OPTIMIZING THE FORMULATION VARIABLES FOR ERLOTINIB LOADED CHITOSAN NANOPARTICLES
HTML Full TextOPTIMIZING THE FORMULATION VARIABLES FOR ERLOTINIB LOADED CHITOSAN NANOPARTICLES
P. Pandey 1, A. Ramkishan 2 and H. Dureja * 1
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak - 124001, Haryana, India.
Deputy Drugs Controller 2, Kolkata Central Drug Standard Control Organisation, East Zone, C.G.O. Bldgs., (Nizam Palace) West, 2nd Floor, 234/4, Lower Circular Road - 700020, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
ABSTRACT: Objective: There is rapidly growing interest in the development of nanoparticles drug delivery mainly for anticancer drugs as it promises to solve problems to several related to anticancer drugs. The aim of present work was to formulate erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles using probe sonication technique. The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of surface stabilizers and sonication time on the entrapment efficiency of erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Methods: In this work, three parameters were evaluated i.e. different surface stabilizers, amount of surface stabilizers (50 - 150 mg) and sonication time (6 - 15 min). The formulated chitosan nanoparticles were characterized by particle size, polydispersity index, percentage yield, loading capacity, entrapment efficiency, differential scanning calorimetry and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Results: It was found that batch PNP-11 (formulated using PEG 600 having amount of 50 mg at sonication time ~ 15 min) has a maximum loading capacity 76.07±0.14 (w/w), entrapment efficiency 73.60 ± 0.17% (w/w) and smallest particle size of 59.80 nm out of all the thirteen formulations (PNP-1 to PNP-13). The DSC analysis of PNP-11 suggested a molecular dispersion of drug inside the system. Infrared analysis of PNP-11 showed no interaction between drug and polymer during the formulation process. Conclusion: The nano-effects due to biocompatible cross-linked chitosan and sonication time are the critical parameters for the development of erlotinib loaded nanoparticles.
Keywords: |
Erlotinib, Chitosan, Ionic gelation, Surface stabilizers, Probe sonicator, Centrifuge
INTRODUCTION: In the current period, extensive consideration has been focused on the advance of novel drug delivery systems (NDDS). The motives behind the development of NDDS contain drug delivery to the site of action without any significant immunogenicity reactions, biological inactivation or the potential side effect to the critical tissues for example kidney, liver, lungs, or bone marrow etc.
The core intention to advance the NDDS is to improve the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the existing drugs by reducing the frequency, amount of dosing and altering the bio-distribution pattern of the drugs 1.
Nanoparticles are novel drug delivery system that consists of particles of nano- ranges for drug and gene delivery in specific regions of the body. The drug is entrapped, encapsulated, dissolved, or attached to a nanoparticles matrix. The main areas in designing nanoparticles as delivery system are to control particles size, surface properties and release of pharmacologically active agents in order to achieve the site-specific action of the drug at the therapeutically optimal rate and dose regimen 2.
Chitosan has an admirable potential in designing nanoparticulate drug delivery and it has ability to control the release of drug and is biocompatible with living tissue. Chitosan is a natural carbohydrate polymer prepared by the partial N-deacetylation of chitin. Chitosan is soluble in dilute acidic solution and has diverse applications in controlled drug delivery systems. Chitosan based nanoparticles have benefits, chiefly for the design of novel nanoparticulate drug delivery systems, due to their desirable properties such as hydrophilic character, biodegradability, bio- and muco-adhesivity and biocompatibility that facilitate the administration of poorly absorbable drugs across various epithelial barriers, such as intestinal mucosa, corneal and nasal 3, 4.
Lung cancer is the major reason of cancer-based deaths globally and it is basically the abnormal and uncontrolled cell growth in the lung. Lung cancer has been proved to be accountable for greater number of deaths than any other tumor in both males and females. According to cancer facts and figures 2015, the estimated number of new cases of cancer in US was 221,200 and estimated deaths were 158,040 5.
