PROXIMATE, PHYTOCHEMICAL PROFILE AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY (IN VITRO AND EX VIVO) OF MORUS INDICA VARIETIES
HTML Full TextPROXIMATE, PHYTOCHEMICAL PROFILE AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY (IN VITRO AND EX VIVO) OF MORUS INDICA VARIETIES
Vanitha P. Reddy and Asna Urooj*
Department of Studies in Food Science and Nutrition, University of Mysore, Mysore-570006, Karnataka, India
ABSTRACT: Plants rich in antioxidants and phytochemicals especially phenolic groups play a protective role in health and disease conditions, like cancer, diabetes, heart disease hypertension etc. by counteracting reactive oxygen species and inhibiting the lipid oxidation. Morus indica is non-toxic natural therapeutic plant used as herbal medicine as hypoglycemic, hypotensive, and diuretic properties. In the present study proximate, phytochemical and antioxidant profile in dehydrated leaves powder of Morus indica varieties, M5, V1 and S36 were estimated. The 100% methanol, 80% methanol (methanol & water, 8: 2), dechlorophyllised, aqueous cold and hot extracts were prepared and their polyphenol content, antioxidant activity of inhibiting oxidation in oil emulsion and liver microsomes was evaluated at 300 to 500µg. There was no significant (P<0.05) difference in the moisture, fat and ash content. All the three samples were found to be good sources of major minerals viz. Iron, Calcium phosphorus and also of trace elements like manganese, zinc, copper, potassium.S36 found to be rich in phytochemicals and antioxidants. The polyphenol content was in the order of The polyphenol content of the extracts was in the order of dechlorophylised>Methanol> 80% methanol > Aq. c old and hot. In oil emulsion, no significant difference in inhibiting oxidation was observed in methanol and 80% methanol extracts, whereas in dechlorophylised, aq. cold and hot extracts V1 and S36 showed higher activity. In microsomes, S36 variety was more potent in inhibiting oxidation in all extracts except Aq. cold. S36 was found to be good source of phytochemicals and showed more potency in inhibiting the oxidation in two food and biological systems.
Keywords: |
Morus indica, Proximate, Phytochemicals, Antioxidants, Oxidation, Microsomes
INTRODUCTION: Medicinal plants are believed to be an important source of new chemical substances with potential therapeutic effects such as phytochemicals and antioxidants 1, 2. The term Phytochemicals is usually used to refer compounds found in plants that are not normally involved in primarily metabolic process such as photosynthesis and cell respiration of plants. The biological activities elicited by a plant are primarily due to the presence of these chemical constituents in the plant.
Currently much research is focused on the beneficial effects of bioactive phytochemicals present in micro level in our daily diet 3. Several epidemiological studies suggest that plants rich in antioxidants play a protective role in health and diseased condition and their consumption lower risk of cancer, heart disease, hypertension and stroke. The major groups of phytochemicals that may contribute to the total antioxidant capacity of plant include polyphenols and vitamins (C and E) 4.
With the focus being shifted towards finding alternatives for synthetic food ingredients, natural substances having antioxidant properties need to be further explored 5. Many plant species have been investigated in search of novel antioxidants and there is still demand to find more information concerning the antioxidant potential of plant species as they are safe and also bioactive. Therefore, in recent years, considerable attention has been directed towards the identification of plant materials, rich in antioxidants 6.
However, besides the role played in human and animal nutrition, knowledge of proximate, phytochemical and micronutrient composition is fundamental for understanding modes of action of medicinal plants in general. It is the diverse composition of these components in plants that places them at advantage position over and above chemotherapy in management of complex diseases such as diabetes mellitus 7. Each medicinal plant species has its own nutrient composition besides having pharmacologically important photo-chemicals. These nutrients are essential for the physiological functions of human body. Such nutrients and biochemicals like carbohydrates, fats and proteins play an important role in satisfying human needs for energy and life processes 8, 9 10.
Morus indica (Mulberry tree) of the family Moraceae has been widely cultivated in countries all over the world including temperate to tropical areas. Different parts of the plant are used as herbal medicine for blood serum glucose reduction, cholesterol and lipids levels reduction, antiphlogistic, diuretic and expectorant effects. It occupies an important position in the holistic system of Indian medicine ‘Ayurveda’ which has its roots in antiquity and has been practiced for centuries. The leaves of mulberry are nutritious, palatable, nontoxic and also enriched with different active principles 11.
The antihyperglycemic effects (properties) of mulberry leaves were investigated in streptozotozin induced diabetic rats 12, 13. There are few reports on the antioxidant activity of Morus indica 14 but the complete information on proximate, phytochemical and antioxidant composition of the plant is scarcely reported.
In the present study, three different varieties of Morus indica (L), M5, V1 and S36 were studied for their proximate, antioxidant and phytochemical composition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Chemicals: Tocopherol, β carotene, 1,1, Diphenyl –2- picryl hydrazyl (DPPH), 5-Dithio (bis) nitro benzoic acid (DTNB), were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Bangalore, India. All other chemicals and reagents used in the study were of analytical grade.
Plant material: The leaves of three varieties of Morus indica (M5, V1 and S36) were collected from Central Sericulture Research and Training Institute (CSRTI), Mysore. The samples were identified by Dr. Shivamurthy, Department of studies in Botany, University of Mysore and voucher specimen was retained in the laboratory for future reference. The leaves were washed, dried in the oven overnight at 50°C, powdered, passed through 60 mesh and stored at 4°C till further use.
Proximate composition (dry basis): Moisture content was determined by using Moisture analyser (Metler Toledo MJ33, Lab systems Bangalore, India). Fat, protein, ash, total fiber (soluble and insoluble fiber) was estimated as per the AOAC standard methods 15, total starch 16, total sugars and free glucose were estimated by Dubois et al., 17 method. Iron, Calcium, Phosphorus, Copper, Manganese, Zinc, Sodium, Potassium, Magnesium and chromium were analyzed using Atomic Absorption spectroscopy (ELICO SL-168, range 160-900nm).
Phytochemical composition (dry basis): Total phenols were extracted from a weighed portion (50-500 mg) of dried sample with 5ml of 1.2M HCl in 50% aqueous methanol for 2 h and analyzed by Folin-Ciocalteu micro method. Results are expressed as µmol Gallic acid equivalent g-1 dry weight18. Flavonoid content was determined by a pharmacopoeia method using Rutin as a reference compound 19, alkaloids by the method based on the reaction with bromocresol green (BCG) using Atropine as a standard 20 saponins by using vanillin/ sulfuric acid reagents and Diosgenin as standard 21, tannins by the method of Makkar et al., 22 were estimated.
Antioxidant profile: In dehydrated sample, different antioxidants components were estimated by using standard methods. α- Tocopherol was extracted by direct saponification of dried sample and estimated based on formation of a red complex from reaction of a,a¢ –bipyridyl with ferrous ion due to reduction of ferric ion by tocopherol 23. β- Carotene was quantified by column chromatography, followed by measuring the absorbance of elute at 450 nm against standard β-carotene 24.Reduced glutathione was determined based on the development of a yellow compound due to reaction of 5,5-Dithio (bis) nitro benzoic acid (DTNB) with compounds containing sulphydryll groups 25.
Preparation of solvent extracts: A 15g dehyadrated sample of all the three varieties individually was extracted with 100 ml solvent [100% methanol, methanol and water (80:20) and 100% water] for 6 h in a mechanical shaker. The extracts were filtered and filtrates were evaporated at 40º C under reduced pressure to dryness in a rotary evaporator (Superfit, India). The residue of each extract was stored in airtight container at 4ºC until further use. In case of hot water extract, the sample was added to boiling water and extracted for 15 min and filtered. The filtrate of both cold and hot water extracts was freeze dried and stored at 4°C until further use.
Dechlorophyllised extract: Since the samples were rich in chlorophyll, an extract was prepared by separating the chlorophyll by the method described by Rich et al. Briefly, hexane was added to the 80% methanol extract and shaken for 30 minutes, as chlorophyll is readily soluble in hexane, a chlorophyll rich hexane layer is formed on the top of the extract leaving the other polar components especially phenolic compounds in the water and methanol layer and this polyphenol (30-40%) rich extract was further dried and stored in air-tight container at 0ºC until used. The Total polyphenol content of all the extracts was estimated 18.
Antioxidant activity:
Inhibition of Lipid Oxidation: The antioxidant activity of the above extracts (300-500µg) was determined in an edible oil emulsion and liver microsomes by modified method of TBARS method 26, 27.
