NOVEL BULK FORMING LAXATIVE FROM WATERMELON RIND
HTML Full TextNOVEL BULK FORMING LAXATIVE FROM WATERMELON RIND
Ashish G. Waghmare, Sonal U. Patil and Shalini S. Arya*
Food Engineering and Technology Department, Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai 400 019, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT: A laxative formulations are widely used for treatment of constipation. They are classified based on their mechanism of action such as bulk forming, stool softener, osmotic, stimulant and mechanical. Bulk forming laxative is most commonly used laxative which works by absorbing water and swelling in small and large intestine to form soft and bulky stool. Presently available bulk forming laxative gives adverse effects such as stomach pain, discomfort and vomiting due to sudden swelling in stomach. Therefore present work was conducted for study of novel bulk forming laxative and minimization of associated adverse effects. Bulk laxative formulation was prepared from watermelon rind, isabgol husk and pectin. Watermelon rind powder (WRP) was prepared and analyzed for proximate composition, carbohydrate content, functional properties and performed for topography by scanning electron microscope. Further, effect of pH on swelling index of WRP was studied at pH 1.3, pH 4.5, pH 6 and pH 7.4. Bulk laxative formulations were developed by varying the concentration of WRP, isabgol and pectin. Developed formulations were evaluated for bulk density, tapped density, compressibility index, flowability and swelling index. High swelling index formulations were compared with market sample for pH dependant swelling at pH 1.3, pH 4.5, pH 6 and pH 7.4. From this study WRP was found as novel potential bulk forming laxative in combination with isabgol and pectin. Developed formulation has site specific action due to pH dependant swelling which might decrease the intensity of adverse effects
Keywords: |
Bulk laxative,
Watermelon rind, Constipation,
Topography, Swelling index
INTRODUCTION: Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) is one of the bulker, most abundant and cheap fruit available in India with an average production of 3 million tons per year. According to the reports from FAOSTAT (2009), India ranks second in watermelon production amongst the Asian countries. Watermelon constitutes 6-7% of overall fruit production and is high during summer 1. In watermelon red flesh present inside is sweet, edible and used for juices and salads but the outer rind is considered as waste which has no commercial value 2. Watermelon rind consists of pectin, citrulline, cellulose, proteins and carotenoids. These polymers are rich in functional groups such as hydroxyl (cellulose) and carboxyl (pectin) and can easily hold large amount of water 3. In our earlier report we have investigated utility of watermelon rind in hypoglycemic thepla 4. Recently many reports have been published on utilization of watermelon rind, such as bio-sorbent for removal of trivalent chromium and copper from aqueous solution 1, 5; as corrosion inhibitor 6; as natural source of antioxidant and dietary fiber in cakes 7.
In addition to this microwave assisted extraction of pectin from watermelon rinds was done by Maran et al. 8; and immobilization of yeast on watermelon rind was done for production of wine 2. However, water melon rind has not been explored for application in bulk laxative formulation.
Constipation is condition where passage of small amount of hard, dry stool fewer than 3 times per week or significant change in one’s usual routine, accompanied by straining and feeling of being bloated, or having abdominal fullness. Constipation is reported to be one the routine health problem and has been increased recently, due to increased consumption of junk food or food which lacks in natural dietary fibres 9. Laxatives are classified on the basis of mechanism of action such as bulk forming, stool softener, osmotic and stimulant agents.
Bulk forming (fiber) laxatives pass through the body undigested. The fibers attract water to the intestine, absorb the water and swell to form a soft, bulky stool 10. The bulky mass stimulates the intestinal muscles and speeds the stool transit time through the colon. Bulk forming laxatives will not work without increased fluid intake. Both soluble and insoluble fibers are important in the formation of stools. Fiber laxatives that contain only one type of fiber can produce stools of poor quality 11. Insoluble fibres do not dissolve in water; they pass into the colon where they help to form stools. Soluble fibers are easily dissolved by water.
They are also passed to the colon where bacteria ferment soluble fiber into a lubricating gel that helps to make stools soft and helps to moisturize the colon lining. Bulk forming agents include psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid (Metamucil®, Karacil®), cellulose (Fibyrax®), calcium polycarbophil (Mitrolan®) and plantago (Siblin®). Bulk forming laxatives must be taken with sufficient fluid (250 ml) to prevent blockage of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) 12. Bloating is the most common short-term treatment side effect of bulk-forming drugs 13. While many fear intestinal obstruction from bulk forming drugs and emphasize the importance of adequate hydration to minimize the risk, it has not been documented that this has occurred 14.
