SPECTROSCOPIC SIGNATURE, ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTICANCER PROPERTIES OF CALOTROPIS GIGANTEA (LINN.) FLOWER
HTML Full TextSPECTROSCOPIC SIGNATURE, ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTICANCER PROPERTIES OF CALOTROPIS GIGANTEA (LINN.) FLOWER
- Gururaja and M. David*
Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Molecular Biology, Department of PG studies in Zoology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka - 580003, India
ABSTRACT: Calotropis gigantea L. flowers were widely used as a natural herbal medication. The objective of the present study was to screen the phytoconstituents and to evaluate the antibacterial and anti-cancer properties of Calotropis gigantea flower extract. The UV-Vis and FTIR spectroscopic techniques were employed to screen the phytochemicals. The antibacterial property of the extract was evaluated through serial broth dilution technique. Cell viability was performed using MTT assay on HeLa cell lines. The presence of Phenolic compounds was confirmed by UV-Vis peak at 271nm. IR spectrum confirms the presence of alcohol/phenols, primary amines, aldehydes, alkanes, alkenes, sulfoxide and halogen compounds. The extract showed antibacterial activity against Enterococcus faecalis (75µg/ml) and Klebsiella pneumonia (2µg/ml). The aqueous ethanolic extract of Calotropis gigantea flower exhibited less activity on HeLa cancer cell viability even at higher concentrations (1000µg/ml). The application of spectroscopic techniques promises to be of a great value in screening phytoconstituents of the extract because of their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. The extract is capable of inhibiting the bacterial growth and may possibly be functional for fortifying of potential antimicrobial compounds. The study provides preliminary scientific evidence for further research in purifying the compounds from aqueous ethanolic extract and to screen their efficacy
Key words: |
Calotropis gigantea,
Flower extract, UV-Vis,
FTIR, Antibacterial, MTT assay
INTRODUCTION: For decades, the herbal system of medication has been practiced in rural countries as a primary health maintenance system 1, 2. WHO reported, 80% of the rural countries depending on herbal medicine. Natural herbal medicine credited as well being in contrast to the synthetics that are regarded as unreliable to human and environment 3. Thus, over a decade an herbal ‘Renaissance’ happening in the development of potential therapeutic applications.
Research on medicinal plants has drawn the attention of many scientists for either its contents or efficacies.
Calotropis gigantea (Family: Asclepiadeace) is a common folk medicinal plant commonly known as “giant milk weed”. The plant has been widely studied, for the presence of potential bioactive components like cardenolides 4, 5, 6 and steroids 14, 15. The plant exhibited multiple therapeutic properties such as anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, sedative, anti-diarrheal, hepatoprotective, trauma, larvicidal, antipyretic, anti-diabetic and anti-tumor activity 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. In addition to this, the flowers are extensively used by ancient medical system for the treatment of diabetes mellitus, bronchial asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and nervous disorders 16, 25. Furthermore, in-vivo studies have demonstrated that, the flower exhibited analgesic, anti-diabetic and anti-tumor activity 26, 27, 28, 29.
The detection and identification of phytochemicals by spectroscopic techniques promises to be of a great value because of their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. In addition, spectroscopic techniques furnish a wealth of qualitative and quantitative information about a given sample 30. The UV-Visible spectroscopy is an elementary technique, to key out the main phytochemicals 31, 32. Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)) is known for its unique “fingerprint” of any compound 29, 30, 31. FTIR spectroscopy was used with success for the identification of various functional groups in the extract 31, 32, 33. Phytochemicals are secondary metabolites produced by plants but these metabolites are not essential for plant growth at the same time they possess certain protective values and also medicinal properties 34.
To detect the phytochemicals in the plant, employment of advanced spectroscopic techniques was necessary. However, the study on the phytochemicals of Calotropis gigantea flower and their efficacy was rare in literature. Therefore, the main objective was aimed to screen the phytochemicals using spectroscopic techniques and to evaluate the antibacterial, anticancer properties of Calotropis gigantea flower extract.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant material:
The fresh blossom flowers with no apparent physical, insect or microbial damages were collected (April, 2014) from Botanical Garden, Karnatak University, Dharwad. Karnataka, India. The flower petals were carefully taken out (without anther, stamen or sepals) and were kept in laboratory hot air oven (Tempo instruments Pvt. Ltd.) at 40⁰C till dry. Samples were powdered and covered with aluminium foil (to avoid exposures to light) and stored at 4⁰C until further analysis.
