STUDIES ON PENETRATION ENHANCERS IN CORPORATED CREAM OF CLOBETASOL-17-PROPIONATE: DEVELOPMENT AND IN VITRO EVALUATION
HTML Full TextSTUDIES ON PENETRATION ENHANCERS IN CORPORATED CREAM OF CLOBETASOL-17-PROPIONATE: DEVELOPMENT AND IN VITRO EVALUATION
Parveen Kumar* and Rubina Bhutani
Pharmacy Department, Shri Ram College of Pharmacy, Ramba, Karnal, Haryana, India
ABSTRACT: Topical corticosteroids have long been the chronic stage in the treatment of steroid responsive dermatitis. Creams containing 0.05% w/w Clobetasol-17-propionate (CP) as active ingredient are categorized as super potent class I topical dermatological corticosteroids. For the drug molecule to reach the cutaneous microcirculation, enhance, the systemic circulation, have to transverse both the lipophilic stratum cornium and much more viable epidermis. Penetration enhancers are thought to intact with one component of skin causing the stratum cornium to swell or leach out some of the structural component their by increasing the drug penetration to the barrier membrane. The current study was carried out to study the effect of various penetration enhancers such as oleic acid (OA), isopropyl myristate (IPM), polysorbate 80 (PS) and thymol (TM) on topical delivery of Clobetasol-17-propionate (CP) and was evaluated in-vitro using cellophane membrane as well as rat skin mounted in Franz diffusion cell. CP was analyzed spectrophotometrically at 240 nm. The efficiency of penetration enhancers to improvise topical delivery of CP was observed in the order of OA> IPM >PS>TM.
Keywords: |
Topical corticosteroids, Clobetasol-17-propionate, Stratum corneum, in-vitro, Franz diffusion cell
INTRODUCTION: Topical glucocorticoids (TG) are the most frequently prescribed drugs by dermatologists. Their clinical effectiveness in the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis is related to their vasoconstrictive, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative effects. Despite their benefit in the therapy of inflammatory diseases, TG is associated with number of side effects that limit their use1. Most TG is absorbed in quantities that can produce both systemic and topical side effects 2.
One of the approaches to reduce the systemic adverse effects of TG is to enhance their permeability so as to reduce the topically applied dose 3. Several approaches have been attempted, such as iontophoresis, electroporation or the application of penetration enhancers 4-5. However, the use of chemical penetration enhancers is the most widely used approach to increase topical and transdermal delivery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clobetasol-17-propionate was a gift sample from Macleods pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai (Maharashtra), cetomacrogol 1000 purchased from S.D fine Chem. Ltd., Mumbai, cetosteryl alcohol, white soft paraffin, light liquid paraffin purchased from RFCL Limited, New Delhi, propylene glycol, methyl paraben, propyl paraben from Merck & co. Inc, USA, thymol from SAS Chemical co., Mumbai, isopropyl myristate from Central drug house (P) Ltd., New Delhi, oleic acid from Thomas baker Chemical Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, polysorbate 80 purchased from Croda Inc, UK. All the chemicals used in the present study were of analytical grade.
Production of Clobetasol-17- Propionate cream 6:
Preparation of Oil phase: Cetosteryl alcohol was melted in a stainless steel vessel. To this Cetomacrogol 1000 was incorporated and allowed to melt. To the molten mass white soft paraffin and light liquid paraffin were added and were allowed to melt. The temperature of the oil phase was maintained at 65-70oC.
Preparation of Aqueous phase: Water was heated to 70oC. In this accurately weighed methyl paraben and propyl paraben were added and the temperature of the aqueous phase was maintained at 65-70oC.
Development of Drug solution: Propylene glycol in half the quantity to be used in respective formulation was heated up to 60oC. To this CP (0.05 g) were dissolved by frequent stirring the mixture. When the drug was dissolved completely the contents were transferred to the aqueous phase. The vessel was rinsed using the remaining one half of propylene glycol and the rinsing was again added to the aqueous phase developed above.
Development of CP Cream: Oily phase was then slowly incorporated in to the aqueous phase by maintaining the temperature at 60oC for at least 5 minutes. During this period emulsification will take place. Finally the mixture was allowed to cool while homogenizing, in order to obtain a cream. The prepared creams were then filled into the collapsible tubes. The tubes were properly sealed and labeled. These creams were then stored at room temperature away from direct sunlight.
Penetration Enhancer study 7:The present study is carried out to study the effect of various penetration enhancers such as oleic acid, isopropyl myristate, polysorbate 80 and thymol for enhancing the topical delivery of CP.
