ISOLATION AND STRUCTURE ELUCIDATION OF BIO-ACTIVE COMPOUNDS FROM BOMBAX CEIBA LEAF EXTRACT
HTML Full TextISOLATION AND STRUCTURE ELUCIDATION OF BIO-ACTIVE COMPOUNDS FROM BOMBAX CEIBA LEAF EXTRACT
Mohd. Rehan 1, Shafiullah * 1 and Ompal Singh 2
Department of Chemistry 1, Chemical Research Unit 2, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh - 202002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: Bombax ceiba is a traditional medicinal plant that is beneficial in the treatment of diuretic, hemostatic, antidysenteric, emetic, antipyretic, astringent, and commonly known silk cotton tree, semal, kapok tree. The aim of this study is to isolate and characterize the biologically active compounds from the ethanolic extract of the leaves. The EtOH extract was subjected to silica gel (60-120 mesh) by glass column chromatography, using gradient petroleum-ether, C6H6, CH3OAc, CH3OH, and purified by preparative TLC (GF254) to yield two pure natural products (taraxerol and β-sitosterol glucoside). The structure was elucidated on the basis of spectroscopic analysis, including 1HNMR, 13CNMR, DEPT-135, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC. The β-sitosterol glucoside shows pharmacological activities such as lowering cholesterol levels, reducing blood pressure, antitumor activity, etc. The glucose moiety is highly effective because it is hydrophilic, which inhibits the entry of cholesterol into the esterification of cholesterol. It is the first time isolated from the leaves of this plant.
Keywords: |
Bombax ceiba, β-sitosterol glucoside, Taraxerol, COSY, HMBC
INTRODUCTION: Bombax ceiba belongs to the plant family Malvaceae, which is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Australia, Malaysia, Java, Sumatra, etc. commonly known cotton tree, red silk cotton and kapok 1. Various investigations have suggested that extract of Bombax ceiba species play a vital role in pharmacological properties including antibacterial, antioxidant 2, antidiabetic 3, hepatoprotective 4, antimicrobial 5, antianxiety 6. From phytochemical studies, it is confirmed that natural products such as polysaccharides, naphthol, naphtha-quinones, anthocyanins, shamimin, mangiferin, saponins, and steroids are useful in the treatment of various diseases 7, 10.
Steroids, flavonoids, saponins, polysaccharides have been isolated from this species. Phytosterols are steroidal type saponins which have been isolated from many plants and show interesting pharmacological activities, including reducing the cholesterol level, act as a potent antitumor agent, lowering blood pressure, anti-genotoxicity, apoptosis, and anticancer nutrients 11, 12, 13, 14. The sterol glucoside has hydrophilic glucose moiety, which plays a vital role in prevention cholesterol entry into esterification of cholesterol 15. β-sitosterol glucoside Fig. 1B is a bioactive compound that decreases nitric oxide production from lip polysaccharides induced RAW 264.7 cells and highly prevents interleukin 6 activities of stimulated macro-phages 16, 17.
β-sitosterol glucoside has been isolated from plant species such as Pisonia grandis 18, Ocimum sanctum, and Viola odorata 19, 20. Taraxerol Fig. 1A is a compound of the saponin group which has been isolated from Jatropha tanjorensis 21, Annona reticulata L. 22, Abroma augusta 23, and play a role in prostate cancer 24 and protects the human hepatic LO2 cells 25. In this study, we report the isolation of a taraxerol (1) and β-sitosterol glucoside (2) from EtOH extract of leaves.
FIG. 1: (A) TARAXEROL AND (B) Β-SITOSTEROL GLUCOSIDE
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection and Identification of Plant Materials: The plant leaves of Bombax ceiba were collected from the Bisalpur area of district Pilibhit, Uttar Pradesh, India and identified by Professor M. Badruzzaman Siddiqui (Plant Taxonomy and Ethno botany), Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh under Acc. No. 31979, AMU, Aligarh.