Stool softener which includes emollients and lubricants such as docusate sodium (DSS) and docusate calcium are typically taken orally, although docusate potassium can be administered rectally 15. Osmotic laxative agents increase intraluminal pressure and stimulate peristalsis. This class of drugs have many side effects like common side effects include abdominal cramping, water stools and the potential for dehydration. Examples of this class of drugs are lactulose, magnesium salts, hydroxide sodium salts, phosphate sodium potassium tartrate etc. Stimulant agents are anthraquinone derivatives (cascara sagrada, sennosides, danthron, and casanthrol) and the diphenylmethane derivatives (bisacodyl and phenolphthalein).
These agents stimulate intestinal motor function by affecting fluid and electrolyte transport 15. In 1999 the FDA ruled that danthron and phenolphthalein are unsafe and prohibited their use in the United States. The FDA also recommended that all anthraquinone laxatives (aloe, cascara sagrada, and senna) and bisacoyl be tested for carcinogenicity because of their similarity to phenolphthalein 16.
TABLE 1: DRUGS COMMONLY USED IN THE TREATMENT OF CONSTIPATION (Modified from Tack et al., 17, 18)
Laxative type | Examples | Proposed mode of action | Side effects |
Bulking forming laxatives
|
Psyllium seed husk, Methylcellulose | Luminal water binding increases stool bulk and reduces consistency | Flatulence and abdominal distension
Stool impaction (rarely) |
Softeners and
lubricants |
Sodium docusate; mineral oil | Lubricates (oil) and softens (detergent) stool (facilitates water absorption and prevents its loss) | Body develops a tolerance after long use, lipid pneumonia, malabsorption of fat-soluble vitamins, |
Osmotic laxatives | Lactulose, Sorbitol, PEG, Polycarbophil, Magnesium hydroxide
|
Luminal water binding by creating an osmotic gradient | Bloating, flatulence and Electrolyte imbalance |
Stimulant laxatives | Bisacodyl,
sodium picosulfate, Senna, aloe, cascara |
Act locally to stimulate colonic motility, decrease water absorption from large intestine | Abdominal discomfort, cramps, Offensive taste; prompt action;
|
From available literature it was found that all class of laxative agents comes with some side effects as mention in Table. 1. Hence there is urgent need to develop laxative formulation with minimum adverse side effect from natural sources. Hence present study was carried out to develop bulk-forming laxative formulation using watermelon rind powder in combination with other polysaccharides isabgol and pectin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Watermelon rind powder (WRP), pectin extra pure from S. D. Fine Ltd., Mumbai, India, isabgol husk (Sat-isabgol®) procured from local market, Mumbai, India., a market sample sold under the category of bulk forming laxative viz., FIBRIL® manufactured
by Lupin, Mumbai, India was procured from local market, Mumbai. All other chemicals used for the analysis were of analytical grade from S. D. Fine Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Preparation of WRP:
Watermelon rind were separated from watermelon and finely chopped. Dried overnight in hot air oven at 70˚C, cooled in desiccators and further milled and passed through standard mesh of 0.3-0.5 mm mesh size, This powder was packed in air tight low density polyethylene (LDPE) self sealable pouches and kept under cool and dry condition until their further applications.
Carbohydrate profiling of WRP:
WRP analyzed for water-soluble reduced sugar using DNS method 19. Percentage of starch was estimated using anthrone reagent method 20, 21. Pectin content was determined using carbazole sulphuric acid method 21. Cellulose content was determined using anthrone 21. Hemicellulose and lignin were done by gravimetric method 22, 23.
Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis (SEM):
The topography of WRP was examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, Model JSM-6380 LA from JEOL, Japan) with 20 kV acceleration voltage. Images are taken at 100X and 200X at 30 µm spot size 24.
Effect of pH on swelling index of WRP
Effect of pH on swelling was studied by adding 1gm of sample in different buffer system as pH = 1.2 (0.1 N HCl and 0.1 N NaOH), pH = 4.5 (0.1 M citrate buffer), pH = 5.8 (0.1 M phosphate buffer) and pH = 6.8 (0.1 M phosphate buffer).