Reagents:
Ethanol (AG-99.7%) was purchased from Sisco Research Laboratory (SRL) and Potassium bromide (IR-Grade) from Himedia. Muller Hinton (MH) broth medium was used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each test microorganism (NCCLS, 2000). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), Penicillin and Streptomycin, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the MTT reagent were purchased from Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai. The HeLa cancer cells were procured from NCCS, Pune.
Preparation of plant extract:
A known weight of the powdered sample (2g) was set in a thimble of the Soxhlet extractor (Borosil). Distilled water and ethanol (99.7%) was employed as solvents for extraction. Round bottom flask containing 70% aqueous-ethanol (100ml) solvent was placed on heating mantel (60⁰C). The operation was carried on for 16 hours. Extract was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper and kept on a water bath (60⁰C) to vaporize the solvent. The obtained aqueous ethanolic crude extract of Calotropis gigantea flower (AECF) was changed to a screw-top glass bottles (with Teflon caps) and covered with aluminium foil to avoid exposure to light. The extract was placed in the refrigerator (4⁰C) until use.
Spectroscopic signature:
UV-Visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis): The AECF was centrifuged at 3000 rpm (Remi R-8C) for 10 min and filtered through Whatman No. 1filter paper. The sample was diluted (1:10) with distilled water. An aliquot of diluted AECF was scanned in the wavelength ranging from 200-800 nm (Hitachi, U-3310) and the characteristic peak was detected.
Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FTIR): FTIR analysis was performed by following the method described by Yin et al., 201333. Briefly, KBr pellet prepared using 1.0 mg of flower extract. The pellet was analysed in the absorption mode of FTIR and spectra was recorded from 4000 to 500 cm-1 at a data acquisition rate of 4 cm-1 using an FTIR Nicolet 6700 FT-IR (Thermo scientific) equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulphate (DTGS) as a detector. The spectral interpretation was analysed in accordance with Barbara(2004),Yin et al., (2013) 33, 35.
Antibacterial activity:
Selection of bacterial strains:
The test bacteria used were two gram‒positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis) and two gram‒negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae).The test bacteria are known to cause severe infections in human, as they are found in multiple environmental habitats 36.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC):
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the AECF was determined by using serial broth dilution technique 37. 1 mg/ml of the sample solution of the extract was prepared using sterile distilled water. Each of the test tubes were filled with 1 ml of sterile MH broth media and graded doses of sample solution was added. The test tubes were the inoculated (1×106cells/ml) with the selected organisms (Streptococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) followed by incubation at 37oC for 24 h to allow the growth of the bacteria. The test tubes which showed lowest concentration as well as clear content were selected. This lowest or minimum concentration was considered as MIC. Test tubes containing medium, medium and sample, medium and inoculum were used as control. Bacterial growth was observed only in test tubes (solution was turbid) containing medium and inoculum and the other were clear showing no growth. Streptomycin was used as standard.
