SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF PREDNISOLONE AND ASPIRIN IN SYNTHETIC MIXTURE BY VIERORDT´s METHOD
HTML Full TextSIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF PREDNISOLONE AND ASPIRIN IN SYNTHETIC MIXTURE BY VIERORDT´s METHOD
Pinak Patel * 1, Jay Patel 1 and Krunal Detholia 2
Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance 1, Department of Pharmaceutics 2, Smt. S. M. Shah Pharmacy College, Amsaran - 387130, Gujarat, India.
ABSTRACT: Prednisolone (10mg/day) plus low dose Aspirin (80mg/day) improve the implantation rate in women with autoimmune condition who are undergoing in-vitro fertilization. A new, simple, precise, accurate, and validated simultaneous equation method (Vierordt´s Method) has been developed for simultaneous determination of Prednisolone and Aspirin in the synthetic mixture. The method was based on the measurement of absorbance of both components at their ʎmax 243 nm and 226 nm of Prednisolone and Aspirin in methanol as solvent correspondingly. Linearity was obtained over a range of 2-6 µg/mL for Prednisone and 16-48 µg/mL for Aspirin. The percentage recovery obtained for Prednisolone and Aspirin was found to be in the range 98.85% to 99.95% and 99.41% to 99.74%, respectively. The results of the proposed method were validated for linearity, precision, accuracy, robustness, ruggedness according to ICH guideline Q2(R1). The developed method can be successfully be applied for simultaneous estimation of drugs in all commercial products.
Keywords: |
Prednisolone (PRE), Aspirin (ASP), Simultaneous Equation Method (Vierordt´s Method), ICH (International Council for Harmonization), Analytical Method Validation
INTRODUCTION: Prednisolone is chemically 11ꞵ, 17, 21-Trihydroxypregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione is well known Glucocorticoid. It is official in British Pharmacopoeia (BP) and Indian Pharmacopeia (IP). PRE is estimated by a spectrophotometric method as per IP and BP 1-2. It is indicated for the treatment of a wide range of inflammatory and auto-immune diseases such as asthma, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune hepatitis, etc. 3-5 On an extensive survey of the literature, several analytical methods such as UV spectroscopy 6-12, RP-HPLC method 12-15, GLS and chemical ionization mass spectrometry 16, LC-MS/MS 17 have been reported for estimation of Prednisolone in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form and also in synthetic mixture.
Aspirin is chemically 2-(Acetyloxy) benzoic acid and it indicated as antipyretic, analgesic, anti-inflammatory. It is official in British Pharmacopeia, Indian Pharmacopeia and United State Pharmacopeia (USP). Official method describes Titration method for its determination 1, 2, 18. Literature survey reveals UV 19-22 and HPLC 23-26 method for determination of Aspirin in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form and also in synthetic mixture. Prednisolone (10mg/day) plus low dose Aspirin (80mg/day) improve the implantation rate in women with autoimmune condition who are undergoing in-vitro fertilization 27-29.
The combination of these two drugs is not official in any pharmacopeia; hence no official method available for the simultaneous estimation of Prednisolone and Aspirin in their combined dosage forms. Literature survey does not reveal any spectrophotomertic method for simultaneous estimation of Prednisolone and Aspirin in synthetic mixture or dosage forms. Based on above-mentioned fact, it was decided to develop and validate a simple, new, precise, accurate for Vierordt´s method for quantification of PRE and ASP in a synthetic mixture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Material: PRE and ASP were obtained as a sample for research purposes from Reliance formulation Pvt. Ltd, Ahmadabad, Gujarat. Methanol (AR-Grade) was purchased from RANKEM chemicals. Whatman filter paper no.41 (Millipore, USA) was used in the study.
Instrument and Apparatus: Analytical balance METTLER TOLEDO was used for weighing purposes. For sonication purposes, ELECTROQUIPE ultrasonic cleaner was used. SHIMADZU-1800 double beam spectrophotometer was used in the present study equipped with UV-Probe 2.42 as system software.