Formulation of bulk forming laxative: Granules were prepared by wet granulation method using water as humectant and pectin as binder. Ten formulations were prepared by combining various concentrations of WRP, pectin and isabgol which is given in Table 2. Water was added in given formulation to form dough. This dough was sieved through 16 mesh by hand pressing. Further these granules were dried at 60˚C for 12 hr. The dried mass was again passed through 16 mesh sieve to get uniform granules and stored in self sealable pouches in desiccators till its further used 25.
TABLE 2: FORMULATIONS OF BULK FORMING LAXATIVE
Sr. No. | Formulation Code | WRP (% W/W) | Pectin
(% W/W) |
Isabgol husk
(% W/W) |
1 | WP1 | 30 | 70 | - |
2 | WP2 | 40 | 60 | - |
3 | WP3 | 50 | 50 | - |
4 | WP4 | 60 | 40 | - |
5 | WP5 | 70 | 30 | - |
6 | WPI1 | 60 | 10 | 30 |
7 | WPI2 | 50 | 10 | 40 |
8 | WPI3 | 40 | 10 | 50 |
9 | WPI4 | 30 | 10 | 60 |
10 | WPI5 | 20 | 10 | 70 |
Note: W=WRP; P= Pectin; I=Isabgol husk
Evaluation of bulk forming laxative formulation:
Evaluations of developed formulations were done on the basis of following parameters:
Bulk Density and tapped density:
For determination of bulk density, a 10 gm of the sample was filled in 100 mL measuring cylinder and the volume occupied by granules was noted.
Bulk density in gm/mL (X) = | Weight in gm |
Untapped bulk volume in mL |
For determination of the tapped density, 10 gm of sample was taken in 100 mL graduated cylinder. The cylinder was tapped till no further reduction in powder bed volume noted 26.
The tapped bulk density Y was calculated as
Tap density in gm/mL (Y) = | Weight in gm |
Tapped volume in mL |
Compressibility index:
Compressibility index was determined according to Carr’s index 27,
Carr’s index= | Tapped density (Y) - Bulk density (X) | Х 100 |
Tapped density (Y) |
Flowability:
Flowability of granules was determined according to Hausner ratio 28.
It was computed from the tapped and bulk densities as,
Hausner’s ratio = |
Tapped density (Y) |
Bulk density (X) |
Swelling Index:
Swelling index was determined according to British Pharmacopoeia; 1 gm of sample was taken in a glass measuring cylinder of 0.5 ml divisions. Different pH buffer was added as required and shaken vigorously after every 10 minutes for 1hr and then allowed to stand for 3 hr. The swelling index was calculated from the mean of three determinations 29.
Comparative study of selected formulation with Fibril® for swelling index at different pH:
Combinations of WRP and isabgol husk formulations were compared with Fibril® for pH dependant swelling index at pH 1.2, pH 4.5, pH 6 and pH 7.4. Swelling index was determined as described above in respective pH using specific buffer system.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Carbohydrate profiling of WRP:
In our previous publication, we reported the proximate composition of WRP 4. From that study we observed that WRP has very high percentage of carbohydrate 79.4 % w/w. Hence in the present paper WRP carbohydrate profiling was done. From Table 3 it can be seen that WRP contains 29.1 % w/w cellulose, 15.9 % w/w pectin and 10.9 % w/w hemicelluloses. WRP have been reported for their good water holding capacity (WHC) 14.1 g/g 4. WHC is the abilities of a material to retain water after centrifugation. Various parameters affect the water holding capacity such as surface properties, microstructure, structural property of substances and chemical composition. WHC is important property for bulk forming formulations 30.
TABLE 3: CARBOHYDRATE PROFILING OF WRP
Parameters | Water rind powder (WRP)* |
Free Reducing Sugar in water (% w/w) | 7.1 ± 0.17 |
Starch (% w/w) | 5.3 ± 0.15 |
Pectin (% w/w) | 15.9 ± 0.83 |
Cellulose (% w/w) | 29.1 ± 0.36 |
Hemicellulose (% w/w) | 10.9 ± 0.42 |
Lignin (% w/w) | 7.3 ± 0.54 |
Others (% w/w) | 3.76 |
*Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 3) and all parameters are expressed on dry weight basis
Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis (SEM):
Scanning electron microscopy revealed presence of porous structure in WRP (Fig. 1). It has been studied that porous structure helps water molecules to diffuse into the amorphous regions of the WRP matrix and break inter-molecular hydrogen bonds.
