Pages Menu
ISSN (Online): 0975-8232,
ISSN (Print): 2320-5148

International Journal Of
Pharmaceutical Sciences And Research

IJPSR is indexed with Embase

An International Journal published monthly
An Official Publication of Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

Categories Menu

NIGELLA SATIVA AMELIORATES OXIDATIVE STRESS INDUCED BY DIETHYL PHTHALATE – AN IN VITRO STUDY

HTML Full Text

NIGELLA SATIVA AMELIORATES OXIDATIVE STRESS INDUCED BY DIETHYL PHTHALATE – AN IN VITRO STUDY

Heena Prajapati and Ramtej J. Verma*

Department of Zoology, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad- 380 009, Gujarat, India

ABSTRACT: The present experiment was designed to assess oxidative stress, if any, caused by diethyl phthalate and its amelioration by Nigella sativa seed extract. For this, the liver and kidney homogenates were treated with different concentrations (10-40 µg/mL) of DEP with or without Nigella sativa seed extract. Lipid peroxidation, a marker for oxidative stress along with total protein content was analyzed. The results revealed that DEP (10-40 µg/mL) caused, significant and concentration - dependent increase in lipid peroxidation, whereas protein content reduced significantly. Maximum effect on lipid peroxidation was obtained with 40 µg/mL DEP concentration and hence used for further studies. On addition of Nigella sativa seed extract(25-200 μg/mL) along with DEP (40 µg/mL) significantly reduced DEP - induced lipid peroxidation in a concentration-dependent manner. However, protein content was higher as compared to toxin alone treated ones. The effect of both DEP alone and DEP along with Nigella sativa seed extract were almost similar in liver and kidney homogenates. It is concluded from the present study that supplementation of Nigella sativa extract can be beneficial in positively modulating DEP – induced alterations in liver and kidney

Keywords:

Diethyl phthalate, Lipid peroxidation, Nigella sativa, Oxidative stress, Protein content

INTRODUCTION:Diethyl phthalate is used in pharmaceutical coating, as a fixative in cosmetics, in the manufacture of varnishes and ropes, in the denaturation of alcohol and as perfume binders 1.Among potential sources of DEP contamination and accumulation in human beings, one is cosmetic products and other is dietary meat of fish particularly from unknown contaminated sources 2, 3.

DEP, an endocrine disrupter chemical, has been found to have diverse acute and chronic toxic effects in several species at different trophic levels 4. It caused mitochondrial swelling, focal dilation and vesiculation of smooth endoplasmic reticulum and increased interstitial macrophage activity associated with the surface of Leyding cells of rats 5. According to Hayashi et al 6, DEP affects sperm count in the mammals. It was also reported as neurotoxicant and enhances production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation 7, 8.

Oxidative stress is a condition in which the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), a ubiquitous by - products of aerobic metabolism, overwhelm the cellular antioxidant defence mechanism. Lipid peroxidation has been taken as an indicator of cellular oxidative damage 9. Lipid peroxidation – derived free radical could attack back-bone of protein and side chains of specific amino acid residues 10.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM), including herbal medicine, is popular in the general population worldwide 11. Nigella sativa belongs to family Ranunculaceae. It is an annual, erect herb, distributed in South West Asia, South Europe and North Africa 12. Studies on Nigella sativa seed extract have provided scientific support for the treatment of rheumatism, immune stimulation, diabetes, cancer and related inflammatory diseases 13.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate oxidative stress; if any caused by DEP in vitro and its amelioration by Nigella sativa seed extract in vitro condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals: Analytical grade diethyl phthalate (DEP) (CAS No. 84-66-2) was purchased from Sisco Research Laboratories, Mumbai, India. All other chemicals used in the present study were of analytical grade.

Nigella sativa extract preparation:  Seeds of Nigella sativa purchased from local market was used for hydro - alcoholic extract preparation by the method as described by Bhargava and Singh with slight modification 14. Finely ground Nigella sativa seeds powder was mixed with 50% methanol and allowed to stand overnight for maximum extraction of polyphenols.  Percolation of the extract was performed at room temperature in two stages. Collected filtrate was evaporated below 50˚C to obtain a final product in the form of residues which was stored under refrigerated condition. Extract was dissolved in double distilled water and used for further studies.

