PHARMACOGNOSTIC AND PHYTOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT PLANTS OF WESTERN GHATS, INDIA
HTML Full TextPHARMACOGNOSTIC AND PHYTOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF POTENTIALLY IMPORTANT PLANTS OF WESTERN GHATS, INDIA
S. R. Wayal * 1 and S. S. Gurav 2
Center for Research and Development 1, PRIST University, Vallam, Thanjavur - 613403, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Pharmacognosy 2, Goa College of Pharmacy, Goa University, 18 June Road, Panaji - 403001, Goa, India.
ABSTRACT: Objective: The Indian traditional system of medicine, namely Ayurveda and Siddha, are primarily based on the use of the whole plant or different parts of plant singly or in combination to make multifactorial formulations. The use of plant drugs, however, demands correct identification of species and the characterization of phytoconstituents. Materials and Methods: The plants reported for their wound healing property in the Western Ghats by tribal community viz. Semecarpus anacardium L. (Bibba), Argemone mexicana L. (Firangi Dhotara), Cocculus hirsutus L. (Vasanvel), Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz. (Dhatki) were identified, authenticated and processed. The plant materials were subjected to morphological and microscopical evaluations. The proximate analysis (moisture content, ash values, extractive values and foreign organic matters) of powdered drugs were carried out. The powdered plant materials were extracted by a Soxhlet extraction process using different solvents. The concentrated extracts were subjected to preliminary phytochemical investigation. Results: The Semecarpus anacardium L. shows less moisture (fruits; 8.73 ± 0.95) and high inorganic content (leaves; 17.50 ± 0.92) as compared to other powdered drugs. The Argemone mexicana L. (35.68 ± 2.92), Cocculus hirsutus L. (41.53 ± 3.08) and Woodfordia fruticosa K. (29.26 ± 1.75 and 24.06 ± 3.01) shows high extractive values in methanolic extract whereas Semecarpus anacardium L. (fruits; 34.61 ± 0.75 and leaves 37.69 ± 1.86) shows in ethanolic extract. The least foreign organic matters (0.76 ± 0.45) were found in Woodfordia fruticosa K. flowers. The alkaloids, carbohydrates, steroids, glycosides, flavonoids and phenolic compounds were found in ethanolic and methanolic extracts. Conclusion: The data thus obtained by standardization of plant materials can be used during the preparation of polyherbal formulations to increase stability and efficacy.
Keywords: |
Proximate, Phytochemical, Standardization, Western Ghats, Morphological, Microscopical
INTRODUCTION: The importance of medicinal plant in drug development is known to humans and they have been using them for the treatment of different diseases since the beginning of human life 1.
The medicinal plants are available abundantly for human beings and animals from thousands of years due to the presence of phytochemical constituents.
India is recognized as an emporium of medicinal plants because of the presence of over 45,000 plant species in different bioclimatic zones. In India, about 90% of the herbs and medicinal plants used in industries are collected from wild sources 2. The traditional folk treatment from wild plants has always guided researchers to search for novel medications to develop healthy life for humans and animals 1.
The Indian traditional system of medicine, namely Ayurveda and Siddha, is primarily based on the use of whole plant or different parts of the plant singly or in combination to make multifactorial formulations. The renowned interest of plant-based drugs or medicines is because of easy availability, economic and less or no side effects 3. Nowadays, the demand for plant-based drugs is increased, which ultimately leads to the chances of substitution or adulteration. The therapeutic efficacy of medicinal plants always depends upon the quality and quantity of chemical constituents. The use of plant drugs, however, demands correct identification of species and the characterization of phytoconstituents. The misuse of herbal medicine or natural products starts with wrong identification, which can be solved by pharmacognostic studies comprising authentication, processing and standardization of medicinal plants 4.
The process of standardization can be achieved by stepwise pharmacognostic studies, which are an essential measure of quality. Most of the research in ‘Pharmacognosy’ consists of the identification and processing of controversial plants species through morphological, phytochemical and physicochemical analysis 3.
Despite the available modern techniques, ordinary light microscopy is still the most common method for primary authentication and has been universally used in the authentication of herbal medicines in India and many other countries because of its virtues of the requirement of a small amount of sample, fast speed and economy 4.
