SIMULTANEOUS STABILITY-INDICATING METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ABACAVIR, DOLUTEGRAVIR AND LAMIVUDINE BY RP-HPLC
HTML Full TextSIMULTANEOUS STABILITY-INDICATING METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ABACAVIR, DOLUTEGRAVIR AND LAMIVUDINE BY RP-HPLC
- Sindu Priya* and D. Gowri Sankar
AU College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT: A simultaneous stability-indicating reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for analysis of abacavir (ABC), dolutegravir (DTG) and lamivudine (3TC) as the bulk drug and in the formulation was developed. Compounds were separated on Kinetex 5 µ C18 100 A (250 mm x 4.6 mm). A gradient program of mobile phase at different proportions of acetonitrile (ACN) and water was used. The retention times of ABC, DTG and 3TC were 5.2, 8.4 and 3.1 minutes (mins) respectively. The drugs were subjected to the stress conditions of acid, base, oxidative, hydrolytic, humidity, thermal and photolytic degradation. The degradation products were well resolved from main peak and its impurities, proving the stability-indicating ability of the method. The method was linear in the concentration range of 20–100 μg/mL, 2-16μg/mL and 10-80 μg/mL for ABC, DTG and 3TC respectively. The method was accurate and precise with a limit of detection and limit of quantitation of 2.05 and 6.73 µg/ mL, 0.28 and 0.94 µg/ mL and 2.32 and 7.72 µg/ mL for ABC, DTG and 3TC respectively. The method was applied for the analysis of ABC, DTG and 3TC in the presence of its degradation products and commonly used excipients and was found to be specific. The developed method is stability indicating, precise and specific which can be applied for the routine analysis.
Keywords: |
High performance liquid chromatography, abacavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine, Stability-indicating method
INTRODUCTION: Abacavir, (ABC) 1 which is chemically (1S,cis) – 4 - [2-amino-6(cyclopropyl amino)-9H-purin-9-yl]-2-cyclopentene-1-methanol sulfate, is a carbocyclic synthetic nucleoside analogue. Intracellularly, it is converted by cellular enzymes to the active metabolite carbovir triphosphate. Carbovir triphosphate is an analogue of deoxyguanosine-5`-triphosphate (dGTP). Carbovir triphosphate inhibits the activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) both by competing with the natural substrate dGTP and by its incorporation into viral DNA.
FIG .1: a ABACAVIR
Dolutegravir(DTG) 1 which is chemically (4R,12aS) - 9 - {[(2,4difluorophenyl) methyl] carbamoyl}-4-methyl - 6,8 -dioxo-3,4,6,8,12,12a-hexahydro-2Hpyrido[1',2':4,5]pyrazino[2,1-b] [1,3] oxazin-7-olate, inhibits HIV integrase by binding to the integrase active site and blocking the strand transfer step of retroviral DNA integration which is essential for the HIV replication cycle.
FIG. 1.b DOLUTEGRAVIR
Lamivudine(3TC) 1 which is chemically(2R,cis)-4-amino-1-(2hydroxymethyl-1,3-oxathiolan-5-yl)-(1H)-pyrimidin-2-one is a synthetic nucleoside analogue. Intracellularly, it is phosphorylated to its active 5′-triphosphate metabolite, lamivudine triphosphate (L-TP). The principal mode of action of L-TP is the inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) via DNA chain termination after incorporation of the nucleoside analogue into viral DNA.
FIG.1. c LAMIVUDUNE
There are several reported spectrophotometric 2-4 and chromatographic 5-7 methods in the literature for analysis of ABC, DTG and 3TC individually but there is no reported method for the simultaneous stability indicating assay of the drugs in combination. Hence LC method that was developed in the present work is advantageous because it enables stability indicating, accurate, specific and reproducible analysis of ABC, DTG and 3TC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Instrumentation and Reagents:
Liquid chromatography was performed with a UFLC Shimadzu LC20 –AD, SPD M20A prominanace DAD detector, Rheodyne universal injector 7725 port and Hamilton 50 µL manual injector. Data processing was performed with shimadzu LC Solutions software version 1.25for LC peak integration. ABC, DTG and 3TC was obtained as a gift sample from Hetero Labs, Hyderabad, India. The components of placebo formulation was D-mannitol, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, povidone, and sodium starch glycolate.
Preperation of solutions:
Preparation of diluents:
ACN - water 60:40 v/v mixture was used as diluents which was prepared by mixing 600 mL of ACN and 400 mL of water in a 1000mL volumetric flask. The mixture was filtered through 0.45 μ membrane filter and sonicated before use.