Evaluation of Cream: Conventional CP creams were evaluated in terms of following parameters:
Physical Characterization: The formulated creams were inspected visually for color, presence of any grittiness and feel. To evaluate the feel, the formulation was put in between the index finger and thumb and grittiness/smoothness was observed manually.
pH Determination 8:The pH of formulated cream was determined using pH meter. 1 g of cream was stirred in distilled water to get a uniform dispersion. Volume was made up to 100 mL. The electrode was immersed in cream distilled water dispersion and readings were recorded on pH meter.
Drug content 8:Each formulation (1g) was taken in a 100 mL volumetric flask, diluted with Ethanol and shaken to dissolve the drug in it. The solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper no. 42. The content of the drug was estimated spectrophotometrically by using standard curve plotted at λmax 240 nm.
Determination of extrudability 9:The apparatus used for extrudability was suitably fabricated in the laboratory. It consists of a wooden block inclined at an angle of 45o fitted with a thin metal strip at one end. While other end was free. The formulations were filled in the collapsible pressed under the influence of varying weight. The extrudability of the formulation was determined in terms of weight in grams required to extrude a 0.5 cm ribbon of cream in 10 seconds. The extrudability of the formulation was determined using the grading system.
Spreadability 9: An apparatus suggested by Multimer et al., (1956) was fabricated in the laboratory and used for the determination of spreadability of cream formulations. The apparatus consists of a wooden block, with a fixed glass slide and movable glass slide with one end tied to weight pan rolled on the pulley, which was in horizontal level with fixed slide. An excess of cream sample 2.5 g was placed between on the ground slide and sandwiched by another glass slides having the same dimensions as that of the fixed ground slide and provided with a hook.
A 1000g weight was placed on slides for 5 minutes to compress the sample to a uniform thickness and excess of the cream scrapped off from the sides. Weight (60g) was added to the pan. The time (seconds) required by top slide to cover a distance of 5 cm was noted. It was calculated using;
S= ml/t.
Where, S -Spreadability in g.cm/sec, m -Weight tied to upper slide, l -Length of glass slide, t -Time in seconds. Length of glass slide was 11.3 cm and weight tied to upper slide was (60g) throughout the experiment.
In-vitro diffusion studies 10:To test the pattern of release of drug from various cream formulations, in vitro diffusion studies were carried out. The developed formulations were subjected to in vitro diffusion studies using Franz diffusion cell. The receptor compartment was filled with a mixture of ethanol and freshly prepared phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4 taken in the ratio of 3:7 respectively. The diffusion cell was covered with a cellophane membrane.
The temperature of the mixture was maintained at 37o±1oC and receptor solution was stirred with a magnetic stirrer at 600 rpm throughout the experiment. Care was taken that no air bubbles should be trapped under the membrane. Aliquots (2 mL) were withdrawn at regular interval of 1 h for a period of 8 h, and replaced with equal volume of freshly prepared ethanol and phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4 mixture equilibrated at 37° ± 1° C. All the samples were suitably diluted with diffusion medium and analyzed spectrophotometrically at 240 nm for Clobetasol 17-propionate content. The percent drug release was calculated for each time interval.
Viscosity and Rheological studies 9:The viscosity of the formulated cream was determined using Brookfield DV II+PRO Viscometer. In a clean and dry 250 mL beaker, take the test sample. Determine the viscosity of the test sample as per standard operating procedure of viscometer by using spindle no. 3 and 4. Viscosity of the sample find out at spindle speed of 0.3, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 rpm for ascending and descending order respectively. Dial reading calculated for the reading of viscosity, shear rate and shear stress.
Data analysis 11: In order to determine the order of drug release and mechanism of drug release the data was treated to different kinetic equations.
Skin irritation test 12-14:The optimized cream formulation was evaluated for skin irritation studies using 15 mice (Grouped in 3 each group having 5 mice). The hair of the dorsal portion was removed applying a hair removal cream and the skin was washed properly one day prior to use.
The area shaved marked by marker for cream application. The application sites were examined for dermal reaction in accordance with draize scoring criteria. The erythema score were given from 0-4 depending upon the degree of erythema as 0- No erythema, 1- Slight erythema (Barely perceptible light pink), 2-Moderte erythema (Dark pink), 3- Moderate to severe erythema (Light red), 4- Severe erythema (Extreme redness)
Stability studies 9:The final formulation was also subjected to 25°C ± 2°C/60 ± 5% RH and 40°C ± 2°C /75 ± 5% RH conditions of temperature and relative humidity during stability studies. Formulation was evaluated for various parameters after one month. The parameters of the creams studied i.e. