SOLUBILITY ENHANCEMENT AND OPTIMIZATION OF VARIOUS VARIABLES OF FAST DISINTEGRATING TABLETS OF LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE USING CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGN
HTML Full TextSOLUBILITY ENHANCEMENT AND OPTIMIZATION OF VARIOUS VARIABLES OF FAST DISINTEGRATING TABLETS OF LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE USING CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGN
Seema Saini 1, * 2 and Rajeev Garg 3
Department of Pharmaceutics 1, Rayat Institute of Pharmacy, S. B. S. Nagar, Railmajra - 144533, Punjab, India.
IKG Punjab Technical University 2, Jalandhar - 144603, Punjab, India.
Department of Pharmaceutics 3, ASBASJSM COP, Bela - 140111, Punjab, India.
ABSTRACT: The oral route of drug administration is the most common and preferred method of delivery due to convenience and ease of ingestion, but it is problematic if the drug is poorly soluble. Sufficient drug absorption, reproducible bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile of orally administered drug substances are highly dependent on the solubility of that compound in an aqueous medium. Also, the therapeutic effectiveness of drugs depends upon bioavailability and, ultimately, upon the solubility of drug molecules. Solid dispersions have attracted considerable interest as an efficient means of improving the solubility and hence bioavailability of a range of hydrophobic drugs. These systems are one of the most promising approaches for solubility enhancement. They are referred to a group of solid products consisting of at least two different components, generally a hydrophilic matrix and a hydrophobic drug (1-4). The aim of the present study was to improve the solubility and dissolution rate of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride (L) by formulating a solid dispersion with Polyvinyl pyrollidone (PVP-K30) and Guar gum. Central composite design (CCD) was employed using Design-Expert software version 12 to prepare optimized fast disintegrating tablets of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride.
Keywords: |
Lercanidipine hydrochloride, Solid dispersion, Statistical design approach, Solvent evaporation method, Kneading method, Fast disintegrating tablet, In-vivo studies
INTRODUCTION: The most simple, easy, and convenient path of drug administration is through the oral route due to its better stability, dose accuracy, lesser bulk, and easy manufacturing 1, 2. Improvement in drug solubility and, in turn, the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs remains one of the most challenging aspects of drug development.
The techniques/approaches that have commonly been used to overcome drawbacks associated with poorly water-soluble drugs, in general, include micronization, salt formation, use of surfactant, and use of pro-drug. However, all these techniques have potential limitations 3-4.
Solid dispersion (SD) technique has been widely used to improve the dissolution rate, solubility, and oral absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs. SD is now firmly established as a platform technology for the formulation of drug delivery systems of poorly water-soluble agents 5-6. The term solid dispersions have been utilized to describe a family of dosage forms whereby the drug is dispersed in a biologically inert matrix, usually with a view to enhancing the oral bioavailability. Chiou and Riegelman defined these systems as the dispersion of one or more active ingredients in an inert carrier matrix at solid state prepared by the melting (fusion), solvent or melting-solvent method 7.
Lercanidipine hydrochloride chemically is 2[(3,3-diphenylpropyl) (methyl)amino]-1, 1-imethylethyl methyl 2,6- dimethyl-4- (3-nitrophenyl)-1, 4-dihydropyridine-3, 5-dicarboxylate hydrochloride. It is reported in 1, 4-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers pharmacological class. It is a BCS class II drug with low aqueous solubility and bioavailability. So, improvement of the drug bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy is a crucial parameter that can only be achieved by increasing the solubility 8, 9. The aim of the present research work is to increase the solubility and dissolution rate of Lercanidipine hydrochloride by forming solid dispersions using polymers PVP K-30 and Guar Gum in different ratios, and also employing two different methods for their preparation. Then work had been undertaken to optimize the fast disintegrating tablets using central composite design 10-14.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials: Lercanidipine Hydrochloride was received as a free gift sample from Cipla Pvt. Limited, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, India. Polyvinyl pyrollidone (PVP-K30) and Guar Gum was purchased from a local vendor. Other materials used were of analytical grade 15.