Standard stock solution:
A standard solution was prepared by dissolving 60 mg, 5 mg and 30 mg of ABC, DTG and 3TC with diluent in a 100 mL volumetric flask and was sonicated for 30 min. From this, working standard solutions of 60μg/mL, 5μg/mL and 30 μg/mL of the drugs were prepared by appropriate dilutions using diluent.
Sample stock solution:
20 tablets were weighed and average weight of each tablet was taken and then powder equivalent to 60 mg, 5 mg and 30 mg of abacavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine was transfered into a 100 mL volumetric flask, 30 mL of diluent was added and sonicated for 30 min, further the volume made up with diluent and filtered. From the filtered solution, 1.0 mL was pipetted out into a 10 mL volumetric flask and made up to 10 mL with diluent.
Optimized Chromatographic Conditions:
Compounds were separated on a Kinetex 5 µ C18 100 A(250 mm x 4.6 mm) column with gradient program of ACN – water [Table 1] as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Chromatography was performed at room temperature and the detection was carried out at 258 nm.
TABLE 1: GRADIENT PROGRAM
Time | Flow | ACN | Water |
0.01 | 1.00 | 20.0 | 80.0 |
5.00 | 1.00 | 60.0 | 40.0 |
8.00 | 1.00 | 20.0 | 80.0 |
15.00 | 1.00 | 20.0 | 80.0 |
Forced Degradation Studies: 9
Intentional degradation 6 (n = 3) was attempted by using water, heat, light, acid, base, humidity and oxidizing agent. For acid degradation, 2 mL of working standard solution was refluxed with 3N hydrochloric acid (HCl) at 60°C for 1hour and then neutralized by adjusting pH to 7.0 with 5N sodium hydroxide (NaOH). For alkali degradation, 2 mL of working standard solution was refluxed with 2N NaOH at 60°C for 1hour and then neutralized by adjusting pH to 7.0 with 2N HCl. For oxidative degradation, 2 mL of working standard solution was refluxed with 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by heating on water bath at 60°C for 1hour. For photolytic degradation, 2mL of working standard solution was exposed to ultra violet (UV) (200watthour/m2) as per ICH Guidelines. For thermal degradation, 2mL of working standard solution was exposed to temperatures at 105°C for 3days. For hydrolytic degradation, 2mL of working standard solution was refluxed with water by heating on water bath at 100°C for 1hour. For humidity degradation, 2mL of working standard solution was exposed to 85% Humidity (Prepared potassium nitrate saturated solution) at 3days.
All these solutions except for photo degradation were prepared in amber volumetric flasks. After completion of the degradation treatments the samples were cooled to room temperature, diluted with the diluent, and injected for chromatographic analysis.
Method Validation:
The method was validated in accordance with recognized guidelines 10, 11.
Specificity:
To demonstrate the specificity of the method, in house placebo formulation containing only excipients was subjected to the methods of sample preparation and analysis described above. Forced degradation samples were also analysied by the above described method to establish its specificity.
Leniarity:
Six solutions containing ABC, DTG and 3TC were prepared in diluents. Peak area and concentration data were treated by least squares linear regression analysis (n = 3).
Precision:
Method precision was evaluated by injecting working standard solution of ABC, DTG and 3TC for 6 times (n=3) on different HPLC system.
Accuracy:
The accuracy of the method was determined by measurement (n = 3) of recovery by spiking the in house placebo with 50, 100, and 150% of the drug.
LOD and LOQ:
LOD and LOQ were determined as the amounts for which the signal-to-noise ratios were 3:1 and 10:1, respectively.
Robustness:
Robustness of the method was assessed by varying the instrumental conditions such as flow rate (±2%), proportion of the organic content in the mobile phase (±2%) and wavelength (±2 units).
Stability of the Analytial Solutions:
The bench top stability of abacavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine in the diluent was assessed by injecting a working standard solution at 0, 6, 8,12 and 24 h after preparation (n = 3).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The retention times of ABC, DTG and 3TC under the chromatographic conditions described above were 5.2, 8.4 and 3.1 mins respectively [Fig. 2.a]. Peaks at 5.2, 8.4 and 3.1 min were observed in chromatograms of the drug samples extracted from the in house formulation [Fig. 2. b]. Assay caluculations are given in Table no. 2. System suitability data is given in table no. 3 where it is evaluated by theoretical plates and tailing factor. The peaks of the degradation products were well resolved from that of ABC, DTG and 3TC [Fig. 2e–j]. There was no interference from the excipients commonly present in the formulation and from the mobile phase. It may therefore be inferred that no degradation of ABC, DTG and 3TC in the pharmaceutical formulation was detected by using this method.
