OPTIMIZATION, CHARACTERIZATION AND PHARMACOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF BERBERINE LOADED NANOPARTICLES – AN APPROACH TO IMPROVE THE EFFICACY OF ANTICONVULSANT AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY
HTML Full TextOPTIMIZATION, CHARACTERIZATION AND PHARMACOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF BERBERINE LOADED NANOPARTICLES - AN APPROACH TO IMPROVE THE EFFICACY OF ANTICONVULSANT AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY
Chitra Karthikeyini *, K. Kavitha and P. S. S. Ramkumar
Department of Pharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacognosy, Ultra College of Pharmacy, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
ABSTRACT: Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid that has better anticonvulsant and antioxidant activities, results in less efficacy due to poor solubility, poor permeability, poor stability and poor drug delivery to the brain. Hence, this study aim at improving Anticonvulsant and Antioxidant activities of Berberine by formulating nanoparticles with three-factor two-level boxbehnken with design expert software 6.1. In this study, the particle size and drug release percentage were considered as dependent variables, whereas the concentration of HPMC, PEG and Sonication time was considered as independent variables. Similarly, sodium caprate was separately optimized by Franz diffusion study to enhance the permeability, and thus nanoparticles were formulated with solvent evaporation method. Prepared nanoparticles were characterized and evaluated. FTIR, DSC and the Computer-based drug interaction revealed that drug encapsulated with HPMC and PEG was compatible with each other. Developed nanoparticles were found to be below 500nm. Zeta potential of nanoparticles was -35.9mV which indicated that the nanoparticles were stable; MES study, Rotarod study, and biochemical study results revealed that the anticonvulsant activity and antioxidant activity were improved in the optimized nanoparticles rather than the pure drug. Thus the overall result showed that the optimized nanoparticles act as a better candidate with improved efficacy.
Keywords: Berberine, Antioxidant, Anticonvulsant, BoxBehnken, Nanoparticles
INTRODUCTION:
Research Background: Berberine is an isoquinoline alkaloid obtained from Chinese herbs Hydrastis Canadensis and captis chinesis 1, 2. It is a promising candidate to exert a boosting antiepileptic effect.
This alkaloid that could be found in many citrus fruits such as grapefruit, berries, peaches, etc., has various pharmacological activities 3. Various researches had described its neuroprotectivity and antioxidant activities 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
Berberine exerts the activities (antioxidant and neuroprotectivity) via: free radical scavenging and lipid peroxidation inhibition, nitric oxide modulation, potassium channel restriction, and NMDAR (also known as: “NMDA receptor” or “N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor”) channel current inhibition in the brain 11. Though Berberine owns antioxidant 10 and anticonvulsant activities, it does not exert its full potency in the brain due to its poor permeability, poor solubility, and poor stability 12.
Apart from the above-mentioned factors, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is another restricting factor that also prevents the entry of ‘Neuro drugs’ to the brain 13. Since delivering the Berberine drug is also considered a challenging process, this research has been designed in such a manner that aims at improving the antioxidant and anti-convulsant activity. To achieve the proposed aim, ‘Nanotechnology’ was adopted with incorporation of Solubility and Permeability enhancement approaches. Since, Nanotechnology is a unique drug delivery system to the brain 14, 15 ‘Solvent Evaporation’ with ‘Probe Sonication’ method was employed to produce the nanoparticles. Nanoparticles were then optimized for the experiment by utilizing the 3-factor 2-level of “Box-Behnken,” a unique statistical model. Similarly, to evaluate the outcome of the independent process components (i.e., Sonication time (C), PEG concentration (B), and HPMC concentration (A)) against the responses (such as: In-vitro release and particle size in nm) BBD-based optimization process was engaged. Lastly, the optimized formulations were chosen via plotting through methods like contour plots and 3D-response surface plots.
PEG and Sodium caprate were used as solubility and permeability enhancers. Sodium caprate increased the bioavailability by opening the tight junctions of BBB through contraction of the calmodulin-dependent actin and cadherin endocytosis 16 - 18. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose that has biocompatible and biodegradable property helps to design the controlled-release dosage-forms and the drug is often released by diffusion 19, 20. PEG, along with HPMC, enhances the bioavailability of Berberine by prolonging the in-vivo circulation period 21. MES study and Rotarod study helps to know the efficacy of anticonvulsant activity, whereas the antioxidant activity is confirmed through the estimation of oxidative parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Research Methodology:
Design: Current experimentation study adapts experimental research as its design since the researcher makes use of laboratory experiments towards exploring the effects and causes of the drugs utilized.
Research Approach: Quantitative approach has been utilized by the researcher; since the study is based on exploration techniques, quantitative study would be the suitable approach.
Sampling:
- Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose was obtained from Medopharm, Chennai (India), at free of cost.
- Berberine Chloride and Sodium Caprate were procured via Sigma Chemical-Co.in USA.
- PEG 6000 was procured as a sample gift from Matrix (India).
- Ethanol and Methanol were procured through Merck in India.
Other reagents (Analytical grade) were purchased from SD Fine chem (Bangalore).
Experimental Section: In this section, various analyses/ studies that had been conducted for the study will be elaborately explained. The analyses such as: pre-formulation study, permeability study, formulation of Berberine Nanoparticles would be explained under the section for better clarification and understanding.
Pre-formulation Study: Generally, basic studies like solubility study, permeability study, formulation of particles/ nanoparticles, evaluation studies, etc. would be focused under the experimental section. Since the study analyses the Berberine nanoparticles, permeability study (egg membrane preparation), formulation of Berberine nanoparticles, and other relevant analyses would be studied.
Permeability Study: 22 Egg membrane Preparation: Egg membrane preparation process was carried out by immersing and soaking the egg with 0.1NHCl over a night (whole night); later, the membrane of the egg was completely peeled off for the permeability test. Permeability study was carried out to optimize the concentration of permeability enhancer with Franz diffusion cells at 37°C. Once the egg membrane has been equilibrated with phosphate buffer (6.8) it was mounted between donor and receptor cells. On the other hand Donor cell Sodium caprate and Berberine were taken in different ratios (1:0.2, 1:0.4, 1:0.8, and 1:1) one after the other with 2ml of Phosphate buffer; whereas PBS filled receptor compartments were then stirred by the magnetic bar (coated bar). The processed samples were then taken from the receptor compartments at predetermined time intervals and replaced with the same volume of phosphate buffer. The maximum permeated drug was estimated at 345nm with Shimadzu UV-1800 Visible Spectrophotometer.