Although cancer-related symptoms have been controlled by platinum-based chemotherapy and survival has also been improved, still the development of the new agents is the urgent need of the hour. The availability of targeted therapies has become a very useful resource in treating advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The major part in the growth and progression of NSCLC and pancreatic cancer has been found to be played by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) 6.
Erlotinib is a quinazolinamine with the chemical name N-(3-ethynylphenyl) - 6, 7 - bis (2-methoxy ethoxy)-4-quinazolinamine. It comes under class II compounds of the biopharmaceutics classification systems (BCS), a scientific framework to classify the drug substances on the basis of their solubility in aqueous medium and on their intestinal permeability. Erlotinib exist as the salt of hydrochloric acid in the market and accepted for the employ in combination with the gemcitabine chemotherapy for the locally advanced treatment, inoperable, or metastatic pancreatic cancer 5, 6.
The aim of present work is to formulate erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles using probe sonication technique. The objective behind the study was to examine the consequence of formulation and process parameters i.e. different surface stabilizers, amount of surface stabilizer and sonication time on the particle size, polydispersity index, percentage yield, loading capacity and entrapment efficiency on erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials: Erlotinib was obtained as a gift sample from Hetero Labs Limited, India. Chitosan (95% deacetylated) having a molecular weight of 40-80 kDa was purchased from Fluka Chemika, Switzerland. Sodium tripolyphosphate (NaTPP) and Glacial acetic acid were purchased from Central Drug House, New Delhi. PEG 600 and Tween 80 were purchased from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India. All other chemicals were of HPLC grade and used as provided by the manufacturer.
Methods:
Preparation of Erlotinib Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles: In this study, the nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared using ionic gelation method. In this method, chitosan (0.1% w/v) was dissolved in 0.1% v/v glacial acetic acid. The solution of sodium tripolyphosphate (NaTPP) (0.2% w/v) was prepared in double distilled water. The drug solution was prepared separately by dissolving erlotinib (150 mg) in methanol and dimethyl sulphoxide (1:1) and the surface stabilizers - PEG 600 and tween 80 were used at different amount i.e. 50, 75, 100 and 150 mg. The chitosan and drug solution were mixed together using magnetic stirrer at speed of 700-1000 rpm for 4 h approximately. Then, NaTPP (100 ml) was added dropwise at 1 drop/sec while magnetic stirring. Then, this solution was sonicated using probe sonicator at different time i.e. 6, 8, 10 and 15 min; the obtained chitosan nanoparticle suspension was centrifuged at 26000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was removed and chitosan nanoparticles were lyophilized using freeze-drying. The erlotinib loaded polymeric nanoparticles were formulated to study the effect of different surface stabilizers, amount of surface stabilizer and sonication time on the entrapment efficiency, loading capacity, percentage yield and particle size of erlotinib. In the present study, three factors were evaluated. The factors selected were X1 = Surface Stabilizers; X2 = Amount of Surface Stabilizer and X3 = Sonication Time. The formulation of erlotinib loaded polymeric nanoparticles were prepared according to Table 1.
TABLE 1: FORMULATION OF ERLOTINIB LOADED POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLES
Formulation code | Surface stabilizers
(X1) |
Amount of surface stabilizer (mg) (X2) | Sonication time (min) (X3) |
PNP-1 | PEG 600 | 75 | 6 |
PNP-2 | PEG 600 | 75 | 8 |
PNP-3 | PEG 600 | 75 | 10 |
PNP-4 | PEG 600 | 75 | 15 |
PNP-5 | Tween 80 | 75 | 6 |
PNP-6 | Tween 80 | 75 | 8 |
PNP-7 | Tween 80 | 75 | 10 |
PNP-8 | Tween 80 | 75 | 15 |
PNP-9 | PEG 600 | 150 | 15 |
PNP-10 | PEG 600 | 100 | 15 |
PNP-11 | PEG 600 | 50 | 15 |
PNP-12 | PEG 600 | 75 | 20 |
PNP-13 | PEG 600 | 150 | 20 |
Characterization of Nanoparticles: The prepared formulations were characterized for particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), entrapment efficiency, loading capacity, percentage yield, differential scanning calorimetry and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as follows:
Particle Size Analysis: For particle size analysis, the dilution of sample was analyzed using Zetasizer Instrument (Malvern, UK) equipped with the Hydro dispersing unit by dissolving 2 mg of sample in 5 ml of distilled water. The sample dilution was filled in a polystyrene cuvette in hydro dispensing unit and scan was carried out at 64 runs per sample. After the completion of scan the average diameter/ scan of all the 64 runs were taken out and recorded as Z-average.
