MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDIES OF THE COMPOUNDS FROM PERGULARIA DAEMIA AND TERMINALIA CATAPPA L. LEAF EXTRACTS WITH CYP2E1,GST,UDP-GLUCURONYL TRANSFERASE AND Nrf2 BINDING SITE IN KEAP1, IL-6
HTML Full TextMOLECULAR DOCKING STUDIES OF THE COMPOUNDS FROM PERGULARIA DAEMIA AND TERMINALIA CATAPPA L. LEAF EXTRACTS WITH CYP2E1,GST,UDP-GLUCURONYL TRANSFERASE AND Nrf2 BINDING SITE IN KEAP1, IL-6
Vijaya Packirisamy 1 and K. Vijayalakshmi * 2
Department of Biochemistry 1, Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore - 641046, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Biochemistry 2, Bharathi Women’s College, Chennai - 600108, Tamil Nadu, India.
ABSTRACT: Objective: Pergularia daemia and Terminalia catappa L.. Leaf extracted with hydroethanol and the extracts were separated by silica gel column chromatography. The selected column fractions are used in GC-MS analysis, from the GC-MS results eight phytochemical compounds are selected based on their biological activities. In the present work we predict the interaction of the selected targeted proteins (CYP2E1, UDP-GT, GST and Nrf2 binding site in keap1 protein,IL-6) with bioactive compounds of the extracts (HAEPD and HAETC) by molecular docking studies. The number of bioactive compounds present in HAEPD and HAETC, and there phytochemicals are responsible for various biological as well as hepatoprotective and anti hepatotoxic properties of the plant extracts.
Keywords: |
Pergularia daemia, Terminalia catappa, CYP2E1, UGT, GST
INTRODUCTION: Medicinal plants are believed to be an important source of new chemical substances with potential therapeutic effects 1. Medicinal plants have been identified and used throughout human history. Plants have the ability to synthesize a wide variety of chemical compounds that are used to perform important biological functions, and to defend against attack from predators such as insects, fungi and herbivorous mammals 2. The term medicinal plants include various types of plants used in herbalism and some of these plants have a medicinal activities. Medicinal plants are the "backbone" of traditional medicine, which means more than 3.3 billion people in the less developed countries utilize medicinal plants on a regular basis 3.
Many metabolites have been found to possess interesting biological activities and find applications, such as pharmaceuticals, insecticides, dyes, flavors and fragrances. Plants used for traditional medicine contain a wide range of substances that can be used to treat chronic as well as infectious diseases 4. Phytochemically the plant has been investigated for cardenoloids, alkaloids, and saponins 5. The plant was found to contain various triterpenes and steroidal compounds, and have been documented for antifertility 6, wound healing 7, antidiabetic 8, hepatoprotective 9, cardio-vascular effect 10, and antibacterial activity 11.
Pergularia daemia Linn. (Asclepiadaeceae) a foetid smelling lactioferous twinner found in the plains throughout the hotters parts of the India, ascending to an altitude of 1,000 m in the Himalayas 12. Widely distributed in the old World tropics and sub-tropics from southern and tropical Africa through Arabia to Afghanistan, India and Sri Lanka 13. Terpenoids, flavonoids, sterols and cardenolides are among the chemicals that have been isolated from the leaves, stems, shoots, roots, seeds or fruit. Traditionally it has been used as an elmintic, laxative, antipyretic and expectorant, besides treatment of infantile diarrhoea, malarial intermittent fevers, toothaches and colds. Studies have shown hepatoprotective, antifertility, anti-diabetic, analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inflammatory properties of substances in its aerial parts 14.
Terminalia catappa Linn. (Combretaceae) is found in the warmer parts of India. It is also known as Indian almond, malabar almond, and tropical almond 15. The various extracts of leaves and bark of the plant have been reported to be anticancer, possess antioxidant properties 16. Terminalia catappa L. is a rich source of allagic acid, corilagin, gallic acid and many more unidentified flavonoids compounds 17.
Recently many researchers revealed pharmacological properties of the plant, among which are anti-inflammatory 18, anti-hepatitis 19, antibacterial 20 and many more. The present investigation is find out the interactions between the phytochemical compounds and selected targeted proteins through the molecular docking studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection of Plant Sample: The fully matured leaves of Pergularia daemia and Terminalia catappa (Red leaves) were collected in August – September 2012 from South Poigainallur Village in Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu, India and the plant was taxonomically identified by Dr. P. Jayaraman, plant anatomy research centre, West Tambaram, Chennai. The voucher specimen of Pergularia daemia (PARC/2013/211) and Terminalia catappa was (PARC/2014/2063).