According to the World Health Organization, the macroscopic and microscopic description of a medicinal plant is the simplest and cheapest step towards establishing the identity and degree of purity of such materials and should be carried out before any tests are undertaken 5. Unlike taxonomic identification, the pharmacognostic study includes parameters which help in identifying adulteration in dry powder form also. Therefore pharmacognostic studies will ensure reproducible quality of herbal products which will lead to safety and efficacy of natural products 3. It will also provide helping hands for the industrialists for manufacturing of superior herbal based formulations 6. The objective of the present research work was to study the various pharmacognostic properties of therapeutically important plants of Western Ghats, India, i.e. Semecarpus anacardium L. (Bibba), Argemone mexicana L. (Firangi Dhotara), Cocculus hirsutus L. (Vasanvel), Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz. (Dhatki). These plants are used in traditional and folk medicinal practices and reported by the tribal or local community for their wound healing potential 7, 8. Present research work deals with pharmacognostic evaluation and standardization (macroscopical, microscopical and physicochemical) of research above plants, which will help their further utilization in the preparation of polyherbal formulation to explore its wound healing property.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Procurement, Authentication and Processing of Plant Materials: 9 The research plants viz. Semecarpus anacardium L. (Anacardiaceae), Argemone mexicana L. (Papaveraceae), Cocculus hirsutus L. (Menispermaceae), Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz. (Lythraceae) were collected from Western Ghats, India and deposited to Botanical Survey of India (B.S.I.), Pune (Maharashtra, India) for identification and authentication (Reference number BSI/WRC/Tech./2013/SND-1 Dated 06/12/2013; BSI/WRC/Tech./2013/JRB-01 Dated 27/11/2013; BSI/WRC/Tech./2013/GVG-01 Dated 31/12/2013; BSI/WRC/Tech./2013/GG-01 Dated 31/12/2013, respectively). The identified and authenticated plant materials were processed to remove adhered dirt and toxic components, dried and pulverized by the use of laboratory blender (REMI) to get coarse powder by passing through sieve no. 40 and retained on sieve no. 60.
Standardization of Plant Materials: The powdered crude drugs and freshly collected plant materials were subjected to stepwise pharmacognostic studies. The standardization of plant materials was carried out based on qualitative (morphological and microscopical) and quantitative (proximate) evaluations.
Morphological and Microscopical Evaluation: 10, 11, 12 The freshly collected plant parts were evaluated qualitatively for morphological and microscopical characteristics. The characteristics viz. size, shape, apex, margin, color, odor, taste and extra features, etc. were used for morphological evaluations. The microscopical characteristics were identified by dissecting plant parts.
Proximate Evaluations: 5, 9, 11, 13 The powdered crude drugs were analyzed quantitatively for different physicochemical parameters viz. moisture content, ash values, extractive values, foreign organic matters as per the standard procedures.
Preparation of Test Extracts: 11, 14 The powdered plant materials were packed in Soxhlet apparatus and then successively extracted with series solvents; petroleum ether, chloroform, ethanol and methanol (40 cycles each). The aqueous extract was obtained by maceration of remaining marc for seven days. After complete extraction extracts were filtered and concentrated for further studies at reduced pressure and temperature in a rotary evaporator.
Preliminary Phytochemical Evaluation: The concentrated tests extracts were subjected to preliminary phytochemical investigation for the detection of various secondary metabolites such as tannins, saponins, sterols, triterpenes, alkaloids, flavonoids, protein/amino acids and carbohydrates and glycosides 9, 11.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The plants for investigation were collected from different regions of Western Ghats, India Table 1. Detoxification or purification process involves the conversion of the poisonous drug into beneficial, non-poisonous, or non-toxic one's Table 2.
TABLE 1: DETAILS OF COLLECTION OF PLANT SPECIES AND PLANT PARTS
S. no. | Common/Local Names of Plant | Plant Parts | Place of Collection |
1 | Bhallataka/Bibba | Fruits and leaves | Kanersar, Tal- Khed, Pune, Maharashtra, India |
2 | Mexican Prickly Poppy/ Firangi Dhotara | Whole plant | Wagholi, Tal- Haveli, Pune, Maharashtra, India |
3 | Broom Creeper/Vasanvel | Whole plant | Pirangut, Tal- Mulasi, Pune, Maharashtra, India |
4 | Red Bell Bush/Dhatki | Leaves and flowers | Pirangut, Tal- Mulasi, Pune, Maharashtra, India |
TABLE 2: DETAILS OF DETOXIFICATION OF COLLECTED PLANT MATERIALS
S.
no. |
Plant
Species |
Plant
Part |
Method of
Detoxification |
Significance of Detoxification |
1
|
Semecarpus anacardium L.