FIG. 1: SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF WATERMELON RIND POWDER A) IMAGE MAGNIFIED BY X100 B) IMAGE MAGNIFIED BY X200
Thus this allows an increase in the inter-molecular distance of the cellulose chains, which results into high swelling index value 31. Similar findings were obtained by Bristow who studied the influence of porous structure on water absorption and swelling. He described that the sorption of water into fibers as a complex diffusion process, involving vapour phase diffusion pores, surface diffusion along the fibers, and bulk diffusion through the fibrous material 32.
Effect of pH on swelling index of WRP
From Fig. 2 it was observed that as pH changed from acidic to neutral an increase in the swelling index was observed. Thus, a pH dependant swelling property of material makes it attractive for use in novel bulk forming agent which also can be used for treatment of obesity by making product target for specific pH GIT environment 33. pH dependant swelling might be due to presence of large amount of free hydroxyl groups on cellulose in WRP 34. pH depending swelling processes lead to a change in the surface composition and, therefore, the actual number of surface group’s increases. It depends on material surface dynamic where reorientations of surface group occur as function of adjusting environment. SEM of WRP shows highly porous microstructure resultant higher surface area for mobility as compared to those in the material in bulk 35.
FIG. 2: EFFECT OF pH ON SWELLING INDEX OF WATERMELON RIND POWDER (WRP) (N=3)
Evaluation of bulk forming laxative formulation:
From Table 4 Carr’s Index and Hausner’s ratio of all prepared formulation showed excellent flowability 27. Uniform particle sizes of all formulations might be the major reason for the excellent flowability as all formulations have been passed through mesh 16; generally particle size influences the powder compaction, flowability, segregation and other factors 36.
In case of bulk forming laxative formulations, granules were prepared by passing through mesh then dried and further dried granular mass were again pass through sieve therefore granular formulation have uniform size and less moisture. Due to drying and uniform particle size of all formulations attribute to excellent flowing properties.
Those flowing properties help in handling of products at large scale 37. Table 4 Shows that as pectin concentration increases from 30-70%; swelling index decreases from 12 mL/gm to 8 mL/gm respectively. Swelling index was decreased with increased pectin concentration. This might be because of the increased pectin concentration resulted into hard granules after drying. Hence, these hard granules were not able to easily disperse in the buffer solution.
As isabgol husk concentration increased from 30 to 70% swelling index was increased from 16 to 40 mL/gm respectively. The Formulation WPI3 and WPI4 may be more preferred because it had both soluble and insoluble dietary fibers in balance proportion as well as it had comparably good pH dependant swelling 38.
TABLE 4: EVALUATION OF BULK FORMING LAXATIVE FORMULATIONS
Sr. no. | Formulation Code | Bulk Density
(gm/mL) |
Tap Density
(gm/mL) |
Carr’s Index (%) | Hausner’s Ratio | Swelling Index at pH 7 (mL/gm) |
1 | WP1 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 13.3 ± 0.06 | 1.2 ± 0.01 | 8.1 ± 0.41 |
2 | WP2 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 12.5 ± 0.04 | 1.1 ± 0.03 | 8.1 ± 0.63 |
3 | WP3 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 11.8 ± 0.23 | 1.1 ± 0.03 | 8.6 ± 0.34 |
4 | WP4 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 11.8 ± 0.31 | 1.1 ± 0.02 | 12.5 ± 0.91 |
5 | WP5 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 11.1 ± 0.17 | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 12.4 ± 0.75 |
6 | WPI1 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 7.7 ± 0.09 | 1.1 ± 0.01 | 16.6 ± 0.50 |
7 | WPI2 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 8.3 ± 0.13 | 1.1 ± 0.03 | 22.5 ± 1.2 |
8 | WPI3 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 10.0 ± 0.37 | 1.1 ± 0.03 | 28.0 ± 1.1 |
9 | WPI4 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 11.1 ± 0.41 | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 36.3 ± 1.5 |
10 | WPI5 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 11.1 ± 0.28 | 1.1 ± 0.01 | 40.4 ± 2.1 |
* Values are mean ± standard deviations (n = 3); Note: W=WRP, P= Pectin, I=Isabgol husk
Comparative study of selected formulation with Fibril® for swelling index at different pH:
Four formulations were compared for pH dependant swelling index against market sample Fibril®. From Fig. 3 showed a combination of WRP and isabgol husk worked better therefore these formulations were compared with Fibril® for pH dependant swelling index. It was found that prepared formulation had pH dependant swelling index. At acidic pH the swelling observed was less compared to neutral pH. The pH dependant swelling may reduce the stomach paining, feeling of unconscious and vomiting as it has less swelling index in stomach where as high swelling index in small and large intestine 39. Site specific action could be achieved using formulation WPI3 and WPI4. Formulation WPI3 has swelling index 16 mL/gm in acidic pH 1.3 and higher swelling toward neutral pH. Same in case of WPI4 have low swelling index at acidic and high swelling index toward neutral pH. Hence those formulations might minimize the adverse effect occur due to sudden swelling of bulk laxative formulation in stomach 39.
