities of Zizyphus mauritiana, World Journal of Agriculture Science 2009; 5(3): 318-322.
- Papuc C, Diaconescu C and Nicorescu V: Antioxidant activity of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) extracts compared with common food additives, Roumanian Biotechnological Letters 2008; 13(6): 4049-4053.
- Paramapojn S and Gritsanapan W: Free radical scavenging activity determination and quantitative analysis of curcuminoids in Curcuma zedoaria rhizome extracts by HPLC method, Current Science 2009; 97(7): 1069-1073.
Article Information
16
98-102
391 kB
1409
English
IJPSR
Mohit Mangla*, Mohd. Shuaib, Jainender Jain and Minakshi Kashyap
Department of Pharmacy, Ram-eesh Institute of Voc. & Tech. Education 3, Knowledge Park -1, Greater Noida (UP), India
mohitpharmacist@gmail.com
15 May, 2010
19 July, 2010
28 August, 2010
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.1(9-S).98-02
15 September, 2010