Antioxidant activity in Lipids: Five grams of oil (sunflower) was weighed and an emulsion was prepared in phosphate buffer of 0.01M, 7 pH, with few drops of tween 20 and the volume was made upto 10ml. To different concentrations (300-500µg) of extracts, 300µl of emulsion, 450µl of fentons reagent was added and volume was made upto 2ml and incubated at 50°C for 6hrs. A control was run without extract.After incubation, 1ml of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) was added and heated in boiling water bath for 30min. and cooled immediately. The inhibition of lipid peroxidation in sun flower oil was determined by TBA, in which the secondary oxidation products (TBARS, expressed as MDA equivalents) formed by oxidation of oil was determined by measuring the absorbance at 532 nm.
Preparation of Microsomes: A healthy male adult rat was sacrificed to get fresh liver. The procedure followed for microsomes preparation was as reported by Shapiro & Rodwell28. The liver was immediately removed and placed in cold buffer (0-4°C) at pH 7.4. The buffer contained 0.1 M triethanolamine.HC1, 0.02 M EDTA, and 2.0mM dithiothreitol. The liver tissue was minced with scissors and homogenized with six strokes of a smooth-walled, glass Remi homogenizer and centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 g to remove cell debris and mitochondria.
After the supernatant solution was carefully removed to prevent contamination with mitochondria and recentrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 g to ensure removal of mitochondria, it was then centrifuged at 60,000 g for 60 min. The 60,000g microsomal pellet was then rinsed with buffer and frozen in a freezer (-20°C). Frozen microsomes were resuspended in 0.1 M triethanolamine buffer, pH 7.4, and containing 0.02M EDTA and 10mM dithiothreitol and allowed to stand 60 min packed in ice. The resuspended microsomes to be used for the assay were diluted with buffer to give a protein concentration of 5-10 mg/ml.
Antioxidant activity in Microsomes: Here in place of oil emulsion, liver microsomes of 1mg protein concentration was taken, 300-500µg extracts with Fentons reagent and incubated at 50°C for 2 hrs. After incubation 1ml TCA 10% and 1ml TBA was added and heated in boiling water bath for 15min. and cooled in ice bath immediately. After cooling 2ml of butanol was added and pink color was read at 532nm. A control was run without samples.
Statistical analysis: Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). SPSS (version 16.0; SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, 2007) statistical program was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: The proximate composition of the Morus indica varieties is given in table 1. No significant (P<0.05) difference was observed between moisture and ash content of the three varieties, and the protein content of the M5 variety was significantly (p<0.05) higher (14.17±0.63a) then the other two varieties, (V1-11.58±1.22b; S36-12.15±0.304b). The fat content of the V1 (7.9 ± 1.68b) was higher than M5 (5.09±0.11a) and S36 (6.45±2.01ab). The mineral composition of M5 was found to be rich in calcium (682.76±3.06 mg), phosphorus (164±11 mg), sodium (0.014mg) and magnesium (3.91 mg). Manganese, copper and potassium were present at high percent in V1 and S36 was rich in Iron and zinc. The carbohydrate profile is given in table 1. The V1 and S36 were found to be significantly high (p>0.05) in carbohydrates than the M5. The total fiber content was significantly high in V1 and in case of S36 total sugars and free glucose was significantly high. The antioxidant and phytochemical composition is given in table 2.