Liver and kidney homogenates: Inbred adult healthy Swiss strain female albino mice weighing 30-35 gm were obtained from Zydus Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. Animals were kept in the Animal House of Zoology Department of Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India under controlled conditions (temperature 25 ± 2OC, 12 h light/dark cycle and relative humidity 50-55%). They were fed with certified pelleted rodent feed supplied by Amrut Feeds, Pranav Agro Industries Ltd., Pune, India and potable water ad libitum. All the experimental protocols were approved by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (Reg-167/1999/CPCSEA), New Delhi, India. Animals were handled according to the guidelines published by Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi, India (1991).

Mice were humanely sacrificed liver and kidneys were isolated, blotted free of blood and used for biochemical studies.

Lipid peroxidation: Liver and kidney homogenates prepared in phosphate buffered saline were used for various treatments followed by estimation of lipid peroxidation.

Following sets of tubes were prepared:

  1. Control tubes: These tubes contained tissues homogenates and phosphate buffered saline.
  2. DMSO control tubes: These tubes contained tissues homogenates and DMSO.
  3. Antidote control tubes: These tubes contained tissues homogenates and Nigella sativa seed extracts.
  4. DEP - treated tubes: These tubes contained tissues homogenates with different concentrations of DEP (10-40 µg/ml) in DMSO.
  5. DEP and Nigella sativa seed extract tubes: These tubes contained tissue homogenates with different concentrations of Nigella sativa seed extract (25 – 200 µg/ml) along with DEP (40 µg/ml ).

The final volume of each tube was made up to 1 ml with phosphate buffered saline. Each tube was added with 0.1 ml H2O2 to induce lipid peroxidation. All the tubes were subjected to incubation for 30 min at 37oC.

The lipid peroxidation in control, DMSO control, toxin and toxin plus antidote treated samples were measured by quantification of thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) determined by the method of Ohkawa et al 15 with slight modifications.

Protein: Liver and kidney were homogenized in chilled water and used for various treatment followed by estimation of protein content.

Following sets of tubes were prepared.

  1. Control tubes: These tubes contained tissue homogenates and distilled water.
  2. DMSO control tubes: These tubes contained tissue homogenates and DMSO.
  3.  Antidote control tubes: These tubes contained tissue homogenates and Nigella sativa seed extracts.
  4. DEP - treated tubes: These tubes contained tissues homogenates with different concentrations of DEP (10-40 µg/ml).
  5. DEP plus Nigella sativa seed extract – treated tubes: These tubes contained tissue homogenates with different concentrations of Nigella sativa seed extract (25 – 200 µg/ml) along with DEP (40 µg/ml ).

The final volume of each tube was made up to 1 ml with distilled water. All the tubes were subjected to incubation for 30 min at 37oC.

The protein content in control, DMSO control, toxin and toxin plus antidote treated samples were estimated by the method of Lowry et al 16 with slight modifications using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Statistical analysis:

All the data are expressed as the means ± standard error mean (SEM). Statistical analysis and linear regression were performed using Graphpad Instat, software, version 5.03. The data were statistically analyzed using One - way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. The level of significance was accepted with p < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: From Tables 1 and 2 we could see that addition of different concentrations (10-40 µg/ml) of DEP to liver homogenates of mice significantly (p<0.05) increased H2O2 – induced lipid peroxidation in vitro condition. At 40 µg/ml DEP concentration maximum lipid peroxidation was observed in both liver and kidney homogenates. The effect was significant (p<0.05) and concentration dependent in both liver and kidney homogenates (r2= 0.993, 0.961 respectively) up to 40 µg/ml DEP as indicated in Figure 1 and 2.

Fig 1

FIGURE 1: SHOWING DEP- INDUCED PERCENT CHANGE IN LIPID PEROXIDATION IN LIVER HOMOGENATES

Fig 2

FIGURE 2: SHOWING DEP- INDUCED PERCENT CHANGE IN LIPID PEROXIDATION IN KIDNEY HOMOGENATES

In the present study, it was found that DEP induce – oxidative stress by increasing thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in mice liver and kidney homogenates. Lipid peroxidation is a major harmful consequence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. Increased lipid peroxidation could lead to severe cell organelle damage leading to impairment in the various metabolic functions of the cell 17. Elevation of oxidative stress in liver and kidney homogenates indicates high level of ROS production due to damage by exposure of DEP. The higher level of TBARS after DEP treatment was also reported in Wistar rat and olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus, a marine culture fish by Pereira et al 18 and Kang et al 19 respectively.