Preparation of standard stock solutions (100 µg/mL): An accurately weighed quantity of standard PRE (10mg) and ASP (10mg) powder were weighed and transferred to 100 ml separate volumetric flask and dissolved in methanol. The flask was shaken, and volume was made up to mark with methanol to give a solution containing 100µg/mL each of PRE and ASP.
Preparation of Sample Solution (5+40 µg/mL of PRE and ASP): As the proposed synthetic mixture is having a dose of 10 mg of PRE and 80 mg of ASP, 10 mg of PRE and 80 mg of ASP was mixed and diluted appropriately to give a mixture containing 5 µg/mL of PRE and 40 µg/mL of ASP.
Methodology: Vierordt´s method uses absorbance at two selected wavelengths, which is their ʎmax of both components. From the overlay spectra of two drugs, it is evident that PRE and ASP ʎmax is 243 nm and 226 nm, respectively. Five standard working solutions having concentration 2-6 µg/mL for PRE and 16-48 µg/mL for ASP were prepared in methanol and absorbance at 243 nm(ʎmax of PRE) and 226 nm (ʎmax of ASP) were measured and absorptivity coefficient were calculated using calibration curve. Finally, Absorbance of the mixture (sample solution) was measured at 243 nm and 226 nm, respectively.
The concentration of two drugs in the mixture can be calculated using the following equation.
Cx = [A2ay1 –A2ay2] / [ax2ay1 – ax1ay2]
Cy = [A1a2 – A2ax1] / [ax2ay1 – ax1ay2]
Where A1 and A2 are absorbance of mixture at 243 nm and 226 nm; ax1 and ay1 are absorptivities of PRE and ASP at 243 nm; ax2 and ay2 are absorptivities of PRE and ASP at 226 nm, respectively.
Validation of the Proposed Method: The proposed method validation according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guideline 30.
Linearity (Regression Method): The calibration curves were plotted over a concentration range of 2-6 µg/mL for PRE and 16-48 µg/mL for ASP. Accurately measured aliquots of PRE (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 ml) and ASP (1.6, 2.4, 3.2, 4.0 and 4.8 ml) were transferred to a series of 10 ml of volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with methanol. The absorbance’s of solutions were measured at 243 and 226 nm against methanol as blank. The calibration curves were constructed by plotting absorbance versus concentration and the regression coefficient was monitored.
Method Precision (Repeatability): The precision of instrument was checked by repeated scanning and measurement of absorbance of solutions (n=6) for PRE (2-6 µg/mL) and ASP (16-48 µg/mL) without changing the parameter of the proposed spectrophotometry method.
Intermediate Precision: Intermediate precision was determined by performing intraday and interday precision. PRE that represents the overall range (2, 4, and 6 µg/mL) were analyzed on the same day at different time intervals for intraday precision and different days for interday precision. ASP that represents the overall range (16, 32, and 48 µg/mL) were analyzed on the same day at different time intervals for intraday precision and different days for interday precision.
Accuracy Study: The accuracy of the analytical method was adjudged by spiking of a blank with a standard solution. Methanol was selected as blank and was spiked at 50, 100, and 150% of target concentration (4+32 µg/mL of PRE and ASP) Table 1. Each spiked concentration was analyzed three times, and mean % recovery was observed at each spiked level.
TABLE 1: PREPARATION OF SOLUTION FOR ACCURACY STUDY
Level of Spiking | Quantity of Placebo (mg) | Volume of standard solution (mL) | Final dilution in 10 mL volumetric flask | Final Concentration (µg/mL) | |
PRE | ASP | ||||
Unspiked | 160 | 0 | volume make up was done with methanol | - | - |
50 % | 160 | 0.2 | 2 | 16 | |
100 % | 160 | 0.4 | 4 | 32 | |
150 % | 160 | 0.6 | 6 | 48 |
Standard solution: 10 mg PRE and 80 mg ASP dissolved in 50 mL methanol, 100 µg/mL and 800 µg/mL of PRE and ASP, respectively.
Solvent Stability: Solvent stability was determined by scanning the same solution prepared in the selected solvent (methanol) at 3 different time intervals that is at 0 h, 6 h, and 24 h. Mixtures of 5 ± 40 µg/ml solutions of PRE and ASP in methanol were scanned at a selected time interval, and characteristics of spectra were compared (λmax).