Preparation of Extract: Matured leaves of Pergularia daemia and Terminalia catappa (Red leaves) were shade dried at room temperature and were powdered by using mechanical grinder. The hydro alcohol extracts of Pergularia daemia and Terminalia catappa were obtained by Soxhlet apparatus and extracting at 65 °C till discoloration. The extract was kept in air tight vials after complete evaporation and was stored in refrigerator till use.
Docking Studies:
Materials: To study the nature of interactions, binding mode of CYP2E1, Nrf2 binding site in keap1, UDP Glucuronyl transferase and Glutathione-S-transferase, IL-6 with secondary metabolites of Pergularia daemia and Terminalia catappa L. docking was carried out with, autodock 4.2. autodock Tool was used for creating PDBQT files from traditional PDB files 21. The sequence of CYP2E1 (Uniprot ID: P05181), UDP glucuronyl transferase (Uniprot ID: P22309), GSTP1 (Uniprot ID: P09211) and Nrf2 binding site in keap1 (Uniprot ID: Q14145), IL-6 (Uniprot ID: P05231) were retrieved from uniprot database. The three dimensional structure of CYP2E1 (PDB ID: 3E6I), UDP glucuronyl transferase (prediction homology modeling), GSTP1 (PDB ID: 2A2R) and Nrf2 binding site in keap1 (PDB ID: 4L7D), IL-6 (PDB ID: IALU) were downloaded from PDB database. The drug compound structures were drawn using ACD chemsketch and converted into PDB format using open Babel tool. The 3D structures of above targeted proteins were docked with various phytochemical compounds using autodock software. The docking results were analyzed using Discovery studio visualize tool.
The major chemical constituents present in the Pergularia daemia and Terminalia catappa L. Leaf extracts were drawn using chemsketch and optimized. Ligands were prepared in the autodock 4.2 for docking studies. The optimized ligands were docked into targeted proteins using “Ligand fit” model in autodock 4.2 22. The energy interaction between protein and ligand was calculated 23.
Auto Dock Calculation: Docking can be carried out by various methods. But, the most efficient method is lamarckian genetic algorithm. Autodock was run several times to get various docked conformations, and used to analyze the predicted docking energy. The binding sites for these molecules were selected based on the ligand-binding pocket of the templates 24. Autodock tools provide various methods to analyze the results of docking simulations such as, conformational similarity, visualizing the binding site and its energy and other parameters like intermolecular energy and inhibition constant 25.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In molecular docking studies, totally eight ligands were selected from GC-MS analysis of HAEPD and HAETC. The compounds like 4’, 5, 7 trihydroxy isoflavone or genistein and pseudo baptigenin are present in both the plant extracts. The rest of the first three compounds (4H1Benzopyran one 7 hydroxy 2-phenyl, Dasycarpidan methanol acetate, mito-flaxone) from Pergularia daemia and second three compounds from Terminalia catappa (Apigenin 6-Cglucoside, 4H1Benzopyran 4one 5, 7 dihydroxy (3, 4, 5-tri methoxy phenyl, 4’Methoxy 5, 7-dihydroxy isoflavone) were taken. These compounds are selected for the docking studies. Auto docking 4.2 lab tool was used to perform the docking analysis of eight selective ligands with selected target proteins. Pseudo baptigenin, 4H1 benzopyran one 7-hydroxy 2-phenyl and 4’ methoxy 5, 7-dihydroxy isoflavone, genistein were interacted CYP2E1 with least docking energy (-8.79, -8.2 and -8.16 Kcal /mol) with 1-3 hydrogen bonds. But the interaction energy of the other compounds with CYP2E1 ranges from -4.88 to -8.1 Kcal /mol with 1-2 hydrogen bonds Table 1, Fig. 1.
