STABILITY INDICATING METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF REVERSE PHASE ULTRA-FAST LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE AND METFORMIN HCL IN BULK AND TABLET DOSAGE FORM
HTML Full TextSTABILITY INDICATING METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF REVERSE PHASE ULTRA-FAST LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE AND METFORMIN HCL IN BULK AND TABLET DOSAGE FORM
Majukar Suryamala Maruti, Palled Mahesh Shivabasappa *, Mahendra Kumar Chouhan, Tirodkar Chaitali Uday, Shailendra Suryawanshi Sanjay and Sunil Satyappa Jalalpure
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, K. L. E College of Pharmacy, Belagavi , Karnataka, India.
ABSTRACT: A RP-UFLC method was developed &validated for simultaneous estimation of Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformin HCl in bulk and tablet dosage form. Separation was achieved by using Phenomenex Luna C18 (150 × 4.6mm, 5µm) column. The mobile phase comprises MeOH: Phosphate Buffer of pH 7 using Triethylamine in the ratio (60:40v/v). The flow rate was 0.6ml/min at temperature 300C. The instrument used for UFLC was Shimadzu autosampler separation model LC 20AD. Quantification was achieved with UV detection using a photodiode array detector at 258nm wavelength. The injection volume was 20µl. The retention times of Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl were found to be 7.027 & 2.802, respectively. The linearity range of Sitagliptin Phosphate was 50-100µg/ml & Metformin HCl was 10-60µg/ml. The correlation coefficient was found to be within limits, i.e., 0.999. The % purity of Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl was found to be 101.99% and 101.73%. LOD values were found to be 2.21437 for Sitagliptin Phosphate & 1.99084 for Metformin HCl and LOQ values were found to be 6.71024 for Sitagliptin Phosphate & 6.03286 for Metformin HCl. % RSD of both the drugs were found within the acceptance criteria, i.e., ˂2. Forced degradation studies were also performed to check the stability of the drugs under acidic, basic, oxidation, thermal, photolytic conditions.
Keywords: Sitagliptin phosphate, Metformin HCl, RP-UFLC, Validation, Force degradation
INTRODUCTION:
UFLC: (Ultra-Fast Liquid Chromatography): Ultrafast liquid chromatography (UFLC) is a new revolution in chromatography. UFLC is ten times faster & three times better separation than other conventional liquid chromategraphy. UFLC is a derivative of UPLC.
UFLC gives speed that is ten times faster and separation that is three times better than UPLC. So that’s why the state of being the importance of UFLC is called prominence UFLC, which provides excellent speed and low system backpressure. It is based on high analysis precision & reliability.
Drug Description:
Sitagliptin Phosphate: Sitagliptin increases insulin production and decreases hepatic glucose overproduction. Sitagliptin prolongs the action of GLP-1 and GIP. By enhancing active incretin levels, sitagliptin increases insulin production and lowers glucagon secretion from alpha cells, which decreases hepatic glucose overproduction.
FIG. 1: CHEMICALLY IT IS CALLED AS (3R)-3-AMINO - 1 - [3 - (TRIFLUOROMETHYL) - 6, 8-DIHYDRO-5H [1, 2, 4] TRIAZOLO [4,3-A]PYRAZIN-7-YL]-4-(2,4,5-TRIFLUOROPHENYL)BUTAN-1-ONE.
Metformin HCl: Metformin is a biguanide derivative, it decreases the blood glucose levels by decreasing the hepatic glucose production ,decreases the intestinal absorption of glucose and increasing insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization.
The literature survey stated that there are many analytical methods available for Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl alone and in combination with each other and other combinations. But only RP-HPLC and other methods have been reported for simultaneous estimation of Sitagliptin & Metformin HCl. The objective of the work is to develop an RP-UFLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl.
To validate the RP-UFLC method according to ICH guidelines like specificity, system suitability, precision, linearity, accuracy, assay, robustness, ruggedness, etc.
FIG. 2: CHEMICALLY, IT IS CALLED AS 1-CARBAMIMIDAMIDO - N, N-DI-METHYL METHAN IMIDAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
MATERIALS & METHODS:
Chemicals and Reagents: Potassium Dihydrogen Orthophosphate (AR Grade), Milliporewater, Triethylamine, Ortho Phosphoric Acid, Aceto-nitrile, Methanol (HPLC Grade).
