PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND CHROMATOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF ALCOHOLIC EXTRACT OF DILLENIA INDICA LINN. LEAVES
HTML Full TextPhytochemical analysis and chromatographic evaluation of alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn. LEAVES
Sapna Biswas* and Nancy Pandita
SVKM’s Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, School of Science, Deemed-to-be-University, V.L. Mehta Road, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400056, India
ABSTRACT: The present study is about the pharmacognostic and phytochemistry study on Dillenia indica Linn. Dillenia indica is commonly known as chalta or chilta in Hindi. It is a medium sized tree, a native of South eastern Asia, India, Bangladesh, East Srilanka, South western China and Vietnam. The plant is evaluated for understanding the pharmacognostic and Phytochemical characteristics of the leaf. The physicochemical parameters were evaluated which revealed the moisture content as 10.71%. Water soluble and alcohol soluble extractives was found to be 11.97% and 42.32% respectively. Total ash content, water soluble ash content and acid insoluble ash content was found to be 17.48%, 14.03% and 10.56% respectively. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of Alkaloids, Glycosides, Steroids, Flavonoids, Tannins, Saponins and Phenolic compounds. TLC and HPTLC analysis revealed the presence of various phyto-constituents along with Flavonoids, Steroids and Amino acids. HPTLC analysis revealed the presence of Quercetine, Kaempferol, Cholesterol and Glutamic acid. Detection was done under 254 and 366nm
Keywords: |
Dillenia indica,
Pharmacognosy,
Physicochemical analysis,
Phyto-chemical analysis,
TLC and HPTLC
Introduction: Since time immemorial plants are known to have a great potential for treatment and cure of various diseases. They possess a great range of phyto constituents that are helpful for various activities and have been documented in ancient Indian literatures. It is known that more than 80% of world population today is dependent on alternative medicines and traditional system of medicine following the Siddha Rasayana methods. The need for biological drugs from plant sources are increasing day by day for its comparably safer to synthetic drugs, less toxic, reliable and easy availability.
Therefore the demand for promising drugs from plant sources is increasing continuously 1. Dillenia india Linn. commonly known as Elephant Apple and locally known as chalta belonging to the family Dilleniaceae is an evergreen, large tree distributed in the South eastern regions of Asia, India, Bangladesh, Eastern Srilanka, South Western China and Vietnam. The fruits are edible and taste sour and astringent. It is traditionally used to prepare pickles and Jams. They are also used as flavouring agents.
Traditionally they are used as laxative and carminative. It also helps in relieving flatulence. Juice of the leaves, fruits and the bark is given orally for treatment of diarrhoea and Cancer. The review of various literature showed that the leaves, bark, fruits or the various part of the D. indica (Chalta) have extensive medicinal properties. It possesses various activities like Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory, Dysentery, Anti-diabetic and Anti-leukemic etc. Thus the D. indica has a wide range of activity which makes the fruit or the whole plant a gift for human being. Despite of various medicinal values expressed by the plant very little information is available about the phyto-chemical constituents till now. Therefore this prompted us to evaluate the plant for various phyto-chemical constituents as the source of good therapeutic value 2, 3, 4, 5.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Fresh leaves were collected from Ganeshpuri (Vasai), Maharastra during monsoon in the month of August. The material was identified and authenticated by Dr. A.K.S Rawat from National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow. The leaves were collected and dried under shade at room temperature for 5 days. Later the leaves were grinded into powder coarsely and passed through mesh size no. 50. The powdered sample was stored in a closed container free from pollution and environmental contaminants 6.
Preparation of extract:
Preparation of Dillenia indica leaf extracts (DILE): 50 gm of powdered sample were evenly packed in Soxhlet’s apparatus and the extraction was done with alcohol. The solvent was evaporated at low temperature. The residual extract was used for further investigation 6.
Pharmacognostic Evaluations:
Macroscopic and Organoleptic Studies:
Macroscopic investigation (evaluation of drugs by colour, odour, size, shape, taste and special features including touch and texture etc.) was done. The organoleptic investigations (condition, colour, odour, taste and texture) were performed 7, 8. The results are depicted in Fig. 1(A), Fig. 1(B) and Table 1.
FIG. 1(A) FIG. 1(B)
FiG. 1(A) and FIG. 1(B): Leaves and fruits of Dillenia indica linn. showing morphological chracteristics
Table 1: Organoleptic Characteristics of Dillenia indica Linn. LEAVES
Sr. No. | Parameters | Leaves |
1 | Condition | Dried and powdered |
2 | Colour | Dark Green |
3 | Odour | Characteristic |
4 | Taste | Kashaya- Amla (Shukta) (Astringent- Sour) |
5 | Texture | Rough and fibrous |
Microscopic Studies: Microscopic characteristics were studied for leaf and leaf powder. Microscopic study was done by taking transverse sections of leaf with help of sharp blade. The hand cut sections were subjected to double staining method using safranine and haematoxylin. Saffranine stains lignified tissues imparting deep red colour whereas Hematoxylin stains cellulose part imparting purplish violet colour. For this safranine solution was taken on watch glass. The hand cut sections
were placed in the solution for 10 min. Then the sections were transferred to 50% alcohol for 5 min. The sections were then washed with water and then again transferred to dilute hematoxylin in watch glass for 2min. The sections were again washed with distilled water. Then the sections were mounted on clean glass slide with help of glycerine water and covered by glass cover slip. Then slides were observed under light microscope 7. The results are depicted in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.
