PALBOCICLIB LOADED SOLID LIPID NANOPARTICLES BY BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN: SOLUBILITY ENHANCEMENT
HTML Full TextPALBOCICLIB LOADED SOLID LIPID NANOPARTICLES BY BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN: SOLUBILITY ENHANCEMENT
Baji Hussain Khan and P. Sandhya *
Career Point University, Kota, Rajasthan, India.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study was to optimize palbociclib-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) by evaluating the relationship between design factors and experimental data. A three-factor, three-level Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used for the optimization procedure, choosing the amount of tricapric, cremophor RH40 and soy lecithin, as independent variables. The chosen dependent variables were particle size, entrapment efficiency, and % cumulative drug released. The generated polynomial equations and response surface plots were used to relate the dependent and independent variables. The optimal nanoparticles were formulated with 08%tricapric, 09% cremophor RH40, and 6% soy lecithin. Three formulations were prepared according to these levels and found that the observed responses were close to the predicted values of the optimized formulation. The formulation PF13 was chosen for characterization as it displayed minimum particle size (103 nm), PI of 0.47, the zeta potential of -16 mV, maximum drug release of 98% in 12h. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) study indicated that the drug was entrapped in nanoparticles with no significant interaction between drug and excipients used. The optimized formulation showed a sustained zero-order release which followed the Peppas model. The formulation was stable when stored according to ICH guidelines for 6 months.
Keywords: Palbociclib, Breast cancer, Solid lipid nanoparticles, Box-Behnken design
INTRODUCTION: Palbociclib is a medication developed by Pfizer for the treatment of HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. It is a selective inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6. Palbociclib was the first CDK4/6 inhibitor to be approved as a cancer therapy. It exhibits poor oral bioavailability of 46 % owing to its poor aqueous solubility and first-pass metabolism.
Hence solid lipid nanoparticles can be considered as a suitable drug delivery system to improve the poor oral bioavailability of palbociclib 1. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) can entrap both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs 2.
SLNs combines the advantage of colloidal carriers, vesicular carriers, and polymeric carriers as physiologically acceptable systems, non-toxic, biocompatible, scalability and in imparting the controlled release of drug from lipid matrix 3. Furthermore, SLNs augment the lymphatic transport of the lipophilic drugs, irrespective of the route of administration, and therefore increase the systemic availability of drug molecules. Nano drug formulations can impart many physical and biological advantages, such as improved solubility and pharmacokinetics (PK), enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity and increased tissue selectivity, compared with conventional medicines 4. The response surface methodology (RSM) is useful in simultaneously analyzing process variables when variable interactions are very complicated. Many studies have demonstrated the value of RSM for establishing the optimal formulation in various drug delivery systems. This study used the Box-Behnken design (BBD), an RSM design because it requires fewer runs in a 3-factor experimental design than all other RSM designs and is particularly useful when extreme treatment combinations need to be avoided5.In the present research, palbociclib SLN was formulated and optimized using Box-Behnken design (BBD).
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Materials used: The drug palbociclib was obtained from Hetero drugs Ltd, Hyderabad.. The excipients tricapric, cremophor RH 40, soy lecithin and solvents chloroform, methanol were purchased from Merck Specialties Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Preparation of palbociclib SLN: Palbociclib SLNs were prepared by a hot emulsification/ultrasonication method. According to the partitioning results, tricapric was selected as a solid lipid to formulate palbociclib - SLNs. Palbociclib (125 mg), tricapric (%) were dissolved in a mixture of chloroform and methanol (1:1) (20 mL). The solvent was then completely removed using a rotary evaporator. The drug-embedded lipid layer was melted by heating at 75 °C. An aqueous phase was then formulated by dissolving the surfactant and co-surfactant(%) cremophor RH40 and soy lecithin in double-distilled water and adding it to the molten lipid phase.
This was followed by homogenization for 3 min. Coarsehotoilina water emulsion was obtained, which was then ultrasonicated using a probe sonicator. Finally, the obtained hot nanoemulsion was allowed to cool to room temperature to prepare palbociclib –SLNs 6-8.