Among three varieties S36 was found to be rich in maximum phytochemical and antioxidant components (glutathione- 788mMoles, β carotene-87.30m), flavonoids-1.15mg/g extract, , alkaloids- 100.66mg/g and tannins-1546.67mg) than other two varieties. M5 was rich in α tocopherol-34 mg, saponins-135.3 mg and steroidal saponins-39.63 mg and V1 was rich in polyphenols -1.406g. The polyphenol content of the extracts was in the order of dechlorophyllised >Methanol> 80% methanol > Aq. c old and hot (table2)
TABLE 1: PROXIMATE COMPOSITION OF THE DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF MORUS INDICA
Components | M5 | V1 | S36 |
g/100g (dry basis) | |||
Moisture | 8.71±0.20a | 8.67±0.12a | 8.52±0.22a |
Protein | 14.17±0.63a | 11.58±1.22b | 12.15±0.304b |
Fat | 5.09±0.11a | 7.9±1.68b | 6.45±2.01ab |
Total fiber | 10.86±1.00a | 12.81±0.91b | 9.78±0.93a |
Ash | 10.06±0.78a | 10.93±0.70a | 10.69±1.26a |
Iron* | 5.80±0.28 | 5.86±0.28 | 8.39±0.48 |
Calcium* | 682.76±3.06 | 626.183±8.35 | 650.32±1.69 |
Phosphorus* | 164±11 | 136.33±3.50 | 152.30±3.05 |
Sodium* | 0.014 | 0.010 | 0.009 |
Manganese* | 2.4 | 5.83 | 4.43 |
Zinc* | 0.86 | 0.90 | 1.03 |
Copper* | 0.416 | 0.483 | 0.366 |
Potassium* | 0.9 | 1.05 | 0.92 |
Magnesium* | 3.905 | 2.223 | 2.172 |
Chromium* | ND | ND | ND |
Soluble fiber | 5.63±0.60a | 6.77±0.26b | 6.58±0.53ab |
Insoluble fiber | 5.23±0.40a | 6.04±0.65a | 3.2±0.40b |
Total sugars | 0.92 ±0.017a | 1.01±0.147ab | 1.26 ±0.079b |
Total glucose | 18.10±2.57a | 20.10±2.67a | 20.58±3.79a |
Free Glucose | 0.162±0.053a | 0.250±0.046ab | 0.292±0.012b |
Total carbohydrate | 30.042±3.64 | 34.17±3.68 | 31.912±5.741 |
*mg/100g dry basis
TABLE 2: PHYTOCHEMICAL PROFILE IN DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF MORUS INDICA
Phytochemical | M5 | V1 | S36 |
/100g (dry basis) | |||
a-Tocopherol (mg) | 34±3.05a | 24±2b | 28±2b |
Glutathione (m Moles) | 520± 0.00a | 550 ± 4.642a | 788 ±15.17b |
β carotene (mg) | 69.35 ±1.64a | 73.50±4.77a | 87.30±3.12b |
Polyphenols (mg) | 0.505±0.02a | 1.406±0.155b | 0.622±0.023c |
Flavonoid (mg/g) | 0.783±0.01a | 1.05±0.07b | 1.15±0.01b |
Alkaloids* (mg) | 46.83±0.288a | 72.5±6.06b | 100.66±9.51c |
Saponins* (mg) | 136.33±8.96a | 103.33±0.577b | 114.66±11.66b |
Steroidal saponins* (mg) | 39.96.±6.01a | 28.3±3.3b | 22.96±3.35b |
Tannins (mg) | 873.33±20.81a | 1003.33±50.33b | 1546.67±55.07c |
Polyphenol content | |||
Meoh | 1.16 | 2.33 | 1.68 |
80% Meoh | 5.3 | 2.8 | 5.3 |
Dc | 5.6 | 3.7 | 5 |
AC | 1 | 1.50 | 1.80 |
AH | 1.5 | 1.91 | 2.16 |
*-expressed /g extract (p<0.05)
The inhibition of oxidation in oil emulsion and microsomes was measured at different concentrations (300-500µg) and IC50 values of the different solvent extracts is given in figure 1 and 2. Among different extracts methanol and 80% methanol was more effective in inhibiting the oxidation rate followed by dechlorophyllised, aqueous cold and hot extracts.
In all the samples except Aq. cold extract, S36 exhibited maximum activity than V1 and M5 in a dose dependent manner. There was no significant difference between the methanol and 80% methanol extracts in inhibiting the oxidation in oil emulsion whereas in dechlorophyllised, aq. cold and hot extracts of V1 and S36 showed significantly (p<0.05) higher inhibition. In microsomes, the IC 50 value of S36 was between 170-210µg. in all extracts except Aq cold, 647µg. The IC50 value of V1 was less incase of Aq cold extract.
FIGURE 1: IC50 OF THE MI EXTRACTS IN INHIBITING THE OXIDATION IN OIL EMULSION
(Meoh- Methanol; 80%- Methanol-8: water-2; Dechl. - Dechlorophyllised; Aq.C- Aqueous cold; Aq.H- Aqueous hot) Values on the bars refer to concentration of extract in µg
FIGURE 2: IC50 OF THE MI EXTRACTS IN INHIBITING THE OXIDATION IN LIVER MICROSOMES.