Solubility Study: Solubility studies of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride were checked in various solvents water, phosphate buffer pH 6.8, and HCl buffer pH 1.2. The saturated solutions were prepared by adding excess drug in the solvent system. The solvent system was shaken for 48 h at 25 ºC. Filtered samples were analyzed by UV spectrophotometer at 236 nm. The solubility data is reported in Table 1 16.
TABLE 1: SOLUBILITY OF LERCANIDIPINE HYDRO-CHLORIDE IN VARIOUS SOLVENTS
Solvents | Solubility (µg/ml) |
Water | 1.68±0.066 |
Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 | 5.18±1.671 |
0.1 N HCl | 145±0.978 |
Preparation of Solid Dispersion: Solid dispersions were prepared with two different methods, Solvent Evaporation Method and Kneading Method using two polymers (PVPK-30 and Guar Gum) in order to study the effect of individual method or polymer on the final formulation.
Solvent Evaporation Method: Drug was mixed with PVPK-30(LP1 to LP4) and Guar Gum (LG1 to LG4) in the ratios of 1:1 to 1:4. The polymers were dissolved separately in an adequate amount of methanol. The solvent was then rapidly evaporated with the help of heat. The precipitate was crushed, sized, and stored in a desiccator, until further use 17, 18.
Kneading Method: A mixture of drug and polymer PVP-K30 (LP5 to LP8) and Guar gum (LG5 to LG8) was wetted with water and kneaded thoroughly for 30 min in a glass mortar. The paste formed was dried under vacuum for 24 h. The dried powder was passed through #60.
Evaluation of Solid Dispersions:
Solubility Studies: The solubility study of various Solid dispersions batches was determined in phosphate buffer pH 6.8. A weighed amount of solid dispersion equivalent to drug dose was added in an excess quantity of solvent in screw-capped glass vials. The vials were continuously shaken for 2 h. Finally, the solutions were filtered and analyzed spectrophotometrically at 236 nm.
TABLE 2: SOLUBILITY DATA OF SOLID DISPERSION BATCHES
Carrier | Drug : Carrier Ratio | Batch | Technique Used | Solubility (µg/ml) |
PVP-K30
|
1:1 | NP1 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 240 |
1:2 | NP2 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 361 | |
1:3 | NP3 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 507 | |
1:4 | NP4 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 518 | |
1:1 | NP5 | Kneading Method | 197 | |
1:2 | NP6 | Kneading Method | 303 | |
1:3 | NP7 | Kneading Method | 469 | |
1:4 | NP8 | Kneading Method | 480 | |
Guar Gum
|
1:1 | NG1 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 198 |
1:2 | NG2 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 315 | |
1:3 | NG3 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 461 | |
1:4 | NG4 | Solvent Evaporation Method | 478 | |
1:1 | NG5 | Kneading Method | 165 | |
1:2 | NG6 | Kneading Method | 291 | |
1:3 | NG7 | Kneading Method | 411 | |
1:4 | NG8 | Kneading Method | 419 |
Infra-Red Spectral Analysis: In FTIR study, the characteristic peak of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride has appeared in the spectra of a pure drug without any remarkable change in the position. It was confirmed that there was no chemical interaction between the drug and the polymer. The FTIR spectra of solid dispersion batch LP3 displayed the same characteristic peaks, which also reveals that the drug and excipients used in the formulation are stable and posses no interaction 19, 20.
FIG. 1: FTIR SPECTRA OF LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE
FIG. 2: FTIR SPECTRA OF BATCH LP3
Differential Scanning Calorimetry: The differential scanning calorimetry experiment was performed on the drug and the solid dispersion batch LP3. The samples were analyzed by DSC analyzer. The DSC thermogram of pure Lercanidipine Hydrochloride showed a sharp endothermic peak at 179.11°C, which was ascribed to drug melting. DSC thermograph of LP3 is shown in Fig. 4, which shows no peak i.e., melting point and amorphous state of drug. The disappearance of the drug melting peak confirmed that amorphization had occurred 21-23.
FIG. 3: DSC OF LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE
FIG. 4: DSC OF SOLID DISPERSION BATCH LP3
Experimental Design: Central composite design (CCD) was employed using Design-Expert software version 12 to prepare fast disintegrating tablets of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride. The independent variables selected were croscarmellose i.e. X1 (0.59-3.41% w/w) and crospovidone i.e. X2, (0.59-3.41% w/w). The response variables studied were friability and disintegration time. Response surface methodology was adopted to study the relationship between dependent and independent variables. The composition of all the nine formulations as designed by design expert software are summarized in Table 3 24, 25.
