PHYSICOCHEMICAL, PHYTOCHEMICAL PROFILING AND ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF PTEROCARPUS MARSUPIUM
HTML Full TextPHYSICOCHEMICAL, PHYTOCHEMICAL PROFILING AND ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF PTEROCARPUS MARSUPIUM
Ramesh L. Londonkar * and Aruna L. Hugar
Biopharmaceutical and Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Post-Graduate Department of Studies and Research in Biotechnology, Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
ABSTRACT: Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. (Fabaceae) is a moderate to large deciduous tree, belonging to family Fabaceae. It is considered as an extremely useful source of unique natural products for development of medicines against various diseases and for industrial product development. The present study includes physicochemical parameters like ash value, extractive value, fluorescence analysis, moisture content and preliminary phytochemical screening along with mineral analysis. Antimicrobial activity was also assessed for this plant. The physicochemical constants obtained were within normal levels prescribed by standards. The phytochemical studies revealed the presence of primary and secondary metabolites in various solvent extracts of Pterocarpus marsupium bark. The estimated mineral composition was in good amounts which would serve as a device for deciding dosage of ayurvedic drug prepared from the plant. Antimicrobial activity by disc diffusion method indicated the zone of inhibition which ranges from 11-22mm for different extracts. Further evaluation of test samples for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using micro dilution method showed that the methanol extract had exhibited significant activity by inhibiting S.typhi, E.faecalis at 12.5μg/ml and A.niger at 25μg/ml. The present paper will provide the data which is helpful in correct identification, standardization of this medicinal plant prior to carrying out further pharmacological evaluation and also help in preventing its adulteration.
Keywords: |
Pterocarpus marsupium, Physico-Chemical Evaluation, Phyto-Chemical Screening, Disc-Diffusion Assay, MIC
INTRODUCTION: Herbal traditional medicines have obtained appreciable amount of momentum worldwide during the past decade and play a paramount role in health management programs especially in developing countries 1. It is estimated that world’s quadrant population i.e, 1.42 billion people are dependent on folk medicines for the treatment of various ailments 2.
However, a key obstacle, which has hindered the acceptance of the alternative medicines in the developed countries, is the scarcity of documentation, stringent quality assessment and control. There is an internationally increasing demand for documentation of research work accomplished on traditional medicines. With this backdrop, it becomes extremely important to make an attempt towards standardization of the plant material to be used as traditional medicine for proper marketing authorization and approval 3. The process of standardization can be achieved by stepwise pharmacognostic and phytochemical studies. Antibiotic resistance has also become a serious and widespread problem in developing countries, causing high mortality each year 4.
These disadvantages undermine the therapeutic utility of the currently available antibacterial drugs and thus necessitating the need for using alternative therapeutic agents from plants origin that are effective against antibiotic resistant bacteria, safe and low cost 5. Medicinal plants are known to produce certain bioactive molecules which react with other organisms in the environment, inhibiting bacterial or fungal growth 6. Different chemical compounds isolated from the bark exhibit wide pharmacological activities and plays a role in treating the various disorders related to human health.
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. is commonly called Red Kino Tree (English), Bijasal (Hindi) and Raktahonne (Kannada). It is native to India, Nepal and Sri Lanka, where it exists in parts of the Western Ghats. Traditionally, the plant material has been used as a cooling external application for headache, inflammations, as antipyretic, anti-helminthic, aphrodisiac, mental aberrations and ulcers. The bark is used for the treatment of stomachache, cholera, dysentery, urinary complaints, tongue diseases and toothache 7. The heartwood and bark of Pterocarpus marsupium are known for their anti-diabetic activity 8.
A variety of flavonoids and their derivatives have been isolated from different parts of the plant. It also showed its antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumonia 9. The literature survey revealed that systemic evaluation of this plant is still lacking. Therefore, the present research work was aimed to evaluate the physicochemical, phytochemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of the Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. bark.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Procurement and Identification of Bark material: About 5kg of Pterocarpus marsupium bark was collected from village Shadipur, Chincholi in Kalaburagi district, Karnataka, India during the month of June 2015. It was identified by the Department of Botany, Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi.