Drug Samples: Sitagliptin phosphate has a potency of 99.98%, was procured from Dr. Reddy’s laboratory, and Metformin hydrochloride having a potency 99.97% was procure from FDC LMT Verna Goa.
Instruments used: A UFLC- Shimadzu instrument & Lab solution software was used. Separation was achieved on column Luna C18 (150 × 4.6mm, 5µ). The autosampler Prominent-LC 20AD injector with reciprocating pump.
PDA detector was used. The weighing balance was used was unibloc & Ultrasonicator was branson-1800. The UV-Spectrophotometer used were UV-1800 Shimadzu with 1mm matched quartz cells integrated with UV probe 2.3.2 software was used for measuring the absorbance of Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl respectively.
Methodology:
Diluent: By performing solubility and literature survey, Sitagliptin phosphate and Metformin hydrochloride are both soluble in water, methanol, and acetonitrile. So that water and mobile phase was used as a binary diluent.
Preparation of Buffer: 2.873 grams of Potassiumdihydrogenortho phosphate was weighed and transferred to 1000ml Millipore water in 1000ml of beaker. The pH was adjusted using triethylamine and filter by using 0.2 µ nylon filter and degassing for 10min.
Preparation of Mobile Phase: Phosphate buffer (pH 7) +MeOH in a ratio 40:60and filter through 0.2µ nylon filter and degassing for 10 min.
Preparation of Standard Solution of Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl: Accurately weighed 10mg of pure drug in 10ml of volumetric flask add 10ml of Millipore water dissolve and sonicate for 5min to get 1000µg/ml stock solution of Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformin HCl.
Preparation of Working Standard Solution: From standard solution 0.5ml of Sitagliptin Phos-phate and 0.1ml of Metformin HCl solution was pipetted out into 10ml volumetric flask & made up with the diluent to get the concentration of 50µg/ml of Sitagliptin & 10µg/ml Metformin solution.
Preparation of Sample Stock Solution: Twenty tablets were weighed and crushed to a fine powder. Tablet powder equivalent to 50mg sitagliptin phosphate and 500mg of metformin hydrochloride was taken and dissolve in 50ml Millipore water sonicated for 30 min to get 1000µg/ml of Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformin HCl.
Preparation of Sample Working Standard Solution: From the above sample stock solution 0.5ml of Sitagliptin Phosphate and 0.1ml of Metformin HCl were pipetted out into 10ml volumetric flask & made up with a diluent to get 50µg/ml of Sitagliptin Phosphate& 10µg/ml Metformin HCl.
Method Development: The mobile phase was chosen after several trials to reach the optimum stationary/mobile phase matching. The flow rate is 0.6ml / min. The retention times under the conditions described were 2.803 min, 7.027 min for Metformin HCl and Sitagliptin Phosphate, respectively Table 1 and Fig. 3.
TABLE 1: OPTIMISE METHOD
Mobile phase | Phosphate buffer (pH 7) : MeOH (40:60) |
Diluent | Binary diluent -Water and mobile phase |
Column | Luna C18 (150 × 4.6mm, 5µm) |
Pressure | 115kgf/c |
Temperature | 30 OC |
Flow rate | 0.6ml/min |
Injection volume | 20µl |
UV Wavelength | 258nm |
FIG. 3: OPTIMISE CHROMATOGRAM
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
Method Validation:
Linearity: The linearity was determined by preparing serial dilutions 6 concentrations of standard stock solutions each in triplicate. Average area was calculated and graph was plotted by taking average peak area vs concentration (μg/ml). The linearity range was found to be 50-100μg/mL for Sitagliptin Phosphate and 10-60μg/mL for Metformin HCl. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.999 for both drugs.
Specificity: The specificity of the UFLC method was demonstrated by interference check by injecting the diluent blank and placebo solution to determine whether any peak in diluent and placebo solution are co-eluting with the peaks of Metformin HCl and Sitagliptin Phosphate.
Sensitivity: Limit of detection and quantification was calculated by using statistical calculations using the formula:
LOD= 3.3×σ/S &
LOQ= 10×σ/S
Where, σ = standard deviation. S = slope of the calibration curve.
