IN-VITRO INHIBITION AND DISSOLUTION OF CALCIUM OXALATE STONES BY THE FRACTIONS OF THE ZIZIPHUS LOTUS L. LEAVES
HTML Full TextIN-VITRO INHIBITION AND DISSOLUTION OF CALCIUM OXALATE STONES BY THE FRACTIONS OF THE ZIZIPHUS LOTUS L. LEAVES
Ahmed Bensatal
Laboratory Physico-chemistry of Materials and Environment, Faculty of Exact Science and Computer Science, University ZianeAchour, BP 3117, Djelfa, Algeria.
ABSTRACT: Nowadays, many clinical studies have provided reliable results on the effects of several herbal medicines on many diseases such as kidney problems. The objective of this study is to evaluate in-vitro the antiurolithiatic activity of polyphenols, flavonoids, and alkaloids fractions of the leaves of the species Ziziphus lotus. The quantification of the polyphenol and flavonoid fractions was carried out by spectrophotometric methods; on the other hand, the alkaloid fraction is quantified gravimetrically. The antiurolithiatic activity of the fractions is studied by the use of the turbidimetric and gravimetric techniques. The polyphenol content varies between 1198,696 ± 99,848 and 15270,751 ± 290,419 (μg GAE)/g). While flavonoids range from 97,340 ± 8,437 to 1745,864 ± 8,690 (μgQE/g). On the other hand, the alkaloid fraction represents 1. 26%. The polyphenols fraction showed a higher inhibition 89.80 ± 0.69 than the two other fractions which represent the values 84.17 ± 1.11 and 78.90 ± 1.40, respectively. The polyphenols fraction (AF: 86.66 ± 1.43) and flavonoids (DMF: 80.85 ± 2.03) show an increasing evolution of the capacity to dissolve the precipitate of calcium oxalate compared to the reference solution (Sodium citrate: 75.38 ± 2.03). On the other hand, the alkaloid fraction represents a less significant dissolving power (AlF: 66.81 ± 4.13). The antiurolithiatic activity of Ziziphus lotus leaves is due to the presence of bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and alkaloids, these results deserve further study to isolate the active substances responsible for the inhibition and dissolution of crystals.
Keywords: Antiurolithiatic activity, Ziziphus lotus, Polyphenols fraction, Flavonoids fraction, Alkaloids fraction, Calcium oxalate
INTRODUCTION: Several drugs have been isolated from medicinal plants, most of them due to their use in traditional medicine. In recent years, more than two-thirds of the world's population has become dependent on plant-derived drugs 1. The genus Ziziphus belongs to the family Rhamnaceae and is represented by 135-170 species 2.
The specie Ziziphus lotus (Z lotus) known by the vernacular names ‛Sedra’, ‛Nbeg’ 3, generally, grows in arid or semi-arid countries 4.
In the last few years, several studies of this plant show that the pulp exerts significant antiobesity, hypoglycemic, antioxidant, and immuno-modulatory activities, other studies show that this species possesses anticancer, antifungal, antibacterial, antiulcer, and wound-healing properties 5, 6, 7. The aqueous extracts have activities cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory 8, on the other hand, the extract of this plant is used for their effect antifungal 9. Z. lotus leaves contain bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols (Resveratrol, Pyrogallol, Gallic acid), phenolic acids (Chlorogenic, p-Hydroxybenzoic, Caffeic, Vanillic, Syringic, p-Coumaric, Ferulic, Sinapic, Rosmarinic), flavonoids (Rutin Luteolin, kaempferol, Apigenin, Quercetin, Naringin, Epicatechin), tannins and saponins (jujuboside B, jujubogenin glycosides, jujubasaponine IV) 1, 6, 7, 10. The extracts of Z. lotus also showed the contents of alkaloids, flavonoids, anthraquinones, and tannins 11. Several phytochemical families, found in most herbal remedies such as phenolic compounds, under physiological conditions, these phenolic compounds can also form phenolate ions 12. Plants of the Rhamnaceae family are the source of cyclopeptide alkaloids 13, and according to the research 14 the alkaloids isolated from the Z. lotus root are Lotusines, on the other hand, the aerial parts of the plant also have other alkaloids, like Lotusanine A, B, Sanjoinenine, Sanjoinine F and Frangufoline 15, 16.
Cyclopeptide alkaloids of Ziziphus species showed interesting biological properties, including, sedative, analgesic, and immunostimulant 13, 17. Researchers use alkaloids in the urolithiasis field, for example, berberine which is an alkaloid present in many medicinal plants and used in the prevention of urolithiasis 18. Nowadays phenolic compounds, alkaloids, saponins, lignins, glycosides, and terpenoids have become a part integral to modern medicine 19. The type of stones depends on the composition of the urine and the nature of the diet consumed by the population 20. Calcium oxalate (CaOx) represents up to 80% of the stones analyzed and generally exists in different forms: calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), dihydrate (COD), and rare trihydrate (COT) 21, 22.