Assay: As the proposed synthetic mixture is having a dose of 10 mg of PRE and 80 mg of ASP, 10 mg of PRE and 80 mg of ASP was mixed and diluted appropriately to give a mixture containing 5 µg/mL of PRE and 40 µg/mL of ASP. This mixture was scanned between 200-400 nm. Absorbance was measured at selected wavelengths and was transformed to concentration with the help of linear regression equation. This mixture was analyzed for three times, and mean % assay was drawn.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Selection of Analytical Wavelength: Proper wavelength selection for estimation of both drugs depends on the nature of the drug and their solubility. For the selection of analytical wavelength solution containing 10 µg/mL of PRE and ASP were scanned individually and overlapped Fig. 1. The method employs solving equation based on measurement of absorbance at 243nm and 226 nm, which were selected as λ1 and λ2, respectively.
FIG. 1: SELECTION OF λ1 (243 nm) AND λ2 (226 nm) FOR THE VIERORDT´S METHOD
Analytical Method Validation:
Linearity and Range: The calibration curve was constructed between absorbance and concentration in the range of 2-6 µg/mL of PRE and 16-48 µg/mL of ASP Fig. 2-4. When the calibration curve was plotted for given concentration range Fig. 5-8, the value of linear regression coefficient was found to be 0.999 and 0.997 for PRE and 0.995 and 0.999 for ASP at 243 nm and 226nm, respectively.
Regression equation was found to be y = 0.034x - 0.0001 and y = 0.022x + 0.0003 for PRE and y = 0.009x + 0.0006 and y = 0.041x - 0.014 for ASP at 243 nm and 226 nm respectively Table 2 -6.
FIG. 2: OVERLAY SPECTRA OF LINEARITY OF PREDNISONE (2-6 µg/mL)
FIG. 3: OVERLAY SPECTRA OF LINEARITY OF ASPIRIN (16-48 µg/mL)
FIG. 4: OVERLAY SPECTRA OF LINEARITY OF PREDNISOLONE (2-6 µg/mL) AND ASPIRIN (16-48 µg/mL)
TABLE 2: LINEARITY DATA OF PRE AT 226 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | Mean ± SD | Absorptivity |
1 | 2 | 0.0442 ± 0.0003 | 221 |
2 | 3 | 0.0662 ± 0.0004 | 220.66 |
3 | 4 | 0.0923 ± 0.0004 | 230.75 |
4 | 5 | 0.1114 ± 0.0003 | 222.8 |
5 | 6 | 0.1322 ± 0.0003 | 220.33 |
- | - | Mean of Absorptivity | 223.11 |
TABLE 3: LINEARITY DATA OF PRE AT 243 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | Mean ± SD | Absorptivity |
1 | 2 | 0.0681 ± 0.00046 | 340.50 |
2 | 3 | 0.1037 ± 0.00043 | 345.66 |
3 | 4 | 0.1393 ± 0.00042 | 348.25 |
4 | 5 | 0.1742 ± 0.00034 | 348.40 |
5 | 6 | 0.2066 ± 0.00030 | 344.33 |
- | - | Mean of Absorptivity | 345.43 |
TABLE 4: LINEARITY DATA OF ASP AT 226 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | Mean ± SD | Absorptivity |
1 | 16 | 0.651 ± 0.00079 | 406.87 |
2 | 24 | 0.978 ± 0.00080 | 407.50 |
3 | 32 | 1.321 ± 0.00085 | 412.81 |
4 | 40 | 1.674 ± 0.00033 | 418.50 |