Preparation of plant extract: Freshly collected bark of Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. was washed thoroughly under running tap water and later through distilled water, shade dried and then powdered to required particle size. The air dried bark powder (100g) were successively extracted by Hot Soxhlet extraction with solvents of increasing polarity i.e., petroleum ether, chloroform, methanol and distilled water(aqueous).The extracts were dehydrated and preserved in a sterile container for further use.
Physicochemical analysis: The finely powdered bark of Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. was subjected to various physicochemical parameters such as determination of ash value like total ash, acid insoluble ash and water soluble ash, Extractive values like petroleum ether, chloroform, methanol and water soluble, Loss on drying (Moisture content) as per the WHO guidelines on quality control methods for medicinal plant materials and according to the standard methods prescribed in Indian Pharmacopeia 10, 11. Fluorescence investigation was executed according to the method of Kokoski 12, 13.
Phytochemical screening: Petroleum ether, chloroform, methanol and aqueous extracts were subjected to phytochemical analysis for the presence of various secondary phytoconstituents using standard procedure described by Kokatte 14, 15.
Mineral analysis: The minerals like cadmium (Cd), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), vanadium (V), titanium (Ti), calcium (Ca), and molybdenum (Mo) contents of the powdered samples were determined by the standard methods given by NIN 16. All the determinations were done in triplicates.
Determination of antimicrobial activity:
Test organisms: The antimicrobial activity of Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. bark was assessed against four gram negative bacterial strains; Salmonella typhimurium (MTCC 98), Escherichia coli (MTCC 45), Enterobacter aerogenes (MTCC111) and Shigella dysenteriae; two gram positive bacterial strains; Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29122) and Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), fungal species; Aspergillus niger (MTCC 282). The test organisms were supplied by the Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
Disc Diffusion Method: The agar well diffusion method was followed to test different extracts of Pterocarpus marsupium bark for antimicrobial activity 17, 18 .The bacterial isolates were grown in nutrient broth for 18 hour and standardized to 0.5 McFarland standards (106 CFU/ml). The fungal isolates grown on Potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25°C until they are sporulated. The fungal spores were harvested and standardized to 0.1 OD at 600nm. The nutrient agar and potato dextrose agar plates were prepared by pouring 20ml of molten media into sterile petriplates. 0.1% inoculum suspension was swabbed uniformly and the inoculum was allowed to dry for 5 minutes. Wells were punched using a sterile 6mm cork borer.100μl of the crude extract (100 mg/ml) was added into the wells, incubated at 37°C, 24hrs for bacteria and 25˚C, 48hrs for fungi. The effects were compared with standard chemotherapeutic agent Cefixime (30mcg, Hi-Media), Piperacillin(30mcg) and Amphotericin B(20mcg) for the gram positive, gram negative bacterial and fungal assays respectively. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as negative control. Antimicrobial activity was assayed by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition formed around the well using standard (Hi-Media) scale. The experiment done in triplicate and the average values were calculated for antibacterial activity.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Assay: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of different extracts were determined by the broth dilution method 19. In this method, 2ml of nutrient broth and subsequently varying concentrations (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25mgmlˉ¹) of plant extracts was added in different test tubes. Standardized inoculums (0.1 ml, 106cfu/ml) of bacterial and fungal suspensions were added to each test tube and incubated at 370C, 12h for bacteria and 250C, 24h for fungi. The test tube with the concentration of plant extract at which no detectable growth was observed is considered as the MIC.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Physicochemical analysis: The nature and colour of petroleum ether extract was found to be oily, greasy yellow, methanol extract to be semi-solid red wine where as chloroform and aqueous extract appeared as solid brown.