|
Fruits | The thalamus portions of the collected fruits were removed and kept in Gomutra (for 7 days) and then washed with water. The fruits were then shifted to a jute bag containing brick gravels (for 3 days), rubbed thoroughly and dried 13, 15 | The toxic compounds like Bhilawanol and Anacardic acids present in tarry oil of pericarp of the fruits were removed |
Leaves | The collected leaves of the plant were washed with distilled water | The dust, foreign particles, debris, etc. were removed. | ||
2 | Argemone
mexicana L. |
Whole plant | The collected whole plant materials were washed with distilled water and lime-water | The dust, earthy matters, foreign particles, debris, etc. were removed |
3 | Cocculus hirsutus L. | Whole plant | ||
4 | Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz. | Leaves | The collected leaves and flowers were washed with distilled water | The dust, foreign particles, debris, etc. were removed |
Flowers |
The processing of collected plant materials and parts was performed to detoxify indigenous toxic ingredients, to improve the purity of the drug, to reduce the drying time, to prevent damage from mold and to achieve desired therapeutic efficacy of the drug 15. The excessive moisture of the collected plant materials was removed by the drying process. These dried drugs were coarsely powdered by using a mechanical grinder and stored in airtight containers separately with appropriate labeling until they were used for further evaluations. The current pharmacognostical methods in identification of crude drugs are based on their morphological, microscopical or histological studies and chemical analysis. The morphological or macroscopical characteristics of the plant materials would be beneficial for identification and standardization on primary basis 5, 11.
The plant parts were evaluated for morphological as well as for organoleptic properties Table 3. The morphological and organoleptic characters of crude drugs were not always sufficient for identification and standardization of herbal drug. Therefore, crude or fresh parts of plant materials were confirmed by their histological evaluation 5, 11.
The microscopic analysis can provide supporting evidence, which, when combined with other analytical parameters for standardization and evaluation of herbal drugs.
TABLE 3: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COLLECTED PLANT MATERIALS
The special microscopical and chemomicroscopical characteristics of freshly collected or crude plant materials were carried out using thin sections Fig. 1-4.
FIG. 1: TRANSVERSE SECTION OF FRUIT OF SEMECARPUS ANACARDIUM LINN.
The T. S. of the fruit of Semecarpus anacardium Linn. showed pericarp which comprises three layers of parenchymatous cells, i.e. epicarp, mesocarp, and endocarp. Epicarp showed the presence of epidermis made up of radially elongated, single layered cells of parenchyma. Epidermal cells were covered with a thin layer of cuticles (Red color with Sudan red solution). Mesocarp comprises numerous layers (about 30-40 layers) of small and sub globular parenchymatous cells immediately below to the epicarp. The parenchyma of mesocarp consists of special characteristics viz. oil globules (Red color with Sudan red solution), papillae cells, lysogenous cavities, etc.
Rosette calcium oxalate crystals were found scattered in parenchymatous cells. Endocarp cells of fruit were differentiated into two layers of parenchyma viz. outermost and innermost endocarp layer. The outermost layer was shorter and thick than that of the innermost layer which comprises of somewhat elongated cells. The innermost layer was big, thick, and fashioned with very radially elongated cells. Below to the endocarp, the cells of seed were observed, which comprises cotyledons with endosperm, aleurone grains (Yellow color with alcoholic picric acid) and fixed oil (Red color with Sudan red solution).
FIG. 2: TRANSVERSE SECTION OF LEAF OF ARGEMONE MEXICANA LINN.
The microscopical studies of the leaf of Argemone mexicana Linn. showed midrib and lamina. Midrib consists of upper and lower epidermises, which were biconvex in outline. Below to the upper epidermis and above to the lower epidermis few layers of rounded, thick-walled, cellulosic collenchymatous cells were observed. Most of the part of midrib occupied with arc-shaped vascular bundle. The vascular bundle consists of lignified xylem vessels (Pink color with phloroglucinol and conc. HCl) and few layers of small, rounded, non-lignified phloem parenchyma.