Anticancer activity:
MTT assay: The cytotoxicity of AECF on HeLa cancer cells was determined by the MTT assay described elsewhere 38, 39. Cells (1 × 105/well) were plated in 100 μl of DMEM /well in 96-well plates. After incubation overnight, AECF was added in various concentrations (200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 μg/ml). After treatment with AECF for 24 h, 20 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT solution (pH 4.7) was added per well and incubated for another 4 h, the supernatant was removed, 100 μl DMSO was added per well and shaken for 15 min. The absorbance at 570 nm was measured with a micro plate reader (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA), using wells without cells as blanks. The experiment was performed in triplicate. The effect of AECF on the viability of HeLa cancer cells was expressed as the % cell viability, using the following formula: % cell viability = A570 of treated cells / A570 of control cells × 100%.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Spectroscopic signature:
The UV-Vis spectrum of AECF was taken at 200 to 800 nm wavelength. The spectra showed the elevation at 271 nm with the absorption height of 0.769 ABS (Fig. 1). Many organic molecules absorb ultraviolet/visible radiation and this is normally because of the behaviour of a special compound. The characteristic wavelength for phenolic compounds may lay in the range 260-280 nm and the obtained peak may indicate the presence of phenolic compounds. The obtained spectrum was evident in identifying the specific bioactive class of molecule 31. IR spectroscopy is the best approach to screen the different functional groups of the extract. The wavelength of light absorbed is attributed to the chemical bonding pattern as can be witnessed in the obtained spectrum (Fig. 2). IR spectrum confirmed the presence of alcohol/phenols, primary amine, aldehydes, alkanes, alkenes, sulfoxide and halogen compounds (Table 1).
The results are analysed in accordance with Barbara, 2004,Yin et al., 201333, 35. The peak at 3423.06 cm-1assigned as hydrogen bonded O-H stretching within alcohols/phenols. Adjacent peak 3396.57 cm-1attributed as N-H stretching primary amine. The vibrations between 2960.43 cm-1, 2920.78 cm-1 and 2848.50 cm-1 can be coupled into symmetric and asymmetric vibrational modes of aldehyde C-H stretching. The peak at 1633.73 cm-1 assigned as C-H bending alkenes compound. The characteristic methylene scissors lies in the region 1464.90 cm-1corresponds to alkanes and O-H bending in alcohol at 1409.30 cm-1.
A small vibration at 1256.44 cm-1 assigned as alkenes C-N stretching. The absorption band at 1070.30 cm-1 corresponds to sulfoxide with S=O stretching. The alkenes C=C bending assigned at 921.19 cm-1.The alkane rocking bands 867.97cm-1, 817.91cm-1and 778.37 cm-1 assigned as methylene C-H out of plane bending. The vibration at 720.77cm-1corresponds to alkanes C=C bending. The peak at 623.74cm-1attributed as halogen compound with C-X stretching. The understanding of the spectrum by the chemical bonds, which formed due to the vibrations in the molecules present in the extract. Geethu et al., (2014) 32 reported that, by understanding the infrared absorption spectrum, the chemical bonds in a compound can be determined. Judging from the band features in Fig.2, the AECF contains alcohol/phenols, primary amines, aldehydes, alkanes, alkenes, sulfoxide and halogen compounds. Ramamurthy and Kennan (2007)40 reported that, FT-IR spectrum is able to predict the phytoconstituents in calotropis gigantea.
The obtained spectrum reveals some chemical constituents in the extract. Furthermore, similar type of studies demonstrated the possibility of spectroscopic techniques in identification of phytochemicals and also to screen the active phytoconstituents with therapeutic values 31, 32, 41. It is most noteworthy that the application of the FTIR spectrum, has the particular advantages of being fast and effective, is easy to operate and allows for easier replication for an analysis of the extract; which is especially important in the field of traditional medicines 41. Taken together, with information of spectral bands obtained from UV-Vis and FTIR, makes spectroscopy an effective tool for the detection and identification of compounds.
FIG. 1: UV-VIS SPECTRA OF AECF EXTRACT.
FIG.2: INFRARED SPECTRUM OF AECF EXTRACT
TABLE 1: CHARACTERISTIC INFRARED BANDS OF AECF EXTRACT.