An analytical result for total ash was found to be 11.4%. The amount of acid insoluble and water soluble ash were found to be 2.64% and 2.35% respectively. From results, it is clear that the amount of water soluble ash is less than that of acid insoluble ash, whereas the amount of total ash was almost double the quantity of water soluble ash as shown in Table 1. The ash content gives an idea about the inorganic content of powdered bark under exploration and thus the quality of the drugs can be evaluated. On the other hand, the water soluble extractive value of the drug was found to be 2.35% which indicates the presence of water soluble components such as sugars, acids and inorganic compounds etc and the alcohol soluble extractive values was found to be petroleum ether (0.5%), chloroform (1.10%), methanol soluble (11.49%) which indicates the presence of polar constituents like phenols, alkaloids steroids, glycosides & flavonoids.
The extractive values are valuable to estimate the chemical constituents present in the crude drug and furthermore aid in evaluation of definite constituents soluble in a particular solvent 20. The results of physicochemical analyses were identified within the acceptable limit which in turn ascertains the quality as well as purity of drug. The moisture content was determined by loss on drying and was found to be 7.2%. The less value of moisture content of drugs could prevent bacterial, fungal or yeast growth through storage 21.
TABLE 1: PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS
S.no.
1 |
Parameters | Percentage(%) |
Total ash value | 11.4 | |
2 | Acid insoluble ash | 2.64 |
3 | Water soluble ash | 2.35 |
4 | Petroleum ether soluble extractive | 0.5 |
5 | Chloroform soluble extractive | 1.10 |
6 | Methanol soluble extractive | 11.49 |
7 | Water soluble extractive | 2.35 |
8 | Moisture content | 7.2 |
Fluorescence analysis: Fluorescence is the phenomenon exhibited by various chemical components present in the plant material. In the present study, the fluorescence analysis of Pterocarpus marsupium bark powder was analyzed under visible light and UV light when treated with different chemicals and solvents.
The exposure of the powder to visible and UV light revealed the development of respective colours as presented in Table 2. Fluorescence analysis of powder gives a clue if powder is in adulteration, thus can be used as a diagnostic device for analyzing the adulteration. Presence or absence of certain important compounds in an extract is determined by color reactions of the compounds with precise chemicals which act as dyes. This method is prerequisite before going for detailed phytochemical investigation 22.
TABLE 2: FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF BARK POWDER
Sl no: | Treatment | Observation under
Visible light |
Observation under
UV light |
1 | Powder as such | Brown | Brown |
2 | Powder+Distilled water | Brick red | Dark brown |
3 | Powder+Petroleum ether | Light brown | Fluorescent green |
4 | Powder+Chloroform | Dark brown | Fluorescent green |
5 | Powder+Methanol | Red | Dark green |
6 | Powder+50% HCl | Pale yellow | Fluorescent green |
7 | Powder+50% HNO3 | Mustard yellow | Pink |
8 | Powder+50% H2SO4 | Brown | Dark green |
9 | Powder+Picric acid | Yellowish brown | Yellowish green |
10 | Powder+Ammonia | Reddish black | Dark green |
11 | Powder+1NNaOH(alcoholic) | Light brown | Fluorescent green |
12 | Powder+1N NaOH (aqueous) | Reddish black | Dark green |
13 | Powder+Ferric chloride | Greenish black | Dark green |
14 | Powder+Acetic acid | Light brown | Fluorescent green |
15 | Powder+Ethyl acetate | Light brown | Fluorescent green |
Phytochemical screening: Carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, lipids and fats were present in petroleum ether and chloroform extracts whereas, methanol extract has showed positive response for all the metabolites except saponins. Aqueous extract was found to contain carbohydrates, proteins, steroids, saponins, alkaloids and tannins as summarized in Table 3. Phytochemical analysis is useful in detecting the source of pharmacologically active chemical constituents. The plant contains isoflavon glycosides, fixed oil, saponin, tannin, flavonoids, alkaloids, mucilage, resin and polyphenol compounds in various parts of it 23. The phytocomponents procured in this study also correlates with the above report.
