STUDIES ON EFFECT OF BREWERY WASTE WATER SLUDGE (BWS) ON MORPHOLOGY AND YIELD OF CHILLY (CAPSICUM ANNUM L.) PLANT.
HTML Full TextSTUDIES ON EFFECT OF BREWERY WASTE WATER SLUDGE (BWS) ON MORPHOLOGY AND YIELD OF CHILLY (CAPSICUM ANNUM L.) PLANT.
Ramya*1, T.Srinivas2 and K.Aruna Lakshmi3
Departmentof Environmental Studies, Departmentof Environmental Studies2, Departmentof Biotechnology3,GITAM Institute of Science, GITAM University, Vishakhapatnam, AP, India
ABSTRACT: In an effort to increase yields from a limited area, farmers tend to indiscriminately use more chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The brewery sludge can be directly applied to the soil for the agricultural purposes or it can be composted before utilizing for plant growth. The main objective of the present study is to test the efficacy of the bio-fertilizer in the growth and yield of Chilly Plant. A potted experiment was conducted to evaluate the potential of brewery sludge on different soil chemical properties and growth in chilly plant. The sun dried Brewery sludge was mixed with three different types of soils viz., clay loamy, river sand and red sandy loamy soil in different ratios. Chilly seeds pre incubated in water were sown in earthen pots. There was a significant increase in nitrogen and Potassium concentration in all the three amended soil samples (90%) where as decrease in Phosphate concentration in the amended soils. There was a realistic increase in plant growth in river sand as compared to red sandy loamy soils and clay loamy soils respectively. Heavy metal concentration was recorded below detectable levels which ensure brewery sludge for agricultural application.
Keywords: |
Fertilizer, brewery sludge, chilly, heavy metals
INTRODUCTION: The current global scenario firmly ascertains the need to adopt eco-friendly agricultural practices for sustainable agriculture. In an effort to increase yields from a limited area, farmers tend to indiscriminately use more chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Such activity makes the soil poor of micronutrients and microorganisms. Due to this the soil loses its original structure and texture.
In this scenario there is a need to detoxify the land rejuvenating the soil health. This leads to a high demand for organic fertilizers all over the world. Brewery waste water sludge is the sludge generated in brewing industry with high organic loading in terms of COD and BOD. The malting and brewing industries use large volumes of water and 70% of the intake is discharged as effluent1. Chemical analysis on brewery sludge revealed that it has high N, P, K, volatile fatty acids and nutrients which are important requirement for plant growth2. It also consists of various important organisms like heterotrophic fungi and actinomycetes3. The fertility of the soil can be improved because of the presence of these minerals and organisms4. The brewery sludge can be directly applied to the soil for the agricultural purposes5 or it can be composted before utilizing for plant growth6.
Accordingly, the pre aerobic treatment has been replaced with the Up flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor (UASBR) in the year 2010 with the advantage of not only achieving effluent quality as per central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) norms but 50% reduction in energy demands7. The effluents discharged are found to have high organic and acidic content, which increases the BOD, COD and high organic load in the waste water contributive to dissolved carbohydrates, alcohols, suspended solids, yeast etc, which pollutes the water bodies considerably8.
United Millennium Breweries Ltd located in village Ranasthalam, Srikakulam, A.P was selected for the present study. The industry is manufacturing beer using barley, broken rice and yeast as raw material. The discharge of sludge is in amount of 3l per 1l beer. The present study was taken up to find an alternative method for disposal of brewery sludge.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The BWS (brewery waste sludge) collected from United Millennium Breweries Limited, Srikakulam; Andhra Pradesh was completely sundried to obtain dry substrate and seed germination. Plant growth trials were conducted to evaluate the application of brewery waste water sludge as organic fertilizer. The brewery waste water sludge was amended with clay loamy, river sand and red sandy loamy soil in different proportions along with controls.
Physico-chemical properties analyzed following standard procedures9
¨ pH
¨ Electrical conductivity
¨ Water Retention Capacity
¨ Organic Carbon
¨ Total Nitrogen
¨ Potassium
¨ Phosphates
Biological Oxygen Demand and Chemical Oxygen Demand of brewery waste sludge were analyzed following standard procedures. The brewery waste sludge were analyzed for detection of heavy metals in bio-geo chemicals laboratory, Visakhapatnam.
Germination trials with chilly seeds:
The brewery waste sludge was mixed with clay loamy, river sand and red sandy loamy soil in various ratios. These mixtures were transferred to earthen pots of 500 g capacity. Three seeds of chilly (Capsicum annum L) were sown into each pot. Five replicates were kept for each ratio. The pots were maintained in green house and were watered every day. The pots were maintained for 75 days until the yield was obtained. Different biochemical parameters like plant height, root length, shoot length, plant dry weight and fruit weight were determined for all the combinations.