SI.No | Wave numbers (cm-1) | Assignment | Functional group |
1 | 3423.06 | O-H stretch (Intermolecular bonded) | Alcohol/Phenols |
2 | 3396.57 | N-H Stretching | Primary amine |
3 | 2960.43, 2920.78 & 2848.50 | C-H stretching
Methyl symmetric/Asymmetric stretch |
Alkanes
Aldehydes |
4 | 1633.73 | C-H bending, Monosubstituted (overtone) | Alkenes |
5 | 1464.90 | C-H bending
Methylene Scissors |
Alkanes |
6 | 1409.30 | O-H bending | Alcohol |
7 | 1256.44 | C-O stretching | Alkenes |
8 | 1070.30 | S=O stretching | Sulfoxide |
9 | 921.19, | C=C bending, Monosubstituted | Alkenes |
10 | 867.97 817.91 & 778.37 | C-H out of plane bending, Methylene rocking | Alkanes |
11 | 720.77 | C=C bending | Alkanes |
12 | 623.74 | C-X stretching (X=F, Cl, Br, or I) | Halogen compounds |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC): Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are considered the ‘gold standard’ for determining the susceptibility of organisms to antimicrobials and are therefore used to judge the performance of all other methods of susceptibility testing 42. The MIC assay is a quantitative method, attributed to the least nominal amount of test compound able to inhibit any visible microbial growth. The antibacterial activity as MIC value of AECF against tested bacteria was represented in Table 2. The MIC of AECF was 75µg/ml against Enterococcus faecalis, whereas 2µg/ml for Klebsiella pneumoniae. Then Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli had highest value (500µg/ml), which was indicated by abundant bacterial growth in the tube. Habib and Karim, (2009) 27 reported the antibacterial activity of Calotropis gigantea flower. Bactericidal activity may be credited to plant bioactive compounds to make complex with bacterial cell wall and thus inhibiting the microbial growth 43. Studies demonstrated that, crude plant extracts exhibit maximum antibacterial activities against gram positive bacteria than gram negative bacteria 33, 44, 45. This may be due to structural variations observed in the bacterial cell membrane and cytoplasmic components between Gram-positiveand Gram-negative bacteria 46. However, in the present study, the flower extract inhibitedboth Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria equally. Furthermore, the bactericidal activity doesn’t depend on only phenolic compounds 47 but may possibly be strengthened by different functional groups. Taken together, our results suggest that AECF is capable of inhibiting the bacterial growth and may possibly be functional for fortifying of potential antimicrobial agents. Streptomycin used as standard and showed better MIC values against tested bacteria.
TABLE 2: THE MIC VALUES OF AECF EXTRACT
Bacteria | Staphylococcus aureus | Enterococcus faecalis | Escherichia coli | Klebsiella pnumoniae |
Calotropis gigantea flower extract (µg/mL) | 500 | 75 | 500 | 2 |
Streptomycin (Standard, µg/mL) | 3.75 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
MTT assay:
For the investigation of anticancer property of AECF, MTT assay is considered as necessary and suitable tool. Enzyme-based methods using MTT rely on a reductive coloring reagent and dehydrogenase in a viable cell to determine cell viability with a colorimetric method. This method is far superior, because it is easy-to-use, safe, has a high reproducibility, and is widely applied in cell viability tests. Thus, this method is suited to screen the anticancer property of the extract. In the present study, we investigate the viability test to evaluate the live or death of HeLa cancerous cells. The observations of the MTT based assay performed on HeLa cell line are represented graphically in Fig. 3. The bars in the graph represent the percent viability of cells caused after incubation with the extract. The extract showed less viability against HeLa cell line. The results indicated that even higher concentration of AECF has less effect on HeLa cancer cells. However, the extract was capable of inhibiting bacterial growth but showed less activity on HeLa cancerous cells. This may be attributed; the phytoconstituents present in the extract are not capable of inhibiting the HeLa cancerous cells and thus showed less activity. This may clearly elucidate that extract showing bactericidal activity could not be an anticancer agent. In-vivo studies reported that, the principle compounds of Calotropis gigantea flower showed potent anti-cancer activity 28 but reports on the in-vitro experiments are rare. Further, we have also compared the effect of 5-fluorouracil, a pyrimide analog anticancer compound on HeLa cancer cells. Results showed a decrease in cell viability. As 5-fluorouracil is a purified compound compared to aqueous ethanolic crude extract of Calotropis gigantea flower, a direct comparison of effective dosage between extract cannot be evaluated 48. Taken together, in the present study AECF cannot exhibit remarkable anticancer property.