Experimental Design: A 33 BBD employed for optimizing the main, interaction, and quadratic effects of formulation components on characteristics of SNEDDS. Seventeen experiments run randomly for chosen independent variables that include 5 repetitions at the center (asterisk-marked) obtained from 3 factor, 3-level BBD, and their subsequent responses noted 11-14. The variables that were chosen as dependent and independent are specified in Tables 1 and 2.
The BBD matrix obtained using Design Expert® software (Version7.0, Stat-Ease Inc., Silicon Valley, CA, USA), the second-order quadratic equations are as:
Y = β1 + β1X1 + β2X2 + β3X3 + β4X1 X2 + β5X2 X3 + β6X1 X3+ β7X12 + β8X22+ β9X32
Y - Level of the measured response
β0 – intercept
β1 to β9 - regression coefficient
X1, X2, and X3 - main effects
X1X2, X2X3, and X1X3 - interaction between the main effects
X12, X22 and X32 - quadratic terms of independent variables.
TABLE 1: COMPOSITION OF PALBOCICLIB SLNS FORMULATION BYBBD
F. no. | Palbociclib (mg) mg | Tricapric (%) | Cremophor RH40 (%) | Soy Lecithin (%) | Tween 80 (ml) | Chloroform:Methanol (1:1) | Distilled Water (mL) |
PF1 | 125 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF2 | 125 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF3 | 125 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF4 | 125 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF5 | 125 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF6 | 125 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF7 | 125 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF8 | 125 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 0.5 | 20 | Q. S |
PF9 | 125 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF10 | 125 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF11 | 125 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF12 | 125 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF13 | 125 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF14 | 125 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF15 | 125 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF16 | 125 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
PF17 | 125 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 0.5 | 20 | Q.S |
TABLE 2: LIST OF DEPENDENT AND INDEPENDENT VARIABLES IN IN BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN
Independent variables | Levels | |||||||
Variable | Name | Units | Low (-1) | Middle (0) | High (+1) | |||
A | Amount of Tricapric | % | 4 | 6 | 8 | |||
B | Amount of Cremophor RH40 | % | 3 | 6 | 9 | |||
C | Amount of Soy Lecithin | % | 2 | 4 | 6 | |||
Dependent variable | Goal | |||||||
Y1 | Particle size | Nm | Minimize | |||||
Y2 | Entrapment Efficiency | % | Minimize | |||||
Y3 | Drug release after 12 Hrs | % | Maximize | |||||
Characterization of Palbociclib loaded SLN: Measurement of particle size, zeta potential, drug content, and entrapment efficiency (EE%) 15, 16, 17 were calculated as per reported procedures.
In-vitro Release Study: In-vitro release studies were performed in 0.1N HCl (pH 1.2) using modified franz diffusion cell and dialysis membrane having pore size 2.4 nm, molecular weight cut-off between 12,000-14,000 was used. The membrane was soaked in double-distilled water for 12 h. SLN dispersion (2 mL) was placed in the donor compartment, and the receptor compartment was filled with 50 mL of release media. During the experiments, the solution in the receptor side was maintained at 37 °C ± 0.5 °C and stirred at 50 rpm with magnetic stirring bars for 2 h. Then, the pH was increased to pH 6.8 for the remaining 10 h. An aliquot of the sample (5 mL) was taken from the dissolution medium at different times 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h time points; samples were withdrawn and analyzed by UV-visible spectrophotometer at 263 nm. Data obtained from in-vitro release studies were fitted to various kinetic equations to find out the mechanism of palbociclib release from SLN 18.
Kinetic Model Fitting: To elucidate the mode and mechanism of drug release, the data from the in-vitro release study were fitted into various kinetic models such as zero-order, first-order, Higuchi’s, and Korsmeyer–Peppas model 19, 20.