Polydispersity Index (PDI): The polydispersity index can also be determined as a measure of the particle size distribution of the dispersion by dynamic light scattering. This index can range from 0 to 1.0, where 0 (zero) is used for an exclusively monodisperse system, and 1.0 for a polydisperse particle dispersion. The polydispersity index is used as a measure of the broadness of a molecular weight distribution of a polymer, and is defined by:
Polydispersity index (PDI) = Mw/Mn ..............eq (1)
Where, Mw: Weight average molecular weight and Mn: Number average molecular weight.
Entrapment Efficiency, Loading Capacity and Percentage Yield: The entrapment efficiency, loading capacity and percentage yield were determined directly using erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles by analysis of the samples in suspension after centrifugation. The extracted erlotinib in the supernatant after ultracentrifugation of the nanoparticles suspension was determined using the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Each sample was assayed in triplicate.
The HPLC analyses were carried out using a system (Agilent technologies 1200 series, Germany) that consisted a stainless-steel column C18 10 cm × 4.6 mm packed with octadecylsilane bonded to porous silica (3µm). The binary mobile phase consisted of a mixture of methanol and 0.1 % orthophosphoric acid in the ratio of 70:30 v/v. The effluents were degassed before running at a flow rate of 1 mL min-1. The column temperature was ambient at 45° C. The 20 µL volume of sample was injected per run and effluents were detected using UV detector at wavelength 247 nm. The entrapment efficiency, drug loading and percentage yield was calculated according to the following equations 7:
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Analysis: DSC measurements were carried out on DSC Q10 (Waters Corporation, USA). The instrument was calibrated using Indium as standard. Samples were placed in sealed aluminium pans and heated from 30 ºC to 300 ºC at a rate of 10 ºC/min under nitrogen atmosphere (60 ml/min), with empty pan as reference.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectro-photometry: FT-IR is a method of obtaining infrared spectra by first collecting an interferogram of a sample signal using an interferometer, and then performing a fourier transform on the interferogram to obtain the spectrum. Fourier transform IR spectra were recorded on FT-IR Alpha, Bruker, Germany. The spectra were recorded over the range of 500 - 3500 cm-1.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: TPP is a non-toxic and multivalent anion that can form cross-linkage involving ionic interactions between the positively charged amino group of chitosan and multivalent, negatively charged TPP molecules. With the dropwise addition of TPP, the nanoencapsulation was processed with electrostatic interaction. Meanwhile, with the incorporation of ion TPP to chitosan solution, the opalescence indicated the formation of nanoparticles with a size of nano-range. During the ionotropic gelation process, most of the available chitosan was formed into nanoparticles 4.
In the experimental work, total 13 formulations of nanoparticles were formulated for optimizing three parameters - Surface Stabilizers (X1), Amount of Surface Stabilizer (X2) and Sonication Time (X3). In this, the entrapment efficiency, loading capacity, particle size, percentage yield and polydispersity index were carried out for all the formulations and are shown in Table 2.
Out of above thirteen formulations, formulation PNP-11 found to be best because of maximum loading capacity 76.07.07±0.14 (w/w), maximum entrapment efficiency 73.60±0.17% (w/w) and minimum particle size (59.80 nm) by using PEG 600 as surface stabilizer having amount of 50 mg at sonication time ~ 15 min and formulation PNP-13 having maximum percentage yield (40.12%) by using PEG 600 as surface stabilize having amount of 150 mg at sonication time ~ 20 min.