Experimental Design: According to the DOE (i.e., design of experiments) principles, the methodology utilizes various kinds of experimental models, response mapping, and generating mathematical relationships of polynomials. The study also adapts BBD, which is considered as one of the most efficient DOE methods 23.
The model of non-linear quadratic is generated as:
Yo = bo + b1X1 + b2X2 + b3X3 + b12X1X2 + b13X1X3 + b23X2X3+b11X2 1 + b22X2 2 + b33X23
(Where the variables: ‘b0’= an intercept; ‘Yo’= dependent; ‘b1’ to ‘b33’= regression coefficients, that are calculated from the ‘examined experimental values’ of ‘Y’; X1, X2, X3 =independent variables’ coded levels. Similarly, the terms X1, X2 and Xi (i = 1, 2 or 3) represents quadratic terms and the interactions, respectively)
Quadratic model of response surface was carried out towards the formulation variables’ optimization in which the design consisted of two stages (high and low); similarly to optimize the selected variables of independent formulation (i.e. (a) polymer concentration as X1; (b) concentration of PEG as X2 and (c) Sonication time as X3) a total of 17 runs were carried out (refer Table 1). The outcomes of the factors were observed with the values of PS and Y1 (particle size) where the Y2 (in-vitro releases) are the variables of formulation responses. To analyze the diagrammatic depiction of the response values, ‘Contour plots’ and ‘three-dimensional (3D) graph’ of response surface were also generated, which acts as a supportive representation in elucidating the association in-between: the variables (dependent and independent) and the responses.
TABLE 1: RESPONSE SURFACE QUADRATIC MODEL – BOX BEHNKEN DESIGN
Runs | Concentration of HPMC as Factor 1 (A) | Concentration of PEG as Factor 2 (B) | Sonication timeas Factor 3 (C) | Particle size (in nm) as Response1 | In-vitro release (in %) as Response2 |
1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 60 | 752 | 75.1 |
2 | 0.88 | 1 | 60 | 998.8 | 76.1 |
3 | 0.5 | 1 | 90 | 961.7 | 72.3 |
4 | 0.88 | 1 | 60 | 998.8 | 76.1 |
5 | 1.25 | 1 | 30 | 804.7 | 89.1 |
6 | 0.88 | 1 | 60 | 998.8 | 76.1 |
7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 60 | 998.8 | 70.3 |
8 | 1.25 | 0.5 | 60 | 567 | 82.7 |
9 | 0.88 | 1.5 | 30 | 1676 | 78.2 |
10 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 60 | 471 | 98.5 |
11 | 0.88 | 0.5 | 30 | 1045 | 74.8 |
12 | 1.25 | 1 | 90 | 459.6 | 96.2 |
13 | 0.88 | 1.5 | 90 | 961 | 81 |
14 | 0.5 | 1 | 30 | 1676 | 70.6 |
15 | 0.88 | 1 | 60 | 998.8 | 76.1 |
16 | 0.88 | 0.5 | 90 | 892.4 | 74.3 |
17 | 0.88 | 1 | 60 | 998.8 | 76.1 |
Factor | Name | Units | Type | Low Actual | High Actual | Low
Coded |
High
Coded |
A | Concentration of HPMC | mg | Numeric | 0.5 | 1.25 | -1 | 1 |
B | Concentration of PEG | mg | Numeric | 0.5 | 1.50 | -1 | 1 |
C | Sonication time | sec | Numeric | 30 | 90 | -1 | 1 |
Statistical Analysis: The experimental designs’ statistical relationship of the independent variables and dependant variables were adopted by utilizing the Software’s design and expert version 6.1. (State-Ease Inc). The fit-quality (the experimental data) from the polynomial equation model was articulated by the coefficients of adjusted R2and determination R2.
Contrarily, ANOVA (analysis of variance) was adopted for analysis where each coefficient significance term along with lack of fit via the suggested model is evaluated through F-value and p-value with a confidence level of 95%.
Statistical Optimization: After statistically analyzing the data through experimental design, a statistical-based arithmetical optimization was adopted by applying D (desirability function) that eventually transforms the response values into 1 and 0; where 0 = response’s non-acceptable value and 1 = values of ideal target 24. Finally, optimization was exemplified through graphs/ plots (contour and 3D response surface) portraying the target areas and desirability fractions.
Preparation of Berberine Nanoparticles: By making use of the selected optimized independent variables, Berberine nanoparticles were prepared by solvent evaporation method 25. Initially, accurately weighed quantities of Berberine were dissolved in ethanol, which later was added to aqueous-HPMC, PEG6000, and sodium caprate solution and kept in magnetic stirrer until its mixed thoroughly into a uniform mixture. The resultant mixture was placed in a rotary evaporator at a speed of 80rpm at 60 ºC. Then it was subjected to probe sonication and centrifugation at 10,000rpm for 15 min. The resultant sediment was then dried and refined (i.e. it contains Berberine nanoparticles).
Evaluation Studies: In this section, various Spectroscopic studies and other analyses, like UV Spectroscopy, FTIR spectrum studies, SEM analysis, etc would be focused on attaining accurate solutions.
Spectroscopic Studies:
UV Spectroscopy (Determination of λmax): Berberine stock solution was prepared with methanol. Dilutions were made with methanol at the concentration level of 10mcg/ml. At the range of 200-400nm the UV spectrum was recorded by using a Shimadzu spectrophotometer.
Standard Calibration Curve of Berberine: Accurately weighed Berberine (50mg) was liquefied in 50ml methanol. The dilutions were made between the range 10-50μg/ml and the maximum absorbance level was observed at 345nm. Absorbance values of the Y-axis were plotted alongside the concentration of the X-axis.
FTIR Spectrum: FTIR studies were conducted on the Berberine (pure drug) and its nanoparticles in order to help to confirm the significant interaction of the drugs Berberine and HPMC. The FTIR spectrums of pure Berberine and nanoparticles were then recorded by Shimadzu Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1800). On the contrary, the KBr disks were formulated by compressing the powders at 5tons of pressure for about 5 minutes in a hydraulic press. Major readings of the spectrum were attained in between 400-4000/cm.