Results shown in tables 1 and 2 revealed significant (p<0.05), concentration- dependent decrease in protein content in liver and kidney homogenates (r2= 0.849, 0.948) (Figure 3 and 4). Highest decrease in protein content was obtained at the 40 µg/ml DEP concentration. The protein content was significantly decreased in DEP treated liver and kidney homogenates. This could be due to oxidative stress. The decreased protein content in liver of DEP treated mice was also reported by Prajapati and Verma 20.

Fig 3

FIGURE 3: SHOWING DEP- INDUCED PERCENT CHANGE IN PROTEIN CONTENT IN LIVER HOMOGENATES

Fig 4

FIGURE 4: SHOWING DEP- INDUCED PERCENT CHANGE IN PROTEIN CONTENT IN KIDNEY HOMOGENATES

Table 1 and 2 shows that cotreatment of Nigella sativa seed extract (25 to 200 µg/ml) along with DEP (40 µg/ml) significantly (p<0.05) mitigated DEP – induced lipid peroxidation in both liver and kidney homogenates. The effect was concentration – dependent in liver and kidney homogenates (r2=0.986, 0.984 respectively) with maximum mitigation at 200 µg/ml of Nigella sativa seed extract (Figure 5 and 6).

Fig 5

FIGURE 5: SHOWING EFFECT OF NIGELLA SATIVA SEED EXTRACT IN AMELIORATING (PERCENT CHANGE) DEP – INDUCED ALTERATION IN LIPID PEROXIDATION IN LIVER HOMOGENATE (Please note that each tube contained 40 µg/ml DEP).

Fig6

FIGURE 6: SHOWING EFFECT OF NIGELLA SATIVA SEED EXTRACT IN AMELIORATING (PERCENT CHANGE) DEP – INDUCED ALTERATION IN LIPID PEROXIDATION IN KIDNEY HOMOGENATE (Please note that each tube contained 40 µg/ml DEP).

The results shown in Figure 7 and 8 reveal mitigation in concentration of protein content in liver and kidney homogenates treated with DEP along with Nigella sativa seed extract. The effect was concentration – dependent in both liver and kidney homogenates (r2=0.982, 0.903 respectively).

Concurrent treatment of Nigella sativa seed extract along with DEP caused significant amelioration in lipid peroxidation and protein content in both liver and kidney homogenates. It could be due to antioxidative properties of Nigella sativa seed extract. Prajapati and Verma 21 have reported a strong DPPH radical scavenging activity of Nigella sativa seed extract. Free radical scavenging activity of Nigella sativa was also reported 22.

Fig7

FIGURE 7: SHOWING EFFECT OF NIGELLA SATIVA SEED EXTRACT IN AMELIORATING (PERCENT CHANGE) DEP – INDUCED ALTERATION IN PROTEIN CONTENT IN LIVER HOMOGENATE (Please note that each tube contained 40 µg/ml DEP).

Fig8

FIGURE 8: SHOWING EFFECT OF NIGELLA SATIVA SEED EXTRACT IN AMELIORATING (PERCENT CHANGE) DEP – INDUCED ALTERATION IN PROTEIN CONTENT IN KIDNEY HOMOGENATE (Please note that each tube contained 40 µg/ml DEP).


TABLE 1: SHOWING EFFECT OF NIGELLA SATIVA SEED EXTRACT ON DEP -INDUCED ALTERATIONS IN LIPID PEROXIDATION AND PROTEIN CONTENT IN LIVER HOMOGENATES OF MICE

