SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF GRANISETRON HYDROCHLORIDE IN BULK AND INJECTIONS
HTML Full TextSPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RP-HPLC METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF GRANISETRON HYDROCHLORIDE IN BULK AND INJECTIONS
P. B. Badhan * 1, S. S. Sonawane 2, A. V. Shelke 1 and A. G. Jadhav 1
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry 1, Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mahiravani, Nashik - 422213, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry 2, Met’s Institute of Pharmacy, Adgaon, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT: The present UV Spectrophotometric and RP-HPLC method was simple, accurate, precise, specific, and sensitive. Spectrophotometric method was developed in water and very useful for analysis of bulk drug and injection formulation. RP-HPLC method was developed in Phosphate buffer (pH 3.0 adjusted with orthophosporic acid) and acetonitrile (70:30) using column HiQsil C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 μm). Flow Rate: 1.0 ml / min. The method was validated for the determination of granisetron hydrochloride in bulk and parenteral dosage form. The standard solution of granisetron hydrochloride in water showed maximum absorption at 301 nm with correlation, slope, and intercept 0.9998, 0.04198, and 0.01255, respectively and the percentage recovery of the formulation was 99.965% by UV spectrophotometry. By RP-HPLC, the % RSD of intraday and interday precision was 0.82% and 1.40 %, respectively. The % means recovery amount of Granisetron hydrochloride in 80 %, 100%, 120% was 94.3%, 94.9%, 95.2%, respectively, which reflect that the method was free from the interference of the impurities and other additives during the estimation of drug in the formulation. The proposed method can be successfully used for analysis of granisetron hydrochloride in marketed preparations. The results of analysis have been validated statistically and by recovery studies. This method was found suitable for quantitative and qualitative estimation of granisetron hydrochloride in bulk and parenteral dosage form.
Keywords: |
Granisetron hydrochloride, UV Spectrophotometry, RP-HPLC, Validation, Small volume parenteral
INTRODUCTION: Granisetron hydrochloride, endo - 1 - methyl - N - (9 - methyl - 9 - azabicyclo 3.3.1 non - 3 - yl) H-indazole-3-carboxamide Fig. 1, is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist 1. Granisetron hydrochloride is an effective and potent antiemetic drug which is used in the postoperative treatment of vomiting and nausea resulting from cancer chemotherapy and radio-therapy in adults and children 2-6.
Granisetron hydrochloride is also effective in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting due to anesthetics 7. Granisetron hydrochloride exhibits its antiemetic effects through central and peripheral 5-HT3 receptors 18. Granisetron, as Granisetron hydrochloride, is used both in oral tablets and injection 1.
Literature survey reveals that the drug has been estimated by HPLC 8-13, HPTL C 20, tandem LC-MS 15, and Bioanalytical 16-17 methods in biological fluids like plasma and pharmaceutical dosage forms but no simple UV Spectro-photometric and RP-HPLC method in pharmaceutical formulations of injection has been reported so far. A thorough literature survey reveals that only few analytical methods have been reported for the determination of granisetron hydrochloride in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations, including RP-HPLC stability-indicating and bioanalytical method. The present work deals with the estimation of granisetron hydrochloride in injection by UV spectrophotometry and by RP-HPLC. Experimentation was carried out in MET’s institute of pharmacy Nashik.
FIG. 1: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF GRANISETRON
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Instruments: A Jasco UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (UV-1700) with a matched pair cell of 10 mm quartz was used for experimental purpose. The HPLC system used consisted of a pump PU- 2080 plus (JASCO Corporation, Japan) fitted with 20 μL Rheodyne loop injector (7725i). Detection was carried out on UV -2075 detector (JASCO Corporation, Japan). The data acquisition was done on BORWIN chromatography software (version 1.50).
