SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM BY RP-HPLC METHOD
HTML Full TextSIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM BY RP-HPLC METHOD
Ramavath Mohanbabu Naik *, Swapna Gumpula and Prajakta Shamsundar Mhaskar
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality Assurance, Gland Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Shivampet Mandal, Medak - 502334, Telangana, India.
ABSTRACT: A simple, selective, rapid, precise and economical reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous estimation of hydrocortisone and ketoconazole from pharmaceutical formulation. The method was carried out on a C18 (25 cm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μ) column with a mobile phase consisting of methanol: water (adjusted to pH 3.0 using triethylamine) in the ratio of 70:30 v/v. The retention time of hydricortusone and ketoconazole was 3.50 min and 6.00 min respectively with the flow rate of 1mL/ min. Eluents were detected at 221 nm. The linear regression analysis data for the linearity plot showed good linear relationship with correlation coefficient value for hydrocortisone and ketoconazole were R2 = 0.9995 and R2 = 0.9996 in the concentration range of 10 - 40µg. mL-1, 20 - 80 µg. mL-1 respectively. The relative standard deviation for intra-day precision was lower than 2.0 %. The method was validated according to the ICH guidelines. The method was also found to be robust. The developed method was validated in terms of accuracy, precision, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification and solution stability.
Keywords: |
RP-HPLC, Hydrocortisone, Ketoconazole
INTRODUCTION: Hydrocortisone (hydro) is chemically (1S, 2R 10S, 11S, 14R, 15S, 17S)-14, 17-dihyroxy-14- (2-hydroxyacetyl)- 2, 15-dimethyl tetracyclo [8.7.0.0^{2,7}heptadec- 6- en- 5- one. Hydro belongs to anti-inflammatory agents. Structure of hydro was shown in Fig. 1 1. Ketoconazole (keto) is chemically 1-[4-(4-{2-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)- 2- (1H-imidazol-1-ylmethyl)-1, 3-dioxolan-4-yl] methoxy] phenyl0piperazin- 1- yl] ethan-1-one. It is used as antifungal agents. Structure of keto was shown in Fig. 2 2. The review of literature revealed that various analytical methods involving spectrophotometry TLC, HPLC, HPTLC have been reported for hydro in single form and in combination with other drugs.
Several analytical methods have been reported for keto in single form and in combination with other drugs including spectrophotometry HPLC, HPTLC, LC - MS. To date, there have been no published reports about the simultaneous estimation of hydrocortisone and ketoconazole by HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage forms. This present study reports for the first time simultaneous estimation of hydrocortisone and ketoconazole by HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage form. The proposed method is validated as per ICH guidelines.
Experimental: Materials and Reagents: Analytically pure hydro was kindly provided by hetero laboratory, and keto was provided by Mylan laboratory, as gift samples. Analytical grade methanol was purchased from Merck & Co. Glass wares used in each procedure were soaked overnight in a mixture of chromic acid and sulphuric acid rinsed thoroughly with double distilled water and dried in hot air oven. Water (HPLC grade) were purchased from Merck, India. Triple distilled water is used for all purpose.
Instrumentation: HPLC system (Agilent HPLC Model-1100 with ezchromelite software) containing C18 (Qualisil BDS, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5µ) column with UV- VWD detection. Lab India-3000 + UV-Visible double beam spectrophotometer with a fixed slit width 1 nm and 1cm matched quartz cells was used for all the spectral measurements.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Method:
Optimisation of the Chromatographic Conditions: The mobile phase consisted of methanol and water in ratio methanol: water (70:30), pH was adjusted to 3.0 with tea to water. The contents of the mobile phase were filtered before use through a 0.45μ membrane and degassed for 10 min. The mobile phase was pumped from the solvent reservoir to the column at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min and the injection volume was 20 μL. The column temperature was maintained at ambient temperature. The eluents were monitored at 221 nm. The results of the optimized chromatogram was shown in Fig. 3 and Table 1.