The crystallization of stones starts with crystalline particles in the urethra, followed by a nucleation step. These crystals will then grow and aggregate with other crystals in the solution, and accumulate in the kidneys 23. Historically, medicinal plants have been used as therapeutic remedies due to the presence of bioactive antiurolithiatic compounds such as phenolic compounds, saponins (solasodine), flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin), alkaloids (berberine), tannins, furanochromones (Khellin, Visnagin) and protein plants 19. The present study aims to investigate in-vitro the antilithiatic ability of polyphenols, flavonoids, and alkaloids fraction of Z. lotus, on urolithiasis of the Calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) type, all this to evaluate potential therapeutic use to treat and/or to prevent nephrolithiasis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Chemicals and Reagents: n-butanol, Ethanol 96%, Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent, Gallic acid, Magnesium sulfate, Sodium hydroxide, Quercetin. Methanol 99%, Sodium oxalate, Dragendorff's reagent, Ethyl acetate, Hydrochloric Acid 35%, Aluminum chloride, Sodium carbonate, Sodium chloride, Petroleum ether 40-60°C, Dichloromethane, Calcium chloride dihydrate, ferric chloride, n-Hexane, Sodium citrate.
Plant Material: The leaves were collected from Charef, Djelfa, Algeria which is an area characterized by a dry and cold semi-arid climate and located between longitude 2 ° 48 ′ 4 ″ East and latitude 34 ° 37 ′ 5 ″ North, and located about 50 km from town of Djelfa. The identification was performed by a botanist in the Faculty of Science of Nature and Life at the University of Djelfa, Algeria, after this procedure, the leaves were air-dried and then powdered and stored in an opaque glass bottle.
Phytochemical Screening: Phytochemical screening was performed using the method cited by M. Barbouchi 24. The experiments were based on the visual observation of a change in color or the formation of a precipitate after the addition of specific reagents 25.
Preparation of the Plant Extract:
Extraction of Polyphenols: Plant extracts were prepared consistent with a typical protocol with a slight modification. The powdered leaves (7g) were extracted by using a Soxhlet system with 150 ml of polarity solvents increased (petroleum ether followed by dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and ended by water distilled) 26. The extracts were filtered using Whatman paper and concentrated under Vacuum with Rotary Evaporator. The presence of polyphenols and flavonoids in the extracts fractions was confirmed by the ferric chloride and the cyanidin reaction respectively 25. These extracts were stored in a refrigerator at 4°C until use.
Extraction of Alkaloids: The extraction method of alkaloids is described in the section determination of the total content of alkaloids.
Determination of Total Phenolic Content (TPC): The samples were prepared by dissolving the organic extracts obtained during the extraction in 60 ml of ethanol and the aqueous extract in 60 ml of distilled water. Folin- Ciocalteu assay method was used for the determination of the total polyphenolics content with a few modifications 26. The reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 0.1 ml of the different extracts, 0.4 ml of distilled water, and 0.25 ml Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent was added to the mixture and shaken well for 2 minutes. After that 1.25 ml of Na2CO3 20 %was added to the mixture. After incubation for 40 min at room temperature, the absorbance of the mixture was read at 750 nm by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (BECKMAN DU 520UV-VIS). When making the blank preparation, the extract is replaced with 0.1 ml of distilled water. The samples were prepared in triplicate for each analysis and the mean value of absorbance was obtained. The same procedure was repeated for the standard curve of gallic acid (20 to 200 μg/ml). Total polyphenolics were expressed as the microgram gallic acid equivalent (μg GAE)/g) of dry weight.
Determination of Total Flavonoids Content (TFC): The total flavonoid content was measured and quantified according to the Aluminum chloride method 27. 1ml of each extract was added to 1 ml of AlCl3 2% solution. After incubation at room temperature for 10 minutes, the absorbance of the mixture was read at 430 nm. A calibration curve was made with quercetin (0-100 μg/ml). The total flavonoid content was expressed as the microgram quercetin equivalent per gram dry weight of the plant material (μg QE/ g). All samples were analyzed in three replicates.
Determination of Total Content of Alkaloids: The alkaloid-rich fraction prepared according to general procedure with some modifications 1, 28. 8 g of the plant material was defatted with n-hexane and after filtration, the dried powder (7g) was extracted with 50ml MeOH for 2 h with magnetic agitation at room temperature, the operation was repeated twice, and the resulting MeOH extract was filtered and concentrated, the latter was dissolved in water, acidified with 2M HCl solution to pH 2, and extracted with CHCl3. The aqueous layer was then basified with NaOH to pH 11and extracted with CHCl3. The CHCl3 extracts were dried with Mg2SO4 and concentrated to obtain the alkaloid-rich fraction (0,1012g). Phytochemical confirmation was carried out using Dragendorff's reagent.
