QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF ETODOLAC BY UV SPECTROPHTOMETRIC METHOD IN BULK DRUG AND COMMERCIAL FORMULATIONS
HTML Full TextQUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF ETODOLAC BY UV SPECTROPHTOMETRIC METHOD IN BULK DRUG AND COMMERCIAL FORMULATIONS
Pinar Demirci Insuyu, Alptug Atila, Yucel Kadioglu* and Atakan Turan
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey
ABSTRACT: The rapid and sensitive UV spectrophotometric method was described for the determination of etodolac, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The type of solvent, the range of wavelength and the range of concentration were chosen in order to optimize the conditions. The developed and validated method was successfully applied to the analysis of etodolac without derivatization with any compound in commercial formulations. The standard calibration curve of etodolac was constructed by plotting absorbance versus concentration in the determined concentration range with the final dilution. The calibration curve was Absorbance in 277 nm wavelength = 0.0303 Concentration in ppm –0.0201 and linear (R³0.9995) in concentration range of 1-50 ppm of etodolac. The LOD and LOQ values of method were 0.7 ppm and 1.0 ppm, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method was fast with respect to analysis time as compared to more sophisticated chromatographic techniques.
Keywords: |
Etodolac, UV Spectrophotometric method, Development and Validation
INTRODUCTION:Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a group of drugs of diverse chemical composition and different therapeutic potentials having a minimum of three common features: identical basic pharmacological properties, similar basic mechanism of action as well as similar adverse effects 1. Etodolac [1, 8-Diethyl-1, 3, 4, 9-tetrahydropyrano (3, 4-b)-indole-1-acetic acid] (Figure 1) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, that it is used for treatment of postoperative pain and inflammation, for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis 2. It is rapidly metabolized in the liver, followed by renal elimination as the primary route of excretion 3.
FIG. 1: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF ETODOLAC
Different analytical techniques including sequential injection analysis 2, voltammetric 4, capillary electrophoretic 5-7, spectrofluorimetric method 8, 9, high-performance thin-layer chromatography 10, 11 and HPLC methods 12-18 used for analysis of etodolac, etodolac enantiomers, and the mechanisms of etodolac degradation in commercial formulations and bulk drug have been described in the literature. The official methods described are a non-aqueous acid-base titration procedure and LC method for determination of etodolac in pure and dosage forms 19-22.
Besides, there are several spectrophotometric method based on the formation of complexes with different compounds. In these studies, the formation of colored complexes between drugs and p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde reagent in the presence of sulfuric acid and ferric chloride 23,the oxidation by Fe(III) in the presence o-phenanthroline or bipyridyl 24, the reduce Fe (III) to Fe (II) in the presence of 2, 2’-bipyriyl and pH 3.5-6.0 acetate buffer medium 25, the oxidation of etodolac by Fe (III) in the presence of o-phenanthroline medium 26 the charges transfer complexes of etodolac 27 and the complexation of etodolac with copper (II) acetate and iron (III) chloride 28.
The purpose of this investigation is to develop by considering all optimization parameters with a simple sample preparation without complex creation process and to work the analysis by UV spectrophotometric of etodolac in bulk drug and commercial formulations. So the method was developed by considering all optimization parameters as different from literature.
The validation of method was carried out by establishing linearity, stability, analytical recovery, repeatability, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), within-day and between-day precision and accuracy according to International Conference on Harmonization guidelines (ICH) for validation of analytical procedures 29.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Apparatus: Thermospectronic double-beam UV spectrophotometer (HEλIOSβ) with a data processing system was used. The curves of the UV-Visible spectra (N=6. Dl=4.0 nm) of standard and sample solutions were recorded in 1 cm quartz cells at a scan range of 240-310 nm fixed slit width of 2 nm and its data processing system (PC Computer and Hewlett-Packard Deskjet printer) was used.