TABLE 1: CYP2E1 DOCKING WITH SELECTIVE LIGANDS
S. no. | Ligand
name |
Protein residue atom | Ligand atom | Hydrogen bond distance(A°) | No. of hydrogen bonds | Energy value (Kcal/mol) |
1 | Genistein | Thr307-OH
Thr307-OH Gln358-O Leu363-NH |
H
O H O |
1.88
2.64 1.91 2.84 |
3 | -8.16
|
2 | Pseudobapigenin | Thr304-OH
Gln358-O Gln363-NH |
O
H H |
2.83
1.91 2.92 |
2 | -8.79
|
3 | 4H1Benzopyran one 7 hydroxy 2-phenyl | Leu363-NH
Gln358-O |
O
H |
3.15
2.12 |
1 | -8.2
|
4 | Dasycarpidan methanol acetate | Asp167-N | O | 3.00 | 1 | -4.88 |
5 | Mitoflaxone | Arg100-NH | O | 2.69 | 1 | -8.1 |
6 | Apigenin 6-C glucoside | Thr307-OH
Thr307-OH Thr304-OH Thr304-OH Pro429-O |
H
H O O H |
2.98
2.07 2.51 3.09 2.23 |
2 | -7.05
|
7 | 4H1Benzopyran 4one5,
7-dihydroxy(3,4,5 tri methoxy phenyl |
Thr307-OH
Thr307-OH Gln358-N |
O
H H |
2.64
1.87 2.29 |
`1 | -7.98 |
8 | 4’Methoxy5,7-dihydroxy isoflavone | Leu363-NH
Gln358-O Gln358-OH |
O
H H |
2.78
1.82 2.35 |
2 | -8.2
|
Many types of flavonoids act as chemopreventive compounds that inhibit the activity of different CYP2E1 isoenzymes. The hydroxyl derivatives of the flavones have been shown to differ in their inhibitory potency and isoenzymes selectivity 26. Carty MC et al., explained that the natural agents inhibiting CYP2E1, including diallyl sulphide (from garlic), phenyl ethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane (in cruciferous vegetables) and bergamottin (found in the essential oils of grape fruits and certain oranges) have been proposed as possible for minimizing the ethanol induced toxicity 27. Jeong et al., reported the YH439 is a noval synthetic compound that inhibit CYP2E1 that is being evaluated as a hepatoprotective agent 28. In GSTP1 docking studies, the above phytochemicals, like the pseudo baptigenin, Apigenin 6-Cglucoside and 4H1Benzopyran one 7- hydroxy 2- phenyl, mitoflaxone were with least binding energy, and ranges from -7.1 to -7.88 Kcal/mol. These compounds exhibited 1-5 hydrogen bonds with the GSTP1 Table 2, Fig. 2.
Molecular docking studies of UDP Glucuronyl transferase with the phytochemicals present in HAEPD and HAETC. The compounds like genistein, pseudo baptigenin, 4H1Benzopyran one 7-hydroxy 2-phenyl, dasycarpidan methanol acetate, mitoflaxone and apigenin 6-cglucoside, 4h1benzopyran 4-one 5, 7-dihydroxy (3, 4, 5 tri methoxy phenyl, 4’Methoxy 5, 7- dihydroxy isoflavone (biochanin A) have shown better interaction energy with UDP glucuronyl transferase.
TABLE 2: GST DOCKING WITH SELECTIVE LIGANDS
S. no. | Ligand
name |
Protein residue atom | Ligand atom | Hydrogen bond distance(A°) | No. of hydrogen bonds | Energy value (Kcal/mol) |
1 | Genistein | Thr108-OH
Thr108-OH Lys44-NH Gly50-O Trp38-NH |
O
H O H O |
2.90
2.31 2.83 1.94 3.03 |
2 | -6.75
|
2 | Pseudobapigenin | Tyr108-OH
Trp38-NH Lys44-NH Gly50-O |
O
O O H |
3.07
3.18 2.91 1.78 |
2 | -7.88
|
3 | 4H1Benzopyran one
7-hydroxy,2-phenyl |
Ser65-NH
Tyr49-NH Gln51-N Gln51-O Gln64-NE2 |
O
O O H O |
2.76
3.06 3.17 2.25 3.01 |
2 | -7.25
|
4 | Dasycarpidan methanol acetate | Tyr108-OH
Tyr7-OH Asn204-NH |
O
O O |
2.94
3.04 2.74 |
1 | -6.27
|
5 | Mitoflaxone | Gln51-NH
Trp38-NH Lys44-NH |
O
O O |
2.92
2.81 2.99 |
2 | -7.1
|
6 | Apigenin 6C glucoside | Lys44-NH
Trp38-NH Gly50-O Leu52-NH Leu52 –O Arg100-NH Try108-OH |