FIG. 5: IMAGES OF CONTOUR PLOTS (A, C) AND THREE DIMENSIONAL SURFACE RESPONSE PLOTS (B, D) SHOWING THE EFFECT OF CROSCARMELLOSE AND CROSPOVIDONE ON THE DISINTEGRATION TIME AND FRIABILITY OF FAST DISINTEGRATING TABLETS
Optimization of Formulation Variables: The optimized amount determined with the help of software is depicted in surface response curves, as shown in Fig. 7.
TABLE 3: CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGN WITH TWO FACTORS, NINE RUNS
Formulation code | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Response 1 | Response 2 |
Crospovidone (%) | Croscarmellose (%) | Disintegration Time (Sec) | Friability (%) | |
LFT1 | 2 | 0.585786 | 58 | 0.81 |
LFDT2 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0.58 |
LFDT3 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0.59 |
LFDT4 | 0.585786 | 2 | 59 | 0.64 |
LFDT5 | 1 | 1 | 61 | 0.77 |
LFDT6 | 1 | 3 | 58 | 0.64 |
LFDT7 | 3 | 1 | 50 | 0.72 |
LFDT8 | 3.41421 | 2 | 29 | 0.6 |
LFDT9 | 2 | 3.41421 | 35 | 0.67 |
Analysis of Data by Design Expert Software: The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple regression analyses were done using Stat-Ease Design Expert 12 software. The statistical treatment and interpretation of data were essential steps where the p-value indicated main effects on optimization of the formulation.
TABLE 4: RESULTS OF ANOVA FOR DISINTEGRATION TIME
Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
Model | 2485.65 | 5 | 497.13 | 259.12 | < 0.0001 | significant |
A-Crospovidone | 1044.85 | 1 | 1044.85 | 544.62 | < 0.0001 | |
B-Croscarmellose | 536.72 | 1 | 536.72 | 279.76 | < 0.0001 | |
AB | 182.25 | 1 | 182.25 | 95.00 | < 0.0001 | |
A² | 340.87 | 1 | 340.87 | 177.68 | < 0.0001 | |
B² | 473.48 | 1 | 473.48 | 246.80 | < 0.0001 | |
Residual | 13.43 | 7 | 1.92 | |||
Lack of Fit | 13.43 | 3 | 4.48 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 4 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 2499.08 | 12 |
TABLE 5: RESULTS OF ANOVA FOR FRIABILITY
Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
Model | 0.1668 | 5 | 0.0334 | 325.87 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
A-Crospovidone | 0.0031 | 1 | 0.0031 | 29.94 | 0.0009 | |
B-Croscarmellose | 0.0262 | 1 | 0.0262 | 256.18 | < 0.0001 | |
AB | 0.0000 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | |
A² | 0.0341 | 1 | 0.0341 | 333.05 | < 0.0001 | |
B² | 0.1176 | 1 | 0.1176 | 1148.67 | < 0.0001 | |
Residual | 0.0007 | 7 | 0.0001 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.0007 | 3 | 0.0002 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 4 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 0.1675 | 12 |
Formulation of Optimized Fast Disintegrating Tablet: The tablets were prepared by direct compression method. Solid dispersion batch LP3 equivalent to 10 mg was weighed and added to the fast disintegrating tablet batch.
TABLE 6: COMPOSITION OF OPTIMIZED FAST DIS-INTEGRATING TABLET
Ingredients | Amount (mg) |
Lercanidipine Hydrochloride SD (LP3) equivalent to 10 mg | 40 |
Crospovidone | 4.5 |
Croscarmellose | 4.5 |
Avicel pH 102 | qs 150 |
Magnesium stearate | 3 |
Talc | 3 |
Total weight | 150 |
Evaluation of Optimized Fast Disintegrating Tablet: Various parameters like weight, hardness, friability, wetting time, disintegration time, and drug content were evaluated as shown in table.
