RP-HPLC METHOD FOR SIMULTATANEOUS DETERMINATION OF IRBESARTAN, LOSARTAN, HYDRO-CHLOROTHIAZIDE AND CHLORTHALIDONE–APPLICATION TO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DRUG PRODUCTS
HTML Full TextRP-HPLC METHOD FOR SIMULTATANEOUS DETERMINATION OF IRBESARTAN, LOSARTAN, HYDRO-CHLOROTHIAZIDE AND CHLORTHALIDONE–APPLICATION TO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DRUG PRODUCTS
R. A. Mhaske*1,S. Sahasrabudhe 1 and A. A. Mhaske 1
Sharon Bio-Medicine Ltd, Plot L6, Taloja-MIDC, Taluka- Panvel, Dist Raigad- 410 208, Maharashtra, India
Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Vidya Nagari, Churu-Bishau Road, Chudela, Dist. Jhunjhunu- 333 001, Rajasthan, India
ABSTRACT
A simple, precise and stability-indicating HPLC method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of anti-hypertensive drugs Irbesartan, Losartan, diuretics Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone. The separation was achieved on Hypersil BDS (Length 250 mm × Diameter 4.6 mm Particle size 5 μm) column with gradient flow. The mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 consisted of 0.05 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (Gradient ratio). The UV detection was carried out at 220 nm. The method was successfully validated in accordance to ICH guidelines. Further, the validated method was applied for commercially available pharmaceutical dosage form.
Keywords:RP-HPLC,
Anti-hypertensive drugs, Diuretic drugs, |
Development, Validation
INTRODUCTION: The parent guideline on drug stability testing Q1A (R2) issued by International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) stipulates stress studies to be carried out on a drug in order to establish the drug's inherent stability characteristics 1-2. Literature studies show various analytical methods reported for the estimation of individual, binary or tertiary combination of anti-hypertensive drugs or in combination with diuretics 3-12. Recently, HPLC method with fluorescence detection for simultaneous determination of chlorthalidone, valsartan and fluvastatin from human plasma has been reported 13.
The HPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous estimation of atenolol, bisoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, salicylic acid, enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat, valsartan and fluvastatin is also reported 14. However, so far, no method was reported for the simultaneous determination in combination for Irbesartan, Losartan, Hydrochlorothiazide, Chlor-thalidone and its application to pharmaceutical samples. An attempt was made in this study to develop a rapid, economical, precise and accurate stability-indicating assay method for simultaneous estimation of Irbesartan, Losartan, Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone in tablet formulation.
The proposed method is rapid, simple, accurate, and reproducible, and can be successfully employed in the routine analysis of both these drugs simultaneously, in tablet dosage form.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Chemicals and Reagents: Drug substances were provided by Sharon Biomedicine, India. All the chemicals and reagents sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, monobasic sodium dihydrogen phosphate, hydrogen peroxide (30 %) were used of Analytical grade. While acetonitrile was procured from Merck (Germany). A Millipore Milli Q plus water purification system (Milford, USA), was used to prepare distilled water (>18 μΩ). The commercially available drug products were used as LOSAR 50 Tablets (Losartan - 50 mg, Unichem Laboratories, India), LOSAR H Tablets (Losartan - 50 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide - 12.5 mg; Unichem Laboratories, India).
Instruments: Integrated HPLC system, Ultimate 3000 manufactured by Dionex (Germany) was used for method development and method validation. This system comprised of a quaternary gradient pump, auto sampler, column oven and a photodiode array detector. PC installed Chromeleon software was used to record and integrates the chromatograms. The analysis was carried out at ambient temperature. Photostability studies were performed in a photostability chamber, from Thermolab (India).
Chromatographic Conditions: Hypersil BDS (Length 250 mm × Diameter 4.6 mm Particle size 5 μm) analytical column from Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc was used as a stationary phase. The flow rate was 1.0 mL min−1 and the detector was set at 220 nm. The volume of the sample solution injected was 10 μL. The gradient mobile phase consisted of 0.05 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (Mobile Phase-B) with the gradient as mentioned in (Table 1). A membrane filter of 0.45 μm porosity was used to filter and degas the mobile phase.