SEM Analysis: The diluted Berberine nanoparticles were examined under a Scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, model EVO 18) to study the complete morphological classification. The nanoparticles were then attached at the top of the SEM aluminium stubs with the carbon-tape and then it was coated with gold by utilizing a sputter oater (Electron Microscopy Sciences; 550X model). The Berberine nanoparticles were collected in the expansion chamber, and the SEM images of different regions were obtained and examined. The process was carried out at a high vacuum range of 300mTorr, and the whole SEM analysis was carried out at 10kv (i.e., an accelerating voltage).
Evaluation of Particle Size and Zeta Potential: Malvern Zetasizer determined the zeta potential of Berberine nanoparticles by utilizing the Mastersizer-2000 method (Malvern in the UK) of laser-light scattering. Later on, the sonication process through diluted nanoparticles of 1ml was accurately conducted for roughly 30sec and positioned cautiously in the Mastersizer cell. Thus particle size along with zeta potential was obtained.
Analysis of DSC Thermograms: DSC analysis process through Q-2000 DSC instrument (TA Instruments in USA) was carried out. Dry Nitrogen purged DSC cell (at 50ml/min) was then weighed and sampled (3 -5 mg) so that it could be placed in a standard aluminium pan at 25-300 °C as its temperature with 10°C/min as its heating rate. Thermograms of Berberine pure drug and nanoparticles were then recorded based upon the sample’s melting point 26.
Computer-Based Drug Interaction Study: The interaction studies between the drug and polymer was carried out at BIOVIA discovery studio of 2017 platform. The Berberine (cid: 2353) and polymer HPMC (cid: 57503849) were gathered from the Pub-chem database. Initially, grids are produced around the polymer at the determined coordinates of Z (-0.0842), Y (3.542), and X (1.152); Berberine drug is then docked around the polymer; finally, the steady complex will be obtained and saved for the purpose of interaction analysis. The CHARM-based algorithm is an effective technique for analyzing the interaction between the drug complex and the polymer, and hence it is utilized here.
Determination of Drug Loading & Encapsulation Efficiency (% EE): Obtained Berberine nanoparticles were then centrifuged at the range of 10000rpm for about 15minutes towards separating the un-entrapped drugs. Free drugs presented in the supernatant were then examined and determined by utilizing the UV-spectrophotometer. Methanol was utilized for the necessary dilution process, and the solution was then filtered where the absorbance rate was measured at 345nm.
The drug content was calculated from the standard curve:
% Drug entrapment = calculated drug concentration (Ctotal – Cfree) × 100 / Theoretical drug concentration (Ctotal)
% Drug loading = Total Drug Weight × 100 / Total Nanoparticles weight
Study on in-vitro Dissolution: Test-apparatus of paddle-type (Labinda, Disso) dissolution was adopted in the in-vitro dissolution analysis. In the selected dissolution chamber, accurately 900ml of dissolution media (0.1 NHCl of 1.2pH and Phosphate buffer pH 6.8) was taken and sustained at 37°C±0.5°C. The obtained samples were inhibited at predestined times, up to 24 h. Contrarily, equal sum of buffer was substituted and the obtained samples were filtered, and the resulted dilution was processed in 10mcg/ml concentration; finally, the drug release was estimated at 345nm by Spectrophotometric method 27.
Drug Release Kinetics: To establish the drug release, various kinetic methods such-as: first order, zero order, etc. were adapted from the study of Higuchi, and also the Korsmeyer-Peppas equations were obtained too. The percent release was plotted against time to get in-vitro release plots similarly, the log percent remaining was plotted against time to get first order plot; additionally, the percent release was plotted beside the times’ square-root towards attaining Higuchi plot. The % log cumulative of the drug release was marked along the log time (in hrs) towards attaining the Korsmeyer-Peppas plot.
Pharmacological Investigation:
Studies on Acute Toxicity: Acute toxicity analysis was executed towards ascertaining a safer dosage of Berberine nanoparticles. For experimental and investigation purposes, healthy Wistar albino rats were chosen with the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee’s approval (IAEC/CHITRA KARTHIKEYINI.S/AU/1524559770/Ph.D/KMCP/40/2018) that was obtained exclusively for the use of experimentation on live animals and the study’s design. Berberine nanoparticles were carefully suspended under administered doses, such as 5, 50, 300, and 2000mg/kg. The control group received an equal volume of vehicles, and the observations were recorded systematically and continuously as per the OECD guideline 423. The animals were then monitored for 14 continuous days, and the toxicological effect was estimated on the source of mortality.
Evaluation of Anticonvulsant Activity by MES Study: 28 Groups of 4 rats (i.e., 6-Wistar albino rats – male) of 150 to 180g were utilized for the experimentations.
Group-A received the vehicle, Group-B received Phenytoin 25 mg/kg as a standard; Group C1 and C2 received pure Berberine 25mg/kg and Berberine nanoparticles 5 mg/kg, respectively. The test was officially initiated after the oral treatment (i.e., an hour from oral treatment) with nanoparticles or the vehicle. The intensity of the stimulus 45mA, 50Hz for 0.2s was applied by pinna electrodes. The test animals/subjects were closely observed for 2 min; subsequently, the tonic hindlimb extensor’s (THLE) onset and period were calculated. Finally, the convulsion inhibition % was calculated.
Rota Rod for Muscle Coordination: 29 Four groups of 6 rats respectively were taken for the study, and they were vigorously trained for a week for about 15minutes/day on Rota-rod. The test animals were finally evaluated towards analyzing the motor coordination with time intervals of 30mins and 60mins; right after the primary initiation of the drugs (standard and test). When each subject falls off the Rotarod experiment for the very first time, it would be noted along with the consecutive occasions of falls, during the period of 5mins test; it would be considered toxic when the subjects fall off the Rotarod approximately thrice or more.
Biochemical Estimation:
Tissue Preparation: Animals were extremely anesthetized with chloral hydrate - 10% for 350mg/kg, intraperitoneally and executed by instant decapitating. Subject’s brains were swiftly dissected for removal of cortex region towards determining the activities of MDA, SOD, GSH, and CAT. Samples of the brain were later weighed and stored at -70°C, prior to the thorough analyses. Samples of each brain were homogenized with phosphate buffer pH 7.4.