5 | 48 | 1.970 ± 0.00030 | 410.41 |
- | - | Mean of Absorptivity | 411.22 |
TABLE 5: LINEARITY DATA OF ASP AT 243 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | Mean ± SD | Absorptivity |
1 | 16 | 0.158 ± 0.00024 | 98.75 |
2 | 24 | 0.236 ± 0.00030 | 98.33 |
3 | 32 | 0.332 ± 0.00039 | 103.75 |
4 | 40 | 0.397 ± 0.00040 | 99.25 |
5 | 48 | 0.467 ± 0.00032 | 97.29 |
- | - | Mean of Absorptivity | 99.47 |
FIG. 5: CALIBRATION CURVE OF PRE (2 - 6 µg/mL) AT 226 nm
FIG. 6: CALIBRATION CURVE OF PRE (2 - 6 µg/mL) AT 243 nm
FIG. 7: CALIBRATION CURVE OF ASP (16 - 48 µg/mL) AT 226 nm
FIG. 8: CALIBRATION CURVE OF ASP (16 - 48 µg/mL) AT 243 nm
TABLE 6: LINEARITY DATA OF ASP AND PRE
Parameter | Prednisolone | Aspirin | ||
At 243 nm | At 226 nm | At 226 nm | At 243 nm | |
Linearity range | 2-6 µg/mL | 2-6 µg/mL | 16-48 µg/mL | 16-48 µg/mL |
Regression equation | Y=0.034x-0.0001 | Y=0.022x+ 0.0003 | Y=0.041x -0.014 | Y=0.009x + 0.006 |
Correlation coeffient (r2) | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.995 |
Intercept | 0.0001 | 0.0003 | 0.014 | 0.006 |
Slope | 0.034 | 0.022 | 0.041 | 0.009 |
Method Precision (Repeatability): When all PRE and ASP were analyzed at all concentration, calculated relative standard deviation at each level was found to be less than 2, so that method was found to be repeatable over the range of 2-6 µg/mL for PRE and 16-48 µg/mL for ASP Table 7-10.
TABLE 7: REPEATABILITY DATA OF PRE AT 243 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | ||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 | 0.0678 | 0.1034 | 0.1389 | 0.1736 | 0.2071 |
2 | 0.0681 | 0.1045 | 0.1396 | 0.1742 | 0.2068 |
3 | 0.0689 | 0.1037 | 0.1397 | 0.1744 | 0.2062 |
4 | 0.0683 | 0.1034 | 0.1394 | 0.1746 | 0.2063 |
5 | 0.0676 | 0.1036 | 0.1388 | 0.1739 | 0.2069 |
6 | 0.0684 | 0.1041 | 0.1398 | 0.1746 | 0.2064 |
MEAN | 0.0681 | 0.1037 | 0.1393 | 0.1742 | 0.2066 |
SD | 0.00046 | 0.00043 | 0.00042 | 0.00040 | 0.00036 |
RSD | 0.677 | 0.419 | 0.303 | 0.230 | 0.176 |
(n = 6 determinations)
TABLE 8: REPEATABILITY DATA OF PRE AT 226 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | ||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 | 0.0438 | 0.0656 | 0.0919 | 0.1109 | 0.1318 |
2 | 0.0444 | 0.0663 | 0.0926 | 0.1112 | 0.1326 |
3 | 0.0441 | 0.0667 | 0.0923 | 0.1116 | 0.1319 |
4 | 0.0446 | 0.0664 | 0.0918 | 0.1115 | 0.1323 |
5 | 0.0439 | 0.0659 | 0.0924 | 0.1114 | 0.1324 |
6 | 0.0445 | 0.0666 | 0.0929 | 0.1119 | 0.1323 |
MEAN | 0.0442 | 0.0662 | 0.0923 | 0.1114 | 0.1322 |
SD | 0.00033 | 0.00042 | 0.00041 | 0.00034 | 0.00030 |
RSD | 0.748 | 0.638 | 0.451 | 0.307 | 0.231 |
(n = 6 determinations)
TABLE 9: REPEATABILITY DATA OF ASP AT 243 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | ||||
16 | 24 | 32 | 40 | 48 | |
1 | 0.1584 | 0.2361 | 0.3323 | 0.3979 | 0.4671 |
