RP-HPLC BIOANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF METFORMIN AND LEVOTHYROXINE IN HUMAN PLASMA- DRUG INTERACTION STUDIES
HTML Full TextRP-HPLC BIOANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF METFORMIN AND LEVOTHYROXINE IN HUMAN PLASMA- DRUG INTERACTION STUDIES
Jinesh Bahubali Nagavi *, Subhajit Ghosh and Preethi Gotadake Anantharaju
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, K.M. Puram, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
ABSTRACT: A simple, sensitive, robust and specific high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination metformin and levothyroxine in human plasma. In the current study, the analysis was performed on Phenomenex Luna 5µ C18 100A (250 x 4.6mm, 5 micron) column using acetonitrile: methanol: 0.03M phosphate buffer (pH 2- 3.5) 50:10:40 v/v/v as mobile phase at flow rate 1.0 mL/min. The analytes were monitored with UV-PDA detector at 251nm. In this developed method Metformin and Levothyroxine elutes at a retention time of 2.698 and 5.929 min respectively. The proposed method is having linearity in the concentration range from 5 to 50μg/mL of Metformin and Levothyroxine. The current method was validated with respect to linearity; precision, lowest limit of detection (LOD) and lowest limit of quantification (LOQ), accuracy and recovery according to the USP guidelines. The system consisted of a pump (Shimadzu, prominence, HPLC), with 20µl sample injector, along with a PDA detector at a wavelength of 251nm. Data was compiled using Shimadzu LC Solution software. A good linear relationship over the concentration range of 5-50µg/ml was shown. Validation of the method was carried out as per the USFDA. The method developed was found to be precise, accurate, specific and selective. Statistical analysis shows that the method is reproducible and selective for the estimation of Metformin and Levothyroxine in dosage form.
Keywords: Bioanalytical, Metformin, Levothyroxine, RP-HPLC, USFDA
INTRODUCTION: Metformin, (CPG) 1,1-Dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride Fig. 1A a drug used to treat diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body cannot control the level of sugar in the blood).
Its mechanism of action is the alteration of the energy metabolism of the cell. Metformin exerts its prevailing, glucose-lowering effect by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and opposing the action of glucagon.
Metformin is a first-line therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, due to its robust glucose-lowering effects, well-established safety profile, and relatively low cost. While metformin has been shown to have pleotropic effects on glucose metabolism, there is a general consensus that the major glucose-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes is mostly mediated through inhibition of hepatic gluconeogenesis. However, despite decades of research, the mechanism by which metformin inhibits this process is still highly debated. A key reason for these discrepant effects is likely due to the inconsistency in dosage of metformin across studies. Literature survey reveals that few analytical methods have been reported for metformin include RP-HPLC methods 1-4, HPTLC method 5, 6 , UV method 7, normal phase HPLC 8, GC method 9, LC-MS method 10, capillary electrophoresis method 11. Levothyroxine, sodium (2S) – 2 – amino – 3 -[4 - (4 - hydroxy-3, 5-diiodophenoxy)-3,5-diiodophenyl] propanoic acid Fig. 1B is synthetically produced form of thyroxine, a major endogenous hormone secreted by the thyroid gland. Also known as L-thyroxine or the brand name product Synthroid, levothyroxine is used primarily to treat hypothyroidism, a condition where the thyroid gland is no longer able to produce sufficient quantities of the thyroid hormones T4 (tetraiodothyronine or thyroxine) and T3 (triiodothyronine or Levothyroxine), resulting in diminished down-stream effects of these hormones. Literature survey reveals that few analytical methods have been reported for levothyroxine include has been estimated by colorimetry 12, Spectrophotometric methods 13, 14, LC-MS/MS 15, RP-HPLC 16-21.
FIG. 1A: STRUCTURE OF METFORMIN HYDROCHLORIDE
FIG. 1B: STRUCTURE OF LEVOTHYROXINE SODIUM
MATERIALS & METHODS:
Chemical and Reagents: Pure sample of metformin and levothyroxine were received from Wintac Limited, Bangalore. The human plasma was received from JSS Hospital, Mysore, Karnataka, India. All the chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade only. Milli-Q-water was used throughout the process, methanol, acetonitrile of HPLC grade were procured from Merck Chemical Laboratories, Bangalore, India.