In-vitro Antilithiatic Activity: The 100% concentration of polyphenols and flavonoids fractions inhibitor is prepared by dissolving the organic extract in 60 ml of ethanol and aqueous extract in 60 ml of water distilled from this inhibitor; several concentrations are prepared using NaCl 0,15M as solvent. After several tests of the inhibitors, we have only chosen the concentrations which give reliable results (10%, 25%, 50%, and 100%). DMF: dichloromethane fraction (fraction rich in flavonoids), AF: aqueous fraction (fraction rich in polyphenols). The 100% concentration of alkaloid fraction inhibitor is prepared by taking 0,1012g of the dry residue with 60 ml of ethanol. From this inhibitor, we have prepared many dilute inhibitor solutions using the solvent sodium chloride (0.15 M). AlF: alkaloid fraction (10%, 25%, 50%, and 100%)
Inhibition of Calcium Oxalate Crystallization by Turbidimetric Method: The study of the crystallization of calcium oxalate is based on the research works illustrated by Chaudhary M. K. et al 29 and Eloumarie F. E. et al 30 with some modifications. The antiurolithiasis activity of alkaloids, polyphenols and flavonoids fractions was tested in-vitro by its inhibitory effect against calcium oxalate crystallization, this inhibition was examined in a mix containing calcium chloride dihydrate (7.5 mmol/l) and sodium oxalate (2.5 mmol/l), and these solutions were prepared using sodium chloride 0.15 M as a solvent. A series of inhibitors were prepared from the extracts as described above.
Study without and with Inhibitor: The formation of calcium oxalate crystals star when 7.5 ml of a sodium oxalate solution is added to 7.5 ml of a calcium chloride solution at 37 °C under magnetic stirring. The absorbance of the mix was checked at 620 nm after 30min using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1240). The blank contains only the solution of calcium chloride dihydrate. Under the same operating conditions, a volume of 5 ml of sodium oxalate solution is added to a mixture containing 5 ml of calcium chloride solution and 5 ml of an inhibitor fraction at a well-defined concentration, after 30 min the absorbance of the mix was checked.
The effect of the inhibitory was compared to that of that of a 3 mM aqueous Sodium citrate trihydrate solution (positive control). All samples were tested in three replicates. The percentage inhibition I (%) produced by each concentration of inhibitor was calculated as follows:
% inhibition = (AbsC – AbsT) / AbsC
Where, AbsC: Absorbance Control (Absorbance without inhibitor). AbsT: Absorbance Test (Absorbance in the presence of inhibitor).
Dissolution of Calcium Oxalate by Gravimetric Method: The study of the efficacy of these fractions on the dissolution of calcium oxalate crystals were tested using the process illustrated by A. Bensatal 31, M Rossi 32, and R. Kachkoul 33.
Preparation of a Precipitate of Calcium Oxalate: In centrifuge tubes, we pour a volume of 2 ml of sodium oxalate 2.5 mmol / l (pH 7) on the same volume of solution calcium chloride (pH 6), leave the mixture under a temperature of 37°C for 30 minutes for the formation of a precipitate of calcium oxalate.
The tubes were then centrifuged at 6000 rpm using a SIGMA 2-16P centrifuge for 16 min, the supernatant was removed. Then the precipitates were washed with distilled water and again centrifuged as mentioned above. After these procedures, the supernatant was removed and the tubes were oven-dried at 70°C until a constant mass was obtained, and then reweighed to measure the mass of the precipitate.
Ability of Fractions to Dissolve the Calcium Oxalate Precipitate: In the centrifuge tubes, a volume of 4 ml of each fraction at various concentrations was poured on the calcium oxalate precipitate, and the tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 30 minutes.
The tubes were centrifuged and the precipitate was cleaned, dried, and weighed as mentioned above. The effect of dissolving was compared to that of a 3 mM aqueous Sodium citrate trihydrate solution. Three replicas were taken for each experiment. The ability to dissolve the precipitate was determined using the following formula:
A (%) = ((Winitial - Wfinal) / Winitial
Where, A (%): the percentage of the ability to dissolve the precipitate. winitial: the weight of the precipitate in the absence of fraction. wfinal: the weight of the precipitate in the presence of fraction (after the incubation).
Statistical Analysis: The data were recorded as means ± standard deviation of three measurements. Difference among data was statistically analyzed using One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey multiple comparison test to determine the level of significance using the software Graph Pad Prism version 8.0.2. A statistical difference of P < 0.05 was considered significant in all cases.
RESULTS:
Phytochemical Screening: A preliminary phytochemical analysis shows the existence of different secondary metabolites and the results are shown in the Table 1.
TABLE1: PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING OF ZIZIPHUS LOTUS EXTRACTS FRACTION
Extracts | Yield (%) | Polyphenols | Flavonoids |
PEF | 3.25 | + | + |
DMF | 4.01 | + | + |
EAF | 3.45 | + | + |
BF | 9.61 | + | + |
AF | 12.23 | + | + |
PEF: Petroleum ether fraction, DMF: Dichloromethane fraction, EAF: Ethylacetate fraction, BF : n Butanol fraction, AF: Aqueous fraction.
Quantitative Estimation of Secondary Metabolites: The total polyphenol compounds, and flavonoids, were quantified in the fractions: Petroleum ether, Dichloromethane, Ethyl acetate, Butanol, and Aqueous, the outcomes were displayed in Table 2.
TABLE 2: CONTENTS OF POLYPHENOLS AND FLAVONOIDS IN EXTRACTS FRACTIONS
Extracts | Total polyphenols (μgGAE)/g) | Total Flavonoids (μg QE /g) |
PEF | 1198,696 ± 99,848 c | 97,340 ± 8,437c |
DMF | 3354,861 ± 343,163c | 2446,064 ±63,606 b |
EAF | 3164,536 ±206,120 c | 591,453 ± 17,9483b |
BF | 14985,212 ± 571,139b | 1875,037 ± 138,941 |
AF | 15270,751 ± 290,419b | 1745,864 ± 8,690a |
Data are reported as mean (n=3) ± SD (standard deviation). Values (a to c) that do not share a common letter in the same column are significantly different (p <0.05). a represents the minimum value, c represents the maximum value.
The total alkaloid fraction (AlF) is 1.26%, and the results of the quantification of the polyphenols and flavonoids are calculated relative to the calibration curves previously defined (correlation of polyphenols: Y = 0.00794 X - 0.00551, R2 = 0,975, correlation of flavonoids: Y = 0.06569 X + 0.03804, R2 = 0,993). These results are shown in Fig. 1 below.
FIG. 1: TOTALS POLYPHENOLS AND FLAVONOIDS IN EXTRACS FRACTIONS. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n=3). **p<0.005, *** p<0.0001.
The results of the polyphenol assay indicate that the aqueous extracts are the richest in total polyphenols (15270.751 ± 290.419 μgGAE/g), conversely, the dichloromethane fraction is the richest in flavonoids (2446.064 ± 63.606 μg QE/g). The findings of the assay also indicate that the petroleum ether extract contains minimal quantities of flavonoids (97,340 ± 8,437) and polyphenols (1198, 696 ± 99,848).
Inhibition of the Calcium Oxalate Crystallization: The results of the inhibition activity of Z. lotus extracts on the crystallization of calcium oxalate are shown in Table 3.
The aqueous fraction had a more marked effect than the other fractions since, at a concentration of 100%, it caused an inhibition of 89.80 ± 0.69, while the other fractions (DMF) and (AlF) respectively caused inhibition of 84.17 ± 1.11; 78.90 ± 1.40 and 78.90 ±1.40, on the other hand, the citrate solution caused a minimum inhibition equal to 66.26±1,94.
The percentage of inhibition of the formation of calcium oxalate crystals as a function of different concentrations of extracts of leaves of Z. lotus (AF, DMF, AlF) and sodium citrate are shown in Fig. 2.
We note that the inhibiting activity of the crystallization of CaOx increases with increasing concentrations of the fractions in a dose-dependent manner from 10% to 100%, as shown in Fig. 2. The Sodium citrate at various concentrations was used as a positive control.
TABLE 3: VARIATION OF PERCENTAGE INHIBITION, IN TERMS OF TO THE FRACTIONS AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS
C I (%) | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 | |
Aqueous fraction(AF) | I (%) | 38.72 ±3.01c | 60.75 ± 2.04b | 74.85±1.61b | 89.80 ±0.69a |
Cv (%) | 7.78 | 3.36 | 2.15 | 0.77 | |
Dichloromethane fraction(DMF) | I (%) | 42.59± 1.26b | 51,12 ±4,14c | 76.40± 0.92a | 84.17 ±1.11a |
Cv (%) | 2.97 | 8.95 | 1.21 | 1.32 | |
Alkaloids fraction(AlF) | I (%) | 32.10 ± 2.39c | 47.84 ± 4.71c | 58.27±5.35c | 78.90 ±1.40b |
Cv (%) | 7.47 | 9.85 | 9.18 | 1.77 | |
Citrate (Control) | I (%) | 26,13 ±2,48c | 45,73±2,58c | 61.65±3.41c | 66.26±1,94b |
Cv (%) | 9.51 | 5.65 | 5.53 | 2.93 |
CI (%) concentration of inhibitor, Cv (%) coefficient of variation, I (%) percentage of inhibition.
FIG. 2: EFFECT OF THE EXTRACTS FRACTIONS ON THE FORMATIO OF CALCIUM OXALATE. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n=3). **p<0.005, *** p<0.0005, ****p<0.0001.
Dissolution of Calcium Oxalate by Gravimetric Method: The dissolving capacity of calcium oxalate by the fractions of the extracts at different concentrations is shown in Table 4. The results are compared against sodium citrate.
TABLE 4: VARIATION OF PERCENTAGE DISSOLUTION, IN TERMS OF TO THE FRACTIONS AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS
C I (%) | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 | |
Aqueous fraction (AF) | A (%) | 46,90±3,17c | 63,39±4,26c | 73,66±3,17b | 86,66±1,43a |
Cv (%) | 6,76 | 6,72 | 4,31 | 1,65 | |
Dichloromethane fraction (DMF) | A (%) | 26,32±2,23c | 58,71±2,74b | 69,92±3,15b | 80,85±2,03b |
Cv (%) | 8,46 | 4,67 | 4,51 | 2,51 | |
Alkaloids fraction (AlF) | A (%) | 6,15±0,19b | 16,06±1,06c | 32,71±2,55c | 66,81±4,13c |
Cv (%) | 3,10 | 6,62 | 7,80 | 6,18 | |
Citrate (Control) | A (%) | 21,20±1,72c | 51,10±4,61c | 66,84±3,22b | 75,38±2,03b |
Cv (%) | 8,12 | 9,03 | 4,82 | 2,70 |
FIG. 2: EFFECT OF THE EXTRACTS FRACTIONS ON THE DISSOLUTION OF CALCIUM OXALATE. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n=3). **p<0.005, *** p<0.0005, ****p<0.0001.
Fig. 3 Presents the percent of calcium oxalate crystals dissolution by different concentrations of fractions aqueous, Dichloromethane, alkaloids, and Sodium citrate. The results show an increasing evolution of the capacity to dissolve the precipitate of calcium oxalate according to the increase in the concentration of the fractions, this change seems more important for the aqueous and dichloromethane fractions compared to the control solution (sodium citrate). On the other hand, the alkaloid fraction represents a less important dissolving capacity.
DISCUSSION: Urolithiasis is among the most common disorders in the world Where it is affected around 12% of the world's population by different forms of kidney stones, the recurrence rate in women is 47 to 60% and in men 70 to 80% 34. The formation of kidney stones is a complex process and hyperoxaluria is one of the major risk factors for the renal stone composed of calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals 35. The values of the yields obtained vary from 1.26% to 12.23%, other studies give different results, this is due to climatic conditions and extraction techniques 15. The extracts obtained show the presence of alkaloids, polyphenols and flavonoids during a qualitative preliminary phytochemical screening; and the results were also supported by previous studies 4, 6, 10.
In the present study, we chose a wide range (10% to 100%) of concentrations to evaluate it is inhibitory and dissolution against the formation of Calcium oxalate to have better comparison and to explore the optimal potential of the fractions, moreover, the techniques used do not contain any toxicity problem because the study was not conducted on the organism 36. The Plant extracts contain several secondary and primary metabolites, but their respective therapeutic effects are not well defined; for this reason, it is necessary to separate and identify their active ingredients and to assess these therapeutic effects in-vitro and then in-vivo. First, we measured the contents of polyphenols and flavonoids in extracts of Z. lotus leaves (petroleum ether, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, n butanol, and aqueous extract). On the other hand, a quantification of the total alkaloids was carried out by the gravimetric method. We noted that the extracts had a variable content of polyphenols and flavonoids. Secondly, to study the antilithiasis activity we have chosen the extract of dichloromethane which is rich in flavonoids (2446, 064 ± 63, 606) and the aqueous extract which is rich in polyphenols (15270, 751 ± 290, 419) and also the fraction of alkaloids (1.26%), this choice was based on recent studies that have shown that some metabolites such as saponins, flavonoids, polyphenols, and polysaccharides contribute significantly to the antiurolithiatic activity 30, 37-39.
The increase in the concentration of each fraction indicates that the formation of calcium oxalate particles has decreased. On the other hand, the dissolving activity is calculated after the lithiasis formation. The use of different concentrations of the polyphenol fraction resulted in a very significant reduction ((a****) and (b***)) in inhibition, but a small significant effect (c**) was observed for a lower dose at (10%). According to study 19, the main chemical constituents present in antiurolithic medicinal plants are respectively flavonoids (80%), alkaloids (65%), saponins (57.5%), tannins (47.5%), and compounds phenolic (42.5%). The comparison of the effects of inhibition of crystallization for the three fractions shows that the polyphenolic extract is more efficient than the two fractions which is even more efficient than the positive control, this result can be explained by the presence of polar compounds in the polyphenols fraction 25.
The–oxygen and nitrogen atoms present in polyphenols fraction (Resveratrol and Pyrogallol), flavonoids fraction (Quercetin, kaempferol), and alkaloids fraction (Lotusanine A, B, Sanjoinenine, Sanjoinine F, and Frangufoline) respectively can complex free Ca2+ in solution, increase Ca2+ enrichment and form high-energy interface on of these metabolites surface, so the chelating ability of Ca2+ was enhanced depending on the number of these atoms. Consequently, the calcium ion amount bound to the oxalate ion (Ox2−) decreased which inhibited the formation of calcium oxalate stones 39, 40. According to the study of Saha S et al 41 the effect of phenolic compounds on the formation of urolithiasis of calcium oxalate type could result not only from the 'electrostatic interaction between polyphenols and calcium ions but also from the interaction of type hydrogen between polyphenolic compounds and oxalate ions.
The study of the polyphenolic content of the leaves of Z. lotus grows in Algeria revealed the existence of flavonoids 7 of which catechin, is known for their antilithiasic effect 42. For the dissolution the adsorbed inhibitor exerts an interfacial pressure on the interactions of the crystal network between the oxygen and nitrogen atoms of the inhibitor and the carboxylic acid of the surface oxalates (Ox) formed via a calcium bridge, (inhibitor) O−(inhibitor Ca2+ −OOC (Ox, COD) or N−(inhibitor) Ca2 + −OOC (Ox, COD) 43. The chelation sites in forming the polyphenols and flavonoids complexes are illustrated in Fig. 4.
FIG. 4: CHELATION SITES IN FORMING THE POLYPHENOLS AND FLAVONOIDS COMPLEXES. S1. Proposed structures of kaempferol– Ca (II) complexes inspired by Jing et al 44. S2. Proposed structure of quercetin-Ca (II) complexes 45. S3. Proposed structure of quercetin-Ca (II) complexes inspired by Jing et al 44. S4. Proposed structure of chlorogenic acid -Ca (II) complexes 46. S5. Proposed structure of rosmarinc acid -Ca (II) complexes 46. S6. Proposed structure of Pyrogallol-Ca (II) complexes inspired by B Zhang et al 47.
CONCLUSION: In this study, we examined the efficacy of three fractions of secondary metabolites isolated from the leaves of .Z lotus extracts on the inhibition and dissolution of calcium oxalate stones. The results of this study allowed us to classify the inhibitory power of the different fractions as follows: Aqueous fraction〉Dichloromethane fraction 〉Alkaloid fraction〉Control.
On the other hand, the alkaloid fraction has a less weak capacity to dissolve the precipitate of calcium oxalate than the other fractions, even compared to the control solution. This activity may be due to the presence of quantified phenolic compounds in the fractions, for this reason, the plant is useful as a preventive and therapeutic natural substance for urolithiasis. Further studies are needed to identify the compounds responsible for this activity and, in addition, further work in vivo is needed to better understand the mechanism and therapeutic effect of these fractions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The author is thankful to the laboratory members of chemistry. Faculty of Exact Science and Computer Science, University Djelfa, Algeria
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The author has no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Tlili H, Hanen N, Ben Arfa A, Neffati M, Boubakri A and Buonocore D: Biochemical profile and in-vitro biological activities of extracts from seven folk medicinal plants growing wild in southern Tunisia. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(9): e0213049.
- El Maaiden E, El Kharrassi Y, Qarah NAS, Essamadi AK, Moustaid K and Nasser B: Genus Ziziphus: A comprehensive review on ethnopharmacological, phytochemical and pharmacological properties. Genus Ziziphus: A comprehensive review on ethnopharmacological, phytochemical and pharmacological properties. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2020; 259: 112950.
- Bencheikh N, Bouhrim M, Merrouni IA, Boutahiri S, Kharchoufa L, Addi M, Tungmunnithum D, Hano C, Eto B and Legssyer A: Antihyperlipidemic and Antioxidant Activities of Flavonoid-Rich Extract of Ziziphus lotus (L.) Lam. Fruits. Applied Sciences 2021; 11(17): 7788.
- Chouaibi M, Boussaid A, Donsì F, Ferrari G and Hamdi S: Optimization of the Extraction Process by Response Surface Methodology of Protein Isolate from Defatted Jujube (Ziziphus lotus) Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 2019; 25: 1509-1521.
- Cadi HE, Bouzidi HE, Selama G, Cadi AE, Ramdan B, Oulad El Majdoub Y, Alibrando F, Dugo P, Mondello L and Fakih Lanjri A: Physico-Chemical and Phytochemical Characterization of Moroccan Wild Jujube “Zizyphus lotus (L.)” Fruit Crude Extract and Fractions. Molecules 2020; 25(22): 5237.
- Bencheikh N, Radi FZ, Fakchich J, Elbouzidi A, Ouahhoud S, Ouasti M, Bouhrim M, Ouasti I, Hano C and Elachouri M: Ethnobotanical, Phytochemical, Toxicological, and Pharmacological Properties of Ziziphus lotus (L.) Lam.: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals 2023; 16(4): 575.
- Bekkar N E, Meddah B, Çakmak Y S, Keskin B, Sonnet P. Phenolic Extracts of Zizyphus lotus (Rhamnaceae) and Rutachalepensis L. (Rutaceae) as Alternatives to Antibiotics and their Antimicrobial Effects on Clinical Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens. European Journal of Biology 2022; 81(2): 163-183.
- Rached W, Barros L, Ziani BEC, Bennaceur M, Calhelha RC and Heleno SA: HPLC–DAD–ESI-MS/MS screening of phytochemical compounds and bioactive properties of different plant parts of Ziziphus lotus (L.) Desf. Food & Function 2019; 10(9): 5898-5909.
- Bouzid HA, Bijla L, Ibourki M, Oubannin S, Elgadi S, Koubachi J, Sakar EH and Gharby S: Ziziphus lotus (L.) Lam. almonds nutritional potential: Evidence from proximate composition, mineral, antioxidant activity, and lipid profiling reveal a great potential for valorization. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023; 1-15.
- Marmouzi I, Kharbach M, ElJemli M, Bouyahya A, Cherrah Y and Bouklouze A: Antidiabetic, dermatoprotective, antioxidant and chemical functionalities in Ziziphus lotus leaves and fruits. Industrial Crops Products 2019; 132: 134-139.
- AitBouzid H, Sakar EH, Bijla L, Ibourki M, Zeroual A, Gagour J, Koubachi J, Majourhat K and, Gharby S: Physical fruit traits, proximate composition, antioxidant activity, and profiling of fatty acids and minerals of wild Jujube (Ziziphus lotus (Desf.)) fruits from eleven Moroccan origins. Journal of Food Quality 2022; 1‑15.
- Ververi M and Goula AM: Pomegranate peel and orange juice by-product as new biosorbents of phenolic compounds from olive mill wastewaters. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 2019; 138: 86-96.
- Alsayari A and Shadma W: Genus Ziziphus for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2021; 28: 6897-6914.
- Zazouli S, Chigr M and Ramos B: Chemical Profile of Lipophilic Fractions of Different Parts of Zizyphus lotus L. by GC-MS and Evaluation of Their Antiproliferative and Antibacterial Activities. Molecules 2022; 27(2): 483-483.
- Natthakaln L, Panomwan P and Pornthip B: New bioactive cyclopeptide alkaloids with rare terminal unit from the root bark of Ziziphus cambodiana. RSC Advances 2018; 8(33): 18204-18215.
- Ghedira K: Zizyphus lotus (L.) Desf. (Rhamnaceae): jujubier sauvage. Phytothérapie 2013; 11(3): 149-153.
- Corrêa dos Santos CH, Geraldo de Carvalho M, Laub A, Franke K and Wessjohann L: UHPLC-ESI-Orbitrap-HR-MS Analysis of Cyclopeptide Alkaloids from Ziziphus joazeiro. Natural Product Communications 2021; 16(11): 1934578X2110549.
- Hassanein EHM, Ibrahim IM, Abd-alhameed EK, Mohamed NM and Ross SA: Protective effects of berberine on various kidney diseases: Emphasis on the promising effects and the underlined molecular mechanisms. Life Sciences 2022; 306: 120697.
- MakbulSAA, Jahan N and Kalam MA: Bio-active Compounds from Unani Medicinal Plants and Their Application in Urolithiasis. In: M. K. Swamy, M. S. Akhtar editors. Natural Bio-active Compounds,V 2: Chemistry, Pharmacology and Health Care Practices, India: E-Publishing Springer Singapore 2019; 369-407.
- Olayeriju OS, Crown OO, Elekofehinti OO, Akinmoladun AC, Olaleye MT and Akindahunsi AA: Effect of moonseed vine (Triclisia gilletii Staner) on ethane‑1,2‑diol‑induced urolithiasis and its renotoxicity in Wistar albino rat African Journal of Urology 2020; 26: 1-16.
- Agawane SB, Gupta VS, Kulkarni M J, Bhattacharya AK, Koratkar SS and Rao VK: Patho-physiological evaluation of Durantaerecta for the treatment of urolithiasis. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 2019; 10(1): 4-11.
- De Bellis R, Piacentini MP, Meli MA, Mattioli M, Menotta M and Mari M: In-vitro effects on calcium oxalate crystallization kinetics and crystal morphology of an aqueous extract from Ceterachofficinarum: Analysis of a potential antilithiatic mechanism. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(6): 0218734.
- Kant R, Singh TG and Singh S: Mechanistic approach to herbal formulations used for urolithiasis treatment. Obesity Medicine 2020; 19: 100266.
- Barbouchi M, Elamrani K, El Idrissi M and Choukrad M: A comparative study on phytochemical screening, quantification of phenolic contents and antioxidant properties of different solvent extracts from various parts of Pistacia lentiscus Journal of King Saud University - Science 2020; 32(1): 302-306.
- Kebede T, Gadisa E and Tufa A: Antimicrobial activities evaluation and phytochemical screening of some selected medicinal plants: A possible alternative in the treatment of multidrug-resistant microbes. PLoS ONE 2021; 16(3): 0249253
- Marhoume FZ, Aboufatima R, Zaid Y, Limami Y, Duval RE, Laadraoui J, Belbachir A, Chait A and Bagri A: Antioxidant and Polyphenol-Rich Ethanolic Extract of Rubia tinctorum Prevents Urolithiasis in an Ethylene Glycol Experimental Model in Rats. Molecules 2021; 26(4): 1005.
- Naghmouchi S and Saham Alsubeie M: Biochemical profile, antioxidant capacity and allelopathic effects from five Ziziphyus spina-christi (L.) provenances growing wild in Saudi Arabia. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-napoca 2020; 48(3): 1600-1612.
- Belyagoubi-Benhammou N, Belyagoubi L, Gismondi A, Di Marco G, Canini A and AtikBekkara F: GC/MS analysis, and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of alkaloids extracted by polar and apolar solvents from the stems of Anabasis articulata. Medicinal Chemistry Research 2019; 28(5): 754-767.