2 | 0.1581 | 0.2366 | 0.3331 | 0.3981 | 0.4673 |
3 | 0.1586 | 0.2363 | 0.3321 | 0.3971 | 0.4679 |
4 | 0.1582 | 0.2364 | 0.3327 | 0.3973 | 0.4678 |
5 | 0.1579 | 0.2366 | 0.3326 | 0.3974 | 0.4674 |
6 | 0.1582 | 0.237 | 0.3321 | 0.3972 | 0.4672 |
MEAN | 0.1582 | 0.2365 | 0.3324 | 0.3975 | 0.4674 |
SD | 0.00024 | 0.00030 | 0.00039 | 0.00040 | 0.00032 |
RSD | 0.153 | 0.131 | 0.117 | 0.101 | 0.069 |
(n = 6 determinations)
TABLE 10: REPEATABILITY DATA OF ASP AT 226 nm
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | ||||
16 | 24 | 32 | 40 | 48 | |
1 | 0.6498 | 0.9772 | 1.3199 | 1.6736 | 1.9704 |
2 | 0.6514 | 0.9779 | 1.3212 | 1.6744 | 1.9703 |
3 | 0.6509 | 0.9784 | 1.322 | 1.6741 | 1.9698 |
4 | 0.6519 | 0.9774 | 1.3224 | 1.6743 | 1.9706 |
5 | 0.6517 | 0.9789 | 1.3214 | 1.6739 | 1.9699 |
6 | 0.6518 | 0.9792 | 1.3212 | 1.6745 | 1.9701 |
MEAN | 0.6512 | 0.9781 | 1.3213 | 1.6741 | 1.9701 |
SD | 0.00079 | 0.00080 | 0.00085 | 0.00033 | 0.00030 |
RSD | 0.122 | 0.082 | 0.064 | 0.020 | 0.015 |
(n = 6 determinations)
Intermediate Precision: For determining interday and intraday precision, RSD was monitored at the selected concentration level, which was found to be less than 2, so the method was found to be precise for estimation of PRE and ASP Table 11-14.
TABLE 11: INTRADAY AND INTER - DAY PRECISION DATA OF PRE AT 243 nm
Concentration (µg/ml) | Intraday Mean ± SD | RSD | Inter-Day Mean ± SD | RSD |
2 | 0.0682 ± 0.0005 | 0.83 | 0.0679 ± 0.0008 | 1.18 |
4 | 0.1393 ± 0.0006 | 0.48 | 0.1392 ± 0.0010 | 0.74 |
6 | 0.2067± 0.0004 | 0.22 | 0.2066 ± 0.0007 | 0.36 |
(n = 3 determinations)
TABLE 12: INTRADAY AND INTER - DAY PRECISION DATA OF PRE AT 226 nm
Concentration (µg/ml) | Intraday Mean ± SD | RSD | Inter-Day Mean ± SD | RSD |
2 | 0.0441± 0.0003 | 0.68 | 0.0441 ± 0.0003 | 0.85 |
4 | 0.0922 ± 0.0003 | 0.38 | 0.0922 ± 0.0004 | 0.49 |
6 | 0.1321± 0.0004 | 0.32 | 0.1319± 0.0005 | 0.41 |
(n = 3 determinations)
TABLE 13: INTRADAY AND INTER - DAY PRECISION DATA OF ASP AT 243 nm
Concentration (µg/ml) | Intraday Mean ± SD | RSD | Inter-Day Mean ± SD | RSD |
16 | 0.1583 ± 0.0002 | 0.15 | 0.1584 ± 0.0005 | 0.36 |
32 | 0.3326 ± 0.0004 | 0.12 | 0.3323 ± 0.0006 | 0.20 |
48 | 0.04674± 0.0004 | 0.08 | 0.4675 ± 0.007 | 0.14 |
(n = 3 determinations)
TABLE 14: INTRADAY AND INTER - DAY PRECISION DATA OF ASP AT 226 nm
Concentration (µg/ml) | Intraday Mean ± SD | RSD | Inter-Day Mean ± SD | RSD |
16 | 0.6505 ± 0.0011 | 0.16 | 0.6503 ± 0.0013 | 0.21 |
32 | 1.321 ± 0.0013 | 0.10 | 1.3211 ± 0.0018 | 0.14 |
48 | 1.9698± 0.0015 | 0.08 | 1.9699 ± 0.002 | 0.11 |
(n = 3 determinations)
Accuracy Study: Spiked blank with standard solution at 50, 100, and 150% level was analyzed for % recovery which was found within 98 to 102, so the method was found to be accurate Table 15.