Instrumentation: The present research was carried on HPLC (SHIMADZU) equipped with PDA detector with LC solution software. Separation was attained using Phenomenex C8 column. The mobile phase was a mixture of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (pH-3.0) and acetonitrile (40:60 v/v) at flow rate 1.2 mL/min. The contents of mobile phase were filtered before use through membrane filter (0.45 μ). The optimized chromatographic conditions are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1: OPTIMIZED CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
Chromatographic Conditions | |
Column | C8 (250 x 4.6 mm. 5 μ) Phenomenex |
Flow rate | 1.2 mL/min |
Run time | 10 min |
Wavelength | 252 nm |
Injection Volume | 10μL |
Detector | PDA Detector |
Elution | Isocratic |
Mobile Phase | potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (pH-3.0) and acetonitrile (40:60 v/v) |
Column oven temperature | 25 ± 5ºC |
Preparation of Mobile Phase: Mobile phase is prepared by adding 4.08g potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate in 250ml of Millipore water, dissolve and adjust the pH to 3.0 using ortho phosphoric acid and made up to 1000ml (0.03M) using Millipore water and acetonitrile were used in the ratio of 40: 60 (v/v).
Preparation of Standard Solutions: Stock solution of Metformin and levothyroxine was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of drugs Metformin and levothyroxine in 50 mL of methanol in 100mL volumetric flask dissolved and volume was made up to 100 mL using the methanol to get the standard stock solutions of concentration 1 mg/mL (1000 μg/mL) for both Metformin and levothyroxine. Different working standard solutions were prepared from the above solution.
METHOD DEVELOPMENT:
Selection of Mobile Phase: Different mobile phases were tried in various ratios for selection of solvents of desired polarity. The drugs metformin and levothyroxine were injected with different mobile phases at different ratios and flow rates till a sharp peak, without any interference was obtained. The mobile phase selected with good resolution was phosphate buffer (pH 3) and acetonitrile in the ratio 40:60 (v/v).
Stock and Standard Solution: The stock solution of metformin and levothyroxine were prepared by dissolving 10mg of each separately into methanol and volume was made up to 100ml with same solvent.
From stock solutions (100 μg/ml of each) 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 μg/ml concentration were prepared separately using methanol as solvent. Equal volumes of both concentrations were mixed and used as standard solutions.
Preparation of Calibration Curve: From the stock solution (1000 μg/mL) aliquots of Metformin and levothyroxine were pipette into a series of 10 mL volumetric flask. The final volume was made up to the mark by using HPLC grade methanol. 10μL solution was injected to the column and peak areas were measured and the calibration curve was obtained. Linear correlations were found between peak ratios of Metformin and levothyroxine and are described by regression equation. The Beer’s law was obeyed in the concentration range of 5 – 50 μg/mL Fig. 2. The regression parameters and system suitability of the method were shown in Table 2.
FIG. 2: STANDARD CALIBRATION GRAPH OF METFORMIN AND LEVOTHYROXINE
TABLE 2: THE REGRESSION AND SYSTEM SUITABILITY PARAMETERS OF THE METHOD
Parameter | Metformin | Levothyroxine |
Linearity (µg/ml) | 5-50 | 5-50 |
Regression Equation | 12007x + 42001 | 13290x + 35691 |
Regression coefficient (R2) | 0.9913 | 0.9924 |
Slope | 97774 | 85001 |
Intercept | 458786 | 583384 |
Retention Time (RT) | 2.698 min | 5.929 min |
LLOQ (µg/ml) | 2.810 | 6.072 |
Resolution factor (RS) | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Capacity Factor (K’) | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Tailing Factor (T) | 1.1 | 1.7 |
Theoretical Plates | 4376.51 | 7810.79 |
HETP | 81.0 | 90.0 |
Determination of Drugs in Plasma (Spiking Method): 0.1 ml of drug from stock solution was added to 0.1 ml of plasma (obtained by centrifuging the blood samples at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes) in append off tubes and made up to the volume (1.8 ml) with acetonitrile for the precipitation of proteins. It is further centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Supernatant fluid is decanted into vial by filtering with syringe filters of 0.45μ size. The obtained chromatograms are shown in Fig. 3A and B.