TABLE 7: EVALUATION OF OPTIMIZED LFDT
Parameters | Optimized LFDT |
Weight (mg) | 149.94±1.89 |
Hardness (kg/sq.cm.) | 2.1±0.87 |
Friability (%) | 0.61±0.89 |
Wetting time (sec) | 15±1.69 |
Disintegration time (sec) | 25±0.75 |
Drug content (%) | 98.89±0.95 |
Weight Variation: Average weight of 20 tablets was determined and then the individual tablet weight was compared with average weight as shown in Table 7.
Friability: The tablets were weighed (Winitial) and placed in friabilator. The apparatus was operated at 25 rpm for 4 min. Finally, the tablets were dedusted and weighed again (Wfinal). The data is reported in Table 7.
F = Winitial – Wfinal × 100 / Wfinal
Hardness: Pfizer Hardness tester was used to check the hardness expressed in kg/cm2. The data is shown in Table 7.
Wetting Time: For the determination of wetting time, tissue paper was soaked with 10 ml of water. Tablet was kept over the wet surface and noted down the time required for water to reach at the top of the tablet. The data is reported in Table 7.
Disintegration Test: The Disintegration test apparatus was used to calculate the disintegration time and data is reported in Table 7.
Determination of Drug Content: Ten tablets were powdered, and the blend equivalent to 10 mg of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride was weighed and dissolved in phosphate buffer pH 6.8. The solution was then filtered, diluted, and drug content was determined by spectrophotometer at 236 nm 26-28. The data is recorded in Table 7.
In-vitro Dissolution Study: Dissolution studies were conducted in a beaker having 30 ml phosphate buffer pH 6.8, which was maintained at 37 ± 0.50 °C. The assembly was placed on a magnetic stirrer and samples were drawn at appropriate time periods with replacement. The aliquots were filtered, diluted and analyzed by spectrophoto-meterically at 236nm 29-30.
FIG. 6: IN-VITRO DRUG RELEASE DATA OF LFDT
DISCUSSION: In the present research work, solid dispersions were prepared with different methods and polymers in order to determine the effect of individual method or polymer on the final formulation. PVP-K30 and Guar Gum were used as polymers, respectively and their effect on solubility enhancement by formation of solid dispersions was checked. The solubility results are reported in Table 1.
Solid dispersions were prepared in different drug to polymer ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:4 using Guar Gum and PVP-K30 as carriers. The data is given in Table 2. Solubility studies data revealed that PVP-K30 polymer increased the drug solubility to a greater extend than the Guar Gum polymer. Based on the solubility results, LP3 batch prepared with Solvent Evaporation Method with PVP-K30 as carrier has shown highest solubility of 507 µg /ml. On further increasing the drug carrier ratio upto 1:4 solubility increased to a non significant level. So, 1:3 drug carrier ratio was selected for further studies.
The FTIR spectra of pure drug and solid dispersion batch LP3 displayed same characteristic peaks and revealed no chemical interaction between the drug and excipients as depicted in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 respectively. Thermograms of drug and batch LP3 are depicted in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 respectively. DSC reports also reveals that the disappearance of the drug melting peak is a result of amorphization as shown in Fig. 4. The reduction in drug peak height and its broadening can be considered as a result of the change in the crystalline state to amorphous one.
Central composite design (CCD) was employed using Design-Expert software version 12 to check the effects of independent variables on the formulation properties of Fast Disintegrating Tablets. Response surface methodology was adopted to study the relationship between dependent and independent variables. The formulations (n=9) were designed by design expert having two independent variables, croscarmellose, and crospovidone concentration, respectively. The response variables studied were friability and disintegration time Adequacy and good fit of the models were tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Mathematical relationships generated for the studied response variables were expressed as equations for Disintegration time (X) and Friability (Y).
The following equations were generated when disintegration time was correlated with independent variables (A and B).
X = 31 – 11.43A – 8.19B - 6.75AB + 7A2 + 8.25B2.....(1)
The Predicted R² of 0.9618 is in reasonable agreement with the Adjusted R² of 0.9908; i.e., the difference is less than 0.2.