When the yield was harvested. The plant was carefully removed from the pot along with the soil and kept in tap water; it is washed thoroughly until the soil has been completely removed. Then the plant was completely stretched and the biochemical parameters like plant height, root length, shoot length, dry weight, fruit weight was measured.
Statistical Analysis:
Data on the parameters studied after harvesting the plant (root length, shoot length, plant height, plant dry weight, fruit weight) were subjected to Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) using the MINITAB 14.0 (2009) software package. Means were separated using the Least Significance Difference (LSD) method at 5% level of probability.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: The pH of the brewery sludge was almost neutral. According to Luque et.al. 1990, the pH of the brewery sludge generally range from 6.5 to 11.5. Kanaga chandran and Jayaratne opine that the differences in pH are due to raw water used and certain process variations in wastewater treated plants10. The pH of the clay loamy soil, river sand and red sandy soil were 6.08, 7.51 and 8.08 respectively. Addition of brewery sludge increased the pH of the clay loamy soil (6.08 to 7.60) making it neutral and red sandy soil (8.0 to 9.51) making it alkaline. Contrary to this situation, addition of brewery sludge decreased the pH of the river sand from 8.36 to 7.51 making it almost neutral.
Analysis of selected heavy metals in Brewery sludge suggested that Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd) were present well below the detection levels and the sludge can be safely used for agricultural purposes.
TABLE: 1 PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY METALS IN BREWERY SLUDGE
S.No. | Name of the Heavy Metal | Percentage |
1 | Lead (Pb) | 0.004% |
Nickel (Ni) | 0.0024% | |
Cadmium (Cd) | Traces | |
Mercury (Hg) | Below detectablelevels |
The brewery sludge collected is a rich source of Nitrogen and Potassium and the available Nitrogen and Potassium were very high i.e., 420.25kg/ha and 840.00kg/ha respectively as compared to the three soils.
Contrary to Nitrogen and Potassium increased application of sludge decreased the availability of Phosphorous. These results are in agreement with the conclusions reported by Ahmadi et.al., 11 who reported that application of high N rates decreased the Phosphorous in spinach plants. Phosphorus uptake is in the form of H2Po4 and HPO42 anions. Nitrate increment might have a competitive effect with Phosphate anions and thus cause the inhibition of both anions absorption.
TABLE: 2 REPRESENTATION OF N, P, K, EC, OC, pH IN CLAY LOAMY SOIL AMENDED WITH BREWERY SLUDGE
Amendment inRatios | Available‘N’(Kg/ha) | Available‘P’(Kg/ha) | Available‘K’(Kg/ha) | EC(dynes/cm) | OC(%) | pH | |
1 | 9:1 | 218.10 | 7.87 | 311.20 | 1.220 | 1.56 | 6.68 |
2 | 8:2 | 231.50 | 7.30 | 387.45 | 1.540 | 1.76 | 6.76 |
3 | 7:3 | 262.25 | 6.90 | 413.10 | 1.830 | 1.97 | 6.87 |
4 | 6:4 | 307.15 | 6.75 | 522.25 | 2.700 | 2.13 | 6.92 |
5 | 5:5 | 336.40 | 6.50 | 582.25 | 2.850 | 2.41 | 7.08 |
6 | 4:6 | 385.20 | 6.35 | 643.10 | 2.920 | 2.49 | 7.24 |
7 | 3:7 | 413.10 | 6.20 | 701.20 | 3.310 | 2.65 | 7.36 |
8 | 2:8 | 448.30 | 5.93 | 762.45 | 3.800 | 2.76 | 7.48 |
9 | 1:9 | 467.15 | 5.85 | 820.10 | 4.250 | 2.86 | 7.60 |
10 | Control 1 | 150.10 | 8.62 | 226.20 | 0.304 | 0.85 | 6.08 |
11 | Control 2 | 470.25 | 5.89 | 840.00 | 4.400 | 2.90 | 7.62 |
TABLE: 3 REPRESENTATION OF N, P, K, EC, OC, pH IN RED SANDY LOAMY SOIL AMENDED WITH BREWERY SLUDGE
Amendment in ratio | Available‘N’(Kg/ha) | Available‘P’(Kg/ha) | Available ‘K’(Kg/ha) | EC(dynes/cm) | OC (%) | pH | |