Materials and reagents: Etodolac was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo, USA). Analytical grade methanol was purchased from Merck (USA). Etol Fort Tablet (Nobel Ilac A.Ş.) and Tadolak Tablet (Saba Ilac A.Ş.) was obtained from the local market (Erzurum, Turkey). Both tablets were claimed to contain 400 mg etodolac/tablet and TiO2 and Fe2O3 as excipient
Preparation of stock and standard solutions: A stock solution (100 ppm) of pure drug was prepared by dissolving 5 mg etodolac in 50 mL of methanol. From this stock solution, the working standard (WS) solutions at 1.0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50.0 ppm concentrations were prepared by suitable dilution. The quality control (QC) solutions (2.5, 7.5 and 25.0 ppm) were prepared in a similar manner. The QC samples were used to assess the accuracy and precision of the assay method.
Assay of etodolac in tablets: Twenty tablets each of Etol fort tablet and Tadolak tablet were carefully weighed and ground to finely divided powders. Accurate weights equivalent to 400 mg etodolac was dissolved in 100 ml methanol, mixed well. Solution was stand for about 10-15 min and filtered up using 12 mm filter paper. The filtrate was diluted with methanol to obtain a 1.0 ppm and 10 ppm concentrations of etodolac for both tablet samples.
Simulated sample: Simulated samples containing 400 mg of etodolac, 3.3 mg of TiO2 and 3.5 mg Fe2O3 were prepared and analyzed by the proposed method. The samples were homogenized (using a mortar and pestle) and the correspondent weight of one tablet was submitted to the analytical procedure.
Placebo sample: Placebo sample containing 3.3 mg of TiO2 and 3.5 mg Fe2O3 were prepared and analyzed by the proposed method. The samples were homogenized (using a mortar and pestle) and the correspondent weight of one tablet was submitted to the analytical procedure.
RESULTS:
Method development: To develop a sensitive UV spectrophotometric method without derivatization of etodolac, the experimental conditions such as the solvent, the wavelength range and smoothing were optimized.
Optimum results were obtained by measuring the wavelength range 24-310 nm through using high smoothing (Δλ = 21.0 nm) for UV spectrophotometric method. In this assay, various solvent systems such as methanol, ethanol and acetonitrile were tried individually or in combinations of different proportions.
The final decision of using methanol was based on sensitivity, interference, suitability for drug, easy preparation of solution, content estimation and cost, respectively.
In UV absorption spectrums of etodolac, one broad shouldered peak with maximum wavelengths at 277 nm in methanol medium was observed as shown in Figure 2. This peak was sharper at higher concentrations.
FIG. 2: UV SPECTRUMS OF STANDARD SOLUTIONS (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30 AND 50 ppm) OF ETODOLAC
Linearity of calibration curves: In the UV method, the working solutions were scanned at 240-310 nm against a similarly prepared blank. The calibration curve, absorption spectrums of etodolac in bulk drug are shown in Figure 2. The 277 nm wavelength for UV was used for calibration curve. Seven-level calibration series with six analyses at each concentration level were measured.
Sensitivity: Spectrophotometrically, LOD and LOQ were determined by an empirical method that analyzing a series of standard solutions which were containing decreasing amounts of etodolac. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was defined as the lowest concentration of measured value [(RSD< 10%) and accuracy (80-120%)] of standard solutions in calibration curves 29, 30. The limit of detection (LOD), determined (RSD< 20%) as the lowest concentration of analyte which was distinguished from the blank with reasonable confidence was also calculated 29, 30.
Repeatability: Repeatability is given as inter-day and intra-day precision and accuracy where evaluated by analyzing three different concentration (2.5, 7.5 and 25.0 ppm) of etodolac on six different day (between-day) and during the same day one day (within-day) in 277 nm wavelength.
The precision of method were given as the relative standard deviation (RSD %= Standard Deviation/Mean x 100) and the accuracy of method were given as the percent of mean deviation from known concentration [Relative Error (RE %) = found concentration-known concentration x 100 known concentration]. The RSD % values for within-day and between-day precision of proposed method were found to be ≤3.86% (n=6). The RE % values for the within-day and between-day accuracy studies of method were found to be ≤3.60%. These data indicated that the developed methods have a good repeatability (Table 1).