Powder Microscopy:
A small amount of powder was taken and few drops of 20% chloral hydrate solution were added to it in a watch glass. The sample was allowed to stand in watch glass for about 2 min. A few, drops of distilled water were added to the solution and was observed under light microscope. Similarly, the powder was also stained with dilute saffranine solution for identification of lignified cells. The powder microscopic characters were noted 7, 8. The results are depicted in Fig. 4(I) - Fig. 4(VIII)
Determination of Physico-chemical characteristics: T
he moisture content, total ash content, water soluble ash content and acid insoluble ash content, water soluble extractives, alcohol soluble extractives were the parameters of determining the physicochemical characteristics. The physicochemical studies were done as per WHO guidelines 9, 10. The results are depicted in Table 2.
Preliminary Phyto-chemical screening:
This involves analysis and screening of DILE for different phytochemical compounds. The preliminary screening gives a general idea regarding the presence of different compounds possessing therapeutic values. The Phytochemical screening was done as per who guidelines 7. The results are shown in Table 3(I), Table 3(II) and Table 3(III).
Test for Carbohydrates:
Test for Reducing sugars (Fehling’s Test):
1 ml. of Fehling’s A and 1 ml. of Fehling’s B solution were mixed thoroughly and boiled for one minute. 2 ml. of alcoholic extract was added to the boiled mixture. The mixture was heated in boiling water bath for 5-10 minutes. The mixture was observed for colour change from yellow to brick red ppt.
Test for Pentose sugars:
1 ml. of HCL for mixed with 1 ml. of alcoholic extract. The mixture was heated and few crystals of phloroglucinol were added. The mixture was observed for development of red colour.
Test for Hexose sugars (Tollen’s Phloroglucinol test for galactose):
2.5 ml of conc. HCL was mixed with 4 ml 0.5% phloroglucinol. The mixture was heated and the solution was observed for appearance of colour change.
Cobalt-chloride Test:
3ml of alcoholic extract was mixed with 2ml cobalt-chloride solution and boiled. The mixture was allowed to cool and few drops of NaOH solution was added to it. The solution was observed for appearance of greenish blue or purplish colour solution.
Test for Non-reducing sugars:
Alcoholic extracts (Test solution) does not give response to Fehling’s test.
Test for Non-Reducing Polysaccharides (Starch): Iodine Test: Few drops Iodine was mixed with 3 ml. of alcoholic extract. The solution was observed for appearance of blue colour and disappearance of blue colour on heating.
Tannic Acid Test: The alcoholic extract was mixed with 20% Tannic acid. The mixture was observed for ppt. formation.
Test for Proteins:
Biuret Test: Few drops of 4% NaOH was mixed with 3ml alcoholic extract and few drops of 1% CuSO4 were added to the mixture. The mixture was observed for violet or pink colour appearance.
Xanthoprotein Test: 3ml. of alcoholic extract was mixed with 1ml. conc. H2SO4 and white ppt. is allowed to form. The ppt. is boiled with the solution and allowed to turn yellow. Few drops of NH4OH were added to the solution for the ppt. to turn orange.
Test for proteins containing sulphur: 5 ml. alcoholic extract was mixed with 2 ml. 40% NaOH and 2 drops 10% lead acetate solution. The mixture was boiled and observed for black or brown colour solution formation.
Precipitation Test for proteins:
1 ml. Alcoholic extract was mixed with 5% CuSO4 solution and observed for white colloidal ppt. formation.
1 ml. Alcoholic extract was mixed with 5% lead acetate solution and observed for white colloidal ppt. formation.
1 ml. Alcoholic extract was mixed with 5% ammonium sulphate solution and observed for white colloidal ppt. formation.
Tests for Amino Acids:
Ninhydrin Test (General Test): 3 ml. of alcoholic extract was mixed with 5% Ninhydrin solution and kept in boiling water bath. The mixture was observed for purple or bluish colour formation.
Test for Cysteine: Few drops of 40% NaOH and 10% lead acetate solution were added to 5 ml. of alcoholic extract. The mixture was boiled and observed for black or brown colour ppt. formation.
Test for Steroids:
Salkowski Reaction test:
To 2ml of alcoholic extract, 2 ml. chloroform and 2ml. conc. H2SO4 was added from the side of the test tube. The chloroform layer was observed for red colour formation and acid layer was observed for greenish yellow fluorescence.