TABLE 1: MOBILE PHASE GRADIENT FOR CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHOD
Time (min) | % 0.05 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer | % Acetonitrile |
0 | 70 | 30 |
3 | 70 | 30 |
5 | 60 | 40 |
15 | 20 | 80 |
18 | 70 | 30 |
20 | 70 | 30 |
Standard and Test solutions: Weighed accurately about 50 mg of each Irbesartan, Losartan, Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone reference standard into 50 ml volumetric flask. Added to it 20.0 ml methanol and sonicated to dissolve. Diluted this solution up to volume with diluent (Buffer: Methanol 30:70 v/v). Pipette out 5.0 ml of this solution into 50 ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume with diluent. (100 μg mL−1 each of Irbesartan, Losartan, Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone).Similarly, the test solutions were prepared at same concentration using same diluents. (100 μg mL−1 of each).
Method Development: A variety of mobile phases were investigated in the development of a stability-indicating LC method for the analysis of Irbesartan, Losartan, Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone drug substances. The suitability of mobile phase was decided on the basis of selectivity and sensitivity of the assay, stability studies and separation among impurities formed during forced degradation studies.
- Wavelength Selection: The individual drug substance solution at concentration of 100μg mL−1 in diluent was scanned on PDA from 190 nm to 400 nm. The maximum wavelength were observed Hydrochlorothiazide (224 nm and 271 nm), Chlorthalidone (196 nm), Irbesartan (202 nm) and Losartan (197 nm and 251 nm). However detection was carried out at 220 nm on basis of higher response (Fig. 1 and Table 2).
FIG. 1: UV SPECTRUM FOR DRUG SUBSTANCES IN DILUENTS
TABLE 2: AREA RESPONSE OF PEAKS AT DIFFERENT WAVELENGTHS
Wavelength (nm) | HTZ | CL | LS | IS |
220 | 106.077 | 79.797 | 49.645 | 61.321 |
230 | 66.306 | 58.102 | 41.734 | 55.227 |
240 | 8.362 | 31.149 | 34.415 | 42.270 |
250 | 11.057 | 12.610 | 34.975 | 36.237 |
260 | 33.829 | 7.420 | 31.756 | 25.729 |
280 | 37.587 | 5.323 | 11.189 | 8.309 |
300 | 8.007 | 0.161 | 1.056 | 1.269 |
Method Validation: The optimized chromatographic conditions were validated by evaluating specificity-Forced degradation, linearity, precision, accuracy, robustness and system suitability parameters in accordance with the ICH guideline Q2 (R1) 2.
Specificity- Forced Degradation Study:
- Acid Hydrolysis: Forced degradation study was conducted on 5 ml stock solution of standard solution containing 1000 μg mL−1 of each drug substances by exposing with 5ml of 1N hydrochloric acid for 1 hour at room temperature. Then neutralized with base and dilute up to 50 ml with diluent.
- Base Hydrolysis: Forced degradation study was conducted on 5 ml stock solution of standard solution containing 1000 μg mL−1 of each drug substances by exposing with 5ml of 1N sodium hydroxide for 30 minutes at room temperature. Then neutralized with acid and dilute up to 50 ml with diluent.
- Oxidation: Forced degradation study was conducted on 5 ml stock solution of standard solution containing 1000 μg mL−1 of each drug substances by exposing with 5ml of 5% H2O2 for 3 hours at room temperature. Then dilute up to 50 ml with diluent.
- Thermal Degradation: Solid drugs powder was kept in dry oven at 105°C for 24 hours.
- Photolysis: Photolysis studies were carried out on solid drugs, their combination and their dosage form. The sample in a petri plate was spread as a thin layer (1 mm) and exposed to light in a photostability chamber. The method's analytical data were collected at a single wavelength of 220 nm. Additional PDA detector data were collected for the peak purity evaluation.
The chromatograms were extracted for Peak purity and demonstrated as in (Fig. 2a, b, c, d, e, f, g and Table 3).
(a) BLANK SOLUTION
(b) STANDARDS SOLUTION
c) SPECIFICITY-ACID HYDROLYSIS
d) SPECIFICITY-ALKALINE HYDROLYSIS
e) SPECIFICITY-PEROXIDE OXIDATION
f) SPECIFICITY PHOTOLYTIC DEGRADATION
g) SPECIFICITY-THERMAL DEGRADATION
FIG. 2: CHROMATOGRAMS FOR STRESSED CONDITIONS
TABLE 3: RESULTS FOR FORCED DEGRADATION STUDY
Degradation Condition | HTZ | CL | IS | LS | |
Acid hydrolysis | % Degradation DeDDegradation | 0.00 | 66.11 | 0.00 | 86.99 |
Peak purity | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | |
Alkaline hydrolysis | % Degradation | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.87 | 72.28 |
Peak purity | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | |
Peroxide Oxidation | % Degradation | 0.00 | 1.26 | 0.82 | 19.85 |
Peak purity | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | |
Photolytic degradation | % Degradation | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Peak purity | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | |
Thermal degradation | % Degradation | 2.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
Peak purity | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 |
Linearity: Standard stock solution of the drug was diluted to prepare linearity standard solutions in the concentration range of 10 –150 μg mL−1 for all Hydrochlorothiazide, Chlorthalidone, Irbesartan and Losartan. Three sets of such solutions were prepared. Each set was analyzed to plot a calibration curve. Slope, intercept and coefficient of determination (r2) of the calibration curves were calculated to ascertain linearity of the method (Fig. 3 and Table 4).
FIG. 3: LINEARITY CURVE WITH CORRELATION CO-EFFICIENT
TABLE 4: SLOPE, INTERCEPT AND REGRESSION COEFFICIENT
Drug substance | Slope | Intercept | Regression (r2) |
Hydrochlorothiazide (HTZ) | 1.069 | 0.473 | 1.000 |
Chlorthalidone (CL) | 0.752 | 0.228 | 1.000 |
Irbesartan (IS) | 0.769 | 0.043 | 1.000 |
Losartan (LS) | 0.701 | -0.226 | 0.999 |
Recovery: Recovery of the method was determined by analyzed the drug products and synthetic mixture of drug products with 50%, 100% and 150% levels. These mixtures were analyzed by the proposed method. The experiment was performed in triplicate and recovery (%); RSD (%) were calculated (Table 5 and 6).
Precision: The precision of the proposed method was evaluated by carrying out six independent assays of test samples. RSD (%) of six assay values obtained was calculated. Intermediate precision was carried out by analyzing the samples by a different analyst on another instrument (Table 7).
Robustness: The robustness was studied by evaluating the effect of small but deliberate variations in the chromatographic conditions. The conditions studied were wavelength (altered by ±0.3 nm), column oven temperature (altered by ±5°C) and pH of buffer in mobile phase (altered by ±0.2). These chromatographic variations were evaluated for resolution between all drug substances (Table 8 to 10).
TABLE 5: RECOVERY FROM COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE SAMPLES
% Recovery | LOSAR TabletsLS 50mg Unichem Lab Ltd | LOSAR H Tablets LS 50mg and HTZ 12.5mg Unichem Lab Ltd | |
Recovery (%)For LS | Recovery (%) For HTZ | Recovery (%)For LS | |
50 % | 101.4199.02
98.08 |
98.5299.61
101.51 |
98.7199.93
101.82 |
100 % | 100.2098.79
98.84 |
101.1599.08
98.45 |
101.1299.16
98.49 |
150 % | 99.9799.06
100.94 |
98.4698.15
100.51 |
98.3798.12
100.44 |
Avg | 99.59 | 99.49 | 99.57 |
RSD | 1.11 | 1.28 | 1.33 |
TABLE 6: RECOVERY ON SYNTHETIC MIXTURE OF ALL FIVE DRUG SUBSTANCE
% Recovery | % Assay | ||||
HTZ | CL | IS | LS | ||
Level – 50% | 99.61101.45
100.36 |
98.4998.37
100.85 |
99.8499.45
101.58 |
98.25100.12
99.21 |
|
Level – 100% | 100.5699.09
98.32 |
101.87101.69
99.85 |
101.61101.79
101.13 |
99.2297.65
97.11 |
|
Level – 150% | 98.9199.48
99.79 |
101.11100.56
98.20 |
100.5898.78
99.10 |
97.5098.03
98.84 |
|
Average | 99.79 | 100.11 | 100.42 | 98.41 | |
RSD | 0.97 | 1.47 | 1.18 | 0.99 |
* Chlorthalidone and Irbesartan drug substances spiked with Losar H drug products.