Materials: Pharmaceutical grade Granisetron hydrochloride was kindly provided as gift sample from Sunpharma Ltd., and it was used without further purification. All analytical grade reagents were purchased from S.D Fine chemicals, Mumbai. Granisetron hydrochloride injection (KYTRIL) was purchased from market. Each 1 mL contains 1.12 mg granisetron hydrochloride equivalent to 1mg of granisetron. Double distilled water was freshly prepared by all double distillation glass Assembly (Borosil, Mumbai, India) for the preparation of solutions and further used in analysis after filtering through 0.45 × 47 mm membrane filter papers purchased from PCI Analytics Ltd. Was used for degassing the prepared mobile phase.
Preparation of Standard Stock Solution and Calibration Curve: The standard stock solution was prepared by dissolving granisetron hydrochloride in distilled water to make the final concentration of 100 μg/ml. Different aliquots were taken from the stock solution and diluted with distilled water separately to prepare a series of concentrations from 5-30 μg/ml.
The λmax was found by the UV spectrum of granisetron hydrochloride in distilled water in the range of 200-400 nm, and it was found to be 301 nm. Absorbance was measured at 301 nm against distilled water as blank. The calibration curve was prepared by plotting absorbance versus concentrations of granisetron hydrochloride.
Analytical Method Validation by UV and RP-HPLC: The developed method was validated in terms of specificity and selectivity, linearity and range, precision, accuracy, the limit of detection, the limit of quantitation, and robustness as per USP and ICH guidelines 21-23.
Linearity and Range: The calibration graph of the absorbance versus concentration was found to be linear over the range of 5-30 μg/ml. The calibration graph was constructed after an analysis of 6 different concentrations. Each point of the calibration graph corresponded to the mean value obtained from three independent measurements. The regression equation was y = 0.04198 × -0.01255, where y is the absorbance, and x is the concentration in μg/ml. (r2 = 0.9998).
Precision and Accuracy: Precision is the degree of repeatability of an analytical method under normal operational conditions. The precision and accuracy were determined with standard quality control samples (in addition to calibration standards) prepared in triplicate at different concentration levels covering the entire linearity range. The precision of the assay was determined by repeatability (intraday) and intermediate precision (inter-day) and reported as %RSD for a statistically significant number of replicate measurements. The intermediate precision was studied by comparing the assays on three different days, and the results are documented as the standard deviation and % RSD. Accuracy is the percent of analyte recovered by assay from a known added amount. Data from nine determinations over three concentration levels covering the specified range were obtained.
Sensitivity: The limit of quantification (LOQ) is the lowest concentration of Granisetron hydro-chloride on the calibration curve that can be quantified with acceptable precision and accuracy. The LOQ was found as 1.35 μg/ml for the proposed method. The limit of detection (LOD) was found to be 0.4465 μg/ml. The results indicate that the proposed method is sensitive to detect and quantify 0.4465 μg/ml and 1.35 μg/ml respectively.
Specificity: The spectra obtained from the test solution were identical with that obtained from a standard solution containing an equivalent concentration of Granisetron hydrochloride indicating that the wavelength of maximum absorbance of Granisetron hydrochloride did not change.
It was concluded that the excipients did not interfere with the quantification of Granisetron hydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulations by the proposed method. Thus, the proposed method can be used for the determination of Granisetron hydrochloride in the presence of excipients.
Robustness: The terms robustness refer to the ability of an analytical method to remain unaffected by small variations in method para-meters (mobile phase composition, column age, column temperature, change in wavelength, etc.) and influential environmental factors (room temperature, air humidity, etc.) and characterize its reliability during normal usage. It was making small deliberate changes in the wavelength of detection used for testing the robustness of method.
Analysis of Marketed Formulation: Granisetron hydrochloride injection (KYTRIL) (containing Granisetron equivalent to 1 mg per ml) was purchased from the market. 0.15 ml of this solution was diluted with 10 ml distilled water (15 μg/ml) and subjected to UV and RP-HPLC analysis. The amount of Granisetron hydrochloride was obtained from the regression equation of calibration curve.
Specificity: Complete separation of Granisetron hydrochloride was noticed in the presence of excipients of the tablet formulation. In addition there was no any interference at the retention time of in the chromatogram of placebo solution, which shows that the peaks of analyte were pure and excipients does not interfere the analyte. Hence, Identification and Specificity of Granisetron is established.