TABLE 1: OPTIMIZED CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS OF HYDROCORTISONE AND KETO-CONAZOLE ON C18 COLUMN
S. no. | Parameters | Hydrocortisone | Ketoconazole |
1 | Mobile phase optimized | MeOH : H2O (70 : 30) | MeOH : H2O (70 : 30) |
2 | Flow rate (ml/min) | 1 | 1 |
3 | Run time (min) | 10 | 10 |
4 | Column temperature ºC | 23 | 23 |
5 | Volume of injection (μl) | 20 | 20 |
6 | Detection wavelength (nm) | 221 | 221 |
7 | Retention
time Rt |
3.50 | 6.00 |
Preparation of Standard Stock Solutions: Accurately weighed 10 mg of hydro and keto standard were transferred to separate 10 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in 10 ml methanol. The flasks were shaken and volume was made up to the mark with methanol to give solutions containing 1000 μg/ml hydro and 1000 μg/ml keto. From this solution 1 ml was transferred to volumetric flask of 100 ml capacity. Volume was made up to the mark to give a solution containing 100 μg/ml of hydro and 100 μg/ml keto.
FIG. 3: OPTIMIZED CHROMATOGRAM OF HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE
Calibration of Standards: The standard calibration curve was constructed for hydro-cortisone and ketoconazole. Different volumes of stock solutions of each were accurately transferred in to 10 mL volumetric flasks and diluted to mark to yield a concentration range of 10 - 40 μg/ml solutions of hydrocortisone and 20 - 80 μg/ml solutions of ketoconazole. The calibration line was obtained by plotting the peak area against concentration of drug.
Determination of Hydrocortisone and Keto-conazole in their Combined Dosage:
Sample Preparation: A powder quantity equivalent to 10 mg hydro and 20 mg keto was accurately weighed and transferred to volumetric flask of 100 ml capacity, methanol was transferred to this volumetric flask and sonicated for 15 min. The flask was shaken and volume was made up to the mark with methanol. The above solution was filtered through Whatmann filter paper (0.45μ). From this solution 2 ml was transferred to volumetric flask of 100 ml capacity. Volume was made up to the mark to give a solution containing 10μg/ml of hydro and 20μg/ml of keto. The resulting solution was analyzed by proposed method. The quantification was carried out by keeping these values to the straight line equation of calibration curve. The results were shown in Table 4 and Fig. 8.
FIG. 8: ASSAY CHROMATOGRAM OF 10 HYDRO-CORTISONE 20 KETOCONAZOLE
TABLE 4: ASSAY REPORT OF FORMULATION
S. no. | Brand name | Content | Peak Area mean ± S.D. | Assay | %RSD |
1 | Ketocon + plus | 10 µg/ml Hydrocortisone | 760340 ± 6610 | 101.00% | 1.785 |
20 µg/ml Ketoconazole | 476733 ± 5687 | 96.50% | 1.145 |
Method Validation: The proposed method has been extensively validated in terms of specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), robustness and reproducibility. The accuracy was expressed in terms of percent recovery of the known amount of the standard drugs added to the known amount of the pharmaceutical dosage forms. The precision (Coefficient of Variation - C.V.) was expressed with respect to the repeatability, intra-day and inter-day variation in the expected drug concentrations. After validation, the developed methods have been applied to pharmaceutical dosage form.
TABLE 2: SYSTEM SUITABILITY PARAMETERS FOR HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE
Parameter | Values obtained (n = 6) | Acceptance Criteria | |
Hydrocortisone | Ketoconazole | ||
Plate Count | 2092
± 62 |
2567
± 87 |
>2000 |
Tailing Factor | 1.100
± 0.032 |
1.097
± 0.054 |
≤ 2.0 |
Capacity factor | 0.3 | 1.44 | ˂ 2 |
HETP | 0.03789 | 0.03210 | ---- |
Rt | 3.50 | 6.00 | ----- |
System Suitability Criteria: It is defined as tests to measure the method that can generate result of acceptable accuracy and precision. The system suitability was carried out after the method development and validation have been completed. The system suitability was assessed by five replicate analyses of the drugs at concentrations of
20 μg mL−1 of hydro and 10 μg mL−1 of keto and for this, parameters like plate number (n), tailing factor, HETP, peak asymmetry of samples were measured, and shown in Table 2.