Liebermann – Burchard reaction Test:
2ml. alcoholic extract was mixed with 1ml chloroform. To the mixture 1 ml. acetic anhydride and 2 drops of conc. H2SO4 from the side of the test tube. The solution was observed for grades of colour change initially red, then blue and finally green.
Test for Glycosides:
Tests for cardiac glycosides:
Legal’s Test (Test for Cardenoloids): 1ml. pyridine and 1 ml. sodium nitroprusside was mixed with 1ml. alcoholic extract. The solution was observed for appearance of pink to red colour formation.
Keller-Killiani Test (Test for deoxysugars):
2ml. of alcoholic extract was mixed with few drops of glacial acetic acid, one drop 5% Fecl3 and conc. H2SO4 from side of the test tube. The solution was observed for reddish brown colour at junction of two liquid layers and the upper layer bluish green.
Test for Saponin Glycosides:
Foam Test:
2 ml. of extract was mixed with water and shaken vigorously. The solution was observed for persistent foam formation.
Test for Alkaloids:
Alcoholic extract was dried and mixed with dil. HCl and filtered. The following tests were performed with the filtrate.
Dragendorff’s Test:
Few drops of Dragendorff’s reagent were mixed with the filtrate. The solution was observed for orange brown ppt. formation.
Wagner’s Test:
Few drops of Dragendorff’s reagent were mixed with the filtrate. The solution was observed for orange brown ppt. formation.
Murexide test for purine alkaloids:
To 3 ml. filtrate 4 drops of conc. HNO3 was added and evaporated to dryness. The mixture was cooled and 2 drops of NH4OH was added. The mixture was observed for purple colour formation.
Tannic acid Test:
1 ml. Tannic acid was added to 1 ml. of filtrate extract and observed for buff coloured precipitate.
Mayer’s Test:
1 ml. of filtrate was treated with few drops of Mayer’s reagent and observed for ppt. formation.
Test for Flavonoids:
Shinoda Test:
A pinch of dried powder or extract was mixed with 5 ml. 95% alcohol and few drops of conc. HCl and 0.5 g of magnesium turnings. The solution was observed for orange, pink or red to purple colour formation.
Sulphuric acid Test:
66% or 80% sulphuric acid when mixed with alcoholic extract it exhibits colour change.
Lead acetate solution Test:
To small quantity of residue, 1% lead acetate was added and observed for yellow colour ppt. formation.
Zinc + HCl Test:
The alcoholic extract was heated with zinc and HCl. The solution was observed for pink to red colour formation.
NaOH and Acid Test:
Addition of increasing amount of NaOH to the alcoholic extracts shows colouration which decolourises after addition of acid.
Tests for Tannins and Phenol compounds:
5% Fecl3 Test: To 2 ml. of alcoholic extract 5% Fecl3 was added. The solution was observed for deep blue-black colour formation.
1% Lead Acetate: To 2 ml. of alcoholic extract 1% Lead Acetate was added. The solution was observed for white ppt. formation.
1% Potassium Dichromate: To 2 ml. of alcoholic extract 1% Potassium Dichromate was added. The solution was observed for red ppt. formation.
Dil. Iodine Solution: To 2 ml. of alcoholic extract Dil. Iodine Solution was added. The solution was observed for transient red colour formation.
Dil. NH4OH and 1% K2FeCN6: To 2 ml. of alcoholic extract Dil. NH4OH and 1% K2FeCN6 was added. The solution was observed for red colour solution.
Dil. Potassium permanganate solution: To 2 ml. of alcoholic extract Dil. Potassium permanganate solution was added. The solution was observed for decolouration.
NH4OH and 10% AgNO3: One drop of NH4OH and excess of 10% AgNO3 solution was added to 2ml of alcoholic extract and heated for 20 min. in boiling water bath. Initially white coloured ppt. was observed which shows dark silver mirror formation on wall of the test tube.
Test for Triterpenes: To 1 ml. of alcoholic extract 1 ml. of chloroform and 1 ml. of conc. H2SO4 were added. The solution was observed for appearance of red colour indicating presence of Triterpenes.
Analysis and Determination of Phyto-Chemical Constituents Using TLC and HPTLC:
Thin Layer Chromatography:
The alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn. (DILE) was subjected to thin layer chromatographic analysis to find the presence of chemical constituents in support to the phytochemical analysis. To analyse the phytochemical constituents qualitatively, 10µl of 0.1% DILE was applied as a single band spot in a row along one side of precoated TLC plate, at a distance about 1cm from the edge, by using capillary tubes. The choice of solvent system depends upon two factors: (a) Nature of substance to be separated, (b) material on which separation is to be carried. To make a choice of suitable solvent system, firstly elutropic series of different solvents was tried by running on the TLC plate 8.
The TLC plate containing the sample spot was placed at an angle of 450 in the development chamber covering the bottom of the plate by the solvent up to nearly 1mm. The ascending technique was used. The solvent front was marked and the plate was finally allowed to dry. The coloured substances were visual on the chromatogram. Colourless components were detected by using various visualizing agent. The qualitative evaluation of the plate was done by determining the migrating behaviour of the separated substances given in the form of RF value 6, 11, 12.