System Suitability: The chromatographic systems used for analysis must pass the system suitability criteria before sample analysis can commence. Set up the chromatographic system; allow the HPLC system to stabilize for 30 min. Inject blank pre-paration (single injection) and standard preparation (six replicates) and record the chromatograms.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
UV Spectrophotometry Selection of Detection Wavelength: The UV spectrum of diluted solutions for various concentrations of Granisetron hydrochloride in the mobile phase was recorded using UV spectrophotometer. The Wavelength of maximum absorbance was observed at 301 nm.
Linearity: The response for the drug was linear in the concentration range of 5-30 µg/ml. The regression equation was y = 0.04198 × -0.01255, where y is the absorbance, and x is the concentration in μg/ml. (r2 = 0.9998). The regression data, values of correlation coefficient (r) and other statistical parameters are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1: ANALYTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GRANISETRON HYDROCHLORIDE BY PROPOSED UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD
S. no. | Parameter | Result |
1. | λmax nm | 301nm |
2 | Linearity range μg/ml | 5-30 |
3 | Regression equation | y =0.04198x-0.01255 |
4 | Correlation coefficient(r2) | 0.9998 |
5 | Limit of detection (LOD) μg/ml | 0.4465 |
6 | Limit of quantification (LOQ) μg/ml | 1.3532 |
7 | Number of data points | 6 |
8 | 95% Confidence interval | 0.9992 to 1.000 |
TABLE 2: REPEATABILITY
Sample no. | Conc. (μg/ml) | Obtained conc. ( μg/ml) |
1 | 15 | 14.89 |
2 | 15 | 14.92 |
3 | 15 | 14.95 |
4 | 15 | 14.67 |
5 | 15 | 14.88 |
6 | 15 | 14.83 |
mean | 14.85 | |
Standard deviation | 0.0999 | |
%RSD | 0.6227% |
Precision and Accuracy: The results of the repeatability listed in Table 2. The developed method was found to be precise as the % RSD values for repeatability, and intermediate precision studies were found < 2. From accuracy data, as shown in Table 3 the % recovery of the drug was 102.1% to 101.2% found.
Analysis of Marketed Formulation: The % recovery of drug content in the marketed formulation was found to be 99.965% with 0.6227 % RSD; the low RSD value indicated the stability of method for the routine analysis of granisetron hydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulation.
Validation using HPLC:
Specificity: There was no any interference at the retention time of in the chromatogram of the drug in the presence of placebo, which shows that the peaks of analyte were pure, and excipients do not interfere with the analyte.
TABLE 3: ACCURACY AND PRECISION TABLE
Amount Added (mg) | Amount Found (mg) | Within Mean Square | Between Mean Square | F | ||
80% (20 mg)
|
Day1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | 0.1864
|
0.1661
|
0.8910
|
19.96 | 20.003 | 19.97 | ||||
20.18 | 20.10 | 20.81 | ||||
21.11 | 19.9 | 20.42 | ||||
Mean | 20.42 | 20.001 | 20.4 | |||
% RSD | 2.98 | 0.5025 | 2.060 | |||
100%(25 mg)
|
24.81 | 25.36 | 25.41 | 0.07490
|
0.3037
|
4.054
|
24.66 | 24.84 | 25.71 | ||||
25.3 | 25.36 | 25.55 | ||||
Mean | 24.92 | 25.18 | 25.55 | |||
%RSD | 1.343 | 1.192 | 0.5874 | |||
120%(30 mg)
|
30.53 | 31.20 | 31.15 | 0.1723 | 0.1440 |
0.8360 |
30.05 | 30.5 | 30.77 | ||||
30.58 | 30.76 | 30.06 | ||||
Mean | 30.38 | 30.82 | 30.66 | |||
%RSD | 0.9631 | 1.147 | 1.804 |
FIG. 4: CHROMATOGRAMS OF GRANISETRON HYDROCHLORIDE STANDARD
System Suitability: System is suitable if the tailing factor should NMT 1.5, theoretical plate count should NLT 2000 and % RSD for peak area of six replicate injections of Granisetron hydrochloride standard should NMT 2.0. Results of system suitability are presented in Table 1, which shows that all results were within acceptance criteria, which proves the reproducibility of the method.