TABLE 1: PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF PROPOSED METHOD (n=6)
Added (ppm) | Within-day | Between-day | ||||
Found±SD (ppm) | Precision RSD % | Accuracy RE % | Found±SD (ppm) | Precision RSD% | Accuracy RE% | |
2.5 | 2.48±0.03 | 1.21 | -0.80 | 2.59±0.10 | 3.86 | 3.60 |
7.5 | 7.39±0.06 | 0.81 | 1.47 | 7.47±0.08 | 1.07 | -0.40 |
25.0 | 25.06±0.25 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 24.48±0.92 | 3.76 | -2.08 |
SD:Standard deviation, RSD: Relative standard deviation,RE: Relative error, average of six replicate determinations
Analytical recovery: The accuracy was determined by analytical recovery of known amounts of etodolac reference standard added to the tablet sample at the beginning of the process. For recovery study, the tablet solutions were prepared according to the procedure described at Section “Assay of etodolac in tablets”. 1.0 ppm concentration of tablet solution was spiked at 2.5, 7.5 and 25.0 ppm concentrations of etodolac standard solutions. The absorbance of solutions prepared was measured with UV spectrophotometric method and analytical recovery was calculated from followed equation:
Analytical Recovery % = [(Ct-Cu) / Ca] x 100
Where Ct is total concentration of the analyte determined; Cu is the concentration of the analyte present in the formulation; Ca is the concentration of the pure analyte added to the formulation.
The mean recoveries and the RSD % of both tablets were found to be 94.0-102.0 % and 1.08-3.42%, respectively. No interference from the common excipient was observed. The results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2: ANALYTICAL RECOVERY VALUES OF ETODOLAC IN COMMERCIAL FORMULATIONS (n=6)
Commercial Formulations | Added (ppm) | Taken (ppm) | Found±SD (ppm) | Recovery % (RSD%) |
Etol Fort Tablet | 1.0 | 2.5 | 3.51±0.12 | 101.0 (3.42) |
7.5 | 8.48±0.15 | 98.0 (1.77) | ||
25.0 | 25.99±0.29 | 99.0 (1.12) | ||
Tadolak Tablet | 1.0 | 2.5 | 3.52±0.09 | 102.0 (2.56) |
7.5 | 8.44±0.14 | 94.0 (1.66) | ||
25.0 | 25.97±0.28 | 97.0 (1.08) |
SD: Standard deviation of six replicate determinations, RSD: Relative standard deviation
Stability: To determine the stability of solutions of etodolac, the stock solution, WS and QC samples of etodolac were stored in the refrigerator and at room temperature during two week. Then, the stability measurements were carried out. The results were evaluated by comparing these measurements with those of standards and expressed as percentage deviation. It was found to be stable of etodolac solutions for a week in the refrigerator and for four days in room temperature. A significant change in concentration (recovery = 100±1%) were not found under both conditions. In addition to this, stock solution was found to be stable for two week in refrigerator.
Interferences study: The effects of common excipients and additives were tested for their possible interferences in the assay of etodolac. The simulated and placebo samples were prepared and analyzed. It has not been determined any interference of these substances at the levels found in dosage forms. Excipient that was used in this preparation was the most commonly used by the pharmaceutical industry. The presence of TiO2 and Fe2O3 did not appear interfere in the results of the analysis.
DISCUSSION: Etodolac is one of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In the present study, sensitive UV spectrophotometric method is widely employed in analysis of commercial formulations in industry. The proposed method is used so much because it is a method easy to apply. For this, UV spectrophotometric method that enabled us to quantify the etodolac without derivatization in commercial formulations was developed and validated. In the development of a simple, rapid, sensitive, and accurate analytical method for the routine quantitative determination of samples in laboratories, the unnecessary tedious sample preparations is not request.
Etodolac has UV-absorbing molecule from the specific chromospheres in the structure that absorb at a particular wavelength and this fact was successfully employed for their quantitative determinations using the UV spectrophotometric method. The UV spectrum of etodolac in methanol was shown in Figure 2. The standard calibration curve of etodolac in 277 nm wavelength was constructed by plotting the A(Absorbance for UV) versus etodolac concentrations (Figure 2).