O
O H O H O O |
2.98
2.07 2.51 3.09 2.23 2.54 2.91 |
5 | -7.34
|
7 | 4H1Benzopyran
4-one-5, 7-dihydroxy (3, 4, 5-trimethoxyphenyl |
Ser65-OH
Ser65-OH Gln64-N Gln64-NH Pro53-O |
H
O O O H |
1.76
2.54 3.12 3.16 2.36 |
`2 | -5.95
|
8 | 4’Methoxy-5,
7-dihydroxy isoflavone |
Tyr108-OH
Trp38-NH Lys44-NH Gly50-O |
O
O O H |
3.04
2.96 2.98 2.02 |
2 | -6.55
|
TABLE 3: UGT DOCKING WITH SELECTIVE LIGANDS
S. no. | Ligand
name |
Protein residue atom | Ligand atom | Hydrogen bond distance(A°) | No. of hydrogen bonds | Energy value (Kcal/mol) |
1 | Genistein | Lys328-O
Lys328-NH Ser143-O |
H
O H |
2.28
2.92 2.12 |
2 | -5.77 |
2 | Pseudobapigenin | Ser445-O
Ser445-NH Tyr379-OH |
H
O O |
1.79
2.73 2.79 |
2 | -7.49
|
3 | 4H1Benzopyran one
7-hydroxy, 2-phenyl |
His132-O
His132-NH Ser128-OH |
H
O O |
1.77
3.19 2.71 |
3 | -7.91
|
4 | Dasycarpidan methanol acetate | Glu291-NH | O | 2.98 | 1 | -6.17
|
5 | Mitoflaxone | Asn384-NH
Asn384-O Gln288-NH Lys437-NH |
O
H O O |
3.07
2.17 2.75 3.01 |
4 | -6.33 |
6 | Apigenin 6C glucoside | His132-NH
Glu291-OH Arg367-NH Arg367-NH Glu289- OH |
O
H O O H |
1.75
2.23 3.09 2.95 1.95 |
3 | -5.56 |
7 | 4H1Benzopyran
4-one 5, 7-dihydroxy (3, 4, 5-tri methoxy phenyl |
Tyr379-O
Gly21-O Gly21-NH Ser445- NH |
H
H O O |
1.81
2.01 3.18 2.85 |
`1 | -6.33 |
8 | 4’Methoxy-5,
7-dihydroxy isoflavone |
Phe145-NH
Glu135-OH Asn133-NH |
O
H O |
3.18
1.95 2.85 |
2 | -6.47
|
TABLE 4: Nrf2 BINDING SITE IN KEAP 1 DOCKING WITH SELECTIVE LIGANDS
S. no. | Ligand
name |
Protein residue atom | Ligand atom | Hydrogen bond distance(A°) | No. of hydrogen bonds | Energy value (Kcal/mol) |
1 | Genistein | Val606-O
Val606-NH Val418-O Val418-NH Val 467-O Val 467-NH |
H
O H O H O |
2.42
3.06 2.19 2.99 2.35 2.69 |
4 | -8.18
|
2 | Pseudonapigenin | Val 467-O
Val 467-NH Val606-NH Ileu559-NH |
H
O O O |
2.23
3.01 3.06 2.93 |
3 | -8.75
|
3 | 4H1Benzopyran one
7-hydroxy, 2-phenyl |
Val606-NH
Gly367-NH Val465-O Val465-NH |
O
O H O |
2.68
3.20 1.90 2.83 |
3 | -7.41
|
4 | Dasycarpidan methanol acetate | Thr560-OH
Val561-NH |
O
O |
2.55
2.71 |
2 | -7.63
|
5 | Mitoflaxone | Gln530-OH
Ser555-OH Ser508-OH Arg483-NH Arg483-NH |
O
O O O O |
2.92 2.66 3.19 2.69 |
5 | -6.76 |
6 | Apigenin 6C glucoside | Val418-O
Thr560-OH Ile559-O Ile559-NH Gly367-O Gly367-O |
H
O H O H H |
1.96
2.95 2.05 3.12 1.93 1.92 |
5 | -8.78 |
7 | 4H1Benzopyran
4-one 5, 7-dihydroxy (3, 4, 5-tri methoxy phenyl |
Val604-O
Val369-NH Thr560-OH |
H
O O |
1.91
3.06 2.65 |
`3 | -8.23 |
8 | 4’Methoxy-5,
7-dihydroxy isoflavone |
Leu559-O
Leu559-NH Ileu557-O Val465-NH |
H
O H O |
3.04
2.96 2.98 2.02 |
3 | -7.97
|
TABLE 5: IL6 DOCKING WITH SELECTIVE LIGANDS
S. no. | Ligand
name |
Protein residue atom | Ligand atom | Hydrogen bond distance(A°) | No. of hydrogen bonds | Energy value (Kcal/mol) |
1 | Genistein | Gln175-NH
Arg179-NH Arg182-NH Arg30-NH Asp34-O |
O
O O O H |
3.01
2.91 3.13 3.01 2.06 |
3 | -6.14
|
2 | PseudoBapigenin | Arg179-NH
Arg182-NH Arg179-NH Asp34-OH |
O O H |
2.83 3.09 1.98 |
4 |
-7.13
|
3 | 4H1Benzopyran one
7-hydroxy, 2-phenyl |
Arg30-NH | O | 3.02 | 1 | -6.18 |
4 | Dasycarpidan methanol acetate | Asp140-NH | O | 2.97 | 1 | -5.13 |
5 | Mitoflaxone | Agr30-NH
Arg30-NH |
O
O |
2.93
2.98 |
2 | -6.73 |
6 | Apigenin 6C glucoside | Asp71-OH