General Experimental Procedures: TLC analysis was performed using commercially available glass plates precoated with silica gel (GF254). The melting point was measured, using stuart digital melting point apparatus (SMP10), which are uncorrected. IR spectra were obtained in potassium bromide pellets on a Perkin Elmer spectrometer. 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectra of compound (1) were acquired on a Bruker Avance II spectrometer, operating at 400 MHz for 1HNMR and 100 MHz for 13CNMR in CDCl3 solvent. 1DNMR (1HNMR and 13CNMR), and 2D NMR (HSQC, COSY and HMBC) spectra of compound (2) were recorded in DMSO-d6 solvent on a Bruker Avance Neo 500 MHz NMR spectrometer, operating 500 MHz for 1HNMR and 125 MHz for 13CNMR with TMS as the internal standard.
Extraction and Isolation: The shade air-dried and pulverized foliage (2 Kg) of Bombax ceiba plant was extracted with 78% ethanol at room temperature. The ethanolic extract was filtered, and the solvent was totally evaporated under reduced pressure. The dry EtOH extract (85 g) was partitioned between petroleum-ether, benzene, EtOAc and methanol to yield 7 g, 18 g, 28 g and 19 g of extract. The benzene extract (18 g) was chromatographed over a silica gel column using stepwise gradient petroleum-ether/benzene (from 100:0 to 0:100 v/v) to obtain 11 fractions (P1-P11). Fraction P-7 was purified by further, CC, eluting with a mobile phase of petroleum/C6H6 (20/80 v/v) to obtain compound 1 (85 mg). Isolated compound with melting point (283 °C) was further, analyzed by spectroscopic methods Fig. 1A.
Compound (1): White solid with melting point 283 °C. IR ῡmax (KBr disc) cm-1: 3483 (-OH), 2931 and 2858 (CH), 1636 (C=C), 1469, 1379, 1035. 1HNMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δH 5.53 (1H, dd, J = 3.3, 7.96, H-15), 3.19 (1H, m, H-3), 0.97 (3H, s, H-23), 0.80 (3H, s, H-24), 0.92 (3H, s, H-25), 1.08 (3H, s, H-26), 0.90 (3H, s, H-27), 0.82 (3H, s, H-28), 0.95 (3H, s, H-29), 0.90 (3H, s, H-30). 13CNMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δC 158.1 (C-14), 116.9 (C-15), 79.1 (C-3), 55.5 (C-5), 49.2 (C-18), 48.7 (C-9), 41.3 (C-19), 39.0 (C-4), 38.7 (C-8), 38.0 (C-1), 37.7 (C-13), 37.7 (C-17), 37.5 (C-10), 36.6 (C-16), 35.8 (C-12), 35.1 (C-7), 33.7 (C-21), 33.3 (C-29), 33.0 (C-22), 29.9 (C-28), 29.8 (C-26), 28.8 (C-20), 28.0 (C-23), 27.1 (C-2), 25.9 (C-27), 21.3 (C-30), 18.7 (C-6), 17.5 (C-11), 15.4 (C-24), 15.4 (C-25).
The ethyl acetate extract (28 g) was fractionated by glass column chromatography on silica gel, eluting with a gradient of benzene / ethyl acetate (100:0/0:100 v/v) to give fractions B1-B7. Fraction B-3 was separated on CC with the elution of benzene / ethyl acetate (20:60/80:40 v/v) to yield nine subfractions (B-31-B-39). Subfraction B-36 was further, subjected to glass CC on silica gel using gradient benzene / ethyl acetate (40/60 v/v) to obtain compound 2. After isolation, it was purified by preparative TLC to give pure compound 2 (15mg).
The purified amorphous solid was further, characterized by IR, 1DNMR and 2DNMR (summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 2).