Validation Parameters: Method was validated as per ICH (Q2) guidelines with respect to linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness, limit of detection and limit of quantification.
Specificity: Commonly used excipients (starch, microcrystalline cellulose and magnesium stearate) were spiked into a pre weighed quantity of drugs. Specificity of the method was shown by quantifying the analyte of interest in the presence of matrix and other components. Blank injections have shown no peaks at retention time of 3.50 min and 6.00 min, the proposed method was specific for the detection of hydro and keto respectively. The selectivity of the method was performed by injecting the solution after the degradation. The degradants formed during solution stability study were well separated from the analyte peak after 20 hrs of sample preparations. Thus the method can be applied to evaluate the stability of the solution.
Linearity: Appropriate volume of aliquot from hydro and keto standard stock solution was transferred to volumetric flask of 10 ml capacity. The volume was adjusted to the mark with methanol to give a solutions containing 10 - 40 μg/ml hydro and 20 - 80 μg/ml keto. The slope, Y-intercept and correlation coefficient were calculated. The regression line relating standard concentrations of drug using regression analysis, the calibration curves were linear in the studied range and equations of the regression analysis were obtained: Y = 56804.9857x + 157033.0714; R2 = 0.9995 for hydro and Y = 58909.4393x + 453271.5356; R2 = 0.9996 for keto respectively. The mean and correlation coefficient of standard curves (N = 3) were calculated. The represented data was shown in below Fig. 4, 5, 6, 7 and Table 3.
TABLE 3: CALIBRATION OF HYDROCORTISON AND KETOCONAZOLE
Concentration of hydrocortisone
(μg/ml) |
Peak Area mean ±
SD (n=3) of Hydrocortisone |
Concentration of ketoconazole
(μg/ml) |
Peak Area mean ±
SD (n=3) of Ketoconazole |
% RSD | |
Hydro | Keto | ||||
10
15 20 25 30 35 40 |
766712 ± 6621
1294165 ± 21330 16672234 ± 10838 2345254 ± 11178 3145342 ± 51089 3312467 ± 10021 4245125 ± 11582 |
20
30 40 50 60 70 80 |
470286 ± 1056
690164 ± 4385 434455 ± 4677 1134567± 51295 1456980 ± 51026 1723673 ± 49568 2012456 ± 18089 |
0.86
1.70 0.60 0.45 1.67 0.28 0.27 |
0.25
0.64 1.06 0.46 0.36 0.29 0.90 |
Accuracy: Accuracy was assessed by determination of the recovery of the method by addition of standard drug to the pre-quantified placebo preparation at 3 different concentration levels 80, 100 and 120%, taking into consideration percentage purity of added bulk drug samples. Each concentration was analyzed 3 times and average recoveries were measured. Results of assay and recovery were presented in the Table 5 and Fig. 9, 10, 11.
Precision: The repeatability was evaluated by assaying 6 times of sample solution prepared for assay determination. The intraday and interday precision study of hydro and keto was carried out by estimating different concentrations of hydro (10, 25, 40 μg/ml) and keto (20, 50, 80 μg/ml), 3 times on the same day and on 3 different days (first, second, third) and the results are reported in terms of C.V. The results are shown in Table 6.