Estimation of Glutathione Reductase (GRD): 30 Glutathione reductase was assayed based on decreases in absorbance caused by oxidation of NADPH. 1unit of enzyme activity is articulated as nmoles (i.e. Nanomoles) of oxidized NADPH per min/mg of protein.
Enzyme activity (M / min / ml) = A340 / min X Vt / Ɛ XdX Vs
Lipid Peroxidase (LPO) Estimation: 31 TBARS method was used to determine the level of lipid peroxide. The lipid peroxide levels were articulated as nmoles of wet tissue through the MDA released/g.
The concentration of MDA = Absorbance at 532nm / L x Ɛ × D
Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Estimation: 32 The SOD activity analysis is particularly based upon the SOD ability towards inhibiting the alkaline pH via epinephrine auto-oxidation. 1unit of SOD is considered as the necessary amount of required enzyme towards producing 50% of epinephrine auto-oxidation inhibition.
Calculation:
% Inhibition = ΔA480nm / min Uninhibited – ΔA480nm / min inhibition / ΔA480nm / min Uninhibited - ΔA480nm / min Black × 100
Estimation of Catalase (CAT): 33 The level of catalase was estimated on the basis of the disappearance of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which was measured spectro-photometrically at 240nm. Catalase activity was later articulated through units/mg of protein.
K = Vt / Vs × 2.3 / Δt × Log A1 / A2 × 60
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Pre-formulation Study: Under this section, a group of various and relevant studies was carried out to validate the experiments and the findings gathered through the study.
Permeability Study: Permeability study was separately carried out with Franz diffusion cell to optimize the permeability enhancer (sodium caprate) concentration. The resulted data proved that 1% sodium caprate increases the permeability of Berberine. Thus the optimized concentration of sodium caprate that was added during the preparation of nanoparticles was optimized by boxbehnken method.
Optimization of Process Variables of Berberine Nanoparticles: On the basis of RSM box Behnken 17 formulations were prepared, and responses were evaluated for the three-factor two response set-up. Table 1 shows the result for all the batches of Berberine nanoparticles that were evaluated for the release of in-vitro and the size of particles. Results that were obtained with wide variation clearly confirmed that chosen dependant variables were closely relying upon the chosen independent variables. The mathematical relationship for responses particle size (Y1) and in-vitro release (Y2) is presented through the polynomial equation where A, B, and C represent HPMC concentration, PEG concentration, and Sonication time. The synergistic effect is indicated through positive value, whereas the antagonistic effect is indicated through negative value. Fig. 1 depicts the relationship of parameters depicted in the three-dimensional graph forms.
The ANOVA was built entirely, and similarly, the p-value, R-value, and R2-value were obtained too. A small value of “Prob>F” (p-value less than 0.05) explains a considerable model upon the response. Since the p-value is below 0.05, the quadratic model is suggested. Predicted R2 and adjusted R2 lies within 0.2 with each other, which indicates that the selected model was significant. The adjusted R2 is the amount of variation around the mean.
An evaluation was carried out towards analyzing the correlation of the data (i.e., predicted versus experimental of particle-size responses and in-vitro release) Fig. 1. As per the acquired information, the well-distributed data points were extremely near towards a straight line of R2 (value of 0.8890, 0.9744) that in turn recommended an exceptional association between values of predicted and experimental responses; similarly,, the primary suppositions of the above-mentioned analysis was thus appropriate. The outcomes thus indicate that the preferred quadratic model was adequate in presuming the variable’s response of experimental data.
Model Sufficiency: A diagnostic plot was obtained between the predicted and experimental value that in turn aided to predict the model suitability. Fig. 1 shows the actual versus predicted plots for in-vitro release and particle size, and the points that are closer to the diagonal line clearly show the model fits the experimental data.
Effect of Process Parameters on Responses: 3D surface plots were represented, and the optimum concentration was established by examining the independent variables' response’s effects.
Effect of Process Parameters on Particle Size: Uniform spherical size plays an important role in nanoparticles drug release. Accordingly, the factors such as minimum size and spherical shape were considered as a primary aim of this optimization study.
Based on the multiple linear regression analysis, Y1 equation goes as:
Particle size = +998.80-260.77* A+44.60* B-240.88*C-234.85*A2-66.75* B2+211.55* C2+37.70*A*B+92.30*A*C-140.60*B*C
Table 2 shows the summary of ANOVA for comparison of the three independent parameters on particle size. The particle size ranges from 459.60nm to 1676nm and "Model F-Value" as this large might result from noise with 1.24% possibility. "Prob>F" values that are lesser than 0.0500 are normally considered as significant model terms. Here, the significant model terms are: A, C, A2 and C2 Regression coefficient was 0.8890. The predicted regression coefficient shows logical agreement towards the variable of adjusted R2. Basically, a ratio with a greater value of 4 is desired, and as the obtained ratio was 9.496, it specifies a sufficient signal that the adapted model could be utilized towards navigating a design space.
TABLE 2: ANOVA - QUADRATIC MODEL (RESPONSE SURFACE) – PARTICLE SIZE
Source | Sum of Squares | DF | Mean Squares | F-Value | Prob>F | |
Model | 1.56E+06 | 9 | 1.74E+05 | 6.23 | 0.0124 | significant |
A | 5.44E+05 | 1 | 5.44E+05 | 19.53 | 0.0031 | |
B | 15913.28 | 1 | 15913.28 | 0.57 | 0.4744 | |
C | 4.64E+05 | 1 | 4.64E+05 | 16.66 | 0.0047 | |
A2 | 2.32E+05 | 1 | 2.32E+05 | 8.34 | 0.0234 | |
B2 | 18760.26 | 1 | 18760.26 | 0.67 | 0.4389 | |
C2 | 1.88E+05 | 1 | 1.88E+05 | 6.77 | 0.0354 | |
AB | 5685.16 | 1 | 5685.16 | 0.2 | 0.6651 | |
AC | 34077.16 | 1 | 34077.16 | 1.22 | 0.3052 | |
BC | 79073.44 | 1 | 79073.44 | 2.84 | 0.1359 | |
Residual | 1.95E+05 | 7 | 27853.17 | |||
Lack of Fit | 1.95E+05 | 3 | 64990.72 | |||
Pure error | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||
Cor Total | 1.76E+06 | 16 |
However, the Nanoparticles prepared with a low concentration of polymer were rough and irregular in shape due to poor encapsulation. Fig. 1 shows the complete encapsulation of spherical morpho-logy found with medium concentration; also, larger diameter nanoparticles were found with a higher concentration of polymer.