Compound 2: White amorphous solid was isolated, Melting point 294 °C, IR ῡmax (KBr disc) cm-1: 3402 (-OH), 2934 and 2872 (aliphatic -CH), 1634 (C=C), 1462, 1375, 1072 1HNMR (DMSO, 500 MHz): δH 5.32 (1H, brs, H-6), 4.2 (1H, d, J = 7.75, H-1’), 3.6 (2H, dd, J = 4.95, 11.3, H-6’), 3.47 (1H, m, H-5’), 3.44 (1H, m, H-3), 3.06 (1H, dd, J = 1.9, 5.85, H-3’), 3.02 (1H, dd, J = 4, 8.8, H-4’), 2.9 (1H, m, H-2’), 0.66 (3H, s, H-18), 0.96 (3H, s, H-19), 0.83 (3H, d, J = 7.25, H-21), 0.89 (3H, d, J = 6.35, H-26), 0.82 (3H, d, J = 6.7, H-27), 0.80 (3H, d, J = 6.4, H-29). 13C NMR (DMSO 125 MHz): δC 140.92 (C-5), 121.67 (C-6), 101.23 (C-1’), 77.39 (C-5’), 77.25 (C-3’), 77.2 (C-3), 73.90 (C-2’), 70.59 (C-4’), 61.58 (C-6’), 56.65 (C-14), 55.92 (C-17), 50.08 (C-9), 45.62 (C-24), 42.3 (C-13), 39.70 (C-4), 38.79 (C-1), 37.31 (C-12), 36.69 (C-10), 35.95 (C-20), 33.83 (C-22), 31.90 (C-8), 31.85 (C 2), 29.75 (C-7), 29.19 (C-25), 28.26 (C-16), 25.93 (C-23), 24.35 (C-15), 23.09 (C-28), 21.07 (C-11), 20.19 (C-26), 19.57 (C-21), 19.42 (C-27), 19.09 (C-19), 12.26 (C-29), 12.15 (C-18).
HSQC: C-1 (38.79, 2.37, 2.1; CH2), C-2 (31.85, 1.94, 1.49; CH2), C-3 (77.2, 3.44; CH), C-4 (39.70, 1.8, 1.4; CH2), C-6 (121.67, 5.32; CH), C-7 (29.75, 2.0, 1.48; CH2), C-8 (31.90, 1.40; CH), C-9 (50.08, 0.9; CH), C-11 (21.07, 1.48, 1.39; CH2), C-12 (37.31, 1.79, 1.02; CH2), C-14 (56.65, 0.9; CH), C-15 (24.35, 1.56, 1.03; CH2), C-16 (28.26, 1.79, 1.23; CH2), C-17 (55.92, 1.08; CH), C-18 (12.15, 0.66; CH3), C-19 (19.09, 0.9; CH3), C-20 (35.95, 1.39; CH), C-21 (19.57, 0.95; CH3), C-22 (33.83, 1.31, 0.99; CH2), C-23 (25.93, 1.56, 1.03; CH2), C-24 (45.62, 0.92; CH), C-25 (29.19, 1.63; CH), C-26 (20.19, 0.89; CH3), C-27 (19.42, 0.95; CH3), C-28 (23.09, 1.22, 1.18; CH2), C-29 (12.26, 0.82; CH3), C-1’ (101.26, 4.2; CH), C-2’ (73.90, 2.9; CH), C-3’ (77.25, 3.06; CH), C-4’ (70.59, 3.02; CH), C-5’ (77.39, 3.47; CH), C-6’ (61.58, 3.6, 3.4; CH2).