In validation of the assay, placebo formulation samples and blank, yielded clean chromatograms [Fig. 2. c, d]; with no interference from the excipients and mobile phase; this is indicative of the specificity of the method. The LOD and LOQ was2.02 and 6.73 µg/ mL, 0.28 and 0.94 µg/ mL and 2.32 and 7.72 µg/ mL, for ABC, DTG and 3TC respectively. A plot of drug peak area against concentration [Fig. 3a 3b 3c] of ABC, DTG and 3TC was linear over the concentration range 20–100µg/ mL, 2 -16µg/ mL and 10- 80µg/ mL respectively. The regression equation was calculated by the least-square method for ABC, y = 49116x - 30073; correlation coefficient 0.999, for DTG, y = 52644x + 845.57; correlation coefficient 0.999 and for 3TC, y = y = 77990x - 60776; correlation coefficient 0.999. Linearity data is given in Table 4. The method was found to be precise as the RSD <2 [Table 5].
The recovery data listed in, obtained from a study of the in house placebo formulation, ranged from 99.86-100.00 % for ABC, 99.64-101.04% for DTG and 99.94-100.24 for 3TC with low RSD values for all the drugs. This quantitative recovery of the drugs indicates that there was no interference from excipients present in the formulation and the method is accurate whose results are shown in Table 6. ABC, DTG and 3TC were found to be stable in the mobile phase for a period of 24hours, because no peaks corresponding to degradation products were observed and there was no significant change in the peak area of the drug (RSD <1%). The deliberate changes in the method have not much affected the peak tailing, theoretical plates and the percent assay. This indicates that the present method is robust. Table 7. Results of Degradation Studies are given in Table 8.
Chromatograms obtained from drugs and its degradation products:
TABLE 2: ASSAY RESULT OF ABC, DTG AND 3TC
S.No. | Drug | Label Claim | % Amount Found* | % RSD |
1 | ABC | 600 | 100.0667 | 0.38 |
2 | DTG | 50 | 100.0667 | 0.38 |
3 | 3TC | 300 | 100.1333 | 0.60 |
* Mean of Three Determinations
TABLE 3: SYSTEM SUITABILITY
S.No. | Drug | Peak Area | SD | % RSD |
1 | ABC | 2795214 | 7916.65 | 0.26 |
2 | DTG | 264173 | 590.36 | 0.22 |
3 | 3TC | 2250381 | 4964.32 | 0.22 |
* Mean of Five Determinations
TABLE 4: LINEARITY OF THE PROPOSED METHOD
ABC | DTG | 3TC | |||
Concentration | Peak Area | Concentration | Peak Area | Concentration | Peak Area |
20 | 958716 | 2 | 106071 | 10 | 756373 |
30 | 1438089 | 4 | 212442 | 20 | 1512747 |
40 | 1967452 | 6 | 310213 | 30 | 2269121 |
60 | 2876179 | 8 | 429285 | 40 | 3025494 |
80 | 3874904 | 12 | 631427 | 60 | 4538242 |
100 | 4912631 | 14 | 842570 | 80 | 6250959 |
Y- Intercept | - 30073 | Y- Intercept | 845.57 | Y- Intercept | - 60776 |
Slope | 49116 | Slope | 52644 | Slope | 77990 |
R2 | 0.999 | R2 | 0.999 | R2 | 0.999 |
* Mean of Three Determinations
TABLE 5: PRECISION DATA OF THE PROPOSED METHOD
ABC | DTG | 3TC | ||||
Injection | Method Precision | System Precision | Method Precision | System Precision | Method Precision | System Precision |
1 | 2089342 | 2197361 | 92482 | 92581 | 1414932 | 1423842 |
2 | 2096298 | 2171736 | 92564 | 92374 | 1426432 | 1422181 |
3 | 2079668 | 2213816 | 92896 | 91886 | 1412376 | 1432283 |
4 | 2103296 | 2182063 | 92978 | 92798 | 1431260 | 1418650 |
5 | 2123354 | 2183219 | 92917 | 92997 | 1422388 | 1422608 |
6 | 2106281 | 2209034 | 92789 | 91756 | 1442871 | 1443245 |
Mean | 2099706.5 | 2192871.5 | 92771.0 | 92398.66 | 1425043.16 | 1427134.83 |
SD | 15072.45 | 16593.72 | 203.21 | 495.41 | 11208.49 | 9098.44 |
RSD | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.22% | 0.54% | 0.79% | 0.64% |
TABLE 6: ACCURACY DATA (TRIPLICATE VALUES AT 50, 100 AND 150 PERCENT LEVELS) OF ABC, DTG AND 3TC.