Lys86-NH Leu62-O Leu62-O Leu62-O Leu62-NH |
H
O H H H O |
1.92
2.48 1.97 1.74 2.48 2.86 |
4 | -4.92 |
7 | 4H1Benzopyran
4-one 5, 7-dihydroxy (3, 4, 5-tri methoxy phenyl |
Lys66-NH
Lys66-O Lys86-NH |
O
H O |
2.85
1.82 2.72 |
`3 | -5.88 |
8 | 4’Methoxy-5,
7-dihydroxy isoflavone |
Lys27-NH
Arg182-O |
O
H |
2.63
2.02 |
1 | -5.85 |
The 4H1Benzopyran one 7-hydroxy 2-phenyl shown least interaction energy (-7.91 Kcal/mol, 3-hydrogen bonds) was followed by pseudo baptigenin (-7.49 Kcal/mol, 2 hydrogen bonds) against UDP glucuronyl transferase Table 3, Fig. 3. Artali et al., demonstrated that the 89% of HGSTP1 docking sites for four green tea catechins occurred at enzyme subunits interface 29.
The binding sites for catechins included Gln52, Pro54, Asn67, Glu97, Asp94 and also residues that overlap with G site (Tyr8, Phen9, Arg14, Trp39, Gln66, Ser67, Glu98) or the H-site (Tyr104, Tyr108, Gly208). Other residues for catechin binding were (Thr68, Arg71, Arg75, Asp91, Asp95 and Asp99) located at the subunit - subunit interface.
FIG. 1: INTERACTION OF LIGANDS WITH CYP2E1
FIG. 2: INTERACTION OF LIGANDS WITH GSTP1
FIG. 3: INTERACTION OF LIGANDS WITH UGT1A1
FIG. 4: INTERACTION OF LIGANDS WITH NRF2 BINDING SITE IN KEAP1
FIG. 5: INTERACTION OF LIGANDS WITH IL-6
Curcumin has been shown to induce GSTP1 expression with involvement of transcription factor Nrf2 in human hepatic cells 30. It also able to induce the protection and activate Nrf2 dependent protective response in cell lines or animal models exposed to oxidative condition 31.
Keep 1 protein docked with the eight ligands from HAEPD and HAETC. All these phytochemicals bind with keap1 protein and the interaction energy ranges from -6.76 to -8.78 Kcal/moles. The stronger interaction was observed with apigenin 6C glucoside, pseudobaptigenin, mitoflaxone and 4H1benzopyran 4one 5, 7-dihydroxy (3, 4, 5 tri-methoxy phenyl, with 3 to 5 hydrogen bonds Table 4, Fig. 4.
The least interaction energy were observed with apigenin 6C glucoside, pseudobaptigenin, mito-flaxone and 4h1benzopyran 4one 5, 7-dihydroxy (3, 4, 5 trimethoxy phenyl and genistein with keap1 protein. The interaction energy were -8.78, -8.75, -8.23 and -8.18 Kcal/mol with 3 to 5 hydrogen bonds.
Many of these antioxidant cytoprotective enzymes are controlled by the same three components of transcription pathway: the antioxidant response elements (ARE), the nuclear factor erythroids 2- related factor (Nrf2) and the Kelch like ECH associated protein 1 (Keap1).
Yoon et al., (2008) reported sulforaphane is present in cruciferous vegetables. This compound have antioxidant, anti inflammatory and it is used to reduced the renal dysfunction. These effects were mediate by the induction of phase II enzymes by decreasing the keap1 protein level and increasing Nrf2 nuclear translocation 32.
Silvian and colleagues identified two compounds (Benzene sulfonyl - pyrimidone and N-Phenyl benzene sulphonamide) as Keap1 –Nrf2 PPI inhibitors. The N-Phenyl benzene sulphonamide bind with central cavity of Keap1 kelch domain and form the electrostatic, hydrophobic interaction with the domain. Three serine (Ser 508, 555, 602) and arginine (Arg 415,483) in the keap1 kelch domain form hydrogen bonds with n-phenyl benzene sulphonamide 33.