As aqueous ethanolic crude extracts of Calotropis gigantea has been used in the study, deciding dosage of effective compounds responsible for the bactericidal activity is difficult. However, identification of active compound possessing antibacterial effect will be of great therapeutic value. Though, the present study offers proof of preliminary evidence that a Calotropis gigantea flower, which is commonly available worldwide, showed antibacterial effect but not be a remarkable in anticancer properties. The study open avenues for further research in purifying the compounds from aqueous ethanolic extract and to screen their efficacy.
FIG.3: PERCENT CELL VIABILITY OF HELA CELLS AFTER TREATMENT WITH AQUEOUS ETHANOLIC EXTRACT OF CALOTROPIS GIGANTEA FLOWER. 5-FLUOROURACIL IS USED AS POSITIVE CONTROL. THE DATA REPRESENT THE MEAN OF TRIPLICATES
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that, extract prepared from Calotropis gigantea flower encompass rich source of Phenolic compounds. With regards to functional group of compounds, the flower extract showed the presence of alcohol/phenols, primary amines, aldehydes, alkanes, alkenes, sulfoxide and halogen compounds. All the findings of the present study warrant further research wherein Calotropis gigantea flowers need to be a further experimental analysis, for the evaluation of a potential drug in the treatment of bacterial diseases, but this work proposes the beneficial aspects of medicinal plant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The authors would like to thank the Director, University Science Instrumentation Centre (USIC), Karnatak University, Dharwad for giving permission to spectroscopic studies. A special gratitude and grateful acknowledgement for the Director, Basic Science Research Centre (BSRC), Belgavi, Karnataka for giving permission to utilize the laboratory facilities. We also thank to Mr. Vijay Kumar Hebsur and Mr. Jayreddy K Govannavar for their help in the collection of plant material. The special acknowledgement for the financial support of this study from UGC-UPE-FAR-1(37-245/2009(SR)) programme fellowship.
REFERENCES:
- Yakut Bint-e-Sadek, Naiyyum Choudhury and Mohammad Shahriar: Biological Investigations of the Leaf Extracts of Carissa Carandas. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Technology 2013; 5: 97-105.
- Sakarkar Dand Deshmukh V: Ethnopharmacological review of traditional medicinal plants for anticancer activity. International Journal of Pharmacyand Technology 2011; 3: 298- 308.
- Sureshkumar P: Phytochemical assessment on various extracts of Calotropis gigantea (L.) R. Br. Through GC-MS. International Journal of pharma and bio sciences 2013; 4(2): (B) 803 – 810.
- Hanyun Youa, Min Lei, Weibin Song, Hu Chena, Yuhui Meng, Dean Guo, Xuan Liu, Lihong Hu: Cytotoxic cardenolides from the root bark of Calotropis gigantea.Steroids 2013;78 :1029–1034.
- Seeka C, Sutthivaiyakit S: Cytotoxic cardenolides from the leaves of Calotropis gigantea. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2010; 58(5): 725-728.
- Lhinhatrakool T and Sutthivaiyakit S: 19-Nor- and 18, 20-epoxy- cardenolides from the leaves of Calotropis gigantea. Journal Natural Products 2006; 69: 1249-1251.
- Pari K, Rao PJ, Devakumar C, Rastogi JN: A novel insect antifeedant nonprotein amino acid from Calotropis gigantea. Journal Natural Products 1998; 61: 102-104.
- Gupta J and Ali M: Rare chemical constituents from Calotropis gigantea Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2000; 62: 29-32.
- Sen S, Sahu NP, Mahato SB: Flavonol glycosides from Calotropis gigantea. Phytochemistry 1992; 31: 2919-2921.
- Shibuya H, Zhang R, Park JD, Back NI, Takeda Y, Yoshikawa M: Chemical structures of Calotroposides C, D, E, F and G, five additional new oxypregnane-oligoglycosides from the root of Calotropis gigantea (Asclepiadaceae). Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1992; 40: 2647-2653.
- Kitagawa I, Zhang RS, Park JD, Baek NI, Takeda Y, Yoshikawa M: Indonesian medicinal plants. I. Chemical structures of Calotroposides A and B, two new Oxypregnane-Oligoglycosides from the root of Calotropis gigantea (Asclepiadaceae). Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1992; 40: 2007-2013.
