MOLECULAR CHARACTERISATION OF CATHARANTHUS ROSEUS CULTIVARS FROM VARIOUS REGIONS OF RAJASTHAN BASED ON RAPD MARKER
HTML Full TextMOLECULAR CHARACTERISATION OF CATHARANTHUS ROSEUS CULTIVARS FROM VARIOUS REGIONS OF RAJASTHAN BASED ON RAPD MARKER
Asheesh Kumar * 1, K. C. Singhal 1, R. A. Sharma 2, Govind K. Vyas 3 and Vinod Kumar 4
Department of Biotechnology 1, Institute of Advance Science and Technology, NIMS University, Jaipur - 303121, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Botany 2, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur - 302004, Rajasthan, India.
Institute of Applied Science and Biotechnology 3, Chemind Diagnosis and Biosolutions, Jaipur - 302019, Rajasthan, India.
Seed Technology Research 4, Agriculture Research Station, SK Rajasthan Agricultural University, Durgapura, Jaipur - 334006, Rajasthan, India.
ABSTRACT: Genetic relationship between ten wild cultivars of C. roseus L. from four different regions of Rajasthan (Jaipur, Bikaner, Kota, and Jhalawar) with the marked difference in climatic condition was investigated using RAPD markers. Catharanthus roseus L. is a storehouse of several secondary metabolites such as vindoline, catharanthine, vinblastine, and vincristine, etc., thus making it an important source of drugs. A number of varieties of C. roseus L. occurs in wild and are cultivated in India. However, an evolutionary study has been limited. Using 24 decamer primers, we obtained a total of 221 amplicons with an average of 9.20 bands per primer. Out of 221 bands, 187 were found to be polymorphic, and the level of polymorphism was 84.61 percent. The average number of polymorphic bands per primer was 7.79. The average genetic similarity coefficient observed was 0.51 ± 0.186. Phylogenetic tree constructed using the neighbor-joining method of cluster analysis separated all the 10 samples of the C. roseus into two clusters. RAPD analysis thus was effective in differentiating the various cultivars, and the resulting high percentage of variation seems to have accumulated in the cultivars of different regions as a result of adaptation.
Keywords: |
Genetic diversity, Catharanthus roseus L., Rajasthan, RAPD, Phylogenetic tree
INTRODUCTION: Catharanthus Roseus L. (commonly known as periwinkle) is popular for its high medicinal value and as one of the richest source of a variety of secondary metabolites 1. It is believed to be of, Indian Ocean Island, Madagascar, origin. It has been generally known as Vinca rosea, Ammocallis rosea, and Lochnera rosea.
It is a perennial plant belonging to the Apocynaceae family. It is found in the areas of India, Australia, Africa and southern Europe 2.
In India, C. roseus is found in all parts of India. C. roseus has potent secondary metabolism responsible for monoterpenoid glucosides and other terpenoid compounds, steroids, phenolics, flavanoids, anthocyanins, and 130 terpenoid indole alkaloids (TIAs) 3, 4, 5. It includes some medically important constituents like ajmalicine, Serpentine and Reserpine, which are well known for their hypotensive and antispasmodic properties 6. C. roseus species are particularly important due to their medicinal alkaloids contents such as vindoline, catharanthine, vinblastine. Vincristine and vinblastine (VBL) are one of the most important alkaloids produced from C. roseus due to its antitumor activity and wide pharmaceutical use 7, 4.
Genetic diversity plays an important role in plant conservation and their survival in adverse conditions. It can be measured at any functional level from a blueprint (DNA) to phenotype 2. DNA-based molecular markers have been proposed as an excellent tool for identifying geographical variation, genetic diversity, phylogenetic relationship, authentication of plant species, pharmacognostic characterization, species characterization and genetic mapping in medicinal plants.
Among the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular techniques, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is convenient in performance and does not require any information about the DNA sequence to be amplified 8. Due to its procedural simplicity, the use of RAPD as molecular markers for taxonomic and systematic analysis of plants 9, as well as in plant breeding and the study of genetic relationships have considerably increased 10. Although several varieties of C. roseus is commonly seen in India, there are a few reports on a genetic-based study on the phylogenetic relationship. In our previous work, variations in the alkaloid content of the different cultivars from different parts of Rajasthan with marked differences in environmental conditions, namely Jaipur, Bikaner, Kota, and Jhalawar 11. The aim of the present study was to find out genetic variations of the same cultivars of C. roseus using RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Sample Collection: Fresh mature leaves of Catharanthus roseus, ranging in age from 7 to 8 months were randomly collected from four different locations of Rajasthan Table 1. The voucher specimen (RUBL 20862) is deposited at the Herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Rajasthan Jaipur. Morphological details of the ten cultivars are given in Table 2.