- Chaudhary MK, Misra A, Tripathi D and Srivastava S: In-vitro anti-urolithiatic activity and simultaneous HPTLC quantification of berberine and palmatine in standardized extract of Thalictrum foliolosum South African Journal of Botany 2022; 151: 445-453.
- El oumari FE, Bousta D and Imtara H: Chemical Composition and Anti-Urolithiatic Activity of Extracts from Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels Press-Cake and Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. Molecules 2022; 27(13): 3973.
- Bensatal A, Rahmoun D, Ardja S. A, Cheikh M, Kahouadji A and Bekhit M: In-vitro antilithiasic activity of saponins rich fraction from the leaves of Zizyphus lotus. International Journal of Green Pharmacy 2020; 14 (3): 281-287.
- Rossi M, Barone B, Di Domenico D, Esposito R, Fabozzi A, D’Errico G and Prezioso D: Correlation between Ion Composition of Oligomineral Water and Calcium Oxalate Crystal Formation. Crystals 2021; 11(12): 1507.
- Kachkoul R, SqualliHousseini T and Mohim M: Chemical compounds as well as antioxidant and litholytic activities of Arbutus unedo leaves against calcium oxalate stones. Journal of Integrative Medicine 2019; 17(6): 430-437.
- Ahmed S, Hasan MM, Khan H, Mahmood ZA and Patel S: The mechanistic insight of polyphenols in calcium oxalate urolithiasis mitigation. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2018; 106: 1292–1299
- Witting C, Langman CB and Assimos D: Pathophysiology and Treatment of Enteric Hyperoxaluria. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2020; 16(3): 487-495
- Goyal PK, Verma SK and Sharma AK: Optimization of extraction protocol of Parmelia perlata and its validation for protective effects against oxalate-induced renal injury in NRK-52E cells. Journal of Herbal Medicine 2018; 12: 79-87.
- Zhou J, Jin J, Li X,Zhao Z, Zhang L and Wang Q: Total flavonoids of Desmodium styracifolium attenuates the formation of hydroxy-L-proline-induced calcium oxalate urolithiasis in rats. Urolithiasis 2018; 46(1): 231-241
- Ayanne LG, Rachel K and Moacir Fernandes Queiroz: In-vitro studies reveal antiurolithic effect of antioxidant sulfated polysaccharides from the green seaweed Caulerpa cupressoides var flabellata. Marine Drugs 2019; 17(6): 326-326.
- El Menyiy N, Khouchlaa A, El Omari N, Zengin G, Gallo M, Montesano D and Bouyahya A: Litholytic Activities of Natural Bioactive Compounds and Their Mechanism Insights. Applied Sciences 2021; 11(18): 8702.
- Chen JY, Sun XY and Ouyang JM: Modulation of calcium oxalate crystal growth and protection from oxidatively damaged renal epithelial cells of corn silk polysaccharides with different molecular weights. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2020; 2020: 1-19.
- Saha S and Mishra A: A facile preparation of rutin nanoparticles and its effects on controlled growth and morphology of calcium oxalate crystals. Journal of Crystal Growth 2020; 540: 125635.
- Zeng X, Xi Y and Jiang W: Protective roles of flavonoids and flavonoid-rich plant extracts against urolithiasis: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2019; 59(13): 2125-2135.
- Li S, Kang X, He Q, Tang W and Gong J: Dual Mechanism of Natural Polyphenols on crystal whiskers formation on calcium oxalate monohydrate crystal surface. Applied Surface Science 2022; 592: 153355.
- Li J, Zhu J, Wu H and Li W: Synthesis, in-vitro, and in-silico studies of fisetin and quercetin and their metal complexes as inhibitors of α-glucosidase and thrombin. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2022; 349: 118164.
- Fedenko VS, Landi M and Shemet SA: Metallophenolomics: A Novel Integrated Approach to Study Complexation of Plant Phenolics with Metal/Metalloid Ions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022; 23(19): 11370.
- Palierse E, Przybylski C, Brouri D, Jolivalt C and Coradin T: Interactions of calcium with chlorogenic and rosmarinic acids: an experimental and theoretical approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020; 21(14): 4948-4948.
- Zhang B, Li X and Wang W: Preparation of silver-coated silica microspheres with high electrical conductivity through pyrogallol-fe(ш) coordinated surface functionalization. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials 2020; 30(9): 3369-3377.
How to cite this article:
Bensatal A: In-vitro inhibition and dissolution of calcium oxalate stones by the fractions of the Ziziphus lotus L. leaves. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2024; 15(3): 844-53. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.15(3).844-53.
All © 2024 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
26
844-853
652 KB
239
English
IJPSR
Ahmed Bensatal
Laboratory Physico-chemistry of Materials and Environment, Faculty of Exact Science and Computer Science, University ZianeAchour, BP 3117, Djelfa, Algeria.
matmatidz@gmail.com
29 July 2023
22 November 2023
30 December 2023
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.15(3).844-53
01 March 2024