(Meoh- Methanol; 80%- Methanol-8: water-2; Dechl. - Dechlorophyllised; Aq.C- Aqueous cold; Aq.H- Aqueous hot), Values on the bars refer to concentration of extract in µg
DISCUSSION: Many traditional plants remedies are known in folk medicine and used for treatment and management of diabetes mellitus29 and some have been validated by scientific studies to actually exert biological action against diabetes or its complications.
The medicinal plants provide a useful source of oral hypoglycemic compounds for the development of new pharmaceutical leads as well as a dietary supplement to existing therapies and about 400 of such traditional plant remedy have been reported 30, 31.
The medicinal properties of these plants have been attributed to the biochemicals resident in the plant materials. Although studies have reported MI to exert an excellent antidiabetic effect 13, 32, the chemical composition of MI has been poorly investigated and most of the available information only deals with traditional and medicinal aspects. The aim of the present study was to determine the phytochemical and proximate composition of three varieties of Morus indica (M5, V1 and S36) leaves.
Hence, in the present study the proximate, micronutrient, carbohydrate and phytochemical compositions of 3 Morus indica (M5, V1 and S36) varieties were determined. In addition to their role in human and animal nutrition, knowledge of proximate, micronutrients and phytochemical composition is fundamental to the understanding of modes and mechanisms of action of medicinal plants in general. There are reports on the proximate, phytochemical and micronutirient composition of some medicinal plants which have been proved in diabetes therapy 33.
The results obtained from proximate analysis of leaves in all three varieties of MI reveals that the samples are good sources of carbohydrate and minerals with low fat content. This trend supports the reports on some medicinal plants with antidiabetic effect. The crude protein content shows they are fair sources and relatively less than some of the medicinal plants 34. Dietary fiber has positively been implicated in management of diabetes and post-prandial hyperglycemia. It delays gastric emptying or increase viscosity of GIT content thereby suppressing digestion and carbohydrate absorption. This mechanism is selectively advantageous in the threat or risk of hypoglycaemia, hyperinsulinemia and undue weight gain is absolved. Many of the Clinical trials (60–70%) have reported the association of high intake of soluble fiber with significant decreases in total and LDL cholesterol 35.
The mineral profile of the MI varieties shows all the three as good sources of iron, calcium and phosphorus. Minerals are naturally occurring chemical elements the body uses, to help and perform certain chemical reactions. Minerals form an integral part of functionally important organic compounds such as iron (Fe) in hemoglobin and Cytochrome or zinc (Zn) in insulin 36, 37.
Mineral deficiencies have manifested in forms of different disease conditions as goiter, rickets, and one form of metabolic dysfunction or the other. These K, Ca, Na and Mg mineral elements are very important in human nutrition. Calcium, potassium and magnesium are required for repair of worn out cells, strong bones and teeth in humans, building of red blood cells and for body mechanisms 38.
Concentrations of some of these macro elements obtained in MI varieties are appreciable (table 2). The biological roles for K and Ca are essential for disease prevention and control and may, therefore, contribute to some of the traditional medicinal influences of the plants. Trace elements such as manganese, iron and zinc are essential in enzymes metabolism. The concentrations of these elements in the plants are quiet important. Manganese is an important modulator of cells functions and play vital role in the control of diabetes mellitus. The importance of iron in maintaining the good health has been recognized 39.
Phytochemicals composition of the samples is given in table 2. As mentioned earlier S36 variety was found to be good source of many phytochemicals. Among the polyphenols all the varieties have shown some quantity of phenolics which are well known for their antioxidant activity, and also anti-microbial agents. Several reports indicate the antioxidant potential of medicinal plants may be related to the concentration of their phenolic compounds which include phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins and tannins 40.
Studies from our laboratory have reported a positive correlation between the polyphenols and antioxidant activity of Moringa oliefera, Psidium guajawa, Aegle marmelos 41, 5. Apart from using as antioxidants, Phenols and phenolic compounds are greatly used in skin infections and other wounds treatment and also for healing, when compared to other bactericides 42. Phenolic compounds have an electron donor capability, moreover, due to this ability; phenolic compounds are readily oxidized to form phenolate ion orquinone, which is an electron acceptor. Phenols and phenolic compounds modify the prostaglandin pathways and due to this action, they prevent platelets from clumping and have the ability to block specific enzymes that cause inflammation; antioxidant, immune enhancers, anti-clotting and hormone modulators.