FIG. 1(A): PREDICTED VS ACTUAL GRAPH FOR PARTICLE SIZE AND IN-VITRO RELEASE
FIG. 1(B): 3-D RESPONSE GRAPH OF PARAMETERS ON IN-VITRO RELEASE AND PARTICLE SIZE
In-vitro Release Effects: Drug release is quite important in a dependent variable that has been chosen for optimization in this analysis. As observed, the obtained response increased when the solubility increased; thus, it has been identified through a response that increasing the concentration of variable PEG (B) has a positive outcome upon the release of drugs. Whereas the variables A & C are inversely proportional to the response and have a negative effect on the release, thus favouring the controlled and prolonged releases. The numerical association as a polynomial equation for Y2 (drug release) is:
In-vitro release (Y2) = +76.10+9.78*A+3.84*B+1.39*C+ 5.26*A2+0.29*B2+0.69*C2+2.75*A*B+1.35 * A * C+0.83 *B*C
As per the ANOVA study, the obtained values were elucidated. The % release ranged from 70.30 to 98.5%. F-value (33.64) thus indicates that adopted model is considerable; similarly, a "Model F-Value" as this large might result from noise with 0.01% possibility. "Prob>F" values that are lesser than 0.0500 are normally considered as significant model terms. On-other-hand coefficient R2’s value (0.9774) represents the appropriate adjustment of the recommended model towards the investigational data as a high inevitability; thus A, B, A2, and AB are accepted as important models. As mentioned earlier, a ratio greater than 4 is commonly desired, and since the obtained ratio was 18.971, it signifies an ample signal that implemented model could be utilized towards navigating the design space. Mathematical optimization was conducted following the statistical analysis towards all the responses aiming at selecting the most optimum formulation for preparation of Berberine nanoparticles, with the desired response by using the desirability approach. A constraint to increase the In-vitro release and minimize the size of the nanoparticles was selected; the independent variables were optimized by using design expert 6.1, based on the desirability.
Table 3 shows the summary of ANOVA for comparison of all three parameters on the in-vitro release. The selected optimum-process variables for preparation of optimized nanoparticles were: A of 1.06mg, B of 1.18mg, C of 50.27sec, and optimized nanoparticles were evaluated for: nm of particle sizes and % of in-vitro releases. Predicted outcomes of the variables, particle size with 995.28nm and in-vitro releases with 76.23%, were noted before experimentation. Later, the experimentation results showed that the in-vitro release was 98.5% and particle size was 471nm, respectively.
TABLE 3: ANOVA - QUADRATIC MODEL: RESPONSE SURFACE - IN-VITRO RELEASE
Source | Sum of Squares | DF | Mean Squares | F-Value | Prob>F | |
Model | 1060.03 | 9 | 117.78 | 33.64 | < 0.0001 | significant |
A | 764.41 | 1 | 764.41 | 218.33 | < 0.0001 | |
B | 117.81 | 1 | 117.81 | 33.65 | 0.0007 | |
C | 15.4 | 1 | 15.4 | 4.4 | 0.0742 | |
A2 | 116.61 | 1 | 116.61 | 33.31 | 0.0007 | |
B2 | 0.35 | 1 | 0.35 | 0.099 | 0.7617 | |
C2 | 1.99 | 1 | 1.99 | 0.57 | 0.4755 | |
AB | 30.25 | 1 | 30.25 | 8.64 | 0.0217 | |
AC | 7.29 | 1 | 7.29 | 2.08 | 0.1922 | |
BC | 2.72 | 1 | 2.72 | 0.78 | 0.4071 | |
Residual | 24.51 | 7 | 3.5 | |||
Lack of Fit | 24.51 | 3 | 8.17 | |||
Pure error | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||
Cor Total | 1084.54 | 16 |
FTIR Study: FTIR spectrums study was conducted upon the pure Berberine and its nanoparticles. The absorption bands were found at a wavenumber of 3540.02cm-1, 1442.75cm-1, 1274.95cm-1, 422.41cm-1 in the spectrum where Berberine was missing in Berberine nanoparticles. At the peak, 1731.6cm-1, 2912.95cm-1, and 2848.35cm-1 in FTIR spectrum, the Berberine nanoparticles represent the carbonyl c=o, stretching of the PEG methyl and propyl group of HPMC. Thus it has been demonstrated that the drug was encapsulated by HPMC, and there was no significant interaction between the drug and carriers (refer Fig. 2a).
DSC Study: Thermal analysis DSC study was also carried out on pure drugs and their nanoparticles. Characteristic Endothermic peak of Berberine was noted at 199°C, which was on the contrary not present in Nanoparticles. Thus the disappearance of peak clearly proved that Berberine drug was encapsulated by HPMC (refer Fig. 2b).
FIG. 2A: FTIR GRAPH OF BERBERINE, HPMC AND BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES
FIG. 2B: DSC GRAPH OF BERBERINE, HPMC AND BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES
Zeta Potential and Particle Size: Average particle size of optimized Berberine nanoparticles was 471nm, and the Particle dispersion index (PDI) was 0.592; particle size distribution by zeta-sizer also proved that all the particles of optimized formulation were found to be smooth, uniform, spherical in shape and exists within the range of 100-500nm. The Zeta potential of Berberine nano-particles was -35.9mv.
Narrow particle size distribution and negative side of zeta potential indicate that system obtained by solvent evaporation method keeps the nanoparticles thermodynamically stable. All the nanoparticles existing below 500nm were circulated in the RES system for a longer time, and the yield prolonged the drug delivery. Particle size and zeta potential were depicted in Fig. 3.
FIG. 3: DISTRIBUTION OF THE PARTICLE SIZE AND OPTIMIZED ZETA POTENTIAL - BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES
SEM Study: Surface Morphology was found by SEM and TEM photographs which are depicted in Fig. 4.
The study proved that particles were in nano-level and they were in uniform-spherical shape.