FIG. 2: CHARACTERISTIC 1HNMR AND 13C-NMR PEAK ASSIGNMENT OF β-SITOSTEROL-GLUCOSIDE
TABLE 1: 1 HNMR, 13 CNMR AND 2D NMR DATA FOR COMPOUND (2)a
Atom | Type | δC | δH | 1H-1H COSY | HMBC |
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1’ 2’ 3’ 4’ 5’ 6’ |
CH2
CH2 CH CH2 C CH CH2 CH CH C CH2 CH2 C CH CH2 CH2 CH CH3 CH3 CH CH3 CH2 CH2 CH CH CH3 CH3 CH2 CH3 CH CH CH CH CH CH2 |
38.79
31.85 77.2 39.70 140.92 121.67 29.75 31.90 50.08 36.69 21.07 37.31 42.3 56.65 24.35 28.26 55.92 12.15 19.09 35.95 19.57 33.83 25.93 45.62 29.19 20.19 19.42 23.09 12.26 101.26 73.90 77.25 70.59 77.39 61.58 |
2.37 (Ha1), 2.1 (Hb1)
1.94 (Ha2), 1.49 (Hb2) 3.44 (m) 1.8 (Ha4), 1.4 (Hb4) ---------- 5.32 (brs) 2.0 (Ha7), 1.48 (Hb7) 1.40 (m) 0.9 (m) ----------- 1.48 (Ha11), 1.39 (Hb11) 1.79 (Ha12), 1.02 (Hb12) ------------ 0.9 (m) 1.56 (Ha15), 1.03 (Hb15) 1.79 (Ha16), 1.23 (Hb16) 1.08 (m) 0.66 (s) 0.96 (s) 1.39 (d) [J = 4.25] 0.83 (d) [J = 7.25] 1.31 (Ha22), 0.99 (Hb22) 1.56 (Ha23), 1.03 (Hb23) 0.92 (m) 1.63 (m) 0.89 (d) [J = 6.35] 0.82 (d) [J = 6.7] 1.22 (Ha28), 1.18 (Hb28) 0.80 (d) [J = 6.4] 4.2 (d) [J = 7.75] 2.9 (m) 3.06 (dd) [J = 1.9, 5.85] 3.02 (dd) [J = 4, 8.8] 3.47 (m) 3.6 (dd) [J = 4.95, 11.3] |
Hb2
H-3 Ha2, Hb2, Ha4, Hb4 H-3 -------- Ha7, Hb7 H-6 --------- Hb11 ---------- H-9, Hb12 Ha11 ---------- Ha15 H-14, Ha16 Ha15 ---------- ---------- ---------- Hb22 ---------- H-20 ---------- H-25 H-24 ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ H-2’ H-1’, H-3’ H-2’ ------------ H-6’ H-5’ |
------------
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 10, 11 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 20 11, 17 ------------ 22 17, 20 ------------ ------------ ------------ 24 25, 27 25 ----------- 28 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- |
aSpectra run at 500 MHz (1HNMR) AND 125 MHz (13CNMR) IN DMSO
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Compound 1 was isolated as a white solid with a melting point of 283 °C. IR spectra show a broad absorption band at 3483 cm-1, which authenticates the presence of hydroxyl groups (-OH) and absorption observed at 1636 cm-1, indicating C=C stretching vibrations. The 1HNMR spectra showed a signal at δH 5.53 (1H, dd, J = 3.3, 7.9) reveal proton that is attached to a double bond carbon. The eight singlets (δH 0.80, 0.82, 0.90, 0.90, 0.92, 0.95, 0.97, 1.08; 3H × 8, s) were displayed in 1HNMR spectra, confirming eight methyl groups (-CH3). The 13CNMR and DEPT spectrum indicate eight methyls, ten methylene, four methine, and six quaternary carbons. Thus, the structure of compounds (1) was defined as taraxerol. Compound 2 was isolated as a white amorphous solid with a melting point of 294 °C. IR spectra were showing a broad absorption peak at 3402 cm-1, which confirming of -OH group and absorption band at 2850 and 2934 cm-1 indicates CH stretching of methyl and methylene groups. 1HNMR and 13CNMR in Table 1 and Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 spectra revealed six methyl signals at δH 0.66 (s), 0.96 (s), 0.80 [d, J = 6.4], 0.82 [d, J = 6.7], 0.83 [d, J = 7.25], 0.89 [d, J = 6.35] and δC 12.15, 19.09, 19.57, 20.19, 19.42, 12.26, indicating six methyl groups (-CH3). 13CNMR, DEPT have resolved six methyls (-CH3), 11 methylene (CH2), nine methines (CH), three quaternary (C) and six glucose moiety carbon [5 methine carbon (CH) and one methylene carbon (CH2)] which were also confirmed by HSQC spectra. Cross-peaks in the COSY spectrum shown in Fig. 3 were observed between H-1’ (δ 4.2) and H-2’ (δ 2.9) and between H-5’ (δ 3.4) and H-6’ (δ 3.6) and between H-2’ (δ 2.9) and H-3’ (δ 3.06) in glucose moiety.