TABLE 3: PHYTOCHEMICAL TESTS FOR DIFFERENT EXTRACTS OF PTEROCARPUS MARSUPIUM BARK
Sl.no: | Tests | Petroleum ether | Chloroform | Methanol | Water |
1 | Test for Carbohydrates | ||||
A)Molisch test | + | + | + | + | |
B)Benedicts test | + | + | + | + | |
C)Fehlings test | + | + | + | + | |
2 | Test for Proteins | ||||
A)Biuret test | + | + | + | + | |
B)Ninhydrin test | + | + | + | + | |
3 | Test for Oils and Fats | ||||
A)Spot test | + | + | + | - | |
B)Saponification test | + | + | + | - | |
4 | Test for Phenols | ||||
A)Phenol test | - | - | + | - | |
B)Ellagic test | - | - | + | - | |
C)Ferric chloride test | - | - | + | - | |
D)Lead acetate test | - | - | + | - | |
E)Gelatin test | - | - | + | - | |
5 | Test for Flavonoids | ||||
A)Flavonoids test | - | - | + | - | |
B)Shinoda test | - | - | + | - | |
C)Ferric chloride test | - | - | + | - | |
D)Lead acetate test | - | - | + | - | |
6 | Test for Steroids | ||||
A)Salkowaski test | - | - | + | + | |
B) Leibermann burchard test | - | - | + | + | |
7 | Test for Saponins | ||||
A)Foam test | - | - | - | + | |
B)Haemolysis test | - | - | - | + | |
8 | Test for Alkaloids | ||||
A)Mayers test | - | - | + | + | |
B)Wagners test | - | - | + | + | |
C)Hagers test | - | - | + | + | |
9 | Test for Taninns | ||||
A)Ferric chloride test | - | - | + | + | |
B)Gelatin test | - | - | + | + | |
10 | Test for Glycosides | ||||
A)Keller-killaini test | - | - | + | - | |
B)Conc. Sulphuric acid test | - | - | + | - |
+ Presence of the Compound; - Absence of the Compound
Mineral analysis: The AAS elemental analysis of the plant was presented in the Table 4. The mineral values were reported as parts per million(ppm).The estimated mineral composition were found in good amounts which would serve as a device for deciding dosage of Ayurvedic drug prepared from the plant. Mineral elements possess a very important role in human nutrition. Though they are required in minute quantities they are essential for proper functioning of the entire human system. This can further be investigated in a wide scale for the purpose of drug development against various deficiencies 24.
TABLE 4: MINERAL ANALYSIS
1 | Cadmium(Cd) | 0.0104 |
2 | Manganese(Mn) | 0.0291 |
3 | Zinc(Zn) | 0.0351 |
4 | Copper(Cu) | 0.0058 |
5 | Potassium(K) | 0.3059 |
6 | Magnesium(Mg) | 0.5973 |
7 | Vanadium(V) | 0.5643 |
8 | Titanium(Ti) | 1.7170 |
9 | Calcium(Ca) | 3.2022 |
10 | Molybdenum(Mo) | 0.1142 |
ppm- parts per million
Antimicrobial activity: Among the four solvent extracts, maximum inhibition was observed in methanol extract (14-22mm) followed by aqueous (13-19mm), petroleum ether (11-17) and chloroform extracts (13-16mm) as shown in Fig. 1. The results were compared with standard Cefixime (14-28mm), Piperacillin (21mm) for gram positive, gram negative bacteria respectively and Amphotercin B (25–28mm) for fungi. 10% DMSO was used as negative control which showed no inhibitory effect against the tested organisms. The results of MIC assay as shown in the Table 5, explains that the methanol extract of Pterocarpus marsupium bark has shown significant antibacterial activity for S.typhimurium at 12.5µg/ml and antifungal activity for Aspergillus niger at 25µg/ml.