TLC Analysis: The presence of different phyto-chemical constituents was analysed with Thin Layer Chromatography using two different solvent system Chloroform: Acetone: Di-ethylamine (10:8:2) and Toluene: Chloroform: Ethanol (28.5: 57: 14.53) as the mobile phases. Natural Product and Anisaldehyde sulphuric acid reagent were used for derivatization. The results are depicted in Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9 and Fig. 10. The RF values are depicted in Table 4(I) and 4(II).
HPTLC Analysis: It can be said that HPTLC is a powerful tool among the modern age analysis tools. HPTLC produces visible chromatograms. Complex information about the entire sample is available at a glance. Multiple samples can be observed simultaneously, So that reference and test samples can be compared for identification. Here the reference standards used are Quercetine, Kaemferol, Cholesterol and Glutamic Acid 6, 12. The optimized chromatographic conditions for flavonoids (Quercetine and Kaemferol), Steroids (Cholesterol) and Amino acid (Glutamic acid) are shown in Table 5(I), 6(I) and 7(I) respectively. Whereas the chromatographic images for flavonoids are shown in Fig. 11(A) and 12(A). Their respective densitogram is shown in Fig. 11(B) and 12(B) with their Rf values depicted in Table 5(II) and 5(III). The chromatographic images for steroids are shown in Fig. 13(A) and 14(A). Their respective densitogram is shown in Fig. 13(B) and 14(B) with their Rf values depicted in Table 6(II) and 6(III). The chromatographic images for amino acids are shown in Fig. 15(A) and 16(A). Their respective densitogram is shown in Fig. 15(B) and 16(B) with their Rf values depicted in Table 7(II) and 7(III).
Results and Discussion:
Pharmacognostic study:
Macroscopic (Morphological) Characteristics:
The leaves of Dillenia indica Linn. are simple, alternate, broad, large, long, elliptical and petiolated with acute apex. The leaves show serrate margin and reticulate venation. Older leaves are dark green in colour whereas young leaves are yellowish green in colour. The leaves are 25cms long and 15cms broad. The leaves have characteristic odour and astringent - sour in taste.
Microscopic Characteristics:
Microscopic evaluation revealed the presence of Collenchyma cells, Upper epidermis, Palisade cells, Parenchyma cells, Spongy parenchyma, Vascular bundles with Phloem and Xylem and Anomocytic Stomata.
FIG. 2: T.S. OF LEAF OF DILLENIA INDICA LINN. THROUGH MIDRIB (10x X 40x)
FIG. 3: Anomocytic Stomata (10x X 40x)
Powder Microscopy: The powder microscopy of the leaves revealed the presence of aciculars, trichome, crystals, stone cells, stomata and sclereid.
Table 2: Physicochemical Analysis OF LEAVES OF dILLENIA INDICA LINN. Results expressed as, Mean±SD, n=9FIG. 4: POWDER MICROSCOPY OF DILLENIA INDICA LINN. LEAVES UNDER DIFFERENT MAGNIFICATIONS
Analysis Parameters | (% w/w) |
Moisture content | 10.71±0.25 |
Water soluble extractives | 11.97±0.41 |
Alcohol soluble extractives | 42.32±0.52 |
Total Ash content | 17.48±0.43 |
Acid insoluble ash content | 10.56±0.18 |
Water soluble ash content | 14.03±0.18 |
Table 3(i): Phytochemical Screening of alcoholic EXTRACT of Dillenia indica Linn.
Chemical Constituents | Test | Inference |
Carbohydrates | Fehling’s Test | -ve |
Pentose sugars | Pentose sugars | +ve |
Hexose sugars | Tollen’s Test | +ve |
Cobalt chloride Test | +ve | |
Non-reducing Sugars | +ve |
Key: “+ve”- Present; “-ve”- Absent
Table 3(Ii): Phytochemical Screening of alcoholic EXTRACT of Dillenia indica Linn.
Chemical Constituents | Test | Inference | |||
Non-Reducing Polysaccharides | Iodine Test | -ve | |||
Tannic acid test | +ve | ||||
Proteins | Biuret Test | -ve | |||
Xanthoprotein Test | -ve | ||||
Proteins containing Sulphur (Precipitation Tests) | 5% CuSo4 Test | -ve | |||
5% Lead acetate | +ve | ||||
5% Ammonium sulphate | -ve | ||||
Amino acids | Ninhydrin Test | -ve | |||
Cysteine Test | -ve | ||||
Steroids | Salkowski Reaction test | +ve | |||
Liebermann- Burchard Test | +ve | ||||
Cardiac Glycosides | Legal’s Test | +ve | |||
Keller-Killiani Test | -ve | ||||
Saponin Glycosides | Foam test | +ve | |||
Alkaloids | Dragendorff’s Test | +ve | |||
Wagner’s Test | -ve | ||||
Murexide Test | -ve | ||||
Tannic Acid Test | +ve | ||||
Mayer’s Test | +ve | ||||
KEY: “+ve”- Present; “-ve”- Absent
Table 3(IIi): Phytochemical Screening of alcoholic EXTRACT of Dillenia indica Linn.