FIG. 3: COSY CORRELATION SPECTRA OF COMPOUND (2)
FIG. 4: 1H-NMR SPECTRUM OF COMPOUND (2)
FIG. 5: HMBC CORRELATION SPECTRA OF COMPOUND (2)
FIG. 6: 13C-NMR SPECTRA OF COMPOUND (2)
1H-1H COSY was also shown correlations between H-3 (δ 3.4) and H-2 (δ 1.49), H-2 (δ 1.94), H-4 (δ 1.44), H-4 (δ 1.85) and between H-6 (δ 5.3) and H-7 (δ 1.48), H-7 (δ 2.0).
The HMBC correlations in Fig. 4 were performed between C-21 (δ 19.5) and C-17 (δ 55.9), C-20 (δ 35.9), indicating the location of methyl groups (-CH3) at C-21 and the correlation between C-18 (δ 12.1) and C-17 (δ 1.08), C-11 (δ 21.07), confirming the position of a methyl group at C-18. Thus, the structure of compound 2 was identified as a β sitosterol-3-O-glucoside and first time isolated from the leaves of this plant.
CONCLUSION: 1HNMR, 13CNMR, DEPT-135, and 2D NMR methods were revealed that isolated compounds were taraxerol and β-sitosterol glucoside. Both show high medicinal activities. Important role β-sitosterol-glucoside is reducing cholesterol levels because glucose moiety is hydrophilic β-sitosterol glucoside is a steroidal saponin which first time reported from the leaves of Bombax ceiba.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Mohd. Rehan thanks UGC, New Delhi, India, for the grant. The authors would also like to thank SAIF, PU, and Chandigarh for providing spectroscopic data. We would also like to thank the Chairman, Department of Chemistry, A.M.U, Aligarh, for providing necessary laboratory facilities.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Raut PN, Nayak SV and Gotmare SR: ceiba Kalpataru, A tree of life. Int J Adv Res 2017; 5(2): 1211-14.
- Rehman MU, Akhtar N and Mustafa R: antibacterial and anti-oxidant potential of stem bark extract of Bombax ceiba collected locally from South Punjab Area of Pakistan. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 2017; 14(2): 9-15.
- Mir MA, Mir BA, Bisht A, Rao Z and Singh D: Antidiabetic properties and metal analysis of Bombax ceiba flower extracts. Glob J Add and Rehab Med 2017; 1(3): 555-62.
- Wanjari MM, Gangoria R, Dey YN, Gaidhani SN, Pandey NK and Jadhav AD: Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of Bombax ceiba flowers against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Hepatoma Res 2016; 2: 144-50.
- Shah SS, Iqbal A, Ahmed S, Khan WM, Hussain S and Li Z: Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activities of red silk cotton tree Bombax ceiba Pak J Pharm Sci 2018; 31(3): 947-52.
- Alsayari A, Ghazwani M, Almaghaslah D, Alhamhoom Y, Saad M, Ahmed R, Saeed W, Ali W and Batool S: Bombax ceiba a potential antianxiety drug. Pharmacogn J 2018; 10(4): 712-14.
- Agrawal GD, Razvi SAI, Gupta PC and Tewari JD: Study of a polysaccharide from the stamens of Bombax malabaricum Planta Medica 1972; 21(3): 293-03.
- Niranjan GS and Gupta PC: Anthocynin from the flowers of Bombax malabaricum. Planta Med 1973; 24(2): 196-99.
- Faizi S and Ali M: Shamimin a new flavonol C-glycoside from leaves of ceiba. Planta Media 1999; 65(4): 383-85.