Treatment Liver homogenate
Lipid peroxidation(n moles MDA formed/mg protein/60 min) Protein content(mg/100 mg tissue weight)
(I) Control
1.Untreated  control 20.90 ± 0.27 12.61 ± 0.71
2. DMSO control 21.17 ± 0.39 12.36 ± 0.54
3. Antidote (200 µg/ml) 20.78 ± 0.33 12.57 ± 0.54
(II) Diethyl phthalate - Treated
4. DEP (10 µg/ml) 27.18 ± 1.87a 8.93 ± 0.65 a
5. DEP (20 µg/ml) 35.39 ± 1.00 a 7.79 ± 0.68 a
6. DEP (30 µg/ml) 42.56 ± 1.65 a 7.27 ± 0.63 a
7. DEP (40 µg/ml) 52.37 ± 1.99 a 6.50 ± 0.57 a
(III) DEP1240(HD) + Nigella sativa extract - Treated
8. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (25 µg/ml) 50.37 ± 0.46 a 8.58 ± 0.42 ab
9. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (50 µg/ml) 44.69 ± 1.13 ab 8.92 ± 0.28 ab
10. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (75 µg/ml) 38.68 ± 0.52 ab 9.49 ± 0.17 ab
11.DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (100µg/ml) 30.71 ± 0.48 ab 10.17 ± 0.15 b
12. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (150 µg/ml) 25.41 ± 0.57 b 11.01 ± 0.19 b
13. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (200 µg/ml) 19.77 ± 0.74 b 11.77 ± 0.20 b

Results are expressed as Mean ± S.E.M., n = 10. No significant difference was noted between control tubes. a p<0.05 as compared to Control. b p<0.05 as compared to Toxin treated. Level of significance p < 0.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 2: SHOWING EFFECT OF NIGELLA SATIVA SEED EXTRACT ON DEP- INDUCED ALTERATIONS IN LIPID PEROXIDATION AND PROTEIN CONTENT IN KIDNEY HOMOGENATES OF MICE

Treatment Kidney homogenate
Lipid peroxidation(n moles MDA formed/mg protein/60 min) Protein content(mg/100 mg tissue weight)
(I) Control
1.Untreated  control 13.31 ± 0.57 9.14 ± 0.38
2. DMSO control 13.78 ± 0.41 9.34 ± 0.35
3. Antidote (200 µg/ml) 13.80 ± 0.38 9.90 ± 0.19
(II) Diethyl phthalate - Treated
4. DEP (10 µg/ml) 19.04 ± 1.63a 7.38 ± 0.20 a
5. DEP (20 µg/ml) 26.63 ± 0.90 a 6.97 ± 0.38 a
6. DEP (30 µg/ml) 36.73 ± 1.48 a 6.02 ± 0.29 a
7. DEP (40 µg/ml) 51.75 ± 1.18a 5.16 ± 0.19 a
(III) DEP1240(HD)+ Nigella sativa extract - Treated
8. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (25 µg/ml) 46.77 ± 1.04 ab 6.70 ± 0.42 ab
9. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (50 µg/ml) 40.94 ± 0.40 ab 11.44 ± 0.19ab
10. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (75 µg/ml) 36.09 ± 0.77 ab 12.40 ± 0.48 ab
11.DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (100µg/ml) 33.77 ± 0.70 ab 13.28 ± 0.44 ab
12. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (150 µg/ml) 28.42 ± 0.48 ab 14.87 ± 0.65 ab
13. DEP (40 µg/ml) + NS (200 µg/ml) 21.63 ± 0.47 ab 16.34 ± 0.90a b

Results are expressed as Mean ± S.E.M., n = 10. No significant difference was noted between control tubes. a p<0.05 as compared to Control. b p<0.05 as compared to Toxin treated. Level of significance p < 0.05

 

CONCLUSION: From this study, it can be concluded that different concentrations of DEP leads to concentration- dependent significant increase in lipid peroxidation and decrease protein content and Nigella sativa effectively mitigates the toxic effect of DEP- induced lipid peroxidation and protein content in liver tissue.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We thank the Gujarat University, Ahmedabad for providing laboratory facility for the study.

REFERENCES:

  1. US EPA: Screening level hazard characterization: phthalate esters category. US Environ prot Agency Accessed September 2010. http://www.gov/oppt/chemrtk/hpvis/hazchar/category-%20pathalatc%20Esters-March %202010.pdf.
  2. Persky V, Turyk M, Anderson HA, Hanraban LP, Falk C, Steenport CR, Freels S and the Great Lakes Consortium: The effects of PCB exposure and fish consumption on endogenous hormones. Environ Health Persp 2001; 109: 1275-1283.
  3. Bosveld ATC, Van D and Berge M: Reproductive failure and endocrine disruption by organohalogens in fish – eating birds. Toxicol 2002;  27: 181-182.
  4. Staples CA, parkerton TF and Peterson DR: A risk assessment of selected phthalate esters in north American and Western European surface waters. Chemosphere 2000; 40: 891.
  5. Zou E and Fingerman M. Effects on estrogenic xenobiotics on molting of the water flea, deaphria Magna. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 1997; 38: 281- 285.
  6. Hayashi K, Nakae A, Fukushima Y, Sakamoto K, Furuichi T, Kitahara K, Miyazaki Y, Ikenoue C, Matumoto S and Toda T: Contamination of rice by etofenprox, diethyl phthalate, and alkyl phenols: effects on first delivery and sperm count. J Toxicol Sci 2010; 35(1): 49-55.
  7. Xu H, Shao X, Zhang Z, Zou Y, Chen Y, Han S, Wang S, Wu X, Yang L and Chen Z: Effect of di-n-butyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate on acelylcholinesterase activity and nerotoxicity related gene expression in embryo zebrafish. Bulletin of Environ Cont Toxicol 2013; sep 17 ( Epub ahead of print).
  8. Xu H, Shao X, Zhang Z, Zou Y, Wu X and Yang L: Oxidative stress and immune related gene expression following exposure to di-n-butyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate in zebrafish embryos. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 2013; 93: 39-44.
  9. Palmieri B nad Sblendorio V: Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Erop Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2007; 11: 309-342.
  10. Wu W, Lin Q, Hua Y, Wu Y, Liang Y, Fu X, and Xiao H: Study on mechanism of soy protein oxidation induced by lipid peroxidation products. J Food Sci Technol 2013; 5(1): 4 -53.
  11. Nagarajan A and Brindha P: Diterpenes- A review on therapeutic uses with special emphasis on antidiabetic activity. J Pharma Res 2012: 5(8); 4530-4540.
  12. Bhatti IU, Rehman FU, Khan MA and Marwat SK: Effect of prophetic medicine kalonji (Nigella sativa Linn.) on lipid profile of human beings: An in vivo approach. World Appl Sci J  2009; 6(8): 1053-1057.
  13. Al- Naqeed G, Ismail M and Al-Zubairi AS: Fatty acid profile, α- tocopherol content and total antioxidant activity of oil external from Nigella sativa seeds. Int J Pharmacol 2009: 5(4): 244-250.
  14. Bhargava K.P and Singh N: Antistress activity of Ocimum scnctum Linn. Ind J Med Res 1981; 73: 443.
  15. Ohkhawa H, Ohishi N and Yagi K: Analytical assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Biochem 1979; 95: 351 – 358.
  16. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biochem 1951; 4: 193-265.
  17. Pereira C and Rao CV: Toxicity study of maternal transfer of polychlorinated biphenyls and diethyl phthalate to 21 – day- old male and female weanling pups of Wistar rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 2007; 68: 118-125.
  18. Pereira C, Mapuskar K and Rao CV. Chronic toxicity of diethyl phthalate in male Wistar rats – a dose response study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2006; 45: 169-177.
  19. Kang JC, Jee JH, Geunkoo J, Keum YH, Jo SG, Park KH: Anti - oxidative status and hepatic enzymes following acute administration of diethyl phthalate in olive flounder paralichthys olivaceus, a marine culture fish. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 2010; 73: 1449 – 1455.
  20. Prajapati H and Verma RJ: Nigella sativa ameliorates diethyl phthalate – induced lipid infiltration in liver of mice. Int J Pharma Biol Sci 2013; 3(3): 443-449.
  21. Prajapati H and Verma RJ. Mitigation of diethyl phthalate induced hepatotoxicity by Nigella sativa seed extract. Int J Pharma Biosci 2013; 4(4):1366-1376.
  22. Yildiz F, Coban S, Terzi A, Ates M, Aksoy N, Cakir H, Ocak A and Bitiren M: Nigella sativa relieves the deleterious effects of ischemia reperfusion injury on liver. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(33): 5204-5209.

    How to cite this article:

    Prajapati H and Verma RJ: Nigella sativa ameliorates oxidative stress induced by diethyl phthalate – An in vitro study. Int J Pharm Sci Res2014; 5(6): 2203-09.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(6).2203-09

    All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

     

Article Information

13

2203-2209

450KB

1201

0

English

IJPSR

Heena Prajapati and Ramtej J. Verma*

Department of Zoology, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad- 380 009, Gujarat, India

amtejverma2000@yahoo.com

03 November, 2013

24 February, 2014

25 April, 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(6).2203-09

01, June 2014

Download