TABLE 5: RECOVERY REPORT OF HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE
Drug | Amount taken
(μg/ml) |
Recovery
Level |
Amount of Drug Added | Amount of Drug Found (μg/ml) Mean ± S.D | %
RSD |
%
Recovery |
Hydro | 10
|
80%
100% 120% |
8
10 12 |
8.06 ± 0.22
10 .00 ± 0.18 12.17 ± 0.12 |
0.225
0.814 0.373 |
100.05
100.00 101..41 |
Keto | 20
|
80%
100% 120% |
16
20 24 |
16.15 ± 0.168
20.22 ± 0.46 23.96 ± 0.24 |
0.234
0.902 0.262 |
100.93
101.00 99.83 |
Precision Intra-Day and Inter-Day Precision:
TABLE 6A: INTRA-DAY PRECISION DATA FOR HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE
S. no. | Conc. (μg/ml) of Hydro | Peak Area mean ± S.D (n=3) of Hydro | Conc. (μg/ml)
of Keto |
Peak Area mean ± S.D (n=3) of Keto | % RSD | |
Hydro | Keto | |||||
1
2 3 |
10
25 40 |
754892± 6523
2345254± 11032 4234568± 11257 |
20
50 80 |
443468 ± 1034
1261647 ±51340 2015712 ±17045 |
0.86
0.47 0.29 |
0.25
0.30 0.80 |
Avg. of % RSD | 1.62 | 1.35 |
TABLE 6B: INTER-DAY PRECISION DATA OF HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE
S. no. | Conc. (μg/ml) of Hydro | Peak Area mean ± S.D. (n=3) of Hydro | Conc. (μg/ml)
of Keto |
Peak Area mean ± S.D. (n=3) of Keto | %RSD | |
Hydro | Keto | |||||
1
2 3 |
10
20 80 |
758345 ± 6530
2346537 ± 11212 4222567 ± 11421 |
20
50 80 |
4424453 ± 1123
1234567 ± 51433 2014589± 17312 |
0.90
0.50 0.35 |
0.30
0.89 0.30 |
Avg. of % RSD | 1.75 | 1.49 |
Robustness: The robustness of the method was evaluated by analyzing the system suitability standards and evaluating system suitability parameter data after varying the HPLC pump flow rate (±0.1 ml) and organic solvent content (±2 ml) and pH (±0.2). None of the alterations caused a significant change in peak area R.S.D (%), USP tailing factor and theoretical plates. Although the changes in retention times were more significant, and quantification was still possible. Results of robustness studies are shown in Table 7 and Fig. 12, 13.
TABLE 7: ROBUSTNESS STUDIES OF HYDROCORTISONE AND KETOCONAZOLE
S. no. | Parameter | Modification | Retention time | Tailing Factor | ||
Hydro | Keto | Hydro | Keto | |||
1
|
Flow rate
|
0.9 ml/min
1.0 ml/min 1.1 ml/min |
3.55 min
3.50 min 2.88 min |
6.76 min
6.00 min 5.50 min |
1.152
1.100 1.165 |
1.140
1.097 1.393 |
2
|
Mobile phase
Composition (MeOH:H2O) |
68 : 32
70 : 30 72 : 28 |
3.19 min
3.50 min 3.10 min |
6.75 min
6.00 min 5.58 min |
1.152
1.100 1.167 |
1.146
1.097 1.314 |
3
|
pH
|
3.0
3.2 |
3.50 min
3.180 min |
6.00 min
6.12 min |
1.100
1.149 |
1.097
1.110 |
4 | Wavelength | 218
221 224 |
3.18 min
3.50 min 3.18 min |
6.12 min
6.00 min 6.1 2 min |
1.139
1.100 1.164 |
1.107
1.097 1.104 |
LOD and LOQ: LOD and LOQ were calculated from the formula 3.3 × (σ/S) and 10 × (σ/S), respectively where, σ is standard deviation of intercept and S is the mean of slope. The LOD and LOQ can also be determined by S/N. The value for LOD should be 3 - 5 whilst for LOQ 10 - 15. The results are presented in Table 8.
TABLE 8: LOD AND LOQ DATA
S. no. | Parameter | Hydrocortisone | Ketoconazole |
1 | LOD | 1.294 µg/ml | 0.241 µg/ml |
2 | LOQ | 3.922 µg/ml | 0.733 µg/ml |
Solution Stability and Mobile Phase Stability: The stability of hydro and keto in solution was determined by leaving test solutions of the sample and reference standard in tightly capped volumetric flasks at room temperature for 3 days during which they were assayed at 12 h intervals. Stability of mobile phase was determined by analysis of freshly prepared sample solutions at 12 h intervals for 48 h and comparing the results with those obtained from freshly prepared reference standard solutions. The mobile phase was prepared at the beginning of the study period and not changed during the experiment. The % assay of the results was calculated for both the mobile phase and solution-stability experiments.