Precision: The intraday and inter-day precision results were shown in Table. The percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) was calculated, which is within the acceptable criteria of not more than 2.0, which proves the repeatability of the method.
TABLE 4: SYSTEM SUITABILITY BY HPLC
S. no. | Injection No. | Peak Area | Theoretical Plate Count (NLT) 2000 | Tailing Factor (NMT 1.5) | Retention Time |
1 | Standard-1 | 4588.55 | 4785 | 1.02 | 4.05 |
2 | Standard-2 | 4422.68 | 4346 | 1.11 | 4.04 |
3 | Standard-3 | 4560.55 | 4589 | 1.13 | 4.05 |
4 | Standard-4 | 4434.22 | 4231 | 1.05 | 4.04 |
5 | Standard-5 | 4580.44 | 4489 | 1.06 | 4.05 |
6 | Standard-6 | 4420.33 | 4178 | 1.09 | 4.05 |
Mean | 4501.12 | ||||
% RSD | 1.26 |
TABLE 5: PRECISION BY HPLC
S. no. | Intraday Precision | Interday Precision | ||
Injection no | Peak Area | Injection no | Peak Area | |
1 | Sample-1 | 4622.20. | Sample-1 | 4522.23 |
2 | Sample-2 | 4520.22 | Sample-1 | 4680.68 |
3 | Sample-3 | 4550.11 | Sample-1 | 4527.53 |
4 | Sample-4 | 4570.68 | Sample-1 | 4584.72 |
5 | Sample-5 | 4480.03 | Sample-1 | 4520.08 |
6 | Sample-6 | 4562.69 | Sample-1 | 4611.54 |
Mean | 4536.746 | Mean | 4574.46 | |
% RSD (NMT 2%) | 0.82 | 1.40 | ||
Theoretical plate count (NLT 2000) | 3890 | 4250 | ||
Tailing factor (NMT 1.5) | 1.18 | 1.09 |
TABLE 6: ACCURACY BY HPLC
Recovery Level (% of Sample Concentration) | Amount
Taken (mg) |
%
Recovery |
Mean % Recovery | % RSD (NMT 2.0%) |
80% | 20 mg | 93.00 | 94.3 | 0.83 |
98.75 | ||||
91.25 | ||||
100% | 25 mg | 97.40 | 94.90 | 0.75 |
91.8 | ||||
95.60 | ||||
120% | 30 mg | 96.00 | 95.2 | 0.95 |
97.77 | ||||
91.87 |
CONCLUSION: The proposed methods can be successfully applied for granisetron hydrochloride assay by UV Spectrophotometry and RP- HPLC in small volume parenteral dosage forms without any interference in quality control. Analysis of the small volume parenteral by this method was reproducible, reliable, and in good agreement with the labeled claim of the drug.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Authors are thankful to the management and trustees of Mumbai Educational Trust’s Bhujbal Knowledge City, Adgaon, Nashik, for providing necessary Analytical requirements and Sunpharma Ltd. for providing gift sample of Granisetron hydrochloride.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Granisetron.
- Wiser W and Berger A: Practical management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oncology 2005; 19(5): 637-45.
- Latreille J, Pater J and Johnston D: Use of dexamethasone and granisetron in the control of delayed emesis for patients who receive highly emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncology 1998; 16(3): 1174-8.
- Granisetron Extended-Release Injection (GERSC) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting; https:// clinicaltrials. gov/ct2/ show/ NCT04085393 .
- Shih YT, Xu Y and Elting LS: Costs of uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among working-age cancer patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 2007; 110(3): 678-85.
- Aapro M: Granisetron: An update on its clinical use in the management of nausea and vomiting. The Oncologist 2004; 9: 673-86.
- Chatterjee S, Rudra A and Sengupta S: Current concepts in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011; 748031.
- Fu-chao Chen, Lin-hai Wang, Jun Guo, Xiao-ya Shi, and Bao-xia Fang: Simultaneous determination of dexamethasone, ondansetron, granisetron, tropi-setron and azasetron in infusion samples by HPLC with dad detection. Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry 2017; Article ID 6749087.
- Balakumaran K, Rajana N, Babu JM and Jayashree A: Development of novel stability indicating HPLC method and characterization of oxidative degradation impurity in Granisetron drug substance. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2017; 8(11): 4591-03.
- Pinguet F, Bressolle F and Martel P: High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of granisetron in human plasma. J of Chroma B Biome Scie and Applications 1996; 675 (1): 99-05.
- Boppana VK: Simultaneous determination of granisetron and its 7-hydroxy metabolite in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography utilizing fluorescence and electro-chemical detection. J of Chrom 1995; 662 (1-2): 195-2-02.
- Rao SV, Ramu V, Kumar G, Ravi D and Rambabu C: A new isocratic RP-HPLC method development for the assay of granisetron HCl in API and dosage forms. Rasayan J of Chemistry 2012; 5(2): 229-33.
- Gopalakrishnan S, Jeyashree B, Thenmozhi M and Chenthilnathan A: Development and validation of new RP-HPLC method for the estimation of granisetron hydrochloride in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 2011; 3(3): 470-76.
- Jyoti A, Keshav J and Gurpreet S: Formulation and evaluation of oral fast dissolving films of Granisetron hydrochloride using different polymers. Inter Rese J of Pharmacy 2015; 6(10): 724-28.
- Jiang Y, Lin M and Fan G: Rapid determination of granisetron in human plasma by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry and its application to bioequivalence study. J of Pharma and Bio An 2006; 42 (4): 464-73.
- Kudoh S, Sato T, Hidek Okada H and Kumakura H: Simultaneous determination of granisetron and 7-hydroxygranisetron in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J of Chromatography B Bio Sciences and Applications 1994; 660 (1): 205-10.
- Huang C, Chen K, Chen C and Tung-HuTsai T: Simultaneous measurement of blood and brain microdialysates of granisetron in rat by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J of Chromatography B: Biom Scie and Applicati 1998; 716 (1-2): 251-55.
- Thompson, Andrew J and Lummis CRS: The 5-HT3 receptor as a therapeutic target. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 2007; 11(4): 527-40.
- Rao SV, Ramu G, Rao NVNM and Rambabu C: Development of simple and sensitive visible spectrophotometric methods for the determination of granisetron hydrochloride in pure and pharmaceutical formulations. International Journal of Pharm Tech Research 2012; 4(4): 1508-12.
- Prabu S, Lakshmana, Selvamani P and Latha S: HPTLC method for quantitative determination of granisetron hydrochloride in bulk drug and in tablets. Latin Ame J of Pharm 2010; 29(8): 1455-30.
- Sarah K: Branch Guidelines from the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005; 38: 798‐
- ICH, Q2R1 validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and methodology; International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva (1996).
- ICH Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. ICH Harm Tripa Guid 2005.
- Q1A (R2), Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products, International Conference on Harmonization. Geneva (2003).
- Snyder LR and Kirkland JJ: Practical HPLC method development. Wiley-Blackwell Second Edit 1997.
- Aggarwal G, Kumar V, Chaudhary and Hema: Design, optimization and characterization of granisetron HCl loaded nano-gel for transdermal delivery. Pharm Nanotechnol 2017; 5(4): 317-28.
How to cite this article:
Badhan PB, Sonawane SS, Shelke AV and Jadhav AG: Spectrophotometric method development and validation of RP-HPLC method for determination of granisetron hydrochloride in bulk and injections. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(2): 1184-89. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR. 0975-8232.12(2).1184-89.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
58
1184-1189
856
806
English
IJPSR
P. B. Badhan *, S. S. Sonawane, A. V. Shelke and A. G. Jadhav
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mahiravani, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
pallavibadhan28@gmail.com
22 February 2020
25 May 2020
28 June 2020
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(2).1184-89
01 February 2021