The equation generated that correlates friability with independent variables (A and B) is:
Y = 0.48 – 0.01A – 0.05B + 0.00AB + 0.07A2 + 0.13B2.....(2)
The Predicted R² of 0.9696 is in reasonable agreement with the Adjusted R² of 0.9927; i.e., the difference is less than 0.2.
Both coefficients A and B bear a negative sign, as shown in equation 1, which indicates that on increasing the concentration of either super-disintegrant, crospovidone or croscarmellose, disintegration time decreases. This is due to the fact that the higher percentage of superdisintegrat induces higher porosity facilitating higher water uptake, which leads to reduced disintegration time. From equation 2, it is again evident that on increasing the concentration of either super-disintegrants, the friability also decreases, and mechanically strong tablets were produced. RSM plots were constructed using a design expert to study the interaction between independent and dependent variables. The combined effect of croscarmellose and crospovidone on friability and disintegration time can be seen in Fig. 5. It is suggested that crospovidone and croscarmellose produced a combined effect of improving disintegration and dissolution. Both the disintegrants work well through swelling and capillary action.
The optimized Lercanidipine Hydrochloride fast disintegrating tablet LFDT was formulated, as shown in Table 6. The weight of the tablet batch LFDT was 149.94±1.89 mg. Friability was reported to be 0.61%±0.89 and hardness of 2.1±0.87 kg/cm2. The accreditation for fast wet ability and disintegration could be assigned to the capillary action mechanism of the superdisintegrant, which leads to the fast puffiness of the dosage form. The drug content was found to be 98.89±0.95%. The wetting time and disintegration time were 15±1.69 and 25±0.75 sec, respectively. This may be credited to the brisk dissolution of the tablet, which is due to the usage of super disintegrant and carrier all together.
CONCLUSION: A fast and effective screening technique to develop stable solid dispersions for a poorly soluble drug is successfully developed. The research work revealed that the solid dispersion technique could be a beneficial way for solubility improvement, using Polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP K-30) and guar gum as carriers. From the preliminary screening for polymers, PVPK30 was selected for the further formulation studies.
Finally, Lercanidipine Hydrochloride Fast Disintegrating Tablets were successfully prepared to apply central composite design with the most appropriate combination of croscarmellose and crospovidone as super disintegrants. Batch LFDT was formulated with a maximum 97.89±3.21% drug release within 10 min. At last, it was summarised that fast disintegrating tablet formulation could be an innovative and promising approach for the delivery of Lercanidipine Hydrochloride with enhanced dissolution and bioavailability, and also as an effective therapy for the treatment of hypertension.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are grateful to Inder Kumar Gujral, Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar for providing the necessary platform for carrying out the research project.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Singh R and Meenakshi: Enhancement of solubility for poorly water-soluble drugs by using solid dsipersion technology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Bio-Science 2016; 5: 47-74.
- Vasconcelos, T, Marques S, Das Neves J and Sarmento B: Amorphous solid dispersions: rational selection of a manufacturing process. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2016; 100: 85-101.
- Vimalson C, Parimalakrishnan S, Jeganathan NS and Anbazhagan S: Solid dispersion technique to enhance the solubility and dissolution of febuxostat an BCS class ii drug. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics 2019; 11: 241-46.
- Mohamed MS, Abdelhafez WA, Zayed G and Samy AM: In-vitro and in-vivo characterization of fast dissolving tablets containing gliquidone–pluronic solid dispersion. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 2019; 45: 1973-81.
- Boyd BJ, Bergström CA and Vinarov Z: Successful oral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs both depends on the intraluminal behavior of drugs and of appropriate advanced drug delivery systems. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2019; 137: 104967.
- Shoormeij Z, Taheri A and Homayouni A: Preparation and physicochemical characterization of meloxicam orally fast disintegration tablet using its solid dispersion. Brazillian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2017; 53: 1-9.
- Moqbel HA, El-Meshad AN, El-Nabarawi MA. A: pharmaceutical study on chlorzoxazone orodispersible tablets: formulation, in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation. Drug Delivery 2016; 23: 2998-3007.
- Eun JK: Preparation of solid dispersion of felodipine using a solvent wetting method. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutica 2016; 64: 200-5.