- Rameshwar V, Kishor D, Tushar G, Siddharth G and Sudarshan G: A pharmacognostic and pharmacological overview on Bombax ceiba. Sch Acad J Pharm 2014; 3(2): 100-07.
- Food and Drug Administration: Department of Health and Human Services, food labeling health claim; phytosterols and risk of coronary heart disease. Federal Register 2010; 75: 76536-71.
- Sharmila R and Sindhu G: Evaluate the antigenotoxicity and anticancer role of β-sitosterol by determining oxidative DNA damage and the expression of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinases’, c-fos, c-jun, and endothelial growth factor receptor. Pharmacogn Mag 2017; 13(49): 95-01.
- Rajavel T, Packiyaraj P, Suryanarayanan V, Singh SK, Ruckmani K and Devi KP: β-Sitosterol targets Trx / Trx1 reductase to induce apoptosis in A549 cells via ros mediated mitochondrial dysregulation and p53 activation. Scientific Reports 2018; 8: 2071.
- Bruce J and Grattan J: Plant sterols as anticancer nutrients evidence for their role in breast cancer. Nutrients 2013; 5: 359-87.
- Saeidnia S, Manayi A, Gohari AR and Abdollahi M: The story of beta-sitosterol- A review. European J Med Plants 2014; 4(5): 590-09.
- Kontogiorgis CA, Bompou EM, Ntella M and Berghe WV: Natural products from mediterranean diet from anti-inflammatory agents to dietary epigenetic modulators. Antiinfl Antialler Age in Med Chem 2010; 9(2): 101-24.
- Gautam SS and Navneet KS: The antibacterial and phytochemical aspects of Viola odorata extracts against respiratory tract pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci India B Biol Sci 2012; 82(4): 567-72.
- Kumar RM, Srikalyani V, Vishu M and Ilango K: β-sitosterol glucoside from Pisonia grandis rbr stems bark in ethyl acetate extract. In J of Green Phar 2018; 12(1): 66.
- Rahman SMM, Mukta ZA and Hossain MA: Isolation and character-ization of β-sitosterol-D-glycoside from petroleum extract of the leaves of Ocimum sanctum As J Food Ag-Ind 2009; 2(01): 39-43.
- Peshin T and Kar HK: Isolation and Characterization of β-Sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucoside from the extract of the flowers of Viola odorata. BJPR 2017; 16(4): 1-8.
- Oladoye SO, Ayodele ET, Hammed MA and Idowu OT: Characterisation and identification of taraxerol and taraxer-14-en-3-one from Jatropha tanjorensis (ellis and saroja) leaves. Pak j Sci Ind Res Ser A phys sci 2015; 58(1): 46-50.
- Surapaneni S and Prakash T: Comprehensive assignments of extraction, isolation and characterization of taraxerol from bark Annona reticulata l and chemo preventive effect on human prostate cancer cell lines (lncap and pc-3). J Car Mut 2018; 9: 313.
- Khanra R, Bhattacharjee N, Dua TK, Nandy A, Saha A, Kalita J, Manna P and Dewanjee S: Taraxerol a pentacyclic triterpenoid, from Abroma augusta leaf attenuates diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic rats. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy 2017; 94: 726-41.
- Saritha S, Prakash T and Ghatamaneni D: Effect of taraxerol on testosterone induced prostate cancer in albino wistar rats. J Clin Exp Pharmacol 2018; 8: 252.
- Yao XY and Bai Q: Taraxerol protects the human hepatic L02 cells from hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis. Bangladesh J Pharmacol 2017; 12: 133-39.
How to cite this article:
Rehan M, Shafiullah and Singh O: Isolation and structure elucidation of bio-active compounds from Bombax ceiba leaf extract. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(7): 3214-21. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(7).3214-21.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
16
3214-3221
987
794
English
IJPSR
M. Rehan, Shafiullah * and O. Singh
Department of Chemistry, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
shafiullah1966@gmail.com
31 July 2019
26 November 2019
18 April 2020
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(7).3214-21
01 July 2020