The lamina (Dorsiventral) of the leaf consists of the upper epidermis, mesophyll and lower epidermis. The epidermises were surrounded by thick cuticles (Red color with Sudan Red solution). The upper epidermis consists of thin-walled, single layered, polygonal, tangentially elongated parenchymatous cell with diacytic stomata. The lower epidermis was the same as that of the upper epidermis. No trichomes were found on both epidermises. Mesophyll comprises of radially elongated, compactly arranged, single layered palisade cells. Mesophyll also consists of few layers of rectangular or rounded shaped spongy parenchyma cells, which were loosely arranged with intracellular spaces. The microscopical characteristics of the leaf of Cocculus hirsutus Linn. were almost the same as that of the leaf of Argemone mexicana Linn. The few special and differential microscopical characteristics of the leaf were identified.
FIG. 3: TRANSVERSE SECTION OF LEAF OF COCCULUS HIRSUTUS LINN.
The hemispherical (Crescent) vascular bundle covered by sclerenchymatous bundle sheath was observed. The stomata were absent on upper epidermis, but lower epidermis consists of numerous anomocytic stomata. Upper and lower epidermis both carry few long, ribbon-shaped, unicellular covering trichomes which were tapering at the apex and mesophyll comprises spongy parenchyma with starch grains (Blue color with iodine solution).
FIG. 4: TRANSVERSE SECTION OF LEAF OF WOODFORDIA FRUTICOSA KURZ.
The microscopy of the leaf of Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz. revealed the presence of arc-shaped bi-collateral vascular bundle in the center. The numerous simple, curved and unicellular to multicellular trichomes were observed on lower epidermis. Below upper epidermis, mesophyll comprises of a single layer of radially elongated, compactly arranged, cylindrical shaped palisade cells containing chlorophyll pigments were observed. Mesophyll consists of spongy parenchyma with few simple, oval starch grains (Blue color with iodine solution) and cluster crystals of calcium oxalate (Insoluble in acetic acid and soluble in sulphuric acid).
TABLE 4: MOISTURE CONTENT OF POWDERED PLANT MATERIALS
S. no. | Parameters | Values in Mean % w/w ± S.D | |||||
Semecarpus
anacardium L. |
Argemone mexicana L. | Cocculus hirsutus L. | Woodfordia
fruticosa K. |
||||
Fruits | Leaves | Whole Plant | Whole Plant | Leaves | Flowers | ||
1 | Moisture Content | 8.73±0.95 | 15.45±0.00 | 12.99±1.05 | 15.76±0.20 | 16.75±0.73 | 9.46±1.01 |
2 | Total Ash | 7.54±0.21 | 17.50±0.92 | 9.54±0.311 | 13.86±0.61 | 8.16±0.34 | 10.72±0.91 |
3 | Acid Insoluble Ash | 0.8±0.10 | 2.77±0.55 | 0.90±0.055 | 0.86±0.07 | 1.11±0.23 | 2.85±0.30 |
4 | Water Soluble Ash | 1.33±0.17 | 11.29±2.53 | 7.41±1.07 | 7.49±0.19 | 5.27±0.25 | 5.90±0.24 |
5 | Ethanol Soluble Extractive | 34.61±0.75 | 37.69±1.86 | 28.03±2.89 | 27.62±1.95 | 26.21±2.21 | 20.21±2.48 |
6 | Methanol Soluble Extractive | 31.08±2.15 | 31.14±3.62 | 35.68±2.92 | 41.53±3.08 | 29.26±1.75 | 24.06±3.01 |
7 | Chloroform Soluble Extractive | 4.40±1.00 | 5.40±0.99 | 8.02±2.17 | 6.06±0.81 | 3.71±0.87 | 7.93±1.89 |
8 | Water Soluble Extractive | 18.09±2.60 | 20.26±2.74 | 14.95±2.01 | 21.50±3.12 | 17.73±1.52 | 14.03±1.81 |
9 | Foreign Organic Matters | 2.87±0.94 | 5.61±0.58 | 8.66±1.43 | 6.85±1.57 | 6.75±1.98 | 0.76±0.45 |
The proximate analysis involves the determination of physicochemical attributes of the drug to determine its identity, quality and purity. Results of the proximate analysis are shown in Table 4. The determination of moisture content gives an idea about stability and susceptibility of crude drug toward bacterial growth. The values of moisture content of Semecarpus anacardium L. (leaves), Argemone mexicana L. (whole plant), Cocculus hirsutus L. (whole plant) and Woodfordia fruticosa K. (leaves) was found to be 15.45 ± 0.00, 12.99 ± 1.05, 15.76 ± 0.20 and 16.75 ± 0.73 respectively.