Entrapment Efficiency, Loading Capacity and Percentage Yield: Erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles were characterized for entrapment efficiency, loading capacity and percentage yield. The loading capacity, entrapment efficiency and percentage yield ranged from 56.18±0.13% to 76.07 ± 0.14, 54.25 ± 0.16% to 73.60 ± 0.17% and 25.90% to 40.12%, respectively Table 2.
TABLE 2: CHARACTERIZATION OF ERLOTINIB LOADED POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLES
Formulation Code | Particle
Size (nm) |
PDI | Percentage
Yield (%) |
Loading
Capacity (%) |
Entrapment Efficiency (%) |
PNP-1 | 1843 | 0.818 | 28.75 | 59.51±0.12 | 55.02±0.11 |
PNP-2 | 913 | 0.353 | 29.04 | 62.70±0.13 | 59.13±0.14 |
PNP-3 | 964.3 | 0.560 | 31.65 | 69.85±0.12 | 64.75±0.12 |
PNP-4 | 149.8 | 0.246 | 34.24 | 74.33±0.11 | 69.42±0.12 |
PNP-5 | 1528 | 0.983 | 26.25 | 56.18±0.13 | 54.25±0.16 |
PNP-6 | 753.5 | 1.000 | 25.90 | 62.44±0.16 | 58.74±0.12 |
PNP-7 | 964.9 | 0.952 | 29.10 | 65.12±0.14 | 62.52±0.15 |
PNP-8 | 643.3 | 1.000 | 33.18 | 68.79±0.25 | 66.81±0.11 |
PNP-9 | 142.7 | 0.262 | 34.75 | 70.95±0.43 | 67.22±0.12 |
PNP-10 | 93.06 | 0.649 | 33.19 | 75.80±0.46 | 71.34±0.16 |
PNP-11 | 59.80 | 0.308 | 32.82 | 76.07±0.14 | 73.60±0.17 |
PNP-12 | 97.70 | 0.514 | 37.63 | 71.62±0.13 | 68.71±0.12 |
PNP-13 | 232.80 | 0.318 | 40.12 | 69.10±0.11 | 66.50±0.13 |
FIG. 1: PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS AND POLY DISPERSITY INDEX OF PNP-11
Particle Size and Polydispersity Index: The particle size analysis of all the formulation has been carried out and it ranges from 59.80 to 1843 nm and the polydispersity index having the values from 0.246 to 1.000. Fig. 1 showed the particle size analysis of PNP-11 because it has lower particle size among all the formulations and having polydispersity index value 0.308.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry Analysis: The drug was confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry (DCS) analysis and there was a sharp peak at 234.87 ºC almost corresponding to its melting point (232 ºC) with percentage purity 99.11% Fig. 2. The disappearance of endothermic peak of PNP-11 Fig. 3 showed that drug may have been dispersed or dissolved in the polymer matrix during formation of nanoparticles. The total incorporation of the drug into the nanoparticles suggested a molecular dispersion of drug inside the system. The nano-entrapment process produced a marked decrease in crystallinity of erlotinib and allows a nearly amorphous state 8, 9. The DSC thermogram of erlotinib, chitosan and optimized batch PNP-11 are shown as overlay in Fig. 4.
FIG. 4: OVERLAY OF DSC THERMOGRAMS OF ERLOTINIB, CHITOSAN AND OPTIMIZED FORMULATION PNP-11
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectro-photometry: The spectra were recorded for pure drug - Erlotinib and PNP-11 as shown in Fig. 5 and 6, respectively, and the comparison of peaks of pure drug with PNP-11 are tabulated in Table 3. There was no significant difference in the FTIR spectra of Erlotinib and drug loaded PNP-11. No significant shifting of functional peaks, no overlapping of characteristic peaks and also no appearance of new peaks were observed upon comparison of obtained spectra with reference spectra. The results suggested drug stability during the entrapment process. The FTIR data suggested that molecular interactions that could alter the chemical structure of the drug did not occur. Therefore, no chemical interaction between functional group of drug and polymer exist 4.
