ISOLATION AND SCREENING OF HEAVY METAL ABSORBING BACTERIA FROM THE INDUSTRY EFFLUENT SITES OF THE RIVER NAGAVALI
HTML Full TextISOLATION AND SCREENING OF HEAVY METAL ABSORBING BACTERIA FROM THE INDUSTRY EFFLUENT SITES OF THE RIVER NAGAVALI
Satpal Singh Bisht*, B. Praveen, M. Rukmini and Harman Dhillon
Department of Biotechnology, Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Berhampur-760010, Orissa, India
ABSTRACT
The present study was designed to evaluate the heavy metal absorbing potential of bacteria isolated from industry effluent sites of river Nagavali, Srikakulam Andhra Pradesh. From the effluent waste water three bacteria were isolated and confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus after performing various biochemical tests. The heavy metal tolerant efficiency was determined by analyzing the growth of the bacteria in presence of heavy metal (Cu, Hg, Co and Zn) solution and their optimum tolerance was determined by measuring the optical density at 600nm after 24hr and 48hr of incubation. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus were found to grow in heavy metal solutions.
Keywords:Nagavali, Heavy metals,
Staphylococcus sp, |
Effluents
INTRODUCTION:An effluent is a out flow of water discarded after industrial operations and manufacturing processes. Industrialization is vital to a Nation’s economy because it serves as vehicle for development but the associated problems needs to be addressed using relevant technologies to minimize toxicity and other possible environmental hazards. Industrial waste consists of both organic and inorganic compounds. Organic wastes include pesticide residues, solvents, cleaning fluids, dissolved fluids, lignin from pulp and paper. Effluents can also contain some in organic wastes such as brine salts and metals.
Heavy metal pollution of fresh water bodies arises from various industries and causes various environmental concerns for aquatic life. These effluents even at the low concentrations adversely affect the composition, distribution and diversity of benthic organisms 1-3. Removal of toxic heavy metals from industrial waste water is essential from the environmental point of view to combat water pollution 4.
Conventional methods for removing metals from industrial effluents include chemical precipitation, chemical oxidation or reduction, ion exchange, filtration, electrochemical treatment, reverse osmosis, membrane technologies and evaporation recovery 5. These processes may be ineffective or extremely expensive especially when the metals in solution are in the range of 1-100 mg/l 6. Therefore, it is important to develop an innovative, low cost and ecofriendly method for removal of toxic heavy metal ions from the wastewater. Wide varieties of microorganisms are capable of growing in the presence of heavy metal ions and tolerate high concentrations 7-9. Since heavy metals are ubiquitously present in the environment microorganisms have developed resistance to these heavy metals 10.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Waste water samples were collected in screw capped sterilized bottles. 100µl of the effluent water sample was spread on nutrient agar plates. Nutrient agar plates were prepared by dissolving 0.5g peptone, 0.3g beef extract and 0.5g NaCl in 100ml distilled water, pH adjusted to 7 and 2.0g agar was added in the 250ml flasks. The medium was autoclaved at 121oC for 15min. The growth of the bacterial colonies was observed after 24hrs of incubation at 37oC.
The microorganisms that grow on nutrient agar were randomly isolated based on their morphology and color of the colonies. Pure cultures obtained were preserved at 4oC for further studies. The isolated strains were studied for morphological, cultural and biochemical characteristics using KB002 Hi Assorted Biochemical test kit of Hi-media Laboratories. The morphology was identified by high resolution microscope. The bacterial isolates were identified in accordance with Bergy’s manual of systematic bacteriology 11. Various biochemical tests were performed viz; catalase activity, starch hydrolysis, mannitol fermentation, glucose fermentation, mannitol salt agar test for biochemical characterization.
Determination of optimum Metal Resistance and Antibiotic Sensitivity: To determine the metal resistance 2ml of nutrient broth inoculated with 1ml of suspension culture of isolated strain and mixed with 1ml of metal solution of various concentrations (10mM, 20mM, 100mM, 200mM) for each heavy metal (Cu, Hg, Zn, Co). These cultures were incubated at 37oC followed by analysis of growth by measuring optical density after 24hrs and 48hrs at 600nm.
RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The present study revealed that the isolated strain Staphylococcus aureus was a gram positive cocci and found positive for catalase test, starch hydrolysis, mannitol fermentation and mannitol salt agar test, whereas Staphylococus epidermidis was a gram positive cocci and found positive for catalase, starch hydrolysis, mannitol fermentation and negative for mannitol salt agar test (Table 1).
TABLE 1: MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BACTERIAL ISOLATES
Characteristics | Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Staphylococcus saprophyticus |
Gram staining | +ve | +ve | +ve |
Shape | Cocci | Cocci | Cocci |
Catalase test | +ve | +ve | +ve |
Mannitol fermentation | +ve | +ve | -ve |
Glucose fermentation | -ve | -ve | -ve |
Starch hydrolysis | +ve | +ve | +ve |
Mannitol salt agar test | +ve | -ve | -ve |
Staphylococcus saprophyticus was found gram positive cocci and gave positive tests for catalase and starch hydrolysis and negative for mannitol fermentation and glucose fermentation respectively. Metal resistance studies showed that Staphylococcus saprophyticus is more resistant to Cu metal than Staphylococus aureus and Staphylococus epidermidis.