The good linearity of calibration curve within the concentration range of 1-50 ppm was showed for proposed method. The linear regression equation [with standard error of intercept (Sa: 5.0x10-5) and slope (Sb: 4.0x10-4)] and the correlation coefficient, R, was found to be Absorbance = 0.0303 concentration ppm – 0.0201 and 0.9995, respectively. The correlation coefficient of standard calibration curves for UV of etodolac in methanol medium was higher.The LOQ and LOD values for UV method for pure etodolac sample were found as 1.0 ppm and 0.7 ppm, respectively. The all RSD values were found lower than 10 %.
The proposed method was evaluated in the assay of commercially available tablet containing was claimed to contain 400 mg etodolac/tablet (Etol fort Tablet and Tadolak tablet) with TiO2 and Fe2O3 as excipient. Evaluation was performed using the calibration curve method since no significant difference between the slopes of the calibration curves for standards and commercial formulation solution was observed.
The amount of tablet including 400 mg etodolac was determined of six replicates. The UV spectra obtained from both tablets are shown in Figure 3. It was apparent that the wavelengths of drug solution are same with standard solutions.
The results obtained are satisfactorily accurate and precise as indicated by the excellent % recovery and RSD% <4.5% (Table 3). Experiments showed that there was no interference from the additions and excipients. The determination repeated for six times, final recovery of proposed method for commercial tablets was obtained approximately to be 100.6% and 99.8%.
FIG. 3: UV SPECTRUMS OF TABLET SOLUTIONS IN 10 ppm CONCENTRATIONS
TABLE 3: DETERMINATION OF ETODOLAC IN COMMERCIAL FORMULATIONS (400 mg ETODOLAC/TABLET)
Commercial Formulations | aMean±SD mg | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | Confidence Interval |
Etol Fort | 402.5±17.3 | 100.6 | 4.30 | 99.8-101.4 |
Tadolak | 399.1±15.8 | 99.8 | 3.96 | 97.8-100.9 |
a Mean of six replicate determinations
CONCLUSION: The analytical UV spectrophoto-metric method were developed and completely validated for quantitative determination of etodolac in commercial tablets. The proposed method provides rapid, simple, accurate and reproducible quantitative analysis for determination of etodolac without derivatization with any compound in commercial formulations, without any interference from the excipients. Moreover, the proposed method was fast with respect to analysis time as compared to more sophisticated chromatographic techniques. The UV spectroscopic method can be conveniently used for the routine determination of etodolac in quality control laboratories, where economy and time are essential.
REFERENCE:
- Gouda AA, El-Sayed MIK, Amin AS and El Sheikh R: Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorimetric methods for the determination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, A review. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2011; Article in press
- Garcia JB, Saraiva MLMFS and Lima JLFC: Determination and antioxidant activity evaluation of etodolac, an anti-inflammatory drug, by sequential injection analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 2006; 573: 371-375.
- Strickmann DB and Balschke G: Isolation of an unknown metabolite of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug etodolac and its identification as 5-hydroxy etodolac. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2001; 25: 977-984.
- Yılmaz S, Uslu B and Özkan SA: Anodic oxidation of etodolac and its square wave and differential pulse voltammetric determination in pharmaceuticals and human serum. Talanta 2001; 54: 351-360.
- Dogrukol-Ak D, Kutluk ÖB, Tuncel M and Aboul-Enein HY: Capillary electrophoretic method for the determination of etodolac in pharmaceutical tablet formulation. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 2001; 24: 773-780.
- Dung PT, Ko MY, Ju Choi H, Sin KS and Ho Kim K: Determination of enantiometric Impurity of etodolac by capillary electrophoresis using (2-Hyrdoxypropyl)-β-cylclodextrin. Archives of Pharmacal Research 2008; 31: 1218-1223.
- De Pablos RR, Garcia-Ruiz C, Crego AL and Marina ML: Separation of etodolac enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis, validation and application of the chiral method to the analysis of commercial formulations. Electrophoresis 2005; 26: 1106-1113.
- Ulu ST: New and sensitive spectrofluorimetric method for the determination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, etodolac and diclofenac sodium in pharmaceutical preparations through derivatization with 7-fluoro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1, 3-dizaole. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 2011; 19: 94-101.