Chemical Constituents | Test | Inference | |
Flavonoids | Schinoda Test | -ve | |
Sulphuric Acid Test | +ve | ||
Lead acetate solution Test | +ve | ||
Zinc + HCl Test | -ve | ||
NaOH and Acid Test | +ve | ||
Tannins and Phenol Compounds | 5% Fecl3 Test | +ve | |
1% Lead Acetate | +ve | ||
1% Potassium Dichromate | +ve | ||
Dil. Iodine Solution | -ve | ||
Dil. NH4OH and 1% K2FeCN6 | +ve | ||
Dil. Potassium permanganate Solution. | -ve | ||
NH4OH and 10% AgNO3 | -ve | ||
Triterpenes | Chloroform and H2SO4 Test | -ve | |
KEY: “+ve”- Present; “-ve”- Absent
TLC Finger Print Profile of Alcoholic Extract of Dillenia Indica Linn.
The TLC finger print profile showed the presence of different phytoconstituents. Two different solvent systems were used to analyse the presence of different phytochemical constituents.
Fig. 5, FIG. 6 and FIG. 7: TLC Chromatogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn showing Separation of 2 different bands under 254nm, Seperation of 15 different bands under 366nm and Seperation of 12 different bands under 366nm after derivatization with Natural Product indicates the presence of different phyto-chemical constituents.
SOlvent System: Chloroform: Acetone: Di-ethylamine (10: 8: 2, v/v/v)
Table 4(i): TLC of DILE indicating the Rf (Retention Factor) values of different bands in different wavelength before and after derivatization
Sr.No. | Rf Factor in 254 nm | Rf Factor in 366 nm | Rf value after derivatization with Natural Product (NP) in 366 nm |
1 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
2 | 0.57 | 0.11 | 0.07 |
3 | - | 0.14 | 0.12 |
4 | - | 0.28 | 0.28 |
5 | - | 0.36 | 0.35 |
6 | - | 0.40 | 0.40 |
7 | - | 0.43 | 0.44 |
8 | - | 0.46 | 0.52 |
9 | - | 0.52 | 0.58 |
10 | - | 0.54 | 0.68 |
11 | - | 0.57 | 0.72 |
12 | - | 0.61 | 0.81 |
13 | - | 0.66 | - |
14 | - | 0.71 | - |
15 | - | 0.81 | - |
Fig. 8, FIG. 9 and FIG. 10: TLC Chromatogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn showing Separation of 6 different bands under 254nm, Seperation of 6 different bands under 366nm and Seperation of 12 different bands under day light after derivatization with Anisaldehyde sulphuric acid indicates the presence of different phyto-chemical constituents.
SOlvent System: Toluene: chloroform: ethanol (5.68: 11.36: 2.89)
Table 4(ii): TLC of DILE indicating the Rf values of different bands in different wavelength
Sr.No | Rf Factor in 254nm | Rf Factor in 366 nm | Rf Factor after derivatization with Anisaldehyde Sulphuric acid |
1 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
2 | 0.3 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.18 |
4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.27 |
5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.47 |
6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.55 |
7 | - | - | 0.59 |
8 | - | - | 0.63 |
9 | - | - | 0.71 |
10 | - | - | 0.79 |
11 | - | - | 0.85 |
12 | 0.89 |
HPTLC Profile:
HPTLC profile showed the presence of Quercetin, Kaemferol, Cholesterol and Glutamic Acid.