System Suitability: In order to check the suitability of instrument system suitability was performed by injecting 100 µg/ml & 60 µg/ml of Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformin HCl solution in six replicates. Chromatograms were obtained and % RSD was calculated (˂ 2).
Precision: Developed method was found to be precise as the results of intraday and interday was found to be within the acceptance 6. replicates of 100µg/ml and 60µg/ml of Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformin HCl respectively were prepared.
Ruggedness: The ruggedness was performed by a change in instrument and by a change in analyst 6. replicates of 100µg/ml and 60µg/ml of Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformin HCl respectively were prepared and injected. %RSD was found within limits.
Robustness: It was performed by a slight change in conditions such as flow rate, wavelength, temperature, pH. % RSD was calculated it was less than 2.
Assay: Assay was carried out using the following formula.
Area of Sample × Std Weight × Dilution Factor × Percentage Purity × 100 % Area of Std × Dilution Factor × Sample Weight × 100
Average Weight of 20 Tablets (Janumet 50/500) = 709.427mg. Equivalent Weight = 50mg of Sitagliptin Phosphate & = 500mg of Metformin HCl.
Accuracy: Accuracy was performed in three levels 50%, 100%, and 150%. The mean value was calculated. % Recovery was found within limits.
TABLE 2: LINEARITY DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE & METFORMIN HCL
Sitagliptin Phosphate | Metformin HCl | ||
Conc(µg/ml) | Peak Area | Conc(µg/ml) | Peak Area |
50 | 349492 | 50 | 349492 |
60 | 394322 | 60 | 394322 |
70 | 436655 | 70 | 436655 |
80 | 486740 | 80 | 486740 |
90 | 523553 | 90 | 523553 |
100 | 573628 | 100 | 573628 |
FIG. 4: LINEARITY GRAPH OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE
FIG. 5: LINEARITY GRAPH OF METFORMIN HCL
FIG. 6: CHROMATOGRAM OF PLACEBO SOLUTION
TABLE 3: SENSITIVITY DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE & METFORMIN HCL
Sample | LOD | LOQ |
Sitagliptin Phosphate | 2.214379 | 6.71024 |
Metformin HCl | 1.990846 | 6.032867 |
TABLE 4: SYSTEM SUITABILITY DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN
S. no. | Metformin HCl | Sitagliptin Phosphate | ||||||
Injection | RT (min) | USP plate count | Tailing | Peak area | RT (min) | USP plate count | Tailing | Peak area |
1 | 2.799 | 2409.4 | 1.635 | 602397 | 7.219 | 4552.5 | 1.479 | 714529 |
2 | 2.799 | 2413.5 | 1.63 | 602677 | 7.198 | 4579.5 | 1.472 | 714478 |
3 | 2.807 | 2419.9 | 1.631 | 601656 | 7.194 | 4555.2 | 1.476 | 716832 |
4 | 2.803 | 2418.8 | 1.65 | 602240 | 7.167 | 4501.5 | 1.475 | 715301 |
5 | 2.794 | 2413.7 | 1.645 | 600346 | 7.17 | 4517.8 | 1.477 | 715961 |
6 | 2.804 | 2425.8 | 1.636 | 600262 | 7.168 | 4497.9 | 1.472 | 711948 |
%RSD | 0.1643 | 0.2409 | 0.4875 | 0.1754 | 0.2944 | 0.7304 | 0.1889 | 0.2343 |
TABLE 5: PRECISION DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN
Conditions | Intraday Precision | Interday Precision | ||||
1st H | 2nd H | 3rd H | 1st Day | 2nd Day | 3rd Day | |
Area of Metformin | 656272.3 | 577507 | 578344 | 561045.8 | 578798.3 | 637804 |
%RSD of Metformin | 1.040551 | 0.200099 | 0.660399 | 0.742175 | 1.296464 | 1.10949 |
Area of Sitagliptin | 760832.8 | 768765.2 | 766314.3 | 773055.5 | 730710.7 | 735145.7 |
% RSD of Sitagliptin | 0.123362 | 0.524053 | 0.343098 | 0.602975 | 0.142768 | 0.231653 |
TABLE 6: RUGGEDNESS DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN
Conditions | Peak Area | %RSD | ||
Metformin | Sitagliptin | Metformin | Sitagliptin | |
Change in analyst | 563680.5 | 781241.2 | 0.114845 | 0.570576 |
Change in instrument | 601596.3 | 714841.5 | 0.175452 | 0.234322 |
TABLE 7: ROBUSTNESS DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN
Conditions
|
Peak area | %RSD | Peak area | %RSD |
Metformin HCl | Sitagliptin Phosphate | |||
pH (7.04) | 564123 | 1.647324 | 741509.5 | 0.154173 |
Wavelength (259nm) | 441351.8 | 0.529722 | 657200.3 | 0.167715 |
Temperature (25 ℃) | 577103 | 1.57225 | 740701.2 | 0.05159 |
Flow rate (0.62ml/min) | 544265 | 0.15896 | 757827 | 0.190395 |
TABLE 8: ASSAY DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE & METFORMIN HCL
S. no. | Sitagliptin Phosphate | Metformin HCl | ||
Injection | Area | RT | Area | RT |
1 | 797703 | 7.040 | 599291 | 2.784 |
2 | 797194 | 7.034 | 588564 | 2.790 |
3 | 794188 | 7.037 | 590219 | 2.784 |
Average | 796381 | 592691.3 | ||
% Assay | 101.99 | 592691.3 |
TABLE 9: ACCURACY DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE & METFORMIN HCL
Accuracy data of Sitagliptin Phosphate | |||||
Levels | Std Conc | Sample Conc | Recovered Amount | Peak Area | % Recovery |
50% | 50 | 25 | 74.81 | 541222 | 100.2% |
100% | 50 | 50 | 105.20 | 568223 | 105.2% |
150% | 50 | 75 | 134.15 | 579684 | 107.32% |
Accuracy data of Metformin HCl | |||||
Levels | Std Conc | Sample Conc | Recovered Amount | Peak Area | % Recovery |
50% | 20 | 10 | 29.98 | 474849 | 99.95 |
100% | 20 | 20 | 41.07 | 487887 | 102.69 |
150% | 20 | 30 | 52.76 | 501395 | 105.54 |
Stability: Stability of drugs was checked by bench and freeze conditions at 24 and 74 h.
TABLE 10: STABILITY DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE AND METFORMIN HCL
Conditions | Sitagliptin Phosphate | Metformin HCl | ||||
Bench | Average | Std. dev | %RSD | Average | Std. dev | %RSD |
24H | 620676 | 658.3102 | 0.106063 | 576757 | 5829.891 | 1.010806 |
72H | 617559 | 4942.203 | 0.800281 | 575482 | 9817.605 | 1.705978 |
Freeze | ||||||
24H | 715959 | 8447.873 | 1.179938 | 614132 | 6347.971 | 1.033649 |
72H | 722819 | 2503.407 | 0.346339 | 612552 | 8676.739 | 1.416491 |
Force Degradation: Degradation was carried out in 5 different stress conditions like acidic, basic, oxidation, photolytic, thermal conditions at 60-80 ℃ in the water bath & in reflux condition. The limit of forced degradation is 5-20%.