FIG. 4: SEM AND TEM IMAGES OF OPTIMIZED BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES
Computer-Based Drug Interaction: The computer-based interaction studies between the polymer and drugs showed the molecular level insight view and stability nature of the complex. Results of the interaction studies showed that both the drugs (Berberine and phenytoin) resulted in good interaction with the polymer. Analyzing the HPMC polymer and Berberine also revealed that the three interactions are formed in the complex, where: Two hydrogens in the dioxal ring of the Berberine forming hydrogen bond with the oxygen atoms of HPMC and One hydrophobic π interaction was generated between benzene ring of Berberine and hydrogen atom of polymer (Fig. 5a & 5b). Similarly, the phenytoin formed three hydrogen-based bond interactions with the range of 2.06 - 2.60Å distance and One-Hydrophobic π interaction with the polymer Fig. 5. The results clearly proved that both the drugs formed a stable complex with HPMC polymer.
FIG. 5: 3D AND 2D INTERACTION PATTERN OF THE HPMC POLYMER AND BERBERINE
Molecular Dynamic (MD) Simulation/ interaction of Berberine Nanoparticles: Molecular dynamic study of Berberine nanoparticles was evaluated by using BIOVIA Discovery Studio and 2017 and Materials Studio 7.0 software. In this analysis, the MD simulations and docking studies were utilized towards investigating the Berberine-HPMC-PEG nanoparticles formation and the interactions between PEG and also the details of Berberine drugs in the molecular level.
The key purpose of this investigation was to authorize the new MD simulations procedure, which was tested on the drug-polymer such as Berberine-HPMC-PEG. Prior MD simulations, the Forcefield (COMPASS) was analyzed for Berberine, HPMC and PEG individually. It showed the Forcite energy as: 4092113472.7683Kcal/mol (Berberine), 131430524.73022Kcal/mol (HPMC) and 7953.42717Kcal/mol (PEG). Berberine-HPMC-PEG molecules are built in an amorphous cell protocol in order to simulate the interaction within the Berberine Fig. 6a.
The Berberine molecule forms van-der Waals energy of 565.235 with HPMC and PEG molecules. The aromatic rings in the Berberine molecules form the highest van-der Waals of energy with hydrophobic groups of the HPMC and PEG molecules. Similarly, the two aromatic rings of the Phenytoin molecule forms van der Waals of the energy of 716.991 with HPMC and PEG molecules Fig. 6b. During the molecular interaction analysis, the H-bond of both the HPMC and PEG molecules were fixed as a stable condition to improve the Berberine and Phenytoin interactions; additionally, the involvement of the van der Waals interactions between the drug and polymers is accountable towards the formations of nanoparticles.
FIG. 6A: FORMATION OF MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BETWEEN (A) BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES SIMULATED BY AMORPHOUS CELL MODULES CONSTRUCTION AND PACKING METHOD USING MATERIAL STUDIO SOFTWARE; FIG. 6B: VAN DER WAALS INTERACTIONS BETWEEN (A) BERBERINE COMPOSITIONS
Entrapment Efficiency and Drug Loading: In this analysis, drugs entrapped in HPMC, depending upon the solubility and polarity properties were examined. The results/ data showed that if the particle sizes increase, the entrapment efficiency will decrease. Drug loading and entrapment efficiency is an important parameter for nanoparticles. Drug loading and entrapment efficiency of optimized Berberine nanoparticles were 25.74% and 90.1%, respectively. Thus, it shows good electrostatic interaction between the drugs and the polymer.
In-vitro Release Examination: This process was performed upon pure Berberine and Berberine nanoparticles in pH 1.2 and 6.8 medium, respectively. The results were gathered (refer Fig. 7) and it suggested that the optimized formulation selected by boxbehnken method exhibited a controlled remarkable dissolution rate in both acidic and alkaline media. The dissolution profile of nanoparticles showed that the release rate was significantly improved, and it releases the drug slowly up to 24 h, and the percentage of release was 98.5%. Thus, it can be proved that nano-drug delivery is an effective strategy towards enhancing the dissolution rate of poorly soluble drugs where the dissolution rate increases in acidic media than alkaline media.
Drug Release Kinetics: Drug release examination with various kinetic models (i.e. first order, zero order, etc) was adapted from the Higuchi study; also, the Korsmeyer-Peppas equations were obtained too.
The percent release was plotted against time towards obtaining the zero-order plots. Similarly, the log percent remaining was plotted against time towards obtaining the first-order plot. Additionally, the percent release was plotted along the time’s square root towards attaining the Higuchi plot. Lastly, drug release’s log of cumulative % was plotted beside log time (in hrs), towards attaining the Korsmeyer-Peppas plot.
Optimized Berberine Formulations have the highest regression coefficients (0.976) towards Higuchi's model, indicating Fickian diffusion. The diffusion mechanism was established by fitting the data into the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation and thus the regression coefficients of the Korsmeyer-Peppas plot was attained at 0.898. The analysis showed a good linearity and the diffusion was identified as the drug release’s predominant mechanism. Release exponent (n) values of Berberine nanoparticles were 0.354, and the results indicated that n-value is around 0.5. Henceforth, it is proved that the drug release follows Fickian diffusion (refer Fig. 7).
FIG. 7: IN-VITRO RELEASE, FIRST-ORDER, KORSMEYER PEPPAS PLOT AND HIGUCHI PLOT OF BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES
Pharmacological Evaluation: This evaluation analysis section has similar studies and techniques as above towards proving that the experimented data are valid and reliable.
Acute Toxicity: After drug administration, animals were observed for the next 14 days. Interpretations were recorded systematically and individually; similarly, records were maintained for each subject, individually.
Changes in mucous membranes and eyes, skin/ fur, central-nervous and autonomic systems, behavioral patterns and somatomotor activity, circulatory, respiratory, etc. were cautiously observed and noted/recorded. In acute toxicity study, Phenytoin and Berberine nanoparticles were found to be toxic at 1000mg/kg in albino rats, and it was found to be safe up to 5mg/kg.
MES Study: The hindlimb tonic extension (HLTE) occurrence was a positive parameter for MES(40). HLTE abolition was taken as a protection against MES seizures. HLTE occurrences and duration of HLTE (in seconds) were recorded and maintained. Statistical analysis was performed using “Graphpad Prism 5” (San Diego, California, USA). For comparison between groups, one-way ANOVA was utilized with post-hoc Turkey’s test where P<0.05 was considered as significant.