9:1 | 156.75 | 12.09 | 347.20 | 0.613 | 0.41 | 8.19 | |
8:2 | 198.90 | 11.89 | 442.10 | 1.201 | 0.72 | 8.26 | |
7:3 | 224.65 | 10.79 | 496.25 | 1.804 | 1.02 | 8.44 | |
6:4 | 249.40 | 9.84 | 527.10 | 2.540 | 1.41 | 8.64 | |
5:5 | 286.20 | 8.21 | 579.45 | 2.986 | 1.82 | 8.96 | |
4:6 | 303.10 | 7.46 | 639.15 | 3.021 | 2.10 | 9.02 | |
3:7 | 318.15 | 7.71 | 690.50 | 3.342 | 2.32 | 9.31 | |
2:8 | 360.45 | 6.07 | 748.50 | 3.716 | 2.64 | 9.42 | |
1:9 | 410.00 | 6.62 | 791.15 | 4.010 | 2.72 | 9.51 | |
C10(control-soil) | 94.05 | 12.00 | 246.40 | 0.319 | 0.30 | 8.08 | |
C11(control-BWS) | 470.25 | 5.89 | 840.00 | 4.400 | 2.90 | 7.62 |
TABLE: 4 REPRESENTATION OF N, P, K, EC, OC, pH IN RIVER SAND AMENDED WITH BREWERY SLUDGE
Amendment inRatios | Available‘N’(Kg/ha) | Available ‘P’(Kg/ha) | Available‘K’(Kg/ha) | EC(dynes/cm) | OC(%) | pH | |
1 | RS1(9:1) | 188.10 | 11.69 | 246.40 | 0.640 | 0.38 | 8.36 |
2 | RS2(8:2) | 208.80 | 11.02 | 320.17 | 0.941 | 0.67 | 8.32 |
3 | RS3(7:3) | 239.40 | 10.68 | 389.29 | 1.622 | 0.86 | 8.29 |
4 | RS4(6:4) | 282.14 | 10.04 | 468.50 | 1.827 | 1.07 | 8.24 |
5 | RS5(5:5) | 319.26 | 9042 | 543.12 | 2.468 | 1.25 | 8.21 |
6 | RS6(4:6) | 349.04 | 8.66 | 692.45 | 2.892 | 1.46 | 7.91 |
7 | RS7(3:7) | 376.82 | 8.12 | 734.10 | 3.321 | 1.80 | 7.72 |
8 | RS8(2:8) | 412.22 | 7.62 | 765.25 | 3.714 | 2.40 | 7.86 |
9 | RS9(1:9) | 462.08 | 6.88 | 820.00 | 4.022 | 2.60 | 7.78 |
10 | RS10(control-sand) | 125.40 | 6.72 | 67.20 | 0.180 | 0.73 | 7.51 |
11 | RS11(control-BWS) | 470.25 | 5.89 | 840.00 | 4.400 | 2.90 | 7.62 |
The percentage of Organic Carbon of the sludge was 2.90 as compared to 0.85, 0.73 and 0.3 for clay loamy, river sand and red sandy soil respectively. Brewery sludge addition improved the organic carbon content of the three soils significantly and the higher water retention capacity is linked to high Organic Matter, high cation exchange capacity and other nutrients. Erdem and Sozudo 12 have found that brewery sludge amendments improved pH of acidic soils and enhanced the Organic Carbon, exchangeable cations, soluble cations and anions, NH4+, N and N03-. The N content of the amended soil increased as brewery sludge rates increased. Germination studies of chillies revealed increased growth of the plants when compared to that of controls.
However enhanced growth was observed with increasing proportions of brewery sludge up to 40%, 50%, and 60% by volume in clay loamy, river sand and red sandy loamy soils respectively. Further increase in the content of sludge in soils severely retarded seed germination and plant growth vice-versa. There was an increase of 16.21%,15.15%, 14.44% for 40% by volume sludge amended with clay loamy soil, 76.14%, 61.349%, 85.71% for 60% by volume amended with river sand, 13.02%, 35.88%, 71.42% for 50% by volume sludge amended with red sandy loamy soil for plant growth, dry weight and fruit weight respectively. Water retention capacity ranged from
FIG: 1: ILLUSTRATION OF PLANT HEIGHT IN COMPARISON TO CONTROL IN CLAY LOAMY SOIL AMENDED WITH BREWERY SLUDGE
FIG: 2: ILLUSTRATION OF PLANT DRY WEIGHT IN COMPARISON TO CONTROL IN RED SANDY LOAMY SOIL AMENDED WITH BREWERY SLUDGE
FIG: 3: ILLUSTRATION OF FRUIT WEIGHT IN COMPARISON TO CONTROL IN RIVER SAND AMENDED WITH BREWERY SLUDGE
Use of brewery sludge in river sand and red sandy loamy soil has shown significant increase in yields. This suggests that brewery sludge would be a positive input for yield increase in relation to poor and semi arid soils. Cost effectively it is cheaper and easy to apply. Investigations by craft and nelson revealed that compost made with brewery sludge was suppressive against seedling and root diseases caused by the fungus pythium graminicola.