FIG. 1: ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITIES OF PTEROCARPUS MARSUPIUM BARK AGAINST A. Enterobacter aerogenes, B. Escherichia coli, C. Shigella dysenteriae, D. Salmonella typhimurium, E. Staphylococcus aureus, F. Enterococcus faecalis, G. Aspergillus niger respectively. PE-Petroleum ether, Ch-Chloroform, Met-Methanol, Aq-Aqueous extracts, Disc-Positive control,-ve-Negative control
On the basis of zone of inhibition and MIC values, Salmonella typhimurium was more sensitive to the methanol extract than all other organisms with inhibition zone of 19mm and MIC value of 12.5µg/ml respectively.
Similarly methanol extract of P.marsupium bark indicated maximum activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyrogens and Staphylococcus aureus 25. Further, identification and elucidation of active constituents in the plant material is expected to develop novel bioactive antimicrobial compounds which can be useful in designing new drugs active against several infectious micro-organisms.
TABLE 5: MIC OF BARK EXTRACTS ON BACTERIAL AND FUNGAL STRAIN
Test Organism | Strains | PE | CE | ME | AE |
Enterobacter aerogenes | MTCC 111 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Escherichia coli | MTCC 45 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 |
Shigella dysenteriae | Clinical isolate | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 |
Salmonella typhimurium | MTCC 98 | 100 | 50 | 12.5 | 25 |
Staphylococcus aureus | ATCC 29122 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 |
Enterococcus faecalis | ATCC 29212 | 100 | 50 | 12.5 | 25 |
Aspergillus niger | MTCC 282 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 50 |
CONCLUSION: Pterocarpus marsupium has a long history of numerous traditional and ethno-botanical applications in diverse cultures. Evaluation of physicochemical parameters is a vital part in the preparation of modern monograph. Thus ash value, extractive values, moisture content and fluorescence studies determined, which signifies standard parameters to ensure the quality and purity of the crude drug. The phytochemical findings of the study confirms the presence of phenolics, flavonoids and other secondary metabolites in plant which are currently of growing interest owing to their functional properties in promoting human health. From our studies, we conclude that the methanol and aqueous extracts of P.marsupium bark have exhibited significant antimicrobial activity against microbes. It is essential to mention that the methanolic extract has given the best all-round results. These information will be helpful to differentiate Pterocarpus marsupium from the closely related other species and varieties of Pterocarpus. Hence, the studied experimental results are useful for further pharmacological and therapeutical evaluation of the extracts along with the standardization of plant material.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are thankful to USIC (University Science Instrumentation Centre), Gulbarga University for carrying out the elemental analysis.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Bigoniya P, Singh CS and Shukla A: Pharmacognostical and physicochemical standardization of ethnopharmacologically important seeds of Lepidium sativum and Wrightia tinctoria R Br. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources 2011; 2(4):464-471.
- Kadam PV, Deoda RS, Shivatare RS, Yadav KN and Patil MJ: Pharmacognostic, phytochemical and physiochemical studies of Mimusops Elengi Linn stem bark (Sapotaceae). Der Pharmacia Lettre 2012; 4 (2): 607-613.
- Jedage HD and Manjunath KP: Phytochemical evaluation and high-performance thin layer chromatography profiling: Sapindus emarginatus vahl and Morinda pubescens J.ES.M. barks extracts. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2016; 9(3):1-3.
- Gyles C: The growing problem of antimicrobial resistance. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 2011; 52(8):817-20.
- Wikaningtyas P and Sukandar YE: The antibacterial activity of selected plants towards resistant bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2016; 6(1):16–19.
- Manoj Kumar: In-vitro antibacterial activity of Nelumbo nucifera (Gaertn) flower extracts against human pathogens. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016; 3(6): 339-342.
- Dharshan S, Veerashekar T, Kuppast IJ and Raghu JD: A Review on Pterocarpus marsupium International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Biosciences 2014; 3(6): 32-41.