Flavonoids are water soluble phytochemicals and are hydroxylated phenolic substances. They show antioxidant activities and prevent oxidative cell damage and carcinogenesis. They have anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory activities and a large effect in lower intestinal tract and heart disease 43. Studies have reported the therapeutic effect of flavonoids against wide array of microorganisms, by making a complex with extracellular and soluble proteins and to complex with the bacterial cell wall Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds are potent water soluble antioxidants and free radical scavengers, which prevent oxidative cell damage, have strong anti-cancer activity 42.
The biological function of alkaloids and their derivatives are very important in medicine and are used in analgesic, antispasmodic and bactericidal activities. However, alkaloids are mainly observed in large amount in flowering plants and they have an important physiological effect on mankind 44. They have the property of binding with cholesterol, bitterness and hemolytic activity in aqueous solution45. In the present study, V1 and S36 variety were found to be good sources of flavonoids, polyphenols and alkaloids. Hence, MI varieties can be used against some degenerative diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cancer, etc.
Saponins comprise a large family of structurally related compounds containing a steroid or triterpenoid aglycone (sapogenin) linked to one or more oligosaccharide moieties by glycosidic linkage. In MI varieties saponins were found in appreciable amount. The primary biological effect of saponins is the interactions with cellular and membrane components. For example, saponins hemolyze red blood cells by nonspecific interactions with membrane proteins, phospholipids, and cholesterol of erythrocytes. Saponins are characterized by their hemolytic activity and foaming properties. Few studies have reported the use of saponin extract from medicinal plants in precipitation and coagulation of RBC and wound healing property 42. Saponins are reported to affect the permeability of the small intestinal mucosal cells and thus have effect on active nutrient transport.
On the other hand, positive nutritional effects of specific saponins such as hypocholesterolemic effects and improvement of growth in various animal species have also been reported 44.
These medicinal properties bestow high medicinal activates of MI extracts varieties. Glutathione, tocopherol, β carotenoids and flavonoids etc. comes under second line defence antioxidants. β carotene is an excellent scavenger of singlet oxygen. Vitamin C directly interacts with radicals like O2-, OH. Glutathione is a good scavenger of many free radicals like O2-, HO and various lipid hydroperoxides and may help to detoxify many in haled oxidizing all pollutants like ozone, NO2 and free radicals in cigarette smoke in respiratory tract. Vitamin E scavenges peroxyl radicals intermediates in lipid peroxidation and is responsible for protect PUFA present in cell membrane and LDL, against lipid peroxidation 45.
Lipid peroxidation is a process in which PUFA undergo oxidative damage resulting in lipid derived radicals such as alkoxy and peroxyl radicals. In biological systems, antioxidants are capable of stabilizing or deactivating free radicals before they attack cells. The polarity of phytochemicals plays a key role in exhibiting antioxidant role at lipid phase especially at unsaturation site, which influence the chain breaking reaction 46.
Similarly in methanol and 80% methanol extracts, the antioxidants with high partition coefficient may be distributed hydrophobic compartments for the protection of lipids. In the present study, S36 found to be rich source of maximum phytochemicals. As mentioned earlier, a positive correlation exists between polyphenols and antioxidant activity 41 and the polyphenol content of the extracts was in the order of dechlorophyllised>Methanol> 80% methanol > Aq. cold and hot.
In contrast, the antioxidant activity was maximum in methanol and 80% methanol, which may be due to the synergistic action of polyphenols and other phytochemicals. Dechloropyllisation might have resulted in the removal of carotene and tocopherol along with chlorophyll which may be the reason for lower ability to inhibit oxidation in the two systems studied. Use of two lipid systems was helpful in studying the inhibition of oxidation by different extracts.
CONCLUSION: Varied proximate and phyto-chemical composition was observed in the three Morus indica varieties studied. Different extracts of MI exhibited protection against lipid peroxidation indicating its role in prevention of oxidative stress. Further studies on characterization and isolation of the phytochemicals are underway. Morus indica is well known for its medicinal properties, present information will help in further exploring the sample as nutraceutical and also to study its therapeutic effect against degenerative diseases (diabetes mellitus, cancer), anti-inflammatory, lipid lowering effect especially in cholesterol metabolism. The high fiber content of Morus indica provides scope to be used as a functional ingredient in disease specific food formulations.