Table 5 and Fig. 5, explained the interaction between IL-6 and phytochemicals from HAEPD and HAETC. The least interaction energy value (-7.13 Kcal/mole) and maximum number of hydrogen bonds (4 bonds) was found in pseudo bapigenin and followed by mitoflaxone (-6.73 Kcal/mol), 4H1Benzopyran one 7- hydroxy 2 phenyl (-6.18 Kcal/mol). Remaining compounds interact with IL-6 and the interaction energy range from -4.92 to -6.14 Kcal/mol with 1 to 4 hydrogen bonds.
Interleukin-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine showing essential roles in immunity, hematopoisis and inflammation 34, 35, 36, 37. Arginine (Arg) at the 179th position of IL-6 plays an important role targeting this particular site in IL-6 will impair its normal function. Five natural compounds (heptadecanoic acid, 2-(2-(2 carboxybenzyl) amino)-2-oxo ethyl) benzoic acid, 2-(2-(2 carboxy benzyl) acetamido benzoic acid and (S) methyl 2-(3-(7 methoxy -4- methyl -2-oxo -2H- chromen -6yl) propanamido) -3- phenyl propanoate, 2- (2- (3- (isopropyl carbamoyl) phenyl) amino)- 2- oxoethyl) benzoic acid) were used in in-silico docking studies. These compounds interacted with the active site amino acids (Arg 179) of IL-6.
These compounds may crucial in blocking considerably elevated IL-6 in the serum of rheumatoid arthritis patients 38. Vkronique fontaine et al., (1993) reported that the 171 -179 amino acids deletion of human interleukin -6 (IL-6) leads biological inactivation of IL-6. The Arg 179th position of IL-6 play an important role in ligand interaction 39.
Naurally occurring compounds like curcumin, lycopene, sulforaphane, oganosulfur compounds in garlic etc have been reported as potent activators of Nrf2 by inhibiting KEAP1, which has been linked to their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic effects. The binding cavity of KEAP 1 is divided into 5 subpockets as P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5, where two subpocket, P1 and P2, play significant role in strong binding interactions and contribute to total binding free energy. The P1, formed by residues Ser508, Phe478, Ile461, Arg483, Arg415, and Gly462, is highly positively charged and the electrostatic interactions with the Arg483 and Arg415 are significant for binding 40, 41, 42.
Flavonoids can exert protective effects by selectively inhibiting or stimulating key proteins in cell signalling cascades and modulate the activity of enzymes, including phase 1 and phase 2 biotransformation enzymes. Although flavonoids have attracted considerable attention as inducer of enzymes involved in phase 2 biotransformation mediated by the EpRE 43. The phytochemicals from GC-MS studies were used in molecular docking, that showed good binding with targeted proteins. These compounds gives satisfactory binding with CYP2E1, Nrf2 binding site in keap1 and IL-6, phase II enzymes with least interaction energy and greater number of hydrogen bonds.
These phytochemicals that blocks CYP2E1, Nrf2 binding site in keap1, IL-6 and activates Nrf2 pathway, Phase II enzymes (detoxification enzymes). Based on the docking results, the above phytochemicals may possess the effectiveness against hepatotoxicity.
CONCLUSION: Naturally occurring compounds like curcumin, lycopene, sulforaphane, oganosulfur compounds in garlic etc have been reported as potent activators of Nrf2 by inhibiting KEAP1, which has been linked to their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic effects. The binding cavity of KEAP 1 is divided into 5 subpockets as P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5, where two subpocket, P1 and P2, play significant role in strong binding interactions and contribute to total binding free energy. The P1, formed by residues Ser508, Phe478, Ile461, Arg483, Arg415, and Gly462, is highly positively charged and the electrostatic interactions with the Arg483 and Arg415 are significant for binding 40-42.
Flavonoids can exert protective effects by selectively inhibiting or stimulating key proteins in cell signalling cascades and modulate the activity of enzymes, including phase 1 and phase 2 biotransformation enzymes. Although flavonoids have attracted considerable attention as inducer of enzymes involved in phase 2 biotransformation mediated by the EpRE 43.
The phytochemicals from GC-MS studies were used in molecular docking, that showed good binding with targeted proteins. These compounds gives satisfactory binding with CYP2E1, Nrf2 binding site in keap1 and IL-6, phase II enzymes with least interaction energy and greater number of hydrogen bonds. These phytochemicals that blocks CYP2E1, Nrf2 binding site in keap1, IL-6 and activates Nrf2 pathway, Phase II enzymes (detoxification enzymes). Based on the docking results, the above phytochemicals may possess the effectiveness against hepatotoxicity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: I express the sincere gratitude towards Dr. K. Vijayalakshmi for supervision.