TABLE 7: PRECESSION
Sr. Nos. | % Assay - Repeatability | % Assay- Intermediate Precision | ||||||
HTZ | CL | IS | LS | HTZ | CL | IS | LS | |
1 | 99.74 | 99.49 | 99.66 | 99.31 | 99.17 | 99.67 | 99.74 | 99.77 |
2 | 99.42 | 99.18 | 100.15 | 99.61 | 99.81 | 99.20 | 100.19 | 99.89 |
6 | 99.60 | 99.26 | 99.85 | 99.71 | 99.65 | 99.18 | 99.91 | 99.81 |
4 | 99.24 | 99.37 | 99.97 | 99.02 | 99.80 | 99.84 | 99.54 | 99.59 |
5 | 99.81 | 99.57 | 99.90 | 98.94 | 99.23 | 99.67 | 100.01 | 99.57 |
6 | 99.49 | 99.59 | 99.88 | 99.61 | 99.18 | 99.67 | 99.69 | 99.42 |
Avg | 99.55 | 99.41 | 99.91 | 99.37 | 99.47 | 99.54 | 99.85 | 99.68 |
RSD | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.18 |
Average for Precision and Intermediate precision | 99.51 | 99.47 | 99.87 | 99.52 | ||||
RSD for Precision and Intermediate precision | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.30 |
TABLE 8: CHANGE IN WAVELENGTH
Wavelength | % Assay | ||||
HTZ | CL | IS | LS | ||
217 nm | 99.18 | 99.76 | 99.57 | 99.47 | |
220 nm | 99.65 | 99.17 | 99.19 | 99.39 | |
223 nm | 99.85 | 99.47 | 9956 | 99.48 | |
Average | 99.58 | 99.47 | 99.44 | 99.45 | |
RSD | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.22 | 0.05 |
TABLE 9: CHANGE IN COLUMN OVEN TEMPERATURE
Column oven temperature | % Assay | ||||
HTZ | CL | IS | LS | ||
20°C | 99.11 | 99.33 | 99.56 | 99.36 | |
25°C | 99.65 | 99.17 | 99.19 | 99.39 | |
30°C | 99.14 | 99.50 | 99.61 | 99.77 | |
Average | 99.30 | 99.33 | 99.45 | 99.51 | |
RSD | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
TABLE 10 - CHANGE IN PH OF BUFFER SOLUTION IN MOBILE PHASE
pH of buffer | % Assay | ||||
HTZ | CL | IS | LS | ||
pH 2.3 | 99.37 | 99.68 | 99.20 | 99.50 | |
pH 2.5 | 99.65 | 99.17 | 99.19 | 99.39 | |
pH 2.7 | 99.22 | 99.45 | 99.30 | 99.64 | |
Average | 99.41 | 99.43 | 99.23 | 99.51 | |
RSD | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
Solution stability: To assess the solution stability, standard and test solutions were kept at 25°C (laboratory temperature) for 24 hrs (Table No. 11).
TABLE 11: RESULTS FOR SOLUTION STABILITY
Time (Hours) | % Assay | ||||
HTZ | CL | IS | LS | ||
Initial | 99.85 | 100.09 | 99.82 | 98.40 | |
5 | 98.80 | 99.24 | 99.37 | 98.24 | |
8 | 99.96 | 100.09 | 100.30 | 98.58 | |
12 | 99.57 | 99.72 | 99.62 | 98.69 | |
18 | 99.40 | 99.46 | 100.19 | 88.93 | |
24 | 96.57 | 97.75 | 99.34 | 80.59 |
System Suitability: The system suitability parameters with respect to theoretical plates, tailing factor, repeatability and resolution between peaks of all drug substances were defined (Table No.12).
TABLE 12: CHROMATOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS OF SYSTEM SUITABILITY
Drug substances | RT (min) | Theoretical plates | Symmetry | Resolution | Peak purity |
HTZ | 4.03 | 5288 | 1.66 | 11.36 | 1000 |
CL | 6.92 | 9259 | 1.60 | 21.13 | 1000 |
LS | 12.60 | 40643 | 1.33 | 2.93 | 1000 |
IS | 13.34 | 42797 | 1.35 | - | 1000 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
HPLC method development: The maximum absorption wavelength of the reference drug solution and of the forcefully degraded drug solution was found to be 220 nm. This was observed from the UV absorption spectra (Fig. 1) and was selected as detection wavelength for LC analysis. The main objective of this chromatographic method was separation of degraded impurities from all drugs. Forced degradation study revealed a critical separation of closely eluting impurity formed from the Hydrochlorothiazide, Chlorthalidone, Irbesartan and Losartan peaks. Hypersil BDS (Length 250 mm × Diameter 4.6 mm, Particle size 5 μm) helped in resolving all peaks as the column had carbon loading approx 11% against conventional ODS. This effect was observed by using the mobile phase 0.05 sodium hydrogen phosphates (pH 2.5) and acetonitrile in the gradient ratio.
Summary of Validation Parameters: The assay test method is validated for Specificity, Linearity, Precision, Accuracy (Recovery), Stability of Analytical Solution and Robustness and was found to be meeting the predetermined acceptance criteria.