TABLE 15: ACCURACY DATA OF PRE AND ASP AT 50, 100 AND 150% OF TARGET CONCENTRATION
Level of spiking | Quantity of placebo (mg) | Amount of std. drug added (µg/mL) | Amount of drug recovered (µg/mL) | % Recovery | |||
PRE | ASP | PRE | ASP | PRE | ASP | ||
Unspiked | 160 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
50 % | 160 | 2 | 16 | 1.977±0.0052 | 15.906±0.048 | 98.85±0.26 | 99.41±0.30 |
100 % | 160 | 4 | 32 | 3.981±0.0068 | 31.895±0.039 | 99.53±0.17 | 99.67±0.12 |
150 % | 160 | 6 | 48 | 5.973±0.0017 | 47.870±0.061 | 99.55±0.28 | 99.74±0.12 |
(n = 3 determination for each set)
Solvent Stability: As the λmax was stable over a period of 24 hrs, the solvent was found to be suitable, and the drug was found to be stable.
Assay: When the prepared synthetic mixture was analyzed by a developed and validated method, % assay was found to be 99.26 ± 1.17 for PRE and for 99.33 ± 0.32 ASP Table 16.
TABLE 16: DETERMINATION OF PRE AND ASP FROM SYNTHETIC MIXTURE
Drug | Amount taken (µg/mL) | Amount found (µg/mL) | % Assay |
PRE | 5 | 4.91 ± 0.11 | 99.26 ± 1.17 |
ASP | 40 | 39.71 ± 0.19 | 99.33 ± 0.32 |
(n = 3 determinations)
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Vierordt´s method was developed and validated as per ICH Q2 R1 guidelines and was successfully applied for the determination of PRE and ASP from its synthetic mixture. The current developed and validated method was found to be simple, new, precise, and accurate.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are grateful to Smt. S.M. Shah Pharmacy College for providing excellent research facilities and promoting research activities. The authors are also extremely grateful to Reliance formulation Pvt. Ltd., Ahmadabad, to provide a sample of PRE and ASP.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Indian Pharmacopeia. Goverment of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Indian Pharmacopeia Commission, Ghaziabad, 2010; 3: 127-128, 2: 968-69.
- British Pharmacopeia. The Department of Health , Social Services and Public Safety, London ,Crown Copyright, 2009;Prednisolone API monograph, 1-4, Aspirin API Monograph, 1-4.
- Czock D, Keller F, Rasche FM and Haussler U: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics of Systemically administered glucocorticoid. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2005; 44: 61-98.
- Chauhan CS, Naruka PS, Rathore RS and Badadwal V: Formulation and evaluation of Prednisolone tablet for colon targeted drug delivery system. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 2010; 2(4): 993-98.
- Lambrou GI: Prednisolone exerts late mitogenic and biphasic effects on resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells: Relation to early gene expression. Leukemia Research 2009; 33(12): 1684-95.
- Raval K and Subhramanyam EVS: Development and validation of UV spectroscopy method for the estimation of prednisolone in bulk and dosage form. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 2012; 4(2): 1090-96.
- Vijaya K and Shetty SK: Development and validation of uv spectrophotomertic method for the estimation of methylprednisolone in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science 2018; 7(5): 498-503.
- Singh G, Kumar D, Sharma D, Singh M and Kaur S: Q-Absorbance ratio spectrophotomertic method for the simultaneous estimation of prednislone and 5-amino salicylic acid tablet dosage form. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Research 2012; 2(6): 222-26.
- Rohitas M, Agrawal A, Jain AK and Lariya NK: Development of simultaneous spectrophotomertic method of mesalazine and prednisolone in same dosage form. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics 2010; 2(4): 8-11.
- Bhusnure OG, Bawage MS and Gholve B: Eco-friendly and cost-effective UV spectroscopy method for the estimation of prednisolone sodium phoshphate in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research 2015; 6(1): 327-32.
- Patel HB and Patel SK: Dual wavelength spectrophtometric method for simultaneous estimation of gatifloxacin sesquihydrate and prednisolone acetate in combined dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research 2013; 3(2): 251-56.