COFLICT OF INTEREST: There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Farnsworth NR. Screening plants for new medicines. In: Wilson EO, Ed. Biodiversity Part III. National Academy Press, Washington. EO Wilson (Ed). 1989.
- Atanasov AG, Waltenberger B, Pferschy-Wenzig EM, Linder T, Wawrosch C, Uhrin P, Temml V, Wang L, Schwaiger S, Heiss EH, Rollinger JM, Schuster D, Breuss JM, Bochkov V, Mihovilovic MD, Kopp B, Bauer R, Dirsch VM and Stuppner H: Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant derived natural products: A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2015; 15: S0734-9750 (15) 30027-6.
- Davidson-Hunt I: Ecological ethno botany: stumbling toward new practices and paradigms. MASA J 2000; 16: 1-13.
- Duraipandiyan V, Ayyanar M and Ignacimuthu S: Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India. BMC Complement. Altern. Med, 2006; 6: 35-41.
- Sathish CJ, Sharma RA, Jain R, Mascalo N, Capasso F and Vijayvergia R: Ethnopharmacological evaluation of Pergularia daemia (Forsk.) Chiov. Phytotherapy Res. 1998; 12: 378-80.
- Kirtikar KR and Basu BD: Indian medicinal plants. Dehradun: international book Distributors 1999; 3: 1616- 1617.
- Golam S, Gafur MA, Shah MAB, Khurshid AHM, Biswas MHU and Hassan P: Antifertility activity of Pergularia daemia. J Medical Sci 2001; 1: 22-24.
- Kumar B, Yadav DK, Govindarajan R and Pushpangadan P: Wound healing activity of Pergularia daemia (Forsk.) Chiov. Pharmacog and Ethnopharmacol 2006; 1: 12-14.
- Wahi AK, Ravi J, Hemalatha S and Singh PN: Antidiabetic activity of Daemia extensa. J Natural Remedies 2002; 2(1): 80-83.
- Sureshkumar SV and Mishra SH: Hepatoprotective activity of extracts from Pergularia daemia (Forsk.) against carbon tetrachloride induced toxicity in rats. Pharmacog Magazine 2007; 3: 187-91.
- Gurumoorthi P and Janardhanan K: Antibacterial Potential of some plants used by tribals in Maruthamalai hills, Tamil Nadu. Natural Product Radiance 2005; 4: 27-34.
- A dictionary of Indian raw materials and industrial products, the wealth of India. 2001, 7: 310.
- Parotta J. A: In Healing Plants of Peninsular India, CABI Publishing, 2001.
- Bhaskar VH and Balakrishnan N: Veliparuthi (Pergularia daemia (Forsk.) Chiov.) - As a phytomedicine: A review. International Journal of PharmTech Research 2009; 1(4): 1305-1313.
- Nadkarni KM: Indian Materia Medica. Popular Prakashn Bombay 1976; 1: 1205.
- Masuda T, Yonemori Y, Oyama Y, Takeda T and Tanaka T: Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of environmental plants: activity of the leaf extracts from seashore plants. J Agric Food Chem 1999; 47: 1749-54.
- Udden BS: Medicinal plant. Bangladesh ethnobotany online data base. 2011- http://www.mpbd.info/plants/terminalia-catappa.php.
- Pawar SP, Pal SC., Kasture VS., Anti-inflammatory activity of Terminalia catappa Pharmacy focus in the new millennium abstracts 1997.
- Siddiqi R, Naz S, Saeed SMG, and Sayeed SA: Antioxidant of extracts derived from Terminalia catappa. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2011; 54(2): 93-98.
- Pawer SP, and Pal SC: Antimicrobial activity of extract of Terminalia catappa Indian journal of med. Sci. 2002; 56(6): 276-278.
- Khodade P, Prabhu R and Chandra N: Parallel implementation of Autodock, J Applied Crystall 2007; 40: 598-599.
- Goodsell DS, Morris GM and Olson AJ: Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of Autodock, J Mol Recog, 1996; 9: 1-5.
- Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK and Olson AJ: J Comput Chem 1998; 19: 1639-1662.
- Chang MW, Ayeni C, Breuer S and Torbett BE: Virtual screening for HIV protease inhibitors: A Comparison of autodock 4 and vina. PLoS ONE 2010; 5(8): e11955. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011955.
- Park H, Lee J and Lee S: Critical assessment of the automated autodock as a new docking tool for virtual screening, Proteins2006; 65: 549-554.