- Ramesh V, Meenakshi S, Jyothirmayee N, Bullebbai M, Noorjahan SK, Rajeswari G, Babu NG and Madhavi D: Enhancement of solubility, Dissolution rate and Bioavailability of BCS Class II Drugs. International Journal of Pharma and Chemical Research 2016; 2: 2395-3411.
- Raj AR and Harindran J: Formulation and evaluation of carvedilol solid dispersion tablets for solubility enhancement. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Science 2017; 4: 337-48.
- Yang D, Kulkarni R, Behme RJ and Kotiyan PN: Effect of the melt granulation technique on the dissolution characteristics of griseofulvin. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2015; 329: 72-80.
- Desai PM, Liew CV and Heng P: Review of disintegrants and the disintegration phenomena. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016; 105: 2545-55. .
- Surendran AS and Iyer SR: Fast dissolving tablet using solid dispersion technique: an overview. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2015; 5: 668-79.
- Onkar D and Manojkumar P: Development and evaluation of fast dissolving tablets of diltiazem hydrochloride. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy 2015; 6: 493-501.
- Kumar RG, Kumar JS and Satyanarayana V: Formulation development and evaluation of clopidogrel fastdissolving tablets. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016; 12: 61-74.
- Chowdary YA, Soumya M, Madhubabu M, Aparna K and Himabindu P: A review on fast dissolving drug delivery systems-A pioneering drug delivery technology. Bulletin of Environment Pharmacology and Life Sci 2015; 1: 8-20.
- Gunda RK and Kumar J: Formulation development and evaluation of amisulpride fast-dissolving tablets. Fabad Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2018; 43: 15-25.
- Sehgal N, Gupta VN, Gowda DV and Sivadasu P: Fabrication and evaluation of solid dispersion containing glibenclamide. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2018; 11: 158-61.
- Venkata S and Kumar DP: Enhancement of solubility of poorly soluble drugs by using solid dispersion technique. Int J of Pharma and Chemical Res 2015; 11: 11-27.
- Sambamoorthy U, Madanmohan K, Rohitreddy T, Someshear K and Kumaraswamy D: Formulation of sustain release solid dispersions of verapamil hydrochloride using ethyl cellulose and Eudragit-Rspo. International J of Pharmaceutical Sci 2011; 3: 116-22.
- Ibrahim MA, Amal El and Sayeh F: Optimized furosemide taste-masked orally disintegrating tablets. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2017; 25: 1055-62.
- Xingwang Z, Ningyun S, Baojian W, Yi L, Tianzheng G and Wei W: Physical characterization of lansoprazole / PVP solid dispersion prepared by fluid-bed coating technique. Powder Technology 2008; 182: 480-85.
- Veerendra R, Pankaj R, Surender G, Harish D, Gitika A and Manju N: Formulation and characterization of solid dispersion of glimepride through factorial design. Iran Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2011; 7: 7-16.
- Nagar P, Singh K, Chauhan I, Verma M, Yasir M and Khan A: Orally disintegrating tablets: formulation, preparation techniques and evaluation. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 2015; 4: 35-45.
- Siddiqui N, Garg G and Sharma PK: Fast dissolving tablets: preparation, characterization and evaluation: an overview. Int J of Pharm Sci 2015; 2: 87-96.
- Abdulraheman ZS, Patel MR and Patel KR: A review on immediate-release tablet. International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Bio Sciences 2016; 3: 93-113.
- Mohanachandran PS, Sindhumol PG and Kiran TS: Super-disintegrants: an overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 2015; 6: 105-9.
- Kumari S, Visht S, Sharma PK and Yadav RK: Fast dissolving drug delivery system: a review article. Journal of Pharmacy Research 2016; 3: 1444-9.
- Tawfeek HM, Faisal W and Soliman GM: Enalapril maleate orally disintegrating tablets: tableting and in-vivo evaluation in hypertensive rats. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology 2018; 23: 496-503.
- Sri J and Bhikshapathi DVRN: Formulation, development, and in-vivo evaluation of mouth dissolving films containing palonosetron l International Journal of Drug Delivery 2016; 8: 23-36.
How to cite this article:
Saini S and Garg R: Solubility enhancement and optimization of various variables of fast disintegrating tablets of lercanidipine hydro-chloride using central composite design. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(7): 3474-82. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(7).3474-82.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.