TABLE 3: COMPARISON OF PEAKS OF PURE DRUG AND PNP-11
Type of peak | Peaks of pure drug | Peaks of PNP-11 |
-C≡C-H Bending (alkyne) | 660 cm-1 | 680 cm-1 |
-C-H Bending (aryl) | 730 cm-1 | 777 cm-1 |
-C-O-C Stretching (alkyl) | 1074 cm-1 | 1059 cm-1 |
-C=C Bending (alkyl) | 1291 cm-1 | 1237 cm-1 |
-C=C- Stretching (aryl) | 1568 cm-1 | 1591 cm-1 |
-C=C- Stretching (alkyl) | 1629 cm-1 | 1639 cm-1 |
-N=C- Stretching (alkyl) | 1701 cm-1 | 1747 cm-1 |
-N-H Stretching (2° amine) | 2715 cm-1 | 2774 cm-1 |
-C-H Stretching (alkyl) | 2893 cm-1 | 2911 cm-1 |
-C-H Stretching (aryl) | 3045 cm-1 | 3031 cm-1 |
-C≡C-H Stretching (alkyne) | 3355 cm-1 | 3351 cm-1 |
CONCLUSION: Freeze-drying and sonication technique has been successfully applied to prepare erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles. The consequences of formulation parameters that are surface stabilizers, amount of surface stabilizer and sonication time were evaluated on the entrapment efficiency, loading capacity, percentage yield and particle size of erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles. The PNP-11 was regarded as the best batch because it has the highest loading capacity (76.07 ± 0.14%), entrapment efficiency (73.60 ± 0.17%) with the smallest particle size (59.80 nm) while PNP-13 having maximum percentage yield (40.12%). The current research supports the approach to prepare erlotinib loaded chitosan nanoparticles in a powdered form by using the freeze-drying and sonication technique and also marked the effect of formulation parameters i.e. surface stabilizers, amount of surface stabilizer and sonication time on the nanoparticles formulation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Declared none
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Bhowmik D, Chiranjib R and Jayakar RM: Role of nanotechnology in novel drug delivery system. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology 2009; 1(1): 20-35.
- Lee YS, Johnson PJ, Robbsins PT and Bridson RH: Production of nanoparticles-in-microparticles by a double emulsion method. A comprehensive study. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2013; 83: 168-73.
- Patil MS and Bhoskar M: Optimization and evaluation of spray-dried chitosan nanoparticles containing doxorubicin. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research 2014; 6(2): 7-15.
- Pandey P, Marwaha RK, Nanda A and Dureja H: Spray-dried nanoparticles-in-microparticles system (NiMS) of acetazolamide using central composite design. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Asia 2016; 6(2): 146-156.
- Pandey P and Dureja H: Erlotinib: A Targeted Anticancer Drug. Current Cancer Therapy Reviews 2017; 13(1): 3-16.
- Choi HG, Jeon JY and Im YJ: Pharmacokinetic properties of two erlotinib 150 mg formulations with a genetic effect in healthy Korean subjects. Clinical Drug Investigation 2015; 35: 31-43.
- Latha ST, Thangadurai SA, Jambulingam M, Sereya K, Kamalakannan D and Anilkumar M: Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the estimation of erlotinib in pharmaceutical formulation. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 2013; 10: 1138-44.
- Elzoghby AO, Samy WM and Elgindy NA: Novel spray-dried genipin- crosslinked casein nanoparticles for prolonged release of an alfuzosin hydrochloride. Pharmaceutical Research 2012; 30: 512-22.
- Pirooznia N, Hasannia S, Lotfi AS and Ghanei M: Encapsulation of Alpha-1 antitrypsin in PLGA nanoparticles: In vitro characterization as an effective aerosol formulation in pulmonary diseases. J Nanobio-technology 2012; 10(20): 1-15.
How to cite this article:
Pandey P, Ramkishan A and Dureja H: Optimizing the formulation variables for Erlotinib loaded Chitosan nanoparticles. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2018; 9(12): 5234-39. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(12).5234-39.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
24
5234-5239
596
967
English
IJPSR
P. Pandey, A. Ramkishan and H. Dureja *
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
harishdureja@gmail.com
05 March, 2018
08 May, 2018
22 May, 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(12).5234-39
01 December, 2018