Ash value indicates the earthy matter or the inorganic composition viz. carbonates, phosphates, silicates and other impurities present along with the drug 11. The inorganic content was found to be high in the powdered drug of Semecarpus anacardium L. (leaves) and Cocculus hirsutus L. (whole plant) viz. 17.50 ± 0.92 and 13.86 ± 0.61 respectively. Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid is the residue obtained after extracting the total ash with hydrochloric acid. This acid-insoluble ash value particularly indicates contamination with siliceous materials like earth or sand 11. The value of acid insoluble ash of Semecarpus anacardium L. (leaves; 2.77 ± 0.55) and Woodfordia fruticosa K. (leaves; 1.11 ± 0.23 and flowers; 2.85 ± 0.29) was found to be more. Water soluble ash is the part of total ash content soluble in water and a good indicator of either previous extraction of water-soluble salts in the drug 11.
The water-soluble salt content was found to be high in the powdered drug of Semecarpus anacardium L., Argemone mexicana L. and Cocculus hirsutus L. viz. 11.29 ± 2.53 (leaves), 7.41 ± 1.07 (whole plant) and 7.49 ± 0.19 (whole plant) respectively. The extractive value indicates amount of phytoconstituents present in the sample crude drug and helps in the determination of exhausted or adulterated drug species 11.
The extractive values of methanolic extract of Argemone mexicana L. (35.68 ± 2.92), Cocculus hirsutus L. (41.53 ± 3.08) and Woodfordia fruticosa K. (29.26 ± 1.75 and 24.06 ± 3.01) were found to be more whereas, extractive values of Semecarpus anacardium L. were high in ethanolic extract of fruit (34.61 ± 0.75) and leaves (37.69 ± 1.86). The determination of foreign organic matters signifies the contamination of plant parts with insect, molds or other animals. The high content of foreign organic matters indicates that plant material is not appropriate for further study 11. The foreign organic matters of whole plant Argemone mexicana Linn. (8.66 ± 1.43), leaves of Semecarpus anacardium Linn. (5.61 ± 0.58), whole plant of Cocculus hirsutus Linn. (6.85 ± 1.57) and leaves of Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz. (6.75 ± 1.98) was found to be high.
The polar and non-polar solvents were used to isolate phytoconstituents of powdered crude drugs. The continuous Soxhlet extraction method was used to prepare test extracts. The extracts thus obtained were dried and utilized for preliminary phytochemical screening.
Preliminary phytochemical evaluation of the concentrated test extracts was carried out through various qualitative chemical tests for identification of phytoconstituents like alkaloids, glycosides, phenolic compounds, steroids, carbohydrate, fats, proteins, amino acids etc. Table 5.
TABLE 5: PRELIMINARY PHYTOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF TEST EXTRACTS
S.
no. |
Solvents | Pet. Ether 40-60 °C | Chloroform | Ethanol | Methanol | Water | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical Test | SA | AM | CH | WF | SA | AM | CH | WF | SA | AM | CH | WF | SA | AM | CH | WF | SA | AM | CH | WF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Test for Alkaloids | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Mayer’s Test | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | Hager’s Test | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||
c) | Wagner’s Test | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Test for Carbohydrate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A | General Test | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Molisch's Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B | Test for Reducing Sugar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | Fehling Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
c) | Benedict’s Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Test for Steroids | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Salkowski Reaction | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | + | - | - | + | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | LibermanBurchards Test | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | + | - | - | + | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Test for Glycosides | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A | Test for Cardiac Glycoside | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Baljet’s Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | Keller-killiani Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B | Test for Anthraquinone Glycosides | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Brontrager’s Test | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C | Test for Saponin Glycosides | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Foam Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Test for Flavonoids | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Lead Acetate Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | Shinoda Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Test for Fat and Oils | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Solubility Test | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | Filter Paper Test | + | - | + | + | + | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Test for Tannin and Phenolic Compound | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Ferric Chloride Solution Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | Lead Acetate Solution Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
c) | Bromine Water Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Test for Protein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Biuret Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | - | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Test for Amino Acid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Ninhydrin Test | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | - | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | Test for Gums and Mucilage’s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a) | Hydrolyse Test (Gums) | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b) | Ruthenium Red Test (Mucilage) | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“+” Indicates presence and “-” Indicates absence of active constituents
The preliminary phytochemical investigation reveals that ethanolic and methanolic extracts of Semecarpus anacardium L. were consists of carbohydrates, steroids, cardiac and saponin glycosides, flavonoids, tannins and phenolic compounds. All extracts of Semecarpus anacardium L. were found to be devoid of alkaloids, proteins and amino acids. Whereas gums and mucilages were found to be present in all test extracts of Semecarpus anacardium L. except petroleum ether extract. The ethanolic extract of Argemone mexicana L. was found to contain alkaloids, saponin glycosides, flavonoids, tannins and phenolic compounds.