Characterization of Optimized SLN Formulation: Characterization of optimized formulation by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), particle size, zeta potential, SEM studies, and Stability studies were performed as per the procedures mentioned in the reference.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
Physico-chemical Evaluation of palbociclib SLNs: Developed palbociclib SLNs (PF1-PF17) were physicochemical evaluated in terms of particle size, entrapment efficiency, drug content, and zeta potential. The drug content of all formulations ranged between 96-99%, with formulation PF13 displaying maximum drug content. The EE of all formulations ranged between 78-93%with a maximum value of 93.32% displayed by formulation PF13.
The particle size of the drug-loaded nanoparticles was found to be in the range of 103 to 239 nm. The nanoformulations exhibited a negative surface charge with the inclusion of palbociclib, which clearly suggested the orientation of palbociclib in the lipid matrix with long-term stability.
The zeta potential of all 17 formulations ranged between 15-29 mV.
In-vitro Dissolution Testing of Palbociclib SLNs: The dissolution profiles of plain palbociclib and palbociclib SLNs formulation in simulated intestinal 23. The drug release from the formulation PF13was shown to be 98.91%, whereas the marketed product was shown to be 86.28% after 12 h Fig. 1-3. This result suggested that the SLNs formulation significantly enhanced the dissolution of palbociclib. The enhanced dissolution may be due to the decrease in crystallinity and the increase in solubility of the drug. The increase in cumulative drug released is mainly attributed to rapid self-emulsification of the formulations due to instantaneous dispersion in the medium after the dissolution of the capsule shell. As the amount of free energy required in forming an emulsion is very low, this results in the spontaneous formation of an oil-water interface. This increases the water penetration of lipid droplets, resulting in disruption of the interface and thereby decreasing the particle size and eventually increasing the release rate
FIG. 1: IN-VITRO DRUG RELEASED PROFILE OF PREPARED PALBOCICLIB LOADED SOLID LIPID NANOPARTICLES PF1-PF6
FIG. 2: IN-VITRO DRUG RELEASED PROFILE OF PREPARED PALBOCICLIB LOADED SOLID LIPID NANOPARTICLES PF7-PF12
FIG. 3: IN-VITRO DRUG RELEASED PROFILE OF PREPARED PALBOCICLIB LOADED SOLID LIPID NANOPARTICLES PF13-PF17
TABLE 3: RELEASE KINETICS OF MARKETED FORMULATION OF PALBOCICLIB SLNS
Formulation
|
Correlation Coefficient (r2) | Diffusional
Exponent (n) |
Inference | |||
Marketed | Zero
Order |
First
Order |
Higuchi
Equation |
Korsmeyer
-Peppas |
Korsmeyer
-Peppas |
Zero-order & Super case II transport |
0.949 | 0.866 | 0.872 | 0.921 | 1.095 | ||
PF13 | 0.961 | 0.895 | 0.881 | 0.944 | 1.115 | Zero-order & Super case II transport |
Kinetic Analysis of Palbociclib Release Data of PF13: It is apparent from the results are as shown in Table 3 that the regression coefficient value closer to unity in case of zero-order plot i.e., 0.961 indicates that the drug release follows a zero-order mechanism.
Further, the n value obtained from the Korsmeyer-Peppas plots, i.e., 0.944 indicating non-Fickian (anomalous) transports; thus, it projected that it delivered its active ingredient by coupled diffusion and erosion for both optimized and marketed formulation.
TABLE 4: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS RESULTS OF PARTICLE SIZE, EE, AND % CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE
Source | Particle size | Entrapment efficiency | % Cumulative drug release | ||||
Sum of squares | p>F | Sum of squares | p>F | Sum of squares | p>F | ||
Residual | 4833.53 | - | 4232.45 | 2431.66 | |||
Lack of fit | 2838.17 | < 0.05 | 3250.17 | < 0.05 | 3485.19 | < 0.05 | |
R-squared analysis | R-squared analysis | R-squared analysis | |||||
R2 | 0.9995 | 0.9991 | 0.9998 | ||||
Design of Experiments:
Statistical Analysis of the Designed Experiment: The range of particle size (Y1) for all batches was 103 – 239 nm. Similarly, the range for % entrapment efficiency (Y2) was 78.63% – 93.32%, and the range for the cumulative percentage of drug released in 12 h (Y3) was 83.88 –98.91 %. All responses were fitted to a second quadratic model, and the adequacy of this model was verified by ANOVA; tests provided by Design-Expert software. For all the responses, the second-order quadratic model generated the highest F value, so it was identified as the fitting model, as shown in Table 4.