Initial area - Final area % Initial area × 100
TABLE 11: DEGRADATION DATA OF SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE AND METFORMIN HCL
Study | Sitagliptin Phosphate | Metformin HCl | ||||
Initial | Final | %Degradation | Initial | Final | %Degradation | |
Acidic | 741061 | 658313 | 11.16% | 562103 | 501321 | 10.81% |
Basic | 733196 | 628091 | 14.33% | 572131 | 520066 | 9.10% |
Thermal | 739096 | 600435 | 18.76% | 579311 | 517916 | 10.59% |
Oxidative | 749101 | 637864 | 14.84% | 559991 | 507084 | 9.44% |
Photolytic | 740866 | 601004 | 18.87% | 562523 | 507079 | 9.85% |
FIG. 7: ACIDIC DEGRADATION
FIG. 8: BASIC DEGRADATION
FIG. 9: THERMAL DEGRADATION
FIG. 10: OXIDATIVE DEGRADATION
FIG. 11: PHOTOLYTIC DEGRADATION
CONCLUSION: In the present investigation, a simple, sensitive, precise and accurate RP-UFLC method for simultaneous estimation of Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl was developed and validated as per ICH guideline & stability study displayed that techniques were helpful in monitoring drug stability & conjointly could also be applied for routine analysis in research institutions, in quality control division of pharmaceutical industries. Both the drugs were resolved on Luna 5u C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 5µm) column using MeOH: Phosphate buffer (pH7) using triethylamine. Flow rate 0.6ml/min. UV detection was performed at 258nm. Assay of resulting formulation shows within limits i. e. 90-110. Hence, it is concluded that developed method are suitable for simultaneous estimation of Sitagliptin Phosphate & Metformin HCl.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The authors are thankful to Principal Dr. S. S. Jalalpure and Former Principal Dr. BM Patil and Vice Principal Dr. MB Patil, Dr. Shankar G. Alegaon, Professor and Head Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, KLE College of Pharmacy, Belagavi for providing necessary facility, support and guidance to carry out present research work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: There is no conflict of interest in the work presented in the manuscript.
REFERENCES:
- Kar A: Pharmaceutical Drug Analysis. 2nd New Delhi New Age International Publishers; 2005.
- Kemp W: Organic Spectroscopy. 3rd Macmillan Education UK 1991: 243-83.
- Sethi PD: High performance Liquid Chromatography-Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Fomulations.1st CBS publishers and distributors, New Delhi 2001: 3: 201.
- Basuri TS, Sheth P, Prajapati P and Modi V: UFLC (Ultra-Fast Liquid Chromatography): A new revolution in liquid chromatography. IJIPSR 2016; 4(4): 456-69.
- Patil TS, Ahirrao AR and Pawar PS: A short review on method validation. JPBS 2017; 5(4): 30-7.
- https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB01261
- https://www.drugbank.ca/salts/DBSALT000114
- Kavitha D, Sahoo SK, Venkateswara Rao P, Nagamani M and Bhagyalaxmi CH: Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for determination Metformin and Sitagliptin in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. JAPR 2017; 5(2): 34-39.
- Adsul S, Bidkar JS, Harer S and Dama GY: RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation for Metformin and Sitagliptin in bulk and tablet formulation. IJCR 2018; 11(11): 428-35.
- Kumar KP, Kavitha M, Patro S, Bhavya CH and Kantibag A: Development and validation of new analytical method for the simultaneous estimation of Metformin and Sitagliptin in bulk and dosage form by RP-HPLC. WJPR 2017; 6(3): 1691-1700.
- Sirigiri N, Subramanian NS and Reddy NG: Stability indicating method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformin HCl in Tablets by HPLC. IJPSR 2018; 9(10): 4294-02.
- Sheikh AI, Chakole DR and Charde SM: Application of validated HPLC method for degradation study of Sitagliptin and Metformin HCl. IJAPA 2017; 7(2): 21-24.
- Lavanya R and Yunoos MD: Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for the estimation of Sitagliptin Phosphate in bulk and its tablet dosage form. JAPER 2013; 3(4): 475-9.
- Sankar SK, Sythana S, Jhansi A, Shanmugasundharam P and Sumithra M: Development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Sitagliptin and Metformin in pharmaceutical dosge form using RP-HPLC method. International Journal of Production Research 2013; 5(4): 1737-44.
How to cite this article:
Maruti MS, Shivabasappa PM, Chouhan MK, Uday TC, Sanjay SS and Jalalpure SS: Stability indicating method development and validation of reverse phase Ultra Fast Liquid Chromatography method for simultaneous estimation of sitagliptin phosphate and metformin HCL in bulk and tablet dosage form. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(9): 4870-76. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(9).4870-76.
All © 2021 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
31
4870-4876
797 KB
433
English
IJPSR
Majukar Suryamala Maruti, Palled Mahesh Shivabasappa *, Mahendra Kumar Chouhan, Tirodkar Chaitali Uday, Shailendra Suryawanshi Sanjay and Sunil Satyappa Jalalpure
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, K. L. E College of Pharmacy, Belagavi , Karnataka, India.
drpalled@gmail.com
01 July 2020
02 August 2021
07 August 2021
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(9).4870-76
01 September 2021