TABLE 1: DETAILS OF DIFFERENT LOCATIONS OF RAJASTHAN SELECTED FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION
Location | Latitude | Longitude | Temperature (Degree) | Climate |
Jaipur | 26° 55' N | 75° 52' E | 28-34 | Semi Arid |
Bikaner | 28° 01' N | 73° 11' E | 34-40 | Hyper Arid |
Kota | 25° 10' N | 75° 52' E | 32-35 | Humid |
Jhalawar | 25° 11' N | 75° 51' E | 30-34 | Humid |
TABLE 2: MORPHOLOGICAL DETAILS OF THE 10 PLANT SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM DIFFERENT PARTS OF RAJASTHAN
Kota | Bikaner | Jaipur | Jhalawar | ||||||||
Characteristics | K1 | K2 | K3 | B1 | B2 | B3 | J1 | J2 | JH1 | JH2 | |
Plant height | 88 cm | 70 cm | 60 cm | 70 cm | 45 cm | 62 cm | 34 cm | 60 cm | 85 cm | 60 cm | |
Plant branching | Many | Many | Many | Medium | Many | Many | Medium | Medium | Many | Many | |
Petal color | White | White | White+ pink spot | White+ pink spot | White+ pink spot | White+ pink spot | Red, dark flower | Pink flower | Pink flower | Pink flower | |
Plant Branching pattern | O S P | O S P | O P | O P | O P | O P | O P | O P | O P | O P | |
Stem color | Green | Green | Reddish brown | Reddish brown | Reddish brown | Greenish brown | Reddish brown | Reddish brown | Dark reddish | Reddish brown | |
Leaf size | Large | Large | Large | Large | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Leaf serration | Strong | Strong | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | |
Pod shape | E F | E F | E F | E F | E F | E F | E F | E F | E F | E F | |
Pod length | 4 cm | 3.8cm | 3.5 cm | 3.0 cm | 3.1 cm | 3.5 cm | 3.3 cm | 3.8 cm | 3.4 cm | 3.1 cm | |
Seed color | Black | Black | Black | Black | Black | Black | Black | Black | Black | Black | |
1000 seed weight | 2.4 g | 2.3 g | 2.0 g | 2.2 g | 2.2 g | 2.0 g | 2.1 gram | 2.1 g | 2.0 g | 2.0 g | |
3th branch length | 36.2 cm | 30.5 cm | 28.5 cm | 24.6 cm | 28.8 cm | 25.4 cm | 22.3 cm | 26.7 cm | 30.7 cm | 26.1 cm | |
3th internode length | 5.4 cm | 5.3 cm | 5.7 cm | 4.1 cm | 4.2 cm | 4.1 cm | 4.2 cm | 5.2 cm | 3.2 cm | 3.8 cm | |
Total number of leaves | 350 | 245 | 212 | 150 | 210 | 212 | 188 | 230 | 350 | 226 | |
Flower number | 15 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 12 | 8 | |
Total number of branch | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 4 | |
Total pod number | 23 | 21 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 13 | 24 | 16 | |
DNA Extraction and Purification: Three grams of tender twigs along with leaves were homogenized in liquid Nitrogen (liq. N2). The homogenized material was handled as per the method described by Doyle and Doyle 12. RNA was removed by treating the sample with DNase free RNase procured from Bangalore Genei, Banglore. Protein, including RNase, was removed by treating with chloroform: Isoamyl alcohol (24:1). DNA concentration and purity were determined by measuring the absorbance of diluted DNA solution at 260 nm and 280 nm.
The quality of the DNA was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide 13. The purity and quantity of the isolated DNA were determined by Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ND1000). The 260/280 ratio was found between 1.8 – 1.99 that indicated the DNA was pure enough for RAPD.
RAPD Analysis: For RAPD analysis, 50 random decamer primers obtained from OPRON TECHNOLOGY, USA were screened, of which 24 were finally used for amplification. The PCR reactions were performed in a 25 μl reaction mixture containing 1X Taq assay buffer, 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase, 200 μM of each dNTPs (Bangalore Genei Pvt. Ltd., India), 0.2 μM primers and 50 ng of template DNA. The PCR reactions were carried out in DNA thermal cycler (Model-CGI-96, Corbett Research, Australia). The PCR reactions were repeated twice for each primer to ensure the reproducibility of RAPD results.