Staphylococus aureus has shown maximum growth at 200mM conc. after 48hrs of incubation whereas Staphylococus epidemidis showed maximum growth at 100mM after 48hrs of incubation (Fig. 1). Staphylococus saprophyticus has shown maximum growth at 100mM after 24hrs of incubation (Fig. 2).
In the mercury solution higher growth rate was observed at 10mM conc. after 24hrs of incubation for Staphylococus aureus and Staphylococus epidermidis (Fig. 3). Staphylococus saprophyticus has shown higher growth at 200mM after 24hrs of incubation (Fig. 4). After 24hrs of incubation in zinc metal solution Staphylococus aureus and Staphylococus epidermidis have shown maximum growth at 100mM conc. (Fig. 5) but Staphylococus saprophyticus showed maximum growth at 10mM after 24hrs of incubation and on further incubation the growth was gradually decreased (Fig. 6).
It was observed that both Staphylococus aures and Staphylococus epidermidis have maximumresistance to cobalt metal at 100mM conc. after 24hrs of incubation (Fig. 7). Similarly Staphylococus saprophyticus has shown maximum growth at 200mM after 24hrs of incubation (Fig. 8).
FIG. 1: EFFECT OF CU, CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDI
FIG. 2: EFFECT OF Cu, CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS SAPROPHYTICUS
FIG. 3: EFFECT OF Hg, CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS
FIG. 4: EFFECT OF Hg, CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS SAPROPHYTICUS
FIG. 5: EFFECT OF Zn, CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS
FIG. 6: EFFECT OF Zn, CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS SAPROPHYTICU
FIG. 7: EFFECT OF Co, CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS
FIG. 8: EFFECT OF Co CONC. ON THE GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS SAPROPHYTICUS
CONCLUSION: The isolated bacterial strains have shown high degree of heavy metal resistance and could be explored as candidate bacteria for wastewater bioremediation processes special reference to heavy metal contaminated water bodies. The isolates have got the potential to remove and recover the toxic metals economically and effectively from the industrial effluents.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors are highly grateful to the Management and Administration of RIPS for the financial support.
REFERENCES:
- Geydu-Ababio TK, Furstenberg JP, Baird D, Vanreusel A: Nematodes as indicators of pollution: A case study from the swartkops River system, South Africa. Hydrobiologia 1999; 397: 155-169.
- Jarup L: Impact of environmental pollution on health; balancing risk. Br.Med.Bull 2003 ; 68:167-182
- Hemme CL, Deng Y, Gentry TJ, Field MW, Wu L, Barau S, Barry K, Tringe SG, Watson DB, He Z, Hazan TC, Tiedje JM, Rubin EM, Zhou J: Metagenomic insights into evolution of a heavy metal contaminated groundwater microbial community. ISME 2010; 4:660-672.
- Guangyu Y, Thiruvankatachari V: Heavy metals removal from aqueous solution by fungus Mucor rouxii. Water Res 2003; 37(18): 4486-4496.
- Ahluwalia,Goyal D : Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from waste water. Bioresour. Technole 2007; 98: 2243-2257.
- Nourbakhsh M, Sag Y, Ozer D, Aksu Z, Kutsal T,Calgar A : A comparative study of various biosorbents for removal of chromium (VI) ions from industrial wastewater. Process Biochem.1994; 29: 1-5.
- Nies DH: Resistance to cadmium, cobalt, zinc and nickel in microbes. Plasmid 1992 ; 27: 17-28.
- Gaballa A, Helmann, JD., Bacillus subtilis CPx-type ATPases: Characterization of Cd, Zn, Co and Cu efflux systems. Biometals 2003; 16: 497-505.
- Rehman A, Ali A, Muneer B,Shakoori AR: Resistance and biosorption of mercury bacteria isolated from industrial effluents. Pakistan J. Zool 2007;39:137-146.
- White C, Gadd G., Uptake and cellular distribution of copper, cobalt and cadmium in strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on elevated conc. of these metals. FEMS Microbiol. Rev1986; 38: 227-283.
- William ST, Goodfellow M & Alderson G .Genus Streptomyces. In: Bergeys Manual of Systematic Bacteriology.Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore,USA; 1989.
Article Information
37
1448-1451
701KB
1380
English
IJPSR
Satpal Singh Bisht*, B. Praveen, M. Rukmini and Harman Dhillon
Department of Biotechnology, Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Berhampur-760010, Orissa, India
19 January, 2012
23 February, 2012
22 April, 2012
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.3(5).1448-51
01 May, 2012