- Zhu-Nian W, Mao-Yuan W, Wen-Li M, Zhuang H, Hao-Fu D: A new cytotoxic pregnanone from Calotropis gigantea. Molecules 2008; 13: 3033-3039.
- Mueen AKK, Rana AC, Kixit VK: Calotropis species (Asclepiadaceae)-A comprehensive review. Pharmacognosy Magazine 2005; 1: 48-52.
- Singh S, Bharti N, Chugh M, Naqvi F, Azam A: Activity of extracts and procesterol from Calotropis gigantea against Entamoeba histolytica. Natural Product Communications 2010; 5(6): 867-8.
- Habib MR, Nikkon F, Rahman M, Haque ME, Karim MR: Isolation of stimasterol and β-sitosterol from methanolic extract of root bark of Calotropis gigantea (Linn). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2007; 10: 4174-4176.
- Rathod, Nanu R. Chitme, Havagiray R. Irchhaiya, Raghuveer Chandra, Ramesh: Hypoglycemic effect of Calotropis gigantea leaves and flowers in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Oman Medical Journal 2011; 26, 2: 104-108.DOI 10. 5001/omj.2011.26
- Adak M and Gupta JK: Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Calotropis gigantea (AKANDA) in several biological systems. Nepal Medical College Journal 2006; 8:156–161.
- Chitme HR, Chandra R, Kaushik S: Studies on anti-diarrhoeal activity of Calotropis gigantea Br. in experimental animals. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2004; 7:70–75
- Chitme HR, Chandra R, Kaushik S: Evaluation of antipyretic activity of Calotropis gigantea (Asclepiadaceae) in experimental animals. Phytotherapy Research 2005; 19:454–456.
- Argal A and Pathak AK: CNS activity of Calotropis gigantea Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2006; 106:142–145.
- Lodhi G, Singh HK, Plant KK, Hussain Z: Hepatoprotective effects of Calotropis gigantea extract against Carbon tetrachloride induced liver injury in rats. Acta Pharmaceutica 2009; 59: 89-96.
- Deshmukh PT, Fernandes J, Atul A, Toppo E: Wound healing activity of Calotropis gigantea root bark in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2009; 125(1): 178-81.
- Rathod NR, Raghuveer I, Chitme HR, Chandra R: Free radical scavenging activity of Calotropis gigantea on streptozotocin- induced diabetic rats. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2009; 71(6): 615-21.
- Rahuman AA, Bagavan A, Kamaraj C, Saravanan E, Zahir AA, Elango G: Efficacy of larvicidal botanical extracts against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitology Research 2009; 104(6): 1365-72.
- Chetty M, Sivaji K, Rao KT: Flowering plants of Chittor district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Tirupati (India): Student offset printers, First Edition 2008.
- Pathak AK and Argal A: Analgesic activity of Calotropis gigantea Fitoterapia 2007; 78: 40-42.
- MR Habib and MR Karim: Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activity of Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate and Anhydrosophoradiol-3-acetate Isolated from Calotropis gigantea (Linn.) Flower. Mycobiology 2009; 37(1):31-36.
- Muhammad Rowshanul Habib, Muhammad Abdul Aziz, Muhammad Rezaul Karim: Inhibition of Ehrlich’s ascites carcinoma by ethyl acetate extract from the flower of Calotropis gigantea in mice. Journal of Applied Biomedicine 2010; 8:47–54, DOI 10.2478/v10136-009-0007-7.
- Habib, Muhammad R. Karim, Muhammad R: Effect of anhydrosophoradiol-3-acetate of Calotropis gigantea (Linn.) flower as antitumoric agent against Ehrlich's ascites carcinoma in mice. Pharmacological Reports 2013; 65: 761-767.
- Huleihel, Mahmoud Pavlov, Valentina Erukhimovitch, Vitaly: The use of FTIR microscopy for the evaluation of anti-bacterial agents activity. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 2009; 96: 17–23.