The PCR amplification conditions for RAPD consisted of an initial extended step of denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min followed by 44 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, primer annealing at 37 °C for 1 min and elongation at 72 °C for 2 min followed by a final step of extension at 72 °C for 4 min.
The PCR reaction products were fractionated on 1.2% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/μl ethidium bromide. After separation, gels were documented using Biovis Image Plus software (LIAS, Avgene, Taiwan).
Data Analysis: RAPD data were scored for the presence (1), or absence (0) and bands with the same molecular weight and mobility were considered as a single locus. Similarity matrix for RAPD primers was constructed using the Jaccard’s similarity coefficient values to find out the genotypic relationship. These data were then subjected to UPGMA (unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages) analysis to generate dendrograms using NTSYSpc-version 2.02e 13.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
DNA Isolation and RAPD Analysis: A single sharp band is corresponding to lDNA was observed for all the samples of DNA on 0.8 percent agarose gel. The quality of DNA was determined as the ratio A260/A280, which ranged from 1.8 to 2.0, which is indicative of good quality plant DNA, and the ratio was almost consistent. The concentration of DNA preparation varied from 5.68 µg/µl to 0.94 µg/µl.
All the ten varieties of C. roseus were examined for random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) genetic marker with 27 decamer primers (OPRON TECHNOLOGY, USA). However, out of these 27 primers, three primers did not amplify (OPC-5, OPG-1, and OPG-7). All the primers showing amplification were repeated at least twice to confirm the reproducibility and polymorphism.
This is because the stoichastic nature of the band, and banding pattern of DNA amplification with RAPD, reproducibility of the banding pattern has been found to change. Finally, only those bands were considered as polymorphic, which did not amplify in certain varieties on repetition. The banding pattern generated by each primer was primer and species dependent and varied from 5-14 at 37 °C annealing temperature. A total of 221 amplicons were obtained with 24 primers with an average of 9.20 bands per primer. Out of 221 bands, 187 were found to be polymorphic, and the level of polymorphism was 84.61 percent Table 3. The average number of polymorphic bands per primer was 7.79.
TABLE 3: LIST OF ARBITRARY PRIMERS WITH TOTAL POLYMORPHIC AMPLICONS AND POLYMORPHISM GENERATED FOR 10 C. ROSEUS SAMPLES
Primers |
Sequence 5’-3’ |
Total no. of bands (a) | Total No. of the polymorphic band (b) | Polymorphism (%) b/a × 100 |
OPA-17 | GACCGCTTGT | 14 | 14 | 100 |
OPB-11 | GTAGACCCGT | 8 | 7 | 87.5 |
OPB-13 | TTCCCCCGCT | 14 | 14 | 100 |
OPB-15 | GGAGGGTGTT | 10 | 9 | 90 |
OPB-16 | TTTGCCCGGA | 10 | 9 | 90 |
OPC-6 | GAACGGACTC | 6 | 5 | 83.33 |
OPC-7 | GTCCCGACGA | 13 | 13 | 100 |
OPC-8 | TGGACCGGTG | 5 | 4 | 80 |
OPC-9 | CTCACCGTCC | 13 | 12 | 92.30 |
OPC-10 | TGTCTGGGTG | 5 | 3 | 60 |
OPC-11 | AAAGCTGCGG | 7 | 7 | 100 |
OPC-13 | AAGCCTCGTC | 7 | 6 | 85.71 |
OPC-14 | TGCGTGCTTG | 5 | 2 | 40 |
OPC-16 | CACACTCCAG | 14 | 14 | 100 |
OPC-17 | TTCCCCCCAG | 5 | 4 | 80 |
OPC-18 | TGAGTGGGTG | 3 | 2 | 66.66 |
OPC-19 | GTTGCCAGCC | 10 | 9 | 90 |
OPC-20 | ACTTCGCCAC | 12 | 4 | 33.33 |
OPG-2 | GGCACTGAGG | 12 | 10 | 83.33 |
OPG-3 | GAGCCCTCCA | 11 | 8 | 72.72 |
OPG-6 | GTGCCTAACC | 14 | 14 | 100 |
OPG-8 | TCACGTCCAC | 9 | 8 | 88.88 |
OPG-9 | CTGACGTCAC | 5 | 2 | 40 |
OPG-10 | AGGGCCGTCT | 9 | 7 | 77.77 |
221 | 187 | 84.61 |
The most informative primers were OPB-13, OPC-16, OPC-17and OPG-6 with all polymorphic bands and least informative primer was OPC-18 with 4 polymorphic bands out of total 12 bands, polymorphism being 33 percent Fig. 1. None of the primer produced all monomorphic bands.