However, methanolic extract was found to contain saponin glycosides, flavonoids and phenolics. The fats and oils were found to be absent in all test extracts of Argemone mexicana L. whereas petroleum ether extract was found to contain only alkaloids and steroids. The methanolic extract of Cocculus hirsutus L. was found to contain carbohydrates, steroids, cardiac glycosides, phenolics like tannins and flavonoids. The Phytoconstituents like alkaloids, carbohydrates, cardiac glycosides, flavonoids and tannins and phenolic compounds were found to be present in ethanolic extract. Whereas petroleum ether and chloroform extracts revealed alkaloids, steroids, fats and oils. The aqueous extract of Cocculus hirsutus L. contains only phenolic compounds and carbohydrates. The proteins, amino acids and gums and mucilages were found to be absent in all test extracts of Cocculus hirsutus L.
CONCLUSION: The pharmacognostic studies of herbal drugs will help in the development of Pharmacopoeial standards and their further exploration in various Ayurvedic or polyherbal formulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are thankful to JSPM’s Charak College of Pharmacy and Research, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra, India, for providing facilities to conduct research activity.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Gul R, Jan SU, Faridullah S, Sherani S and Jahan N: Preliminary phytochemical screening, quantitative analysis of alkaloids, and antioxidant activity of crude plant extract from Ephedra intermedia indigenous to Balochistan. The Scientific World Journal 2017; 1-7.
- Sivasankari B, Pitchaimani S and Anandharaj M: A study on traditional medicinal plants of Uthapuram, Madurai District, Tamil Nadu, South India. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2013; 3(12): 975-79.
- Chanda S: Importance of the pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2014; 2(5): 69-73.
- Gurav S and Gurav N: Indian Herbal Drug Microscopy. Springer Sciences, New York, Edition 1st, 2014: 1-3.
- World Health Organization: Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. WHO Library, Geneva 1998.
- Bikshapathi and Shantha: Role of “Pharmacognosy” in Ayurveda. Ayurved Conference Paper. Regional Research Institute, Bangalore 2006; 79-87.
- Bahir SS, Wayal SR, Barke AS, Shelke TT, Gunjegaonkar SM, Hadke SP, and Bayas JP: Preliminary phytochemical investigation of anacardium Linn. International J of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sci 2013; 5(3): 102-07.
- Ramachandra TV and Suja A: Sahyadri: Western Ghats Biodiversity Information System. Biodiversity in Indian Scenarios 2006: 1.
- Khandelwal KR and Sethi V: Practical Pharmacognosy Techniques and Experiments. Nirali Prakashan, Pune, Edition 24th, 2014.
- Gurav S and Gurav N: Indian Herbal Drug Microscopy. Springer Sciences, New York, Edition 1st, 2014.
- Mukherjee PK: Quality Control of Herbal Drugs an Approach to Evaluation of Botanicals. Business Horizons Pharmaceutical Publishers, Delhi, Edition 3rd, 2008.
- Gurav S, Tilloo S and Burade K: Indian Herbal Drug Microscopy. Springer Sciences, New York, 2014: 9-14.
- Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: Indian Pharmacopoeia of India. The Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, Edition 7th, Vol. I, 2014.
- Gurav S, Deshkar N, Tilloo S, Duragkar N, Burade K: Antimicrobial and antioxidant evaluation of Flacourtia ramontchi Herit. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 2013; 19: 76-95.
- Kore SC, Majumdar SH, Suryawanshi JS and Pimpodkar NV: Investigation on chemical changes occurs during purification (Shodhana) of Bhallataka by HPTLC. International Research Journal of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences 2018; 1(3): 5-10.
How to cite this article:
Wayal SR and Gurav SS: Pharmacognostic and phytochemical investigation of potentially important plants of Western Ghats, India. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2019; 10(6): 3101-08. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(6).3101-08.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
60
3101-3108
948
1477
English
IJPSR
S. R. Wayal * and S. S. Gurav
Department of Pharmacognosy, JSPM’s Charak College of Pharmacy & Research, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
sandy.wayal@gmail.com
25 April 2019
27 May 2019
29 May 2019
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(6).3101-08
01 June 2019