Concentration of spiked level | Amount added | Amount found | % Recovery | Mean Recovery % | %RSD |
ABC | |||||
50% | 30.12 | 30.04 | 99.73 | 99.86 | 0.32 |
29.94 | 30.01 | 100.23 | |||
30.04 | 29.93 | 99.63 | |||
100% | 60.12 | 60.16 | 100.06 | 100.00 | 0.11 |
60.08 | 60.12 | 100.06 | |||
60.09 | 60.02 | 99.88 | |||
150% | 90.19 | 90.21 | 100.02 | 99.96 | 0.05 |
90.10 | 90.03 | 99.92 | |||
90.22 | 90.17 | 99.94 | |||
DTG | |||||
50% | 2.83 | 2.8 | 98.93 | 99.64 | 0.97 |
2.68 | 2.7 | 100.74 | |||
2.71 | 2.69 | 99.26 | |||
100% | 5.07 | 5.13 | 101.18 | 101.04 | 0.41 |
5.13 | 5.2 | 101.36 | |||
5.18 | 5.21 | 100.57 | |||
150% | 7.59 | 7.65 | 100.79 | 100.30 | 0.95 |
7.64 | 7.71 | 100.91 | |||
7.58 | 7.52 | 99.20 | |||
3TC | |||||
50% | 15.16 | 15.18 | 100.13 | 100.24 | 0.10 |
15.20 | 15.25 | 100.32 | |||
15.07 | 15.11 | 100.26 | |||
100% | 29.92 | 30.01 | 100.30 | 99.95 | 0.62 |
30.32 | 30.42 | 100.32 | |||
30.10 | 29.87 | 99.23 | |||
150% | 45.07 | 44.89 | 99.60 | 99.94 | 0.30 |
45.32 | 45.36 | 100.08 | |||
45.14 | 45.2 | 100.13 |
TABLE 7: ROBUSTNESS DATA OF ABC, DTG AND 3TC
Variation | -2 % of ACN in
mobile phase |
+2 % of ACN in
mobile phase |
Flow rate at 0.9ml/min | Flow rate at 1.1ml/min | Wave length at 243nm | Wave length at 247nm |
ABC | ||||||
% Assay | 100.08 | 100.25 | 100.14 | 99.56 | 99.81 | 99.91 |
Theoretical Plates | 8520 | 4995 | 7153 | 4829 | 5876 | 5985 |
Tailing Factor | 1.32 | 1.26 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.68 | 1.62 |
DTG | ||||||
% Assay | 100.10 | 100.32 | 100.29 | 100.43 | 100.49 | 100.20 |
Theoretical Plates | 6649 | 6593 | 4325 | 6434 | 5985 | 6642 |
Tailing Factor | 1.53 | 1.57 | 1.30 | 1.45 | 1.35 | 1.53 |
3TC | ||||||
% Assay | 100.21 | 100.26 | 100.13 | 100.30 | 100.04 | 100.01 |
Theoretical Plates | 5763 | 4148 | 4792 | 4045 | 4312 | 4275 |
Tailing Factor | 1.16 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 1.21 | 1.37 | 1.38 |
* Mean of Three Determinations
TABLE 8: FORCED DEGRADATION DATA
Treatment | % Label Claim | % Degradation | Peak Purity | Pass/Fail | |||
Purity angle | Purity Threshold | ||||||
ABC | |||||||
Control | 100.5 | 0 | 0.270 | 1.129 | |||
Acid | 79.7 | 21.8 | 0.420 | 1.284 | Pass | ||
Alkali | 79.8 | 20.7 | 0.220 | 1.204 | Pass | ||
Peroxide | 78.3 | 22.2 | 0.245 | 1.178 | Pass | ||
Thermal | 76.9 | 23.6 | 0.248 | 1.194 | Pass | ||
Photolysis | 78.0 | 22.5 | 0.251 | 1.243 | Pass | ||
Humidity | 80.4 | 21.1 | 0.232 | 1.168 | Pass | ||
Hydrolysis | 73.0 | 27.5 | 0.254 | 1.196 | Pass | ||
DTG | |||||||
Control | 100 | 0 | 1.473 | 3.756 | Pass | ||
Acid | 71.5 | 28.5 | 3.514 | 9.286 | Pass | ||
Alkali | 78.9 | 21.1 | 3.262 | 6.832 | Pass | ||
Peroxide | 77.9 | 22.1 | 2.970 | 6.443 | Pass | ||
Thermal | 80.2 | 19.8 | 3.411 | 6.677 | Pass | ||
Photolysis | 73.1 | 26.9 | 3.464 | 8.901 | Pass | ||
Humidity | 72.6 | 27.4 | 2.683 | 5.079 | Pass | ||
Hydrolysis | 76.3 | 23.7 | 3.553 | 6.148 | Pass | ||
3TC | |||||||
Control | 100 | 0 | 0.342 | 1.219 | Pass | ||
Acid | 81.2 | 18.8 | 0.016 | 1.467 | Pass | ||
Alkali | 79.4 | 20.6 | 0.549 | 1.387 | Pass | ||
Peroxide | 81.3 | 18.7 | 0.457 | 1.290 | Pass | ||
Thermal | 74.5 | 25.5 | 0.536 | 1.363 | Pass | ||
Photolysis | 76.9 | 2.1 | 0.972 | 1.417 | Pass | ||
Humidity | 75.5 | 24.5 | 0.469 | 1.278 | Pass | ||
Hydrolysis | 74.8 | 25.2 | 0.570 | 1.342 | Pass | ||
CONCLUSION: This RP-HPLC method for assay of abacavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine is precise, specific, rapid, and stability-indicating. The method may be used to assess the stability of abacavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine as the bulk drug and in its pharmaceutical formulation. Chromatographic analysis time of less than 20 min was advantageous for use of the method in routine analysis. It may be extended to study of abacavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine and also analysis of the drug in plasma and other biological fluids.