Effect on Particle Size (Y1): The particle size of the nanoparticles was found to be in the range of 103-239 nm, as shown in Table 3. The quadratic model generated revealed that the amount of tricapric, amount of cremophor RH40, and amount of soy lecithin significantly influence the Y1. The theoretical (predicted) values and the observed values were in reasonably good agreement. The equation results indicate that B's effect is more significant than A and C Table 4. The perturbation plot Fig. 4A shows that B has the main and the major effect on Y1, followed by A & C, which have a moderate effect on Y1. The respective contour plots Fig. 4B.
FIG. 4A: RESPONSE 3D SURFACE PLOT SHOWING THE INFLUENCE OF AMOUNT OF TRICAPRIC AND AMOUNT OF CREMOPHOR RH40 ON PARTICLE SIZE FIXED LEVEL OF C
FIG. 4B: CONTOUR PLOT SHOWING THE INFLUENCE OF AMOUNT TRICAPRIC AND AMOUNT OF CREMOPHOR RH40 ON PARTICLE SIZE FIXED LEVEL OF C
Entrapment Efficiency (%): The entrapment efficiency (%) of the SLNs was found to be in the range of 78.63% to 93.32 % as shown in Table 3. The quadratic model generated revealed that the amount of tricapric and amount of cremophor RH40 have a significant influence on the entrapment efficiency (%). The theoretical (predicted) values and the observed values were in reasonably good agreement as seen. Results of the equation indicate that the effect of B is more significant than A and C. The factorial equation for Entrapment Efficiency (%) showed a good correlation coefficient (0.9991) in Table 4. Fig. 5 A clearly shows that B has the main and the major effect on Y2 followed by C, which has a moderate effect on Y2. The respective contour plots are as shown in Fig. 5B.
FIG. 5A: RESPONSE 3D SURFACE PLOT SHOWING THE INFLUENCE OF AMOUNT OF TRICAPRIC AND AMOUNT OF CREMOPHOR RH40 ON ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY (%) FIXED LEVEL OF C
FIG. 5B: CONTOUR PLOT SHOWING THE INFLUENCE OF AMOUNT OF TRICAPRIC AND AMOUNT OF CREMOPHOR RH40 ON ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY (%) FIXED LEVEL OF C
FIG. 6A: RESPONSE 3D SURFACE PLOT SHOWING THE INFLUENCE OF AMOUNT OF TRICAPRIC AND AMOUNT OF CREMOPHOR RH40 ON CUMULATIVE % DRUG RELEASED FIXED LEVEL OF C
FIG. 6B: CONTOUR PLOT SHOWING THE INFLUENCE OF AMOUNT OF TRICAPRIC AND AMOUNT OF CREMOPHOR RH40 ON CUMULATIVE % DRUG RELEASED FIXED LEVEL OF C
Cumulative Percent Drug Released: The cumulative percent drug release in 12 h from the SLNs was found to be in the range of 78.37 – 98.87% Table 3. The quadratic model generated revealed that the amount of tricapric, amount of cremophor RH40 and amount of Soy lecithin have a significant influence on the particle size. Results of the equation indicate that the effect of B is more significant than A and C Table 4 and Fig. 6A and Fig. 6B.
Optimization by Desirability Function: An optimization process was undertaken with desirability function to optimize the three responses simultaneously. The results are shown in Table 5.
The model was proven to be validated since a fine agreement existed between the predicted and observed results.
It can be seen that the experimental values were in very close agreement with the predicted values, indicating the success of the Box–Behnken design combined with a desirability function for the evaluation and optimization of SLNs formulations.