Table 5(i): Optimized chromatographic conditions for detection of flavonoids
Parameters | Description |
Stationary Phase | Merck Silica gel 60 F254 TLC pre-coated plates |
Plate size | 11.0 cm x 10.0 cm |
Mode of separation | Normal phase |
Mobile phase | Cyclohexane: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid (6: 4.5: 0.2, v/v/v) |
Development chamber | Camag twin trough chamber |
Chamber saturation | 20 min |
Sample applicator | CAMAG Linomat 5 |
Syringe | Hamilton, 100.0 µL |
Band width | 7.0 mm |
Distance from the edges of the plate | 12.5mm |
Rate of sample application | 100 nL/sec |
Spotting volume | 10 µL |
Development distance | 85.0 mm |
Densitometric scanner | CAMAG Scanner 4 equipped with winCATS Planar Chromatography manager software version 1.4.7 |
Photodocumentation | CAMAG Reprostar 3 |
FiG. 11(A) and FIG. 11(B): HPTLC Chromatogram and densitogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn. for flavonoids showing Separation of 11 different bands under 254 nm
Table 5(ii): HPTLC Peaks of Dillenia indica Linn. for Flavonoids
Peak | Start Rf | Start Height | Max Rf | Max Height | Max % | End Rf | End Height | Area | Area % |
1 | 0.00 | 74.4 | 0.01 | 245.2 | 11.35 | 0.02 | 4.3 | 2220.7 | 2.84 |
2 | 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.16 | 97.9 | 4.53 | 0.18 | 19.7 | 2277.0 | 2.91 |
3 | 0.18 | 19.9 | 0.21 | 120.0 | 5.55 | 0.22 | 114.6 | 2358.2 | 3.01 |
4 | 0.23 | 114.9 | 0.25 | 236.9 | 10.96 | 0.26 | 227.6 | 4934.0 | 6.30 |
5 | 0.26 | 228.1 | 0.32 | 537.3 | 24.86 | 0.37 | 102.7 | 30704.7 | 39.22 |
6 | 0.37 | 103.5 | 0.42 | 605.0 | 27.99 | 0.48 | 0.0 | 24024.0 | 30.69 |
7 | 0.49 | 0.0 | 0.52 | 11.4 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 10.5 | 241.3 | 0.31 |
8 | 0.54 | 10.9 | 0.59 | 34.1 | 1.58 | 0.61 | 31.8 | 1226.2 | 1.57 |
9 | 0.62 | 31.7 | 0.66 | 88.7 | 4.10 | 0.68 | 53.6 | 2796.6 | 3.57 |
10 | 0.68 | 54.0 | 0.71 | 99.8 | 4.62 | 0.74 | 51.5 | 3431.1 | 4.38 |
11 | 0.74 | 51.6 | 0.77 | 85.0 | 3.93 | 0.86 | 1.2 | 4067.0 | 5.20 |
FiG. 12(A): DILE: HPTLC Chromatogram of Alcoholic EXTRACT of Dillenia indica Linn for flavonoids under 254 nm; s1: Standard quercetin; s2: standard Kaemferol FIG. 12(B): HPTLC Densitogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn overlapped with standards quercetin and kaemferol under 254 nm
Table 5(iii): Rf values of standard Flavonoids Quercetin and Kaemferol coinciding with two spots observed in DILE.
HPTLC FIG. | Name Of Phytochemical Constituent | Compound | Rf Value Obtained(Standards) | Rf Value Obtained (Dillenia indica Linn.) |
11 A,B12 A,B | Flavonoid | Quercetin | 0.18 | 0.16 |
Kaemferol | 0.27 | 0.25 |
Table 6(i): Optimized chromatographic conditions for detection of STEROIDS
Parameters | Description |
Stationary Phase | Merck Silica gel 60 F254 TLC pre-coated plates |
Plate size | 11.0 cm x 10.0 cm |
Mode of separation | Normal phase |
Mobile phase | Toluene: methanol (8: 1, v/v) |
Development chamber | Camag twin trough chamber |
Chamber saturation | 20 min |
Sample applicator | CAMAG Linomat 5 |
Syringe | Hamilton, 100.0 µL |
Band width | 7.0 mm |
Distance from the edges of the plate | 12.5mm |
Rate of sample application | 100 nL/sec |
Spotting volume | 10 µL |
Development distance | 85.0 mm |
Densitometric scanner | CAMAG Scanner 4 equipped with winCATS Planar Chromatography manager software version 1.4.7 |
Photodocumentation | CAMAG Reprostar 3 |
Derivatizing agent: | 10% Methanolic sulphuric acid |
FiG. 13(A) and FIG. 13(B): HPTLC Chromatogram and densitogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn. for steroids showing Separation of 7 different bands and Peaks under 366 nm respectively
Table 6(ii): HPTLC Peaks of Dillenia indica Linn. for Steroids
Peak | Start Rf | Start Height | Max Rf | Max Height | Max % | End Rf | End Height | Area | Area % |
1 | -0.07 | 1.4 | -0.05 | 25.3 | 2.68 | -0.04 | 15.2 | 396.8 | 2.03 |
2 | -0.03 | 15.3 | 0.02 | 522.1 | 55.34 | 0.05 | 49.8 | 9713.1 | 49.74 |
3 | 0.05 | 50.3 | 0.07 | 152.7 | 16.19 | 0.11 | 18.1 | 3212.6 | 16.45 |
4 | 0.13 | 23.4 | 0.16 | 69.3 | 7.34 | 0.18 | 35.3 | 2066.3 | 10.58 |
5 | 0.18 | 35.5 | 0.21 | 134.5 | 14.26 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 2888.6 | 14.79 |
6 | 0.33 | 2.7 | 0.36 | 22.6 | 2.39 | 0.40 | 1.1 | 634.8 | 3.25 |
7 | 0.50 | 5.8 | 0.55 | 17.0 | 1.80 | 0.59 | 1.3 | 617.3 | 3.16 |
FiG. 14(A): DILE: HPTLC Chromatogram of Alcoholic EXTRACT of Dillenia indica Linn for steroids under 366 nm; s3: Standard Cholesterol. FIG. 14(B): HPTLC Densitogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn overlapped with standard cholesterol under 366 nm.