- Zhai S, Dai R, Friedman FK and Vestal RE: Comparative inhibition of human cytochromes P4501A1 and 1A2 by flavonoids. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1998; 26: 989-992.
- Mc-carty MF: Inhibition of CYP2E1 with natural agents may be feasible strategy for minimizing the hepatotoxicity of ethanol. Med. Hypothesis 2001; 56: 8-11.
- Jeong KS, Lee JW and Song BJ: Transcription inhibition of CYP4502E1 by a synthetic compound YH439. Arch –Biochem biophys 1996; 326: 137-144.
- Artali R, Beretta G, Morazzoni P, Bombardelli and Meneghetti F: Green tea catechins in chemoprevention of cancer a molecular docking investigation into their interaction with glutathione-S- transferase (GST-P1-1). Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry, 2009; 24: 287-295.
- Nishinaka T, Ichijo Y, Ito M, Kimura M, Katsuyama M and Iwata K: Curcumin activates human glutathione –S-transferase P1 expression through antioxidant response elements. Toxicology letters 2007; 170(3): 238-47.
- Canales Aguirre AA, Gonez pinedo UA, Luquin S, Ramirez Herrera MA, Mendoza Magana ML, Feria velasco A: Curcumin protects against the oxidative damage induced by the pesticide parathion in the hippocampus of the rat brain. Nutritional neuroscience 2012; 15(2): 62-9.
- Yoon HY, Kang NI, Lee HK, Jang KY, Park JW and Park BH: Sulforaphane protects kidney against ischemic reperfusion injury through induction of the Nrf2 de pendent phase II enzymes. Biochemical Pharmacology 2008; 75(11): 2214 -23.
- Marcotte D, Zeng W K, Hus J, McKenzie A, Hession C and Jin P: Small molecules inhibit the interaction of Nrf2 and the Keap1 Kelch domain through a non covalent mechanism. Bio org Med Chem 2013, 21: 4011-9.
- Akira S, Hirano T, Taga T and Kishimoto T: Biology of multifunctional cytokines: IL-6 and related molecules (IL-1 and TNF). FASEB J 1990; 4: 2860-2867.
- Hirano T, Nakajima K and Hibi M: Signaling mechanisms through gp130: a model of the cytokine system. Cytokine growth factor Rev. 1997; 8: 241- 252.
- Gruol DL and Nelson TE: Physiological and pathological roles of interleukin-6 in the central nervous system, NWL, Neurobiol1997; 15: 307-339.
- Hirano T: Interleukin 6 and its receptor. Int. Rev. Immunol. 1998; 16: 249-284.
- Zhou W, Cai JF, Yuan F, Ma M and Yin F: In in-silico targeting of interleukin -6 by natural compounds. Bangladesh J Pharmacol 2014; 9: 371-376.
- Fontaine V, Savino R, Arcone R, Wit LD, Brakenhoff JPJ, Content J and Ciliberto G: Involvement of the Arg179 in the active site of human IL-6. Em. J. Biochem 1993; 211: 749-755.
- Tong YH, Zhang B, Fan Y and Lin NM: Keap1–Nrf2 pathway: A promising target towards lung cancer prevention and therapeutics. Chron Dis Transl Med. 2015; 1: 175-86.
- Jaramillo M and Zhang D: The emerging role of the Nrf2–Keap1 signaling pathway in cancer. Genes Dev. 2013; 27: 2179-91.
- Nair S, Li W and Kong ANT: Natural dietary anti-cancer chemopreventive compounds: redox-mediated differential signaling mechanisms in cytoprotection of normal cells versus cytotoxicity in tumor cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007; 28: 459-72.
- Valerio LG, Kepa JK, Pickwell GV and Quattrochi LC: Induction of human NADPH: quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) gene expression by the flavonol quercetin. Toxicol Lett 2001; 119: 49-57.
How to cite this article:
Packirisamy V and Vijayalakshmi K: Molecular docking studies of the compounds from Pergularia daemia and Terminalia catappa L. leaf extracts with CYP2E1,GST,UDP-Glucuronyl transferase and Nrf2 binding site in keap1, IL-6. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2018; 9(5): 2037-47. doi: 10.13040/ IJPSR.0975-8232.9(5).2037-47.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
41
2037-2047
818
1193
English
IJPSR
V. Packirisamy and K. Vijayalakshmi *
Department of Biochemistry, Bharathi Women’s College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
viji42research@yahoo.co.in
28 July, 2017
13 October, 2017
24 April, 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(5).2037-47
01 May, 2018