According to Mohimi et.al. 13 land application and use of sludge as a soil conditioner appear to be the most acceptable way to dispose industrial sludge. Brewery sludge, as organic manure, should be regarded as valuable commodity especially in warm arid and semi arid regions particularly where soil fertility depletion and soil degradation are most serious problems. Since the sludge is a rich source of organic manure which is an important property for moisture retention, it can be used to reclaim desert soils.
CONCLUSIONS: A cost effective user friendly technique was developed to convert Brewery sludge into a bio-fertilizer.Bio fertilizer can reduce the need of inorganic fertilizers like NPK and indirectly reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. Brewery sludge which is considered as a waste product can be substituted for fertilizers and nutrients and thereby avoid costly inputs. It would be a boon to small and medium farmers who tend to borrow heavily for costly fertilizers. This would be therefore ameliorate their condition and avoid the dangers of debt trap for farmers of this region.
REFERENCES:
- L Vriens, H. Van Soest and H. Verachtert (1990): Biological Treatment of Malting and Brewing Effluents, Critical reviews in biotechnology, Vol. 10, No. 1, Pages 1-46.
- Mohammad Ajmal, Ahsan Ullah Khan (1996): Effects of brewery effluent on agricultural soil and crop plants, Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological, Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 289-391.
- Craft CM and Nelson EB (1996): Microbial properties of composts that suppress damping –off and root rot of creeping bent grass caused by pythium graminicola, Applied and Environment al Microbiology, vol 5, pp: 1550-1557.
- Luque, O., Bracho, O. and Maier, T.W., Utilization of brewery waste water sludge for soil improvement. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am., 1990, 27(1), 5–9.
- Cihat Kutuk, Gokhan Cayci, Abdullah Baran, O uz Ba Kan and Roger Hartmann (2003): Effects of beer factory sludge on soil properties and growth in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris saccharifera L.), Bio Resource Technology, pp : 75-77.
- Stocks, C., Barker, A. J. and Guy, S., The composting of brew-ery sludge. J. Inst. Brew., 2002, 108(4), 452–458.
- Avinash Kumar Sharda, M.P. Sharma, Sharwan Kumar (2013):Performance Evaluation of Brewery Waste Water Treatment Plant, International Journal of Engineering Practical Research (IJEPR) Volume 2, pp: 105-111.
- Chaitanyakumar, Syeda Azeem Unnisa., Bhupattthi Rao., (2011), Efficiency assessment of Combined Treatment Technologies, Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 1(2):138‐145.Jackson1974; Walkey and Blackwww.icarda.org/publications/labmanualread.hm.
- Kanagachandran. K and Jayaratne. R (2006): Utilization potential of brewery waste water sludge as an organic fertilizer, Journal of Institute of Brewing, vol. 112(2), pp: 92-96.
- Ahmadi Hemmat, Vahid Akbarpour, Farshad Dashti and Abdolati Shojaeian (2010): Effect of different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on yield, nitrate accumulation and several quantitative attributes of five Iranian spinach accessions, vol. 8(4), pp: 468-473.
- Nihal Erdem and Sonay Sozudo RU OK (2002): Effect of brewery sludge amendments on some chemical properties of acid soil in pot experiments, Journal of Bioresource Technology, vol .84, pp: 271-273.
- Mohimi A. O, Ekpo KE and Chukwuedo ME. (2010): Economic importance and application options of some industrial sludge conditioned by different treatment methods, African Journal of Biotechnology, vol 7, pp: 2434-2440.
How to cite this article:
- Ramya, Srinivas T and Lakshmi KA: Studies on Effect of Brewery Waste Water Sludge (Bws) on Morphology and Yield of Chilly (Capsicum Annum L.) Plant.. Int J Pharm Sci Res2015; 6(1): 405-09.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6 (1).405-09.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
51
405-409
617KB
1518
English
IJPSR
N. Ramya *, T. Srinivas and K. Aruna Lakshmi
Deptartment of Environmental Studies. GITAM Institute of Science, GITAM University, Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
ramyananda85@gmail.com
29 May, 2014
19 July, 2014
20 September, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(1).405-09
01 January, 2015