The tonic hindlimb extension is suppressed by anti-epileptic drugs. THLE onset of actions and duration of actions were recorded for standard and test drugs such as phenytoin nanoparticles, Berberine nanoparticles, and Capsules (phenytoin and Berberine combination). When compared with control, individual nanoparticles significantly reduced THLE duration (P<0.001) than pure drug. Similarly, combination nanoparticles reduced the THLE duration than individual nanoparticles and inhibited the remarkable convulsion level. Thus the study showed more efficacies which in turn acts as an improved efficacy for capsules loaded nanoparticles. The THLE onset and duration along with inhibition percentages of convulsions, are tabulated for references (refer to Table 4).
TABLE 4: EFFECT OF PHENYTOIN, BERBERINE AND BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES ON MES INDUCED CONVULSION IN RATS
Treatment | Onset of THLE (s) | Duration of THLE (s) | Percentage of inhibitions of Convulsions |
Control | 1.90 ± 0.05 | 101.0± 4.58 | - |
Phenytoin 25mg/kg | 2.73 ± 0.29 | 57.67 ± 3.84*** | 43.33% |
Berberine 25mg/kg | 3.26 ± 0.27 * | 68.33± 2.02 *** | 32.67% |
Berberine Nano 5mg/kg | 5.40 ± 0.40 *** | 57.33± 2.72 *** | 43.67% |
FIG. 8: ONSET AND DURATION OF THE FOR CONTROL, PHENYTOIN, BERBERINE AND BERBERINE NANOPARTICLES
Rota Rod for Muscle Coordination: Rotarod study was conducted towards the estimation of muscle relaxant activity. The standard Diazepam treated animals were fallen down in shorter time. The result revealed that mean time of fall was increased for berberine nanoparticles at 30min and 60 min which represents that the nanoparticles have higher efficacy than pure berberine (refer Table 5).
TABLE 5: MUSCLE RELAXANT ACTIVITY - ROTA ROD STUDY
Group & Dose | Rotarod fall apparatus test - (Mean Time in sec) | |
30 | 60 | |
Normal saline (0.5% Nacl.,i.p.) | 215.16 ± 5.16 | 200.28 ± 6.16 |
Diazepam | 29.16 ± 9.45*** | 13.45 ± 4.86 *** |
Berberine 25 mg/kg .,ip | 192.16± 4.28 | 188. 27± 2.65 |
Berberine Nano | 203.16 ± 3.89 | 211.18± 5.92 |
Biochemical Study: Oxidative parameters such as SOD, TBARS, CAT, and GSH were analyzed; the obtained results in the table (refer Table 6) shows that the values were greater for Berberine nanoparticles than pure drug. Thus it indicates that antioxidant efficacy was improved for optimized.
TABLE 6: BIOCHEMICAL STUDY
Treatment | GSH
(nmoles/g of tissue) |
SOD (units/min/mg of protein) | TBARS
(nmoles/mg of protein) |
CAT
(mg of protein/min) |
Normal saline (0.5% Nacl., i.p.) | 22.42± 6.42 | 4.12± 2.08 | 4.85±0.12 | 0.98± 1.26 |
Phenytoin 25 mg/kg., ip | 31.26±2.49 ** | 7.92± 1.94 ** | 1.59±0.96 *** | 2.93± 0.93 *** |
Berberine 25 mg/kg ., ip | 32.18± 8.16 ** | 7.43± 2.96 ** | 1.98± 0.23 *** | 2.81± 1.34 *** |
Berberine nanoparticles 5mg/kg | 39.31±8.34*** | 7.58± 6.02 ** | 2.12± 0.12*** | 2.98± 1.45 *** |
Histopathological Study: In the Control cortex regions, the albino rats showed a decrease in neuronal cells and increased chromatolysis and pyknotic nuclei. Phenytoin 25mg/kg., ip and Berberine 25mg/kg.,ip significantly decreased: the neuronal cell death, brain cell oedema, chromatolysis, and pyknotic nuclei in all regions when compared to the control rats cortex regions.
Individual nanoparticles treated rats showed a significant decrease in cell edema and neuronal cell degeneration in all regions when compared to the control rats. Thus the combination of phenytoin and Berberine nanoparticles treated rats showed a significant decrease in neuronal cell death with mild edematous nuclei in all regions when compared against the control rats.
FIG. 9: HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY – ALBINO RATS’ BRAIN CORTEX REGION
CONCLUSION: In this research, Optimized controlled release Berberine nanoparticles were prepared with improved efficacy by the Boxbehnken method. In order to accomplish the goal/ proposed aim, permeability enhancement and solubility enhancement techniques were adopted. Physicochemical characterization study revealed that prepared nanoparticles were spherical in shape and existed in the nano-level. Similarly, MES and Rotarod study showed that developed nanoparticles are more efficacious, and its 24 h drug release design reduces the dosage frequency. Thus the overall result proves that the developed nanoparticles have certainly improved the efficacy of anticonvulsant and antioxidant activity than the pure drug.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The study was conducted at Anna University, Thiruchirappalli and part of work at KM College of Pharmacy, Madurai and the authors wish to offer their sincere gratitude to Mrs. Ruckmani Kandasamy and Mr. Subramanian Natesan, Anna University, Thiruchirappalli and Mr. Nagarajan Mr. MS. Prakash and Mr. Hariharan, K. M. College of Pharmacy, Madurai, Mr. Saisivam, NR Venkaria institute of Pharmacy, Junagadh, Gujarat, for providing sufficient laboratory facilities and valuable guidance’s for carrying out the experiment
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in this study.
REFERENCES:
- Neag MA, Mocan A, Echeverría J, Pop RM, Bocsan C, Crişan G and Buzoianu AD: Berberine: Botanical occurrence, traditional uses, extraction methods, and relevance in cardiovascular, metabolic, hepatic, and renal disorders. Front Pharmacol 2018; 9: 557.
- Tang J, Feng Y, Tsao S, Wang N, Curtain R and Wang Y: Berberine and Cop-tidisrhizoma as novel antineoplastic agents: A review of traditional use and biomedical investigations. J Ethnopharmacol 2009; 126(1): 5-17.
- Hua W, Ding L, Chen Y, Gong B, He J and Xu G: Determination of berberine in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2007; 44(4): 931-37.
- Wu M, Wang J and Liu LT: Advance of studies on antiatherosclerosis mechanism of berberine. Chin J Integr Med 2010; 16(2): 188.