HPTLC Image No. | Name Of Phytochemical Constituent | Compound | Rf Value Obtained(Standards) | Rf Value Obtained(Dillenia indica Linn.) | |
13 A, B14 A, B | Steroid | Cholesterol | 0.35 | 0.36 | |
TABLE 6(III): RF VALUES OF STANDARD CHOLESTEROL COINCIDING WITH A SPOT OBSERVED IN DILE.
Table 7(i): Optimized chromatographic conditions for detection of AMINO ACIDS
Parameters | Description |
Stationary Phase | Merck Silica gel 60 F254 TLC pre-coated plates |
Plate size | 20.0 cm x 10.0 cm |
Mode of separation | Normal phase |
Mobile phase | n-Butanol: acetic acid: water (6.5: 3.5: 2, v/v/v) |
Development chamber | Camag twin trough chamber |
Chamber saturation | 30 min |
Sample applicator | CAMAG Linomat 5 |
Syringe | Hamilton, 100.0 µL |
Band width | 6.0 mm |
Distance from the edges of the plate | 13.0mm |
Rate of sample application | 100 nL/sec |
Spotting volume | 10 µL |
Development distance | 85.0 mm |
Densitometric scanner | CAMAG Scanner 4 equipped with winCATS Planar Chromatography manager software version 1.4.7 |
Photodocumentation | CAMAG Reprostar 3 |
Derivatizing agent | Ninhydrin reagent |
FiG. 15(A) and FIG. 15(B): HPTLC Chromatogram and densitogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn. for Amino Acids showing Separation of 7 different bands and Peaks under visible light (550 nm) respectively.
Table 7(ii): HPTLC Peaks of Dillenia indica Linn. for amino acids
Peak | Start Rf | Start Height | Max Rf | Max Height | Max % | End Rf | End Height | Area | Area % |
1 | -0.02 | 0.0 | -0.00 | 307.8 | 24.81 | 0.01 | 0.7 | 4088.3 | 6.91 |
2 | 0.16 | 15.0 | 0.33 | 263.3 | 21.22 | 0.36 | 170.6 | 18064.3 | 30.53 |
3 | 0.37 | 171.2 | 0.41 | 232.6 | 18.75 | 0.47 | 76.6 | 12864.2 | 21.74 |
4 | 0.50 | 80.2 | 0.53 | 88.0 | 7.10 | 0.58 | 79.2 | 4785.6 | 8.09 |
5 | 0.64 | 78.0 | 0.68 | 87.7 | 7.07 | 0.72 | 70.7 | 4514.7 | 7.63 |
6 | 0.72 | 70.6 | 0.79 | 117.3 | 9.45 | 0.83 | 92.1 | 7337.8 | 12.40 |
7 | 0.83 | 92.1 | 0.86 | 144.0 | 11.61 | 0.96 | 7.5 | 7523.6 | 12.71 |
FiG. 16(A): DILE: HPTLC Chromatogram of Alcoholic EXTRACT of Dillenia indica Linn. for steroids under 550 nm; s4: Standard Glutamic ACID. FIG. 16(B): HPTLC Densitogram of Alcoholic extract of Dillenia indica Linn. overlapped with standard Glutamic acid under 550nm (Visible light).
Table 7(iii): Rf values of standard Cholesterol coinciding with a spot observed in DILE
HPTLC Image No. | Name Of Phytochemical Constituent | Compound | Rf Value Obtained(Standard) | Rf Value Obtained(Dillenia indica Linn.) | |
15 A, B 16 A, B | Amino Acids | Glutami Acid | 0.34 | 0.33 | |
Discussion: The macroscopic study (Table 1) of leaf indicated that its colour, odour, taste and texture may be an important characteristic feature for identifying the plant. The anatomy of the leaf was studied by taking transverse section. Transverse section (Fig. 2) of the leaf showed epidermis with palisade parenchymatous cells followed by Spongy parenchymatous cells. Collenchyma cells were seen in the midrib region below the epidermis and vascular bundles were also present. Anomocytic stomata were seen scattered (Fig. 3). Powder studies (Fig.4) indicated the presence of Aciculars, Trichomes, Prismatic crystals, Phloem, Stomata, Starch grains and Sclereid. Physicochemical parameters are important parameters in detecting adulteration and are adopted to confirm the purity and quality of drug. The moisture content of the drug plays an important role as too high moisture content may encourage the bacterial, fungal or yeast growth. The moisture content, extractive values and ash values, of leaves were determined. The results are depicted in Table 2. Ash values are particularly important parameter as it shows the presence and absence of foreign matters like metallic salts or silica.
The Phytochemical study (Table 3(I), 3(II) and 3(III)) shows Alcoholic extracts of Dillenia indica L. contains Carbohydrates, Starch, Proteins containing sulphur, Steroids, Cardiac Glycosides, Saponin Glycosides, Alkaloids, Flavonoids, Tannins and Phenol compounds.