REFERENCES:
- http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/205551s000lbl.pdf
- Pradeep Nagisetty, S.M. Shanta Kumar, Putta Rajesh Kumar, Analytical Method Development and Validation of Anti-HIV Drug Abacavir Sulphate, Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2010;2(4): 417-419
- Bhavar Girija Balasaheb, Aher Kiran Balasaheb, Thorat Ravindra Subhash, Kakad sachin Jijabapu, Pekamwar Sanjay Sudhakar, Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Dolutegravir Sodium In Tablet Dosage Form, Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, 2015; 19(6) 1156 – 1163
- Deepali G, Elvis M, UV Spectrophotometric Method for Assay of the Anti-Retroviral Agent Lamivudine in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient and in its Tablet Formulation, Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2010;2(4) 417-419
- Savaser A, Goraler S, Tasoz A, Uslu B, Lingeman H, Ozkan SA. Determination of Abacavir, Lamivudine and Zidovudine in Pharmaceutical Tablets, Human Serum and in Drug Dissolution Studies by HPLC. Chromatographia, 2007 ;65(5)259
- Chantelle Bennetto-Hooda, Glenn Taboltb, Paul Savinac, Edward P. Acostaa, A sensitive HPLC–MS/MS method for the determination of dolutegravir in human plasma, J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014; 225-32.
- M Sarat, P Murali Krishna and C Rambabu, Development and Validation of RP-UPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Abacavir Sulphate and Lamivudine in Combined Tablet Dosage Form, International Journal of ChemTech Research, 2012; 3(4) 939-944.
- Krzek J, Moniczewska M, Zabierowska S´lusarczyk G, Lee Y: Method validation for HPLC analysis of related substances in pharmaceutical drug products. In: Chan CC, Lam H, Lee YC, Zhang XM (eds) Analytical method validation and instrument performance verification. Wiley, New York, pp 2004; 27–48 7.
- Stability testing: Photostability testing of new drug substances and products q1b, ICH harmonised tripartite guideline, Current Step 4 version dated 6 November 1996
- United States Pharmacopeial Convention: The United States Pharmacopeia, USP NF 29, Validation of compendial methods. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, pp 2005; 3050–3053
- http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__Guideline.pdf
- Skoog D, Holler F, Nieman T: High performance liquid chromatography, principles of instrumental analysis, 5th edn. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, 1998; pp 725–726 8.
- United States Pharmacopeial Convention: The United States pharmacopeia, USP NF 29, High performance liquid chromatography. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2005; pp 2644–2651 9.
- United States Pharmacopeial Convention: The United States Pharmacopeia, USP NF 29, Validation of compendial methods. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2005; pp 3050–3053
How to cite this article:
Priya DS and Sankar DG: Simultaneous Stability-Indicating Method for the Determination of Abacavir, Dolutegravir and Lamivudine by RP-HPL. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2016; 7(7): 2905-16.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(7).2905-16.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
18
2905-16
749
1781
English
IJPSR
D. Sindu Priya* and D. Gowri Sankar
AU College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
sindupriya87@gmail.com
20 February, 2016
09 April, 2016
16 April, 2016
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(7).2905-16
01 July 2016