FIG 1: RAPD PROFILE USING OPERON PRIMERS – 17 AND 18
Varietal Identification: To identify different accessions of C. roseus, different patterns generated by each primer were considered. The primer generating unique banding patterns for all the varieties are most useful for varietal identification or discrimination of varieties. In the present study, only one primer (OPB-17) produced unique patterns for all the varieties; hence, this primer can be used without the help of other primers to distinguish all the varieties studied.
The discriminatory power of a primer is determined by a number of types defined by the profiles (banding patterns) generated and the relative frequency of these types, i.e. the number of genotypes generating that same pattern. These two facets of discrimination are not generally presented as a single numerical value and therefore, cannot be used for a straight forward comparison of different methods, we have used a single numerical index of discrimination (D) based on the probability that two unrelated strains sampled from the test population will be placed into different typing groups. This probability was calculated by Simpson’s index of diversity as described by Hunter and Gaston 6.
The discriminatory power ranged from 0.53 to 1.0 for pattern generated by various primers. The discriminatory index of value one was obtained for the primer OPB-13, which produce unique banding pattern for all the varieties Table 4. The discriminatory power of protein profile was less than one [0.93], i.e. it failed to generate unique banding for all varieties. However, polypeptide patterns show a few variety of specific bands.
The maximum discriminating power was assessed for OPB-17 (D = 1) followed by OPA-13 (D = 0.95) producing maximum different types of banding patterns. The minimum discriminating power was assessed for OPC-10 (D = 0.53).
TABLE 4: PRIMER DISCRIMINATIVE POWER (D)
Primer |
D at 37º |
OPA-17 | 0.95 |
OPB-11 | 0.73 |
OPB-13 | 1 |
OPB-15 | 0.73 |
OPB-16 | 0.62 |
OPC-06 | 0.86 |
OPC-07 | 0.91 |
OPC-08 | 0.64 |
OPC-09 | 0.91 |
OPC-10 | 0.53 |
OPC-11 | 0.86 |
OPC-13 | 0.88 |
OPC-14 | 0.6 |
OPC-16 | 0.84 |
OPC-17 | 0.91 |
OPC-18 | 0.75 |
OPC-19 | 0.77 |
OPC-20 | 0.82 |
OPG-02 | 0.86 |
OPG-03 | 0.8 |
OPG-06 | 0.82 |
OPG-08 | 0.8 |
OPG-09 | 0.71 |
OPG-10 | 0.73 |
Genetic Relationship among the Varieties/Lines: The pairwise genetic similarity estimates (Jaccard’s coefficient) based on RAPD banding pattern were used for cluster analysis to present genetic relationship in the form of the dendrogram. The similarity coefficient matrix was subjected to algorithm unweighted pair group method for average arithmetic analysis (UPGMA) to generate clusters. The Jaccard’s pairwise similarity coefficient value for ten C. roseus is presented in Table 5.
The range of genetic similarity was found to be between 0.335 (B-1 and B-2, J-1, and K-3) to 0.87 (B-2 and B-3). The average genetic similarity coefficient observed was 0.51 ± 0.186. The genetic similarity was found between group the 80 and 65% and within group 36%.
Dendrogram constructed using the neighbor-joining method of cluster analysis separated all the 10 samples of the C. roseus into two clusters Fig. 2. Cluster 1, which is separated into 2 sub-clusters, first includes one Bikaner region, and second includes three Kota regions and two Jhalawar regions. Cluster 2 contains Bikaner and Jaipur regions. The cultivars thus show close relation in terms of origin. It can be explained from the observation that geographically isolated individuals tend to accumulate genetic variations during environmental adaptations 14.