- Bhusnure OG, Gholve SB, Bawage M, Todkar M and Giram PS: Analytical method development and validation of prednisolone sodium phoshphate by QBD approach. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Science 2015; 10(6): 64-75.
- Ghosh S, Sahu A, Banji D and Kumar DS: Development and validation for prednisolone in tablet dosage form by reverse phase-HPLC. Asian Journal of Chemistry 2011; 23: 5092-94.
- Gai MN, Pinllia E and Paulos C: Determination of prednisolone and prednisone in plasma, whole blood, urine , and bound-to-plasma protein by high-performanceliquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatographic Science 2005; 43: 201-06.
- Divyashree S, Veena MK and Channabasvaraj KP: Method validation for simultaneous estimation of prednisolone and abiraterone acetate by RP-HPLC. J Journal of Chronotherapy and Drug Delivery 2016; 7(1): 41-49.
- Sheikh M: Quantitative determination of prednisolone and prednisone in human plasma using GLC and chemical-ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1978; 67(7): 923-26.
- Reddy M, Beotra A and Jain S: A simple and rapid ESI-LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous screening of doping agents in urine samples. Indian Jounal of Pharmacology 2009; 41(2): 80-86.
- The United State Pharmacopeia 31, National Formulary 26. Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD, 2008; 31: 1447-48.
- Dolores M, Morales EA and Garduno JA: Development and validation of an alternate stability-indicating UV spectrometric analytical method for aspirin in tablets. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 2016; 78(6): 810-17.
- Sharma M, Pathak M, Roy B, Jain L and Sharma M: Quantitative estimation of aspirin in various drugs: UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy and colorimetric studies. Journal of Undergradate Research and Innovation 2015; 1(1): 157-62.
- Kokot Z and Burda K: Simultaneous determination of salicylic acid and acetylsalicylic acid in aspirin delayed-release tablet formulation by second-derivative UV spectrophotometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 1998; 18: 871-75.
- Murtaza G, Khan SA, Shabbir A and Muhammad HH: Development of UV-spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of aspirin and paracetamol in tablets. Scientific Research Essay 2011; 6(2): 417-21.
- Kumar S, Jamadar LD, Bhat K and Musmade PB: Analytical method development and validation for aspirin. International Journal of Chemtech Research 2010; 2(1): 389-99.
- Sawyer M and Kumar V: A rapid high performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous quantitation of aspirin, salicylic acid and caffeine in effervescent tablet. Journal of Chromatographics Science 2003; 41: 393-97.
- Patel D, Patel N, Vaishy R, Patel V and Solanki C: Development and validation of RP-HPLC mehod for simultaneous estimation of aspirin and esomeprazole magnesium tablet dosage form. J of Chemistry 2012; 1-5.
- Shinde S, Kachave RN and Chaudhari R: Method development and validation of aspirin and ticlopidine hydrochloride in bulk drug and tablet formulation by RP-HPLC. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2013; 5(3): 19-22.
- Isao H, Mina S, Yasuaki Y and Hauro M: Prednisolone plus low dose aspirin improves the implantation rate in women with autoimmune condition who are undergoing in-vitro Fertility Sterility 1998; 70: 1044-48.
- “The value of Prednisolone with Aspirin before Transfer ICSI Cycle” Sept 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT03503227
- “The value of Prednisolone with Aspirin before Transfer ICSI Cycle” Apr 2019,http://www.cenerwatch.com/ clinical-trials/listings/203196/infertility-value-prednisolone-aspirin-before/?section=contact
- International conference of Harmonization of Technical Requirement for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human use. Validation of Analytical Procedure Text and Methodology. ICH Q2A (R1), 2005.
How to cite this article:
Patel P, Patel J and Detholia K: Simultaneous determination of prednisolone and aspirin in synthetic mixture by Vierordt´s method. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(5): 2620-27. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(5).2620-27.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
10
2620-2627
790
860
English
IJPSR
P. Patel *, J. Patel and K. Detholia
Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Smt. S.M. Shah Pharmacy College, Amsaran, Gujarat, India.
pinakqa@gmail.com
23 April 2020
30 August 2020
13 April 2021
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(5).2620-27
01 May 2021