- Akansha M, Rohit S, Swayam PS, Sudeep G, Akhilesh KT, Rakesh M and Arvind KS: Antidiabetic activity of heartwood of Pterocarpus marsupium and analysis of phytoconstituents. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 2013; 51:363-374.
- Anshul C, Jasdeep K and Anil Kumar S: Systemic Review: Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Clinical Applications of Pterocarpus marsupium International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research 2013; 2(5): 319-327.
- Indian Pharmacopoeia, Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Edition 4, Vol.(II), Controller of Publication, New Delhi,1996:53-54.
- Chase CR and Pratt RS: Fluorescence of Powdered Vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a System of Identification. Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association 1949; 38(6): 324-31.
- Kokate CK, Khandelwal KR, Pawar AP and Gokhale SB: Practical Pharmacognosy. Nirali Prakashan 1995; 1:11-19.
- Subha D, Chandralega N and Geetha N: Pharmacognostic investigation of Tanacetum parthenium grown in India. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Business Management 2014; 2(12):21-28.
- Raghuramulu N, Nair MK and Kalyanasundaram S: A manual of Laboratory techniques: National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, 2003:175-195.
- Sanjeevkumar C B, Ramesh L L, Umesh M K, Aruna L H and Amarvani P K: Preliminary phytochemical screening from different extracts of Bryonopsis laciniosa Research and Reviews: Journal of Herbal Science 2016; 5(2):25-29.
- Abbas Z K, Shalini S, Mohamed I S, Nahla Z, Hasibur R and Abid A A: Phytochemical, antioxidant and mineral composition of hydroalcoholic extract of chicory (Cichorium intybus) leaves. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2015; 22: 322-326.
- Londonkar RL, Kattegouda UM, Shivsharanappa K and Hanchinalmath JV: Phytochemical screening and in-vitro antimicrobial activity of Typha angustifolia Linn leaves extract against pathogenic gram negative micro organisms. Journal of Pharmacy Research 2013; 6:280-283.
- Jayashree VH and Londonkar RL: Comparative phytochemical studies and antimicrobial potential of fruit extracts of Feronia limonia International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 6(1):731-734.
- Jency Blesson, Chinthu V S, Nivya R M and Kumar R: Synergistic antibacterial activity of natural plant extracts and antibiotics against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015; 4(3):741-763.
- Raja S and Ravindranadh K: Phyto, Physicochemical Standardization and TLC fingerprinting of Medicinal Plant Couroupita guianensis. International Journal of Phytomedicine 2014; 6(4): 587-594.
- Raja S and Ravindranadh K: Preliminary phytochemical screening of various extracts of Limnophila heterophylla. International Journal of Biological & Pharmaceutical Research 2014; 5(12):950-957.
- Awanti BS and Londonkar RL: Pharmacognostic and Phytochemical screening of cowpea seeds. International Journal of Phytomedicine 2015; 6(4): 510-514.
- Chawla A, Kaur J and Sharma A K: Systemic Review: Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Clinical Applications of Pterocarpus marsupium International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research 2013; 2(5):319-327.
- Christie Hannah MA and Krishnakumari S: Analysis of Mineral Elements, Proximate and Nutritive value in Citrullus vulgaris Schrad. (Watermelon) seed The Pharma Innovation Journal 2015;4(8): 07-11.
- Dharshan S, Veerashekar T, Kuppast I J and Raghu J D: A review on Pterocarpus marsupium International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Bio Sciences 2014; 3(6): 32-41.
How to cite this article:
Londonkar RL and Hugar AL: Physicochemical, phytochemical profiling and anti-microbial activity of Pterocarpus marsupium. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2017; 8(5): 2177-83.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(5).2177-83.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
30
2177-2183
452
1379
English
IJPSR
Ramesh L. Londonkar * and Aruna L. Hugar
Biopharmaceutical and Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Post-Graduate Department of Studies and Research in Biotechnology, Gulbarga University, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
londonkarramesh53@gmail.com
06 October, 2016
08 December, 2016
08 January, 2017
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(5).2177-83
01 May, 2017