The validated method is Specific, Linear, Precise, Accurate and Robust for determination of assay of Irbesartan, Losartan, diuretics Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone drug substances and drug products. Hence this method can be introduced into routine and stability analysis for the assay of Irbesartan, Losartan, diuretics Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone drug substances.
CONCLUSION: The stability indicating RP-HPLC assay method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of Irbesartan, Losartan, diuretics Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone drug substances and drug products. The method was found to be simple, specific, Precise and Robust and can be applied for the routine and stability analysis for commercially available formulation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors are thankful to entire team of JJT University and Mr. K Kaul, Mr. Lalit Mishra- Sharon Bio Medicine for their encouragement and support during the work.
REFERENCES:
- ICH, International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A (R2), 2003.
- ICH, International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Validation of analytical procedure : Text and Methodology Q2 (R1), 2005.
- Ashok K , Sathya A , Senthil K, Patil S, Prathap N B, Lokesh SB, Gopa V: Simultaneous Estimation of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide by RP-HPLC Method from Combined Dosage Form. International Journal of Research and Pharmaceutical Science, 2010, 1(1): 24-27.
- Joshi SJ, Pradnya A, Karbhari S I, Bhoir KS, Bindu D Chhanda D: RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of Bisoprolol Fumarate and Hydrochlorothiazide in tablet formulation. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2010, 52(3): 362-371.
- NJ Shah, BN Suhagia, RR Shah, NM Patel: Development and validation of a HPTLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide in tablet dosage form, Indian journal of Pharmaceutical science, 2007, volume 69, Issue 2.
- María del Rosario Brunetto, Yaritza Contreras, Sabrina Clavijo, Dina Torres, Yelitza Delgado, Fernando Ovalles, Carlos Ayala, Máximo Gallignani, José Manuel Estela, Víctor Cerdà Martin : Determination of losartan, Telmisartan, and Valsartan by direct injection of human urine into a column-switching liquid chromatographic system with fluorescence detection, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis,2009, Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 194-199,
- Feng G, Mengliang Z, Xiangyong C, Zhonghua W, Yantong S and Jingkai G: Simultaneous quantitation of hydrochlorothiazide and Metoprolol in human plasma by liquid chromatography–Tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2010, 52(1): 149-154.
- R.R Kirtawade, P.L Salve, A.S.Kulkarni and P.N. Dhabale (2010) : RP-HPLC method for Simultaneous estimation of Losartan Potassium and Atenol in Tablet formulation, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 2010, Volume 1, Issue 2.
- Rao PL, KM Venugopal V, Anil Kumar G, Rajesh B, R Aneel and Ravindergoud D: Quantative estimation of Losartan Potassium in Pharmaceutical Dosage form by UV-Spectrophotometric, International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry, 2011, Volume 1 (3)
- Alaa EM, Khedr: Simultaneous Determination of Candesartan Cilexetil and Hydrochlorothiazide by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. The Journal of King Abdulaziz University - Medical Sciences, 2008, Vol 15, No 2.
- Wankhede SB, Tajne MR, Gupta KR and Wadodka SGRP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of Telmisartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in tablet dosage form. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Research, 2007, 69(2):298-300.
- Patel Jignesh, Dave JB, Patel CN and Patel Dhrumil: Q-Analysis Spectrophotometric methods for estimation of Candesartan Cilexetil and Hydrochlorothiazide in tablet dosage form. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical, Research, ISSN No: 0975-7384 CODEN (USA): JCPRC5.
- Oskar Gonzalez et al:Optimization and validation of a SPE-HPLC-PDA-Fluorescence method for the simultaneous determination of drugs used in combined cardiovascular therapy in human plasma. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2009, 50(4): 630-639.
- Gonzalez O, Iriarte G, Rico E, Ferreirós N, Maguregui MI, Alonso RM and Jiménez: RM. LC-MS/MS method for the determination of several drugs used in combined cardiovascular therapy in human plasma. Journal of Chromatography B Analytical Technology Biomedical Life Science, 2010, 15(28): 2685-92.
Article Information
30
1116-1123
871KB
2010
English
IJPSR
R. A. Mhaske*, S. Sahasrabudhe and A. A. Mhaske
Asst General Manger – AMD Sharon Bio-Medicine Ltd., Plot L6, Taloja-MIDC, Taluka – Panvel, Dist Raigad, 410208, Maharashtra, India
19 December, 2011
12 January, 2012
28 March, 2012
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.3(4).1116-23
01 April, 2012