REFERENCES:
- Sannigrahi S, Parida S, Patro VJ, Mishra US, Pathak A. Antioxidant and Antiinflammatory potential of Pterospermum acerifolium. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2010; 2(1), 1-5.
- Javanmardi J, Stushnoff C, Locke E, Vivanco JM, Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Iranian Ocimum accessions. Food Chemistry 2003; 83, 547–550.
- Sairam S, Reddy PV, Urooj A, Ex- Vivo Inhibition of Oxidation in Liver Microsomes by Selected Oilseeds Extracts. International Journal of Biomedical Research and Analysis 20121; (3), 111-113.
- Muanda F, Kon´e, D, Dicko A, Soulimani R, Younos, C, Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Three Malian Medicinal Plant Parts. Evidence-based Complementary and AlternativeMedicine2011; 1-8.
- Reddy PV, Sahana, N, Urooj A, Antioxidant activity of Aegle mamrmelos and Psidium guajava leaves. International Jounal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 2012; 2(1), 155-160.
- Patel VR, Patel PR., Kajal SS, Antioxidant Activity of Some Selected Medicinal Plants in Western Region of India. Advances in Biological Research, 2010; 4(1), 23-26,
- Tiwari AK, Rao JM, Diabetes mellitus and multiple therapeutic approaches of phytochemicals: present status and future prospective. Current Science 2002; 83, 30-38.
- 8. Hoffman PC, Combs, DK, Casler MD, Performance of lactating dairy cows fed alfalfa silage or perennial ryegrass silage. Journal of Dairy Science 1998;.81, 162-168.
- Mathews CE, Van Holde KE, Ahern KG, 1999. Modern Experimental Biology (3rd edn). Benjamin Cummings.
- Dingman SL, Water in soils: Infiltration and redistribution. Physical hydrology, second edition, upper saddle river, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall 2002; 646
- Kumar RP, Sujatha D, Saleem TSM, Chetty CM, Ranganayakulu, D, (Potential hypoglycemic & hypolipidemic effect of Morus Indica and Asystasia gangetica in alloxan induced diabetes mellitus. International Journal of ResearchinPharmaceuticalSciences 2010; 1(1), 51-56.
- 12. Andallu B, Varadacharyulu NC, Antioxidant role of mulberry (Morus indica. L) leaves in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Journal of Clinica Chemica Acta. 2003; 338, 3–10.
- Devi V, Urooj A, Hypoglycemic potential of Morus indica. L and Costus igneus. Nak- a preliminary study. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 2008; 46, 614-616.
- Arabshahi-Delouee S, Urooj A, Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of mulberry (Morus indica L). Food Chemistry 2007; 102, 1233-1240
- AOAC, 1970. Official methods of analysis, AOAC International, Washington, DC, 11th Edition,
- Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH, Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.1992; 46: 223-250.
- Dubois, M. Gills, KA. Hamilton, JK. Ribers, PA. Smith, F: Estimation of sugars by colorimetric methods. Analytical Chemistry 1956; 2, 350.
- Slinkard K, Singleton VL, Total Phenol Analysis; Automation and comparison with manual methods. American JournalofEnologyandViticultutre- 1967; 28, 49–55.
- Miliauskas,G, Venskutoni PR, Van Beek TA, Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food Chemistry 2004; 85, 231–237.
- Shamsa F, Monsef H, Ghamooshi R, Verdian-rizi M, Spectrophotometric determination of total alkaloids in some Iranian medicinal plants. Thai Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2008; 32, 17-20.
- Hiai S, Oura H, Hamanak, H. Color reaction of some sapogenins and saponins with vanillin and sulfuric acid. Planta Medica, 1976; 29, 116-122.
- Makkar ,HPS, Blummel M, Borowy, N, Becker K. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 1993; 61,161-165.
- Freed M, 1966. Methods of vitamins assay (3rd ed) Association of Vitamin Chemists. Interscience, New York
- Ranganna S, 1999. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control forFruits and Vegetables Products (2nd ed). McGrow-Hill, NewDelhi, India.