TABLE 5: OPTIMIZED VALUES OBTAINED BY THE CONSTRAINTS APPLIES ON Y1, Y2 AND Y3
Independent variable | Nominal values
% |
Predicted values | |||||||
Particle size (Y1) (nm) | Entrapment Efficiency
(%) (Y2) |
%CDR (Y3) | Batch | Particle size (Y1) (nm) | Entrapment Efficiency (%) (Y2) | Percent drug release in 12 h (Y3) | |||
Amount of Tricapric(A) | 8 | 103 | 93.32 | 98.91 | 1 | 103 | 93.25 | 98.75 | |
Amount of Cremophor RH40(B) | 9 | 2 | 106 | 93.21 | 98.84 | ||||
Amount of Soy Lecithin (C) | 6 | 3 | 105 | 93.18 | 98.82 | ||||
Characterization of Optimized SLN:
FTIR Study: The FTIR of pure drug displays the carbonyl vibration in the 1900–1650 cm−1 region of the IR spectra. The N–H stretching exhibited a bathochromic shift from 3421.24 cm−1 to 3413.79 cm−1, whereas the N–H bending vibration appear at 1549.67 cm−1. No variation is observed in principal peaks of the drug in optimized formulation, indicating the compatibility between drug and excipients Fig. 7 and 8.
FIG. 7: FTIR OF PALBOCICLIB PURE DRUG
FIG. 8: FTIR OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION PF13
Droplet Size and Zeta Potential: Droplet size distribution following nanoemulsification is critical in evaluating a nanoemulsion system. The mean globule size of the selected SLN formulation PF 13 was 103 nm with low polydispersity index, which indicates the present technology's ability to produce nanoemulsion that offers larger interfacial surface area required for drug absorption. A narrow polydispersity index of 0.47 means that the colloidal particles are homogenous in nature. The optimized SLN showed a high absolute zeta potential value of -16.0 mv. The emulsion stability is directly related to the magnitude of the surface charge Fig. 9 and 10.
FIG. 9: PARTICLE SIZE OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION PF13
FIG. 10: ZETA POTENTIAL OF OPTIMIZED SLN PF13
FIG. 11: SEM OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION
SEM Analysis: The SEM data indicates spherical and uniform particles of Palbociclib optimized formulation PF 13, that are slightly porous with rougher surfaces. The roughness of surface is due to quick moisture loss from wet mass possessing higher liquid content due to porous surface Fig. 11.
Stability Studies: The formulation PF13 is found stable for 6 months with no significant variations in the values of particle size, entrapment efficiency, drug release profile and drug content value Table 6.
TABLE 6: STABILITY STUDIES OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION
Retest Time for Optimized formulation (PF13) | Particle Size
(nm) |
Entrapment Efficiency (%) | In-vitro drug release profile (%) | Drug content (%) |
0 days | 103 | 93.32±1.18 | 98.91±1.06 | 99.83±1.65 |
30 days | 103 | 93.25±1.09 | 98.84±1.23 | 99.83±2.12 |
60 days | 103 | 93.24±1.15 | 98.72±1.15 | 99.79±2.37 |
120 days | 103 | 93.24±1.11 | 98.68±1.20 | 99.75±2.55 |
180 days | 103 | 93.23±1.05 | 98.65±1.13 | 99.73±2.29 |
Values are expressed in mean± SD :( n=3)
CONCLUSION: In the present study, BBD was used for the optimization of SLN formulation. Controlled release profiles for more than 12 h were obtained by incorporating palbociclib into the solid matrix of tricapric based lipid nanoparticles. The use of surfactants cremophor RH40 and soy lecithin resulted in the formation SLNs with decreased particle size. For optimization, the desirable goal was fixed for various responses particle size, entrapment efficiency, and % cumulative drug release. The optimized single dose of SLN obtained using BBD the formulated SLNs were considered a promising approach to improve drug solubility and long-term stability.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Nil
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Rocca A, Schirone A, Maltoni R, Bravaccini S, Cecconetto L, Farolfi A, Bronte G and Andreis D: Progress with palbociclib in breast cancer: latest evidence and clinical considerations. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017; 9(2): 83-05.