FIG. 2 : DENDROGRAM GENERATED FOR TEN C. ROSEUS CULTIVARS USING UPGMA CLUSTER ANALYSIS BASED ON JACKARDS’ SIMILARITY COEFFICIENT FOR RAPD DATA
TABLE 5: JACCARD’S SIMILARITY COEFFICIENT FOR TEN VARIETIES OF C. ROSEUS BASED ON RAPD PROFILING
Varieties |
B-1 |
B-2 |
B-3 |
J-1 |
J-2 | K-1 | K-2 | K-3 | JH-1 | JH-2 |
B-1 | 1 | |||||||||
B-2 | 0.33 | 1 | ||||||||
B-3 | 0.35 | 0.87 | 1 | |||||||
J-1 | 0.35 | 0.8 | 0.82 | 1 | ||||||
J-2 | 0.37 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 1 | |||||
K-1 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 1 | ||||
K-2 | 0.56 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.77 | 1 | |||
K-3 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 1 | ||
JH-1 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 1 | |
JH-2 | 0.53 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.7 | 1 |
CONCLUSION: RAPD analysis revealed that a high percentage of polymorphism among the ten selected cultivars of C. roseus, which indicates that genetic variation, has been preserved over the different regions of Rajasthan.
These results will be useful to establish and maintain a germplasm collection of C. roseus and may guide us in designing strategies for breeding programs that maximize the utility of C. roseus genetic resources.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Mr. Asheesh Kumar would like to thank Dr. Sandeep Tripathi, Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, NIMS University, Jaipur, India, for his valuable advice and constant support.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Papon N, Bremer J, Vansiri A, Andreu F, Rideau M and Creche J: Cytokinin and ethylene control indole alkaloid production at the level of the MEP/terpenoid pathway in Catharanthus roseus suspension cells. Planta Med 2005; 71: 572-74.
- Lewis WH and Lewis MPHE: Medicinal Botany Plants Affecting Man’s Health. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1977.
- Facchini JP: Alkaloid Biosynthesis in Plants: Biochemistry, Cell Biology, Molecular Regulation, and Metabolic Engineering Applications. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 2001; 52: 29-66.
- Van Der Heijden R., Jacobs DI, Snoeijer W, Hallared D and Verpoorte R: The Catharanthus alkaloids: Pharmacognosy and Biotechnology. Curr Med Chem 2004; 11: 607-28.
- Pandey-Rai S, Mallavarupa GR, Naqvi AA, Yadav A, Rai SK and Srivastava S: Volatile compounds of leaves and flowers of periwinkle Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don from New Delhi. Flavour and Fragm J 2006; 21: 427-30.
- Hunter PR and Gaston MA: Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microb 1988; 26: 2465-66.
- Rischer H, Oresic M, Seppänen-Laakso T, Katajamaa M, Lammertyn F, Ardiles-Diaz W and Montagu V: Gene-to-metabolite networks for terpenoidindole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006; 10: 5614-19.
- Weder JK: Identification of lint food raw material by RAPD–PCR: legumes. J Agric Food Chem 2002; 50: 4456-63.
- Bartish IV, Garkava LP, Rumpunen K and Nybom H: Phylogenetic relationship and differentiation among and within the population of Chaeno meles (Rosaceae) Estimated with RAPDs and isozyme. Theor Appl Genet 2000; 101: 554-63.
- Ranade SA, Farooqui N, Bhattacharya E and Verma A: Gene tagging with random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker for molecular breeding in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2001; 20: 251-75.
- Kumar A, Singhal KC, Sharma RA, Vyas GK and Kumar V: Analysis of Antioxidant Activity of Catharanthus roseus And it’s Association with Habitat Temperature. Asian J Exp Biol Sci 2012; 3: 4.
- Doyle JJ and Doyle JL: A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 1990; 12: 13-15.
- Rohlf FJ: Program Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 1.70, New York 1992.
- Sarwat M, Das ES and Srivastava EPS: Analysis of genetic diversity through AFLP, SAMPL, ISSR and RAPD markers in Tribulus terrestris, a medicinal herb. Plant Cell Rep 2008; 27: 519-28.
How to cite this article:
Kumar A, Singhal KC, Sharma RA, Vyas GK and Kumar V: Molecular characterisation of catharanthus roseus cultivars from various regions of Rajasthan based on rapid marker. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2014; 5(9): 3936-41. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(9).3936-41.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
52
3936-3941
838
1854
English
IJPSR
A. Kumar *, K. C. Singhal, R. A. Sharma, G. K. Vyas and V. Kumar
Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Advance Science and Technology , NIMS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
asheesh8282@yahoo.com
15 March 2014
13 May 2014
27 June 2014
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(9).3936-41
01 September 2014