- Beutler E, Kelly BM. The effect of sodium nitrate on RBC glutathione. Experienita. 1963; 19, 96–97.
- Buege JA, Aust ST. Microsomal lipid Peroxidation. Methods in Enzymology. 1978; 52:302-310.
- Kamath SA, Rubin E. Interaction of calcium with microsomes: A modified method for rapid isolation of rat liver microsomes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications1972; 49; 52-59.
- Shapiro DJ, Rodwell VW: Regulation of hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A reductase and cholesterol synthesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1971; 246: 3210-3216
- Akhtar FM, Ali MR. Study of antidiabetic effect of a compound medicinal plant prescription in normal and diabetic rabbits, Journal of Pakistan Medical. Association 1984; 34, 239-244.
- Bailey LJ, Day C, Traditional plant medicine as treatment for diabetes. Diabetes Care, 1989; 12, 553-564.
- Mc Whorter LS, Biological Complementary Therapies in Diabetes - A Focus on Botanical Products. Diabetes Spectrum. 2001; 14: 99-208.
- Atangwho J, Ebong PE, Eyong EU, Williams IO, Eteng MU, Egbung GE, Comparative chemical composition of leaves of some antidiabetic medicinal plants: Azadirachta indica, Vernonia amygdalina and Gongronema latifoliumI). African Journal of Biotechnolgy 2009; 18, 4685-4689.
- Ejoh RA, Nkonga, DV, Inocent G, Moses,, MC.. Nutritional Components of Some Non-Conventional Leafy Vegetables Consumed in Cameroon”. Pakistan journal of Nutrition 2007; 6(6), 712-717.
- Brown, L, Rosner B, Willet, WW, Sacks, FM. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 69(1), 30-42.
- FC & A Super Life Span, Super Health. Frank W. Cawood and Associates: Los Angeles, CA. ISBN: 0-915099-92-6. 2010;.1(1):1-6.Available at http://www.ijpsb.com
- Chaney SG. “Principles of Nutrition II: Micronutrients”. In: Textbook of Biochemistry, with Clinical Correlation, 6th ed. 2006.Devlin, T.M. (ed.), John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY. 1091-1120. ISBN: 10 0-471-67808-2.
- WHO, 1996. Trace elements in Human Nutrition and Health. WHO Technical Report Series, Geneva, 199-205.
- Aliyu AB, Mus, AM, Oshanimi JA, Ibrahim HA, Oyewale AO, Phytochemical analyses and mineral elements composition of some medicinal plants of northern Nigeria Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences2008; 7(1), 119-125,
- Irimpan MT., Jolly CI, Sheela D. Antioxidant activity and polyphenol content of seven medicinal plants of asclepiadaceae - a comparative study. International Journal of Current Research, 2012; 4(3), 066-068. ]
- Urooj A, Reddy PV: Moringa oleifera: antioxidant properties and stability of various solvent extracts. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biotechnology 2010. [Online] 1(1):1-6. Available at http://www.ijpsb.com.
- Okwu DE, Evaluation of the chemical composition of indigenous spices and flavoring agents. Glob Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 2001. 455-459.
- Farquar, JN. 1996. Plant sterols, their biological effects in humans, Handbook of Lipids in Human. Nutrition. BOCA Rotan HL CRC Press,. pp: 101-105.
- Stary F, 1998. The Natural Guide. The Natural Guide to Medicinal Herbs and Plants. Tiger Books International, London, p. 12-16
- Gupta VK, Gupta SK. Plants as natural antioxidants, .Natural Product Radiance, 2006; 5(6), 326-334,
- 46. Lizcano LJ, Viloria-Bernal M, Vicente F, Berrueta LA, Gallo B, Martínez-Cañamero M, Ruiz-Larrea MB, Ruiz-Sanz JI. 2012.
How to cite this article:
Reddy VP and Urooj A: Proximate, Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant activity (in vitro and ex vivo) of Morus indica Varieties. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013; 4(4); 1626-1634.
Article Information
56
1626-1634
396KB
1442
English
IJPSR
Vanitha P. Reddy and Asna Urooj*
Department of Studies in Food Science and Nutrition, University of Mysore, Mysore-570006, Karnataka, India
asnaurooj@foodsci.uni-mysore.ac.in
02 December, 2012
23 February, 2013
30 March, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.4(4).1626-34
01 April, 2013