FIG. 3: CHROMATOGRAM OF (A) BLANK, (B) METFORMIN AND LEVOTHYROXINE IN PLASMA
RESULTS & DISCUSSION:
Method Validation: Since, the HPLC method was developed, validation of the method by using various parameters was performed to ensure that the accomplishment of the method meets the requirements of the described bioanalytical applications.
Following parameters were performed for method validation:
- System suitability
- Specificity
- Detection Limit (LOD)
- Quantification Limit (LOQ)
- Linearity
- Precision
Accuracy:
Linearity: From the experimental conditions described above, linear calibration curves of Metformin and levothyroxine were obtained for ten different concentrations level for both. The r2 for metformin was 0.991 and for levothyroxine was 0.990. Linear correlations were found between peak area of Metformin and levothyroxine concentration and are described by the regression equation. The linearity range for Metformin and levothyroxine is 5-50 μg/ml. Results are specified in Table 2.
Specificity: Specificity is the capability to evaluate the analyte distinctly in the presence of expected impurities and degraded products.
20 µl of the blank was injected in duplicate to the UPLC system and chromatographed. 20 µl of Metformin and levothyroxine standard solutions were injected in duplicate to the UPLC system. Standard chromatograms obtained are presented in Fig. 4 (A, B and C).
FIG. 4: CHROMATOGRAM OF (A) BLANK, (B) STANDARD SOLUTION OF LEVOTHYROXINE (50 µG/ML), (C) STANDARD SOLUTION OF METFORMIN (50 µG/ML)
Precision and Accuracy: The accuracy of an analytical method is the percentage of relativeness between the conventional true value and the value obtained by that method. Precision and Accuracy were determined by replicate analysis of known content of sample. The mean value should be within 15% of the actual value as per the acceptance criteria. The difference between mean amounts added and recovered (RE, %) serves as a measure of accuracy. The coefficient of variation (CV, %), as a measure of precision at each concentration, should not exceed 15%. Intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision were evaluated by analysis of quality-control samples containing metformin at three different concentrations a low concentration (LQC), a concentration near the centre of the calibration plot (MQC) and a concentration near the upper limit of the calibration plot (HQC). Intra-day accuracy and precision were evaluated by analysis of these QC samples prepared and analyzed on the same day (eight samples of each concentration; three replicate injections). Inter-day accuracy and precision were evaluated by analysis of these QC samples prepared and analyzed on five different days (three samples of each concentration; three replicate injections). The intra-day precision and accuracy of the method for metformin and levothyroxine are presented in Table 3A. The inter-day precision and accuracy of the method for metformin and levothyroxine are presented in Table 3B. All values for accuracy and precision were within the recommended limits.
TABLE 3: INTRADAY AND INTERDAY PRECISION OF METFORMIN AND LEVOTHYROXINE
(A) Intraday Precision | |||||
Concentration (µg/ml) | Mean (µg/ml) | %RSD | |||
Metformin | Levothyroxine | Metformin | Levothyroxine | ||
Low (n=3) | 5 | 5.11 | 5.25 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
Medium (n=3) | 25 | 25.5 | 26.6 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
High (n=3) | 50 | 51.30 | 50.16 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
(B) Intraday Precision | |||||
Concentration (µg/ml) | Mean (µg/ml) | %RSD | |||
Metformin | Levothyroxine | Metformin | Levothyroxine | ||
Low (n=3) | 5 | 5.21 | 5.30 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
Medium (n=3) | 25 | 25.7 | 25.96 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
High (n=3) | 50 | 51.30 | 50.35 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
Recovery: Recovery of the method was performed comparing the three quality control (QC) samples at low, medium and high concentrations (5, 25, 50 μg/ml). The recoveries of metformin and levothyroxine were determined by comparing peak area obtained for QC samples that were subjected to the extraction procedure with those obtained from blank plasma extracts that were spiked post extraction to the same nominal concentrations.