- Muniswamy David and Gururaja Karekalammanavar: Spectrographic analysis and in vitro study of antibacterial, anticancer activity of aqueous ethanolic fruit extract of Carissa carandas Journal of Advanced Scientific Research 2015; 6(3): 10-13.
- Geethu MG, Suchithra PS, Kavitha CH, Aswathy JM, Dinesh Babu, K Murugan: Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of different solvent extracts of water hyacinth (eichhornia crassipes mart Solms.) an allopathic approach. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 3(6): 1256-1266.
- Yin Wei Mak, Li Oon Chuah, Rosma Ahmad, Rajeev Bhat: Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of hibiscus (Hibiscus rosa-sinensis) and Cassia (Senna bicapsularis L.) flower extracts. Journal of King Saud University – Science 2013;25: 275–282.
- Pranay Dogra: Study of Antibacterial and Anticancer Activity of Selected Trifoliate Plants. Biofrontiers 2009; 1: 2, 4-8.
- Barbara Stuart: Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley & Sons (UK) 2004.
- Maleki S, Seyyednejad SM, Damabi NM, Motamedi H: Antibacterial activity of the fruits of Iranian torilis leptophylla against some clinical pathogens. Pakistan Journal of Biological sciences 2008; 11:1286-1289.
- Reiner, R: Antibiotics- An Introduction, F. Hoffman La Roche and Co., Basle, Switzerland 1982.
- Selvakumaran M, Pisarcik DA, Bao R, Yeung AT, Hamilton TC: Enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity by disturbing the nucleotide excision repair pathway in ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Research 2003; 63: 1311–1316.
- Yasantha Athukorala, Kil-Nam Kim, You-Jin Jeon: Antiproliferative and antioxidant properties of an enzymatic hydrolysate from brown alga, Ecklonia cava. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2006; 44; 1065–1074.
- Ramamurthy N and Kennan S: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of a plant (Calotropis gigantea Linn) from an Industrial Village, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu, India. Romanian Journal of Biophysics 2007; 17 (4): 269-276.
- Yew Keong Choonga, Su-Qin Sunb, Qun Zhoub, Zakiah Ismaila, Badrul Amini Abdul Rashida, Jia-Xun Taob:Determination of storage stability of the crude extracts of Ganoderma lucidum using FTIR and 2D-IR spectroscopy. Vibrational Spectroscopy 2011; 57:87–96.
- Jennifer M Andrews: Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2001; 48: 5-16.
- Cowan MM: Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1999; 12:564–82.
- Kabuki T, Nakajima H, Arai M, Ueda S, Kuwabara Y, Dosako S: Characterization of novel antimicrobial compounds from mango (Mangifera indica L) kernel seeds. Food Chemistry 2000; 71:61–66.
- Tian F, Li B, Ji B, Yang J, Zhang G, Chen Y, Luo Y: Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of consecutive extracts from Galla chinensis: the polarity affects the bioactivities. Food Chemistry 2009; 113: 173–179.
- Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S: The bacterial cell envelope Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2, 2010.
- Sumaira Sahreen, Muhammad Rashid Khan, Rahmat Ali Khan and Taibi Ben Hadda: Evaluation of phytochemical content, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and antitumor activities of extract from Rumex hastatus Don roots.BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2015; 15:211.
- Mrinal Srivastava, Mahesh Hegde, Kishore K, Chiruvella, Jinsha Koroth, Souvari Bhattacharya, Bibha Choudhary and Sathees C. Raghavan: Sapodilla Plum (Achrassapota): Induces Apoptosis in Cancer Cell Lines and Inhibits Tumor Progression in Mice.Scientific Reports 2014; 4:6147. DOI: 10.1038/srep06147
How to cite this article:
Gururaja K and David M: Spectroscopic Signature, Antibacterial and Anticancer Properties of Calotropis Gigantea (Linn.) Flower. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2016; 7(4): 1686-93.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(4).1686-93.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
38
1686-93
380
1227
English
IJPSR
K. Gururaja and M. David*
Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Molecular Biology, Department of PG studies in Zoology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka - 580003, India
mdavid.kud@gmail.com
09 October, 2015
03 February, 2016
20 February, 2016
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(4).1686-93
01 April, 2016