CONCLUSION: The present study represents an accurate, precise and specific HPLC method for routine analysis of hydrocortisone and keto-conazole combination in tablet dosage form. In addition to assay it may be used to detect related substance or other impurities which are formed during storage conditions and the analyte of interest could be estimated without any interferences. The use of C18 column in the present work has shown better elution of analytes with good resolution, improved plate count, capacity factor, reduced tailing. So the C18 column can be used to achieve high specificity in shorter time of analysis hydrocortisone to ketoconazole in tablet as per ICH Q2 (R2) guidelines.
The developed UV-spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of hydrocortisone and ketoconazole in combined pharmaceutical dosage form is simple and reliable. From the study of validation parameters namely accuracy, precision (SD and RSD), (interday, intraday and different analyst), specificity, linearity and range, it was observed that the method is specific, accurate, precise and reproducible. Hence the method can be employed for routine analysis of dosage form.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Nil
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Hisham E: Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 1998; 17: 1267.
- Simoncic Z, Roskar R, Gartner A, Kogej K and Kmetec V: International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2008; 356: 200.
- Medenica M, Ivanovic D, Maskovic M, Jancic B and Malenovic A: Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2007; 44: 1087.
- Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodo-logy (Q2B), ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline.
- General Chapter 1225, Validation of compendial methods, United States Pharmacopeia 30, National Formulary 25, Rockville, Md., USA, The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, Inc., 2007.
- Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products {Q1A (R2),} ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline.
- Nash RA and Wachter AH: Pharmaceutical process validation 129(3): 507-523.
- Grace SN, Lau JA, Critchley JH, Patel A, Patel J and Shah A: Development and validation of spectrophotometric method for Simultaneous estimation of hydrocortisone and ketoconazole in tablet dosage form, International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2012; 56: 198.
- Kumar AD, Sujan DP, Vijayasree V and Rao JVLN: Development and validation of dual wavelength spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of hydrocrtisone and ketoconazole in their combined dosage form, E. J. Chem. 2009; 6: 541-544.
- ICH-Q2A. Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures, March 1995.
- Zaheer Z, Devdikar MM and Nikalje AG: Stability indicating HPLC method for determination of ketoconazole tablet dosage form, Inventi impact: Pharm Analysis & Quality Assurance 2011; 34: 541-589.
- Kumar S, Nanda RK, Kuttepali P and Sharma SK: Development and RP-HPLC Method for estimation of hamycin and ketoconazole in pharmaceutical cream, Thomson reuter: Pharm Analysis and Quality Assurance 2014; 5(1): 263-68.
- Adi-Dako O, Bekoe SO and Ofori-Kwakye K: Novel HPLC analysis of hydrocortisone in conventional and controlled release pharmaceutical preparations, Pharma-ceutics 2017; 9495732: 8.
- Manikanta AYN: Analytical method development and validation of hydrocortisone and miconazole simultaneous in topical dosage form by RP-HPLC 2015; 4(8): 2063-2080.
- Birsan M, Cojocaru IC, Scutarju MM and Popovici I: Validation of a chromatographic method for miconazole assay fromoral sustained release mucoadhesive tablets Farmacia 2014; 62: 3.
How to cite this article:
Naik RM, Gumpula S and Mhaskar PS: Simultaneous estimation of hydrocortisone and ketoconazole in pharmaceutical dosage form by RP-HPLC method. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2018; 9(11): 4805-11. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(11).4805-11.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
36
4805-4811
533
1115
English
IJPSR
R. M. Naik *, S. Gumpula and P. S. Mhaskar
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Quality Assurance, Gland Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Shivampet Mandal, Medak, Telangana, India.
mohanbabu623@gmail.com
23 February, 2018
04 May, 2018
13 May, 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(11).4805-11
01 November, 2018