- Zhang X, Qiu F, Jiang J, Gao C and Tan Y: Intestinal absorption mechanisms of berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine: Involvement of P-glycoprotein. Xenobiotica 2011; 41(4): 290-96.
- Zhao L, Li W, Han F, Hou L, Baillargeon JP and Kuang H: Berberine reduces insulin resistance induced by dexamethasone in theca cells in-vitro. Fertil and steril, 2011; 95(1): 461-3.
- Zhou J and Zhou S: Berberine regulates peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptors and positive transcription elongation factor bexpression in diabetic adipocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 2010; 649(1): 390-7.
- Lee IA, Hyun YJ and Kim DH: Berberine ameliorates TNBS induced colitis by inhibiting lipid peroxidation, enterobacterial growth and NF-κB activation. Eur J Pharmacol 2010; 648(1): 162-70.
- Liu X, Li G, Zhu H, Huang L, Liu Y and Ma C: Beneficial effect of berberine on hepatic insulin resistance in diabetic hamsters possibly involves in SREBPs, LXRα and PPARα transcriptional programs. Endocr J 2009; 57(10): 881-93.
- Xie D, Xu Y, Jing W, Juxiang Z, Hailun L, Yu H, Zheng DH and Lin YT: Berberine nanoparticles protects tubular epithelial cells from renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Oncotarget 2017; 8(15): 24154-162.
- Tourandokht BM and Mehrdad R: The Anticonvulsant and Antioxidant Effects of Berberine in Kainate-induced Temporal Lobe Epilepsy in Rats. J Pharmacol 2014; 5(2): XX.
- Meng Z, Zhang M, Wei S, Bi X, Hatch GM, Jingkai G and Li C: Amorphous solid dispersion of berberine with absorption enhancer demonstrates a remarkable hypoglycemic effect via improving its bioavailability. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2014; 467: 50-59.
- Salunkhe SS, Bhatia NM, Kawade VS and Bhatia MS: Development of lipid based nanoparticulate drug delivery systems and drug carrier complexes for delivery to brain. J Appl Pharm Sci 2015; 5: 110-29.
- Prabaharan M: Chitosan-based nanoparticles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 2014; 72-C: 1313-22.
- Peer D, Karp JM and Hong S: Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol 2007; 2: 751-60.
- Tomita M, Hayashi M and Awazu S: Absorption-enhancing mechanism of EDTA, caprate, and decanoylcarnitine in Caco-2 cells. J Pharm Sci 1996; 85: 608-11.
- Tscheik GDVC: Sodium Caprate Transiently Opens Claudin-5-Containing barriers at tight junctions of epithelial and endothelial cells. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2012; 9(9): 2523-33.
- Greene C and Campbell M: Tight junction modulation of the blood brain barrier: CNS delivery of small molecules. Tissue Barriers 2016; 4(1): e1138017.
- Sleziona D, Mattusch A, Schaldach G, Ely DR, Sadowski G and Thom M: Determination of Inherent Dissolution Performance of Drug Substances. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13: 146.
- Mesnukul, Yodkhum K and Phaechamud T: Solid Dispersion Matrix Tablet Comprising Indomethacin-PEG-HPMC Fabricated With Fusion AndMold Technique. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2009; 413-20, DOI:10.4103/0250-474X.57290.
- Mujtaba A, Ali M and Kohli K: Formulation of extended release cefpodoxime proxetilchitosanalginate beads using quality by design approach. Int J Biol Macoromol 2014; 69: 420-9.
- Sanjeev R, Elizabath O, Irene M and Thirumala G: Comparative buccal permeability enhancement of didenosine and tenofovir by potential multifunctional polymeric excipients and their effects on porcine buccal histology. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology J 2014; 19(1): 82-90.
- Rania AHI, Nada MM and Amany OK: Stealth lipid polymer hybrid nanoparticles loaded with rutin for effective brain delivery – A comparative study with the gold standard (Tween 80): Optimization, characterization and bio-distribution. Drug Delivery Journal 2017; 24(1): 1874-90.
- Derringer G: A balancing act: Optimizing a product’s properties. Qual Prog 1994; 5: 1-5.
- Stéphanie D, Christine V, Didier B, Joël V, Jean-Louis G, Michel V and Patrick C: The design of nanoparticles obtained by solvent evaporation: a comprehensive study. Langmuir 2003; 19(22): 9504-10.
- Averineni RK, Shavi GV, Gurram AK, Deshpande PB, Arumugam K, Maliyakkal M, Meka SR and Nayanabhirama U: PLGA 50:50 nanoparticles of paclitaxel: development, in-vitro anti-tumor activity in BT-549 cells and in-vivo Bull Mat Sci 2012; 35: 319-26.
- Girish S, Seth AK, Ghanshyam P, Sachin C and Ankur J: Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of berberine containing liposome optimized by 32 full factorial designs. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 2015; 5(7): 023-028.
- Mittal R: Antiepileptics. In: Gupta SK, editor. Drug Screening Methods”, 2nd Ed, New Delhi. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2009; 400-22.
- Doodipala SR and Michael AR: Chronic treatment with the neuroactive steroid Ganaxolone in the Rat induces anticonvulsant tolerance to Diazepam but not to itself. JPET 2000; 295(3): 1240-48.
- Beutler E, Duran O and Kelly BM: Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J Lab Clin Med 1963; 61: 882.
- Ohkawa H, Ohishi N and Yagi K: Assay for lipid peroxidation in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. PubMed - Annals of Biochem 1979; 95: 351-58.
- Misra HP and Fridovich I: The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem 1972; 247(10): 3170-5.
- Aebi H: Catalase In: Bergmeyer”, HVEds – Vol 2, Methods in enzymatic analysis Academic Press Inc, New York. 1974; 674‐84.
How to cite this article:
Karthikeyini SC, Kavitha K and Ramkumar PSS: Optimization, characterization and pharmacological activity of berberine loaded nanoparticles - an approach to improve the efficacy of anticonvulsant and antioxidant activity. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(11): 5723-38. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(11).5723-38.
All © 2021 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
11
5723-5738
1253KB
508
English
IJPSR
S. Chitra Karthikeyini *, K. Kavitha and P. S. S. Ramkumar
Department of Pharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacognosy, Ultra College of Pharmacy, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
chithirraanbalaghan@gmail.com
22 November 2020
03 April 2021
25 May 2021
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(11).5723-38
01 November 2021