FIG. 3: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SELECTED FORMULATION WITH MARKETED FORMULATION FOR SWELLING INDEX AT DIFFERENT pH (n=3)
CONCLUSIONS: Granular formulation prepared using WRP and isabgol husk was shown pH dependant swelling property. The prepared formulation was beneficial over Fibril® as this formulation may help in decreasing the intensity of adverse effect like stomach pain, feeling of unconscious and vomiting. WRP was majorly composed of polysaccharides and having micro porous structure resultant high water holding capacity and high swelling index. This work is exploring functional properties of WRP and its novel application in bulk forming laxative formulation. Since formulation was devoid of any constituent who stimulates the intestinal peristalsis and only acts by its bulk forming property, it is suitable for people suffering from habitual constipation. The bulk forming laxative prepared from WRP and isabgol were found to be better as compared with market sample (Fibril®). WRP can also be used in innovative product such as hypoglycemic and anti-obesity product as it contains high percentage of soluble and insoluble fibers.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors would like acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India for their financial support.
REFERENCES:
- Reddy NA, Lakshmipathy R and Sardar NC: Application of Citrullus lanatus rind as biosorbent for removal of trivalent chromium from aqueous solution. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2014; 53(1):969-975.
- Veeranjaneya L, Kumar YH, Anjaneya LP and Sarathi OV: Wine production by novel yeast biocatalyst prepared by immobilization on watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris) rind pieces and characterization of volatile compounds. Process Biochemistry 2008; 43:748-752.
- Mort A, Zheng Y, Qiu F, Nimtzc M and Bell-Eunice G: Structure of xylogalacturonan fragments from watermelon cell-wall pectin, endopolygalacturonase can accommodate a xylosyl residue on the galacturonic acid just following the hydrolysis site. Carbohydrate Research 2008; 343:1212-1221.
- Waghmare AG and Arya SS: Use of fruit by-products in the preparation of hypoglycemic Thepla: Indian unleavened vegetable flat bread. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2014; 38:1198-1206.
- Liu Cong, Ngo Huu Hao, Guo Wenshan and Kuo-Lun Tung: Optimal conditions for preparation of banana peels, sugarcane bagasse and watermelon rind in removing copper from water. Bioresource Technology 2012; 119:349-354.
- Odewunmi NA, Umoren SA and Gasem ZM: Utilization of watermelon rind extract as a green corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in acidic media. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2014; 21:239-247.
- Al-Sayed HMA and Ahmed AR: Utilization of watermelon rinds and sharlyn melon peels as a natural source of dietary fiber and antioxidants in cake. Annals of Agricultural Science 2013; 58(1):83-95.
- Maran PJ, Sivakumar V, Thirugnanasambandham K and Sridhar R: Microwave assisted extraction of pectin from waste Citrullus lanatus fruit rinds. Carbohydrate Polymers 2014; 101:786-791.
- Whorton J: Civilisation and the colon: constipation as the disease of diseases. British Medical Journal 2000; 321(7276):1586-1589.
- Warnberg J, Marcos A, Bueno G and Moreno LA: Functional benefits of psyllium fiber supplementation, Current Topics in Nutraceutical Research 2009; 7(2).
- Economou DC: Bowel management: constipation, diarrhea, obstruction, and ascites. Textbook of palliative nursing, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
- Schiller LR: Review article: the therapy of constipation. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2001; 15:749-763.
- Costilla VC and Foxx-Orenstein AE: Constipation: Understanding Mechanisms and Management. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 2014; 30(1):107-115.
- Emmanuel AV, Tack J, Quigley EM and Talley NJ: Pharmacological management of constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21:41-54.