- Mukherjee S, Ray S and Thakur RS: Solid lipid nanoparticles: A modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci 2009; 71: 349-58.
- Patra CN and Routray SB: Solid lipid-based delivery systems for oral delivery of drugs: A review. Asian J Pharmaceutics. 2018; 12: 12-23.
- Muller RH, Mader K and Gohla S: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlling drug delivery- A review of the state of the art. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000; 50: 161-77
- Kakodka SS and Gajare P: Pharmaceutical quality-by-design (QbD): Basic principles. Int J Res Methodol 2015; 1: 1-25
- Nerella A, Basava Raju D and Aruna Devi M: Formulation, optimization and in-vitro characterization of letrozole loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharm Sci and Drug Res 2014; 6(3): 183-88.
- Mehnert W and Mader K: Solid lipid nanoparticles: Production, characterization and applications, Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 47: 165-74.
- Huang Z, Hua S, Yang Y and Fang J: Development and evaluation of lipid nanoparticles for camptothecin delivery: a comparison of solid lipid nanoparticles, nano structured lipid carriers, and lipid emulsion. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 2008; 29 (9): 1094-02.
- Hao J, Fang X and Zhou Y: Development and optimization of solid lipid nanoparticle formulation for ophthalmic delivery of chloramphenicol using a Box-Behnken design. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011; 6: 683-92.
- Chang J, Huang Y, Hou S, Wang R, Wu P and Tsai Y: Formulation optimization of meloxicam sodium gel using response surface methodology. Int J Pharm. 2007; 338(1–2): 48–54.
- Myers R, Montgomery D and Anderson-Cook C: Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons 2009; 73(1): 25–33.
- Rahman Z, Zidan A, Habib M and Khan M: Understanding the quality of protein loaded PLGA nanoparticles variability by Plackett-Burman design. Int J Pharm 2010; 389(1–2): 186-94.
- Derringer G and Suich R: Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Techn 1980, 12: 214-19.
- Woitiski C, Veiga F, Ribeiro A and Neufeld R: Design for optimization of nanoparticles integrating biomaterials for orally dosed insulin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009; 73(1): 25–33.
- Schubert M and Müller-Goymann C: Solvent injection as a new approach for manufacturing lipid nanoparticles-evaluation of the method anprocess parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003; 55(1): 125-31.
- Schwarz C, Mehnert W, Lucks J and Müller R: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery. I. Production, characterization and sterilization. J Control Release 1994; 30(1): 83–96.
- Yang C, Zhao X and Hu H: Preparation, Optimization and Characteristic of Huperzine a Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers. Chem Pharm Bull 2010; 58(5): 656-61.
- Kovac evic AB, Muller RH and Savic SD: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) stabilized with polyhydroxy surfactants: preparation, characterization and physical stability investigation. Colloid Surf A 2014; 444: 15–25
- Chidambaram N, Porter W, K Flood and Qiu Y: Formulation and characterization of new layered diffusion matrices for zero-order systained release, J. Control. Release 1998; 52: 149-58.
- Bayomi MA: Geometric approach for zero-order release of drugs dispersed in an inert matrix. Pharm Res 1994; 11: 914-16.
- Zhang Z, Gao F, Bu H, and Xiao J: Solid lipid nanoparticles loading Dasatanibcilexetil enhance oral bioavailability: in-vitro characteristics and absorption mechanism in rats. Nanomedicine 2012, 8: 740-47
- Zhang Z, Gao F, Bu H and Xiao J: Solid lipid nanoparticles loading Palbociclib cilexetil enhance oral bioavailability: in-vitro characteristics and absorption mechanism in rats. Nanomedicine. 2012; 8: 740-47.
- Qiu S, Wang K and Li M: In-vitro dissolution studies of immediate-release and extended-release formulations using flow-through cell apparatus. Dissolution Technologies 2014; 21(2): 6-15.
How to cite this article:
Khan BH and Sandhya P: Palbociclib loaded solid lipid nanoparticles by box-behnken design: solubility enhancement. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2022; 13(3): 1241-50. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.13(3).1241-50.
All © 2022 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.