Stability Studies: The stability in human plasma over three freeze–thaw cycles and during short-term, long-term, and post-preparative storage was tested by analysis of LQC and HQC samples. The freeze–thaw stability was determined over three freeze–thaw cycles within 3 days. Spiked plasma samples were frozen at -22oC for 24 h and thawed at room temperature in each freeze–thaw cycle. To study short-term stability, the frozen (-22oC) and then thawed plasma samples were kept at room temperature for 6 h before sample preparation. The results obtained from these test samples were compared with those from freshly thawed and processed samples (reference samples). Long-term stability was determined after keeping spiked plasma samples frozen at -22oC for 1 month. For this stability test the samples (test samples) were analyzed and the results were compared with those obtained from freshly prepared and processed samples (reference samples). The stability in stock solutions was studied after storage at 2oC for 1 month. Three freeze thaw cycles of the quality control samples did not seem to affect quantification. Quality-control samples stored in a freezer at -22oC were stable for at least 1 month. Thawing of the frozen samples and keeping them at room temperature for 6 h had no effect on quantification. The stability in stock solutions was confirmed after storage for 29 days at 2oC.
CONCLUSION: The method involves simple and precise method for bioanalytical determination of metformin and levothyroxine in human plasma. This study showed that metformin along with levothyroxine significantly decreased plasma level of metformin. Such a variation would lead to sub therapeutic concentration and a consequent lack of therapeutic efficacy of metformin. This consequence may be expected due to inhibition of enzyme cytochrome P450 2C19 which is responsible for bioactivation of metformin. In conclusion, present study showed that levothyroxine can alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin to significant levels. Summary of validation parameters data for Metformin and Levothyroxine is presented in Table 4.
TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PARAMETERS DATA FOR METFORMIN AND LEVOTHYROXINE
Parameters | Metformin | Levothyroxine | Acceptance criteria | |
Retention Time (min) | 5.14 | 2.62 | - | |
LOD (μg/ml) | 5 | 5 | - | |
LLOQ (μg/ml) | 6.5 | 7.2 | - | |
Linearity (μg/ml) | 5-50 | 5-50 | - | |
Accuracy (% Recovery) | 96.7-98.2% | 96.2-98.4 | 90 -110% | |
Precision (%RSD) | System | 0.025 |
< 2% |
|
Method | 0.0020 | |||
Intermediate precision | 0.72 | |||
Specificity | No peak of diluent, excipients and impurities were detected. | No peak should
be detected |
||
System Suitability Parameters
|
N | 9772 | >2000 | |
HETP | 0.0021 | - | ||
Asymmetry | 1 | ~1 | ||
Resolution | 1.115 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors express their sincere thanks to the Principal, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, Mysore and JSS Hospital, Mysuru for providing the necessary facilities to carry out the research work. Authors thank the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore for providing the financial assistance (Ref: RGU/ADV-RES/BR-19/2019-20) to carry out the research work.
Funding: This study received grant from Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA (Ref: RGU/ADV-RES/BR-19/2019-20).
Author’s Contributions: All the authors have contributed for planning the study, manuscript design and interpretation the data.
Consent for Publication: The authors have approved and consented for publication.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
REFERENCES:
- Panda SS: Ion-pairing RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of aspirin and metformin bisulphate in tablet and capsule dosage form. International J Pharm Tech Research 2020; 2(1): 269-273.
- Mitakos A and Panderi I: A validated LC method for the determination of metformin in pharmaceutical preparations. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2022; 28(3-4): 431-438.
- Patel RB, Shankar MB, Patel MR and Bhatt KK: Simultaneous estimation of acetylsalicylic acid and metformin bisulfate in pure powder and tablet formulations by high-performance column liquid chromatography and high-performance thin-layer chromatography. J AOAC Int 2018; 91(4): 750-755.
- Anandakumar T, Ayyappan V, Raghu Raman, Vetrichelvan T, Sankar ASK and Nagavalli D: RP-HPLC analysis of aspirin and metformin bisulphate in combination. Indian J Pharm Sci 2017; 69: 597-599.
- Londhe SV, Mulgund SV, Deshmukh RS and Jain K: Simultaneous HPTLC analysis of aspirin, atorvastatin calcium and metformin bisulphate in the bulk drug and in capsules, Acta Chromatogr 2020; 22(2): 297-305.
- Agrawal H, Kaul N, Paradar AR and Mahadik KR: Stability indicating HPTLC determination of metformin bisulphate as bulk drug and in pharmaceutical dosage form, Talanta 2013; 61: 581-589.