- Tedesco FJ and Dipiro JT: Laxative use in constipation. American Journal of Gastroenterology 1985; 80:303-309.
- Food and Drug Administration. Laxative drug products for over the counter human use. Federal Register 1999; 64:4535-4540.
- Tack JS, Ller-Lissner MV, Boeckxstaens SG, Kamm MA, Simren MJ, Galmiche P and Fried M: Diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation a European perspective. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23:697-710.
- Pierre GL: Preventing constipation: a review of the laxative potential of food ingredients. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2013; 48:445-467.
- Miller GL: Use of DNS reagent for the determination of glucose. Analytical Chemistry 1972; 31:426-428.
- Hodge JE and Hofreiter BT: In: Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Whistler, 1962.
- Thayumanavan B and Sadasivam S: Quality of Plant Foods Human and Nutrition 1984; 34:253.
- Sadasivam S and Manikam A: Biochemical Methods 2nd ed. Chemistry and allied sciences books of new age international limited (New Delhi, India). 2005; ISBN 8122409768, 9788122409765.
- Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA: Method for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74:3583-3597.
- Bismarck A, Aranberri-Askargorta I, Springer J, Lampke T, Wielage B, Stamboulis A, Shenderovich I and Limbach HH: Surface characterization of flax, hemp and cellulose fibers; Surface properties and the water uptake behavior. Polymer Composite 2002; 23: 872–894.
- Yunxia B, Yonezawa Y and Sunada H: Rapidly Disintegrating Tablets Prepared by the Wet Compression Method: Mechanism and Optimization. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 1999; 88(10):1004-1010.
- Gohel MC, Jogani PD and Bariya SH: Development of Agglomerated Directly Compressible Diluent’s consisting of brittle and ductile materials 2003; 8(2):143-151.
- Carr RL: Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chemical Engineering 1965; 72:163-168.
- Abdullah EC, Salam AM and Aziz AR: Cohesiveness and flowability properties of silica gel powder. Physics International 2010; 1(1):16-21.
- British Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia Commission Lab. I, 2003.
- Fuentes-Alventosa JM, Gutierrez RG, Jaramillo-Carmona S, Espejo-Calvo JA, Rodriguez-Arcos R and Andez-Bolanos FJ: Effect of extraction method on chemical composition and functional characteristics of high dietary fibre powders obtained from asparagus by-products. Food Chemistry 2009; 119:665-671.
- Martina B, Stefan S, Michal J, Lucia K and Milan V: Monitoring of kraft pulps swelling in water. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 2013; 47(1-2):95-102.
- Bristow JA: The swelling of paper during short time intervals. Svensk Papperstidn. 1971; 74(20):645–652.
- Sannino A, Demitri C and Madaghiele M: Biodegradable Cellulose-based Hydrogels: Design and Applications. Materials 2009; 2:353-373.
- Peppas NA: Development of disintegration forces during water penetration in porous pharmaceutical system. Journal of Control Release 1989; 10:245-250.
- Bismarck A, Aranberri-Askargorta I, Springer J, Lampke T, Wielage B, Stamboulis A, Shenderovich I and Limbach HH: Surface characterization of flax, hemp and cellulose fibers; Surface properties and the water uptake behavior. Polymer Composite 2002; 23:872–894.
- Fitzpatrick JJ: Particle properties and the design of solid food particle processing operations. Food and Bioproducts Processing 2007; 85:308–314.
- Davor J: Assessment of powder flow characteristics in incoherent soup concentrates. Advanced Powder Technology 2012; 23(5):620–631.
- Emilia BH, Emilia GV and Rafael CC: Study of the swelling capacity of a mild laxative formulation, Pharmaceutics Acta Helvetiae 1997; 72:75-80.
- Mali SP, Sarungun S, Gupte RV, Deshpande JV and Ranbhan KJ: Synyhetic bulk laxative. United state patent, Patent No. US 6969511 B1, 2005.
How to cite this article:
Waghmare AG, Patil SU and Arya SS: Novel Bulk Forming Laxative from Watermelon Rind. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2015; 6(9): 3877-84.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(9).3877-84.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
26
3877-84
480
2996
English
Ijpsr
Ashish G. Waghmare, Sonal U. Patil and Shalini S. Arya*
Food Engineering and Technology Department, Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
shalu.ghodke@gmail.com
09 February, 2015
21 March, 2015
05 June, 2015
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(9).3877-84
01 September, 2015