T.L.C. Profile (Fig. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) of alcoholic extract using Chloroform: Acetone: Di-ethylamine (10: 8: 2, v/v/v), showed fifteen spots under 366 nm whereas Toluene: Chloroform: Ethanol (5.68: 11.36: 2.89, v/v/v) showed twelve spots on derivatization under visible light.
HPTLC Profile of alcoholic extract using Cyclohexane: ethyl acetate: formic acid (6: 4.5: 0.2, v/v/v) showed presence of Quercetin and Kaemferol (11 A, B and 12 A, B) with 0.16 and n0.25 Rf values respectively. Toluene: methanol (8: 1, v/v) solvent system showed the presence of Cholesterol (13 A, B and 14 A, B) at 0.36 Rf value. n-Butanol: acetic acid: water (6.5: 3.5: 2, v/v/v) showed the presence of Glutamic acid (15 A, B and 16 A, B) with 0.33 Rf value.
Pharmacognostic standardization including physico-chemical evaluation in Table 2 is meant for identification, authentication, and detection of adulteration and also compilation of quality control standards of crude drugs. Since the plant Dillenia indica Linn. is useful in traditional medicine for the treatment of various ailments it is important to standardize it for use as a drug.
Conclusion: Since time immemorial plants have been playing an important role in treatment of various ailments. Herbal plants are considered to be source of varied phytoconstituents exhibiting various pharmacological properties. Therefore it becomes a necessity to study the phytochemical constituents and pharmacognostic characteristic before its use in the field of research and pharmaceutical formulation. From the present study, it can be concluded that most of the biologically active phytochemicals were present in the methanolic extract of Dillenia indica Linn. leaves. In other words, the results confirmed the presence of therapeutically potent compound in leaf extract of Dillenia indica. The chromatogram of thin layer chromatography showed the presence of various unknown compounds whereas HPTLC densitogram showed the presence of flavonoids (quercetin and kaemferol), sterols (cholesterol) and amino acids (glutamic acid).
Acknowledgement: We the authors would like to express our sincere thanks to Dr. Aparna Khanna, Dean, School of Science, Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Sciences for providing us the opportunity to conduct the research work thereby providing platform and fulfilling the research needs.
References:
- Panda SK, Thatoi HN and Dutta SK: Antibacterial activity and Phytochemical screening of leaf and bark extracts of Vitex negundo from similipal biosphere reserve, Orissa. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2009; 3:294-300.
- Gowri SS and Vasantha K: Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial activity of Syzygium cumini (L.) (Myrtaceae) leaves extracts. International Journal of PharmTech Research 2010; 2:1569-1573
- Alam MB, Rahman MS, Hasan M, Khan MM, Nahar K and Sultana S: Antinociceptive and Antioxidant activities of the Dillenia indica International Journal of Pharmacology 2012; 8:243-251
- Kumar S, Kumar V and Prakash Om: Antidiabetic and hypolipidemic activity of Dillenia indica extract in Diabetic Rats. Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine 2011; 9:570-574
- Talukdar A, Talukdar N, Deka S and Sahariah BJ: Dillenia indica (OUTENGA) as Anti-diabetic herb found in Assam: A REVIEW. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2012; 3:2482-2486
- Yadav RD, Jain SK, Alok S, Kailasiya D, Kanaujia VK and Kaur S: A study on Phytochemical investigation of Pongamia pinnata leaves. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2011; 2:2073-2079
- Khandelwal KR: Practical Pharmacognosy. Nirali Prakashan, Pune, Edition 12, 2004: 15-159.
- Arya V and Thakur R: Organoleptic and Microscopic Analysis of Gentiana regeliana. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2012; 1:32-35.
- Aneja S, Vats M, Sardana S and Aggarwal S: Pharmacognostic evaluation and Phytochemical studies on the roots of Amaranthus tricolor (Linn.). International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2011; 2:2332-2336.
- Sharma NK, Ahirwar D, Gupta S and Jhade D: Pharmacognostic standardization, Physico and Phytochemical evaluation of Nigella sativa seed. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2011; 2:713-718.
- Chakraborty DD, V Ravi and P Chakraborty: Phytochemical evaluation and TLC Protocol of various extracts of Bombax ceiba International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2010; 1.
- Sahu VK, Irchhaiya R, Shashi A and Gurjar H: Phytochemical investigation and chromatographic evaluation of ethanolic extract of whole plant extract of Dendrphthoe falcata (L.F.) Ettngsh. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2010; 1:39-45
How to cite this article:
Biswas S and Pandita N: Phytochemical Analysis and Chromatographic Evaluation of alcoholic Extract of Dillenia Indica Linn. LeavesInt J Pharm Sci Res 2015; 6(7): 2799-12.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(7).2799-12.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
18
2799-12
1655
1638
English
Ijpsr
Sapna Biswas* and Nancy Pandita
SVKM’s Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, School of Science, Deemed-to-be-University, V.L. Mehta Road, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
sapnabiswas@ymail.com
09 November, 2014
12 January, 2015
08 March, 2015
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(7).2799-12
01 July, 2015