- Mishra P and Dolly A: Spectrophotometric methods for determination of metformin in tablets. J Pharm Sci 2015; 67(4): 491-493.
- Durga Rao D, Kalyanaraman LS, Sait S and Venkata Rao PA: A validated stability-indicating normal phase LC method for metformin bisulfate and its impurities in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage form. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2010; 52(1): 160-165.
- Kample NS and Venkatachalam A: RP-HPLC analysis of aspirin and metformin bisulphate in combination. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007; 69: 597-599.
- Mitakos A and Panderi I: Experimental design approach for the development and validation of an enantiospecific RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of metformin and related compounds, Anal Chim Acta 2008; 27: 53–64.
- Fayed AS, Weshahy SA, Shehata MA, Hassan NY, Pauwels J, Hoogmartens J and Van Schepdael A: Separation and determination of metformin and its impurities by capillary electrophoresis. J Pharmaceut Biomed 2009; 49(2): 193-200.
- Kalaichelvi R, Fatima Rose M, Vadivel K, Jayachandran E. Simple extractivecolorimetric determination of levothyroxine sodium by aciddye complexation method in solid dosage form, Int J Chem Res 2010; 1(1): 6-8.
- Kakde RB, Gedam SN, Chaudhary NK, Barsagade AG, Kale DL and Kasture AV: Three-wavelength spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of levothyroxine and domperidone in pharmaceutical preparations, Inter J Pharm Tech Research 2009; 1(2): 386-389.
- Pimpodkar NV, Nalawade RS, Kuchekar BS, Mahajan NS and Jadhav RL: New spectrophotometric method for the estimation of levothyroxine in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation, Inter J Chem Sci 2008; 6(2): 993-999.
- Challa BR, Boddu SH, Awen BZ, Chandu BR, Bannoth CK, Khagga M, Kanala K and Shaik RP: Development and validation of a sensitive bioanalytical method for the quantitative estimation of levothyroxine in human plasma samples by LC-MS/MS: application to bioequivalence study. J Chromatogr B 2010; 878(19): 1499-1505.
- Prasanna Reddy B and Kiran Kumar Reddy N: Development and validation of RP-HPLC for the levothyroxine sodium sesquihydrate in pharmaceutical dosage forms and human plasma, Inter J Chem Tech Research 2009; 1(2): 195-198.
- Rajnish Kumar, Pinderjit Singh and Harinder Singh: Development of UV Spectrophotometric method for estimation of Levothyroxine in pharmaceutical dosage forms, Inter J Pharm Res & Devel 2011; 3(2): 113-17.
- Prasanna Kumar Reddy B, Ramanjaneya Reddy Y and Ramachandra D: Determination of levothyroxine sodium and lansoprazole in individual tablet dosage forms by RP-HPLC using single mobile phase. E-Journal of Chemistry 2009; 6(2): 489-494.
- Gupta KR, Chawla RB and Wadodka SG: Spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of levothyroxine and itopride hydrochloride in capsules Orbital the Electro J Chem 2010; 2(2): 181-188.
- Manoj K and Anbazhagan S: Reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of domperidone and levothyroxine from tablet formulation, Indian Drugs 2004; 41: 604-609.
- Sivakumar T, Manavalan R and Valliappan K: Development and validation of a RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of domperidone and levothyroxine in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Acta Chromatogr 2007; 18: 130-142.
- FDA Guidance for Industry, Bioanalytical Method Validation, Biopharmaceutics, September 2013.
How to cite this article:
Nagavi JB, Ghosh S and Anantharaju PG: RP-HPLC bioanalytical method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of metformin and levothyroxine in human plasma- drug interaction studies. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2024; 15(4): 1190-97. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.15(4).1190-97.
All © 2024 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
21
1190-1197
799 KB
236
English
IJPSR
Jinesh Bahubali Nagavi *, Subhajit Ghosh and Preethi Gotadake Anantharaju
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Sarada Vilas College of Pharmacy, K.M. Puram, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
nagavi.jinesh@gmail.com
25 March 2023
05 March 2024
29 March 2024
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.15(4).1190-97
01 April 2024