- Abd El-Hay SS, Colyer CL, Hassan WS and Shalaby A: Spectrofluorimetric determination of etodolac, moxepril HCl and fexofenadine HCl using europium sensitized fluorescence in bulk and pharmaceutical preparations. Journal of Fluorescence, 2011; August 19, DOI 10.1007/s10895-011-0954-8.
- Lalla JK, Bhat SU, Sandy NR, Shah MU and Hamrapurkar PD: HPTLC determination of etodolac in pharmaceutical formulations and human samples: HPTLC vs HPLC. Indian Drugs 1999; 36: 115-118.
- Sane RT, Francis M and Khatri AR: High-performance thin-layer chromatographic determination of etodolac in pharmaceutical preparations. Journal of Planar Chromatography-Modern TLC 1998; 11: 211-213.
- Saleh OA, El-Azzouny AA, Aboul-Enein HY, Badawey AM and Rashed MS: Development and validation of stability-indicating high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) and DD1-spectrophotometric assays for etodolac in bulk form and in pharmaceutical dosage form.Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 2009; 32: 2584-2599.
- Pirkle WH and Murray PG: The separation of the enantiomers of a variety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as their anilide derivatives using a chiral stationary phase. Journal of Liquid Chromatography 1990; 13: 2123-2134.
- Caccamese S: Direct high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation of etodolac enantiomers using chiral stationary phases. Chirality 1992; 5. 164-167.
- Lee YJ, Padula J and Lee H-K: Kinetics and mechanisms of etodolac degradation in aqueous solutions. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1988; 77: 81-86.
- Patel MJ, Badmanaban R and Patel CN: Reversed phase-high performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of tolperisone hydrochloride and etodolac in a combined fixed dose oral formulations. Pharmaceutical Methods 2011; 2: 124-129.
- Ammar A and Surmann P: Improvement of etodolac purity test by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Die Pharmazie 2008; 12: 913- 914.
- Ficarra R, Ficarra P, Calabro ML and Costantino D: Quantitative high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of etodolac in pharmaceutical formulations. Farmaco 1991; 46: 403–407.
- The United States Pharmacopeia XXVII The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, Inc., Rockville, MD, 2004; pp 770-772.
- European Pharmacopoeia, 4th Ed., Council of Europe, Strasburg, France, 2002; pp 1153-1155.
- British Pharmacopoeia, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, UK, 2001; pp 690-692, 2069-2070.
- Pharco Pharmaceuticals personal communications, February 2004
- El Kousy NM: Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorimetric determination of etodolac and aceclofenac. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 1999; 20: 185-194.
- Gouda AA, Hassan WS. Spectrophotometric determination of etodolac in pure form and pharmaceutical formulations. Chemistry Central Journal 2008; 2: 1-8.
- Hu Q, Li Y, Yang X, Wei Q and Huang Z: Study on spectrophotometric determination of etodolac. Chemistry Journal on Internet 2008; 10: 31-33.
- Ye Y, Yinke L and Huang Y: Spectrophotometric determination of etodolac. Asian Journal of Chemistry 2009; 21: 649-654.
- Duymus H, Arslan M, Kucukislamoglu M and Zengin M: Charge transfer complex studies between some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and π-electron acceptors. Spectrochimica Acta A 2006; 65: 1120–1124.
- Amer SM, El-Saharty YS, Metwally FH and Younes KM: Spectrophotometric study of etodolac complexes with copper (II) and iron (III). Journal of AOAC International 2005; 88: 1637-1643.
- Validation of analytical procedures, Proceedings of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). Commission of the European Communities, (1996).
- Maslov LG, Evtushenko NS and Schavlınskıı AN: Structure of chemical compounds, methods of analysis and process control. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal 1998; 32: 217-225.
How to cite this article:
Insuyu PD, Atila A, Kadioglu Y and Turan A: Quantitative determination of Etodolac by UV Spectrophotometric method in bulk drug and commercial formulations. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013: 4(8); 2927-2932. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR. 0975-8232.4(8).2927-32
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
10
2927-2932
380KB
2006
English
IJPSR
Pinar Demirci Insuyu, Alptug Atila, Yucel Kadioglu* and Atakan Turan
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey
yucel@atauni.edu.tr
20 March, 2013
05 June, 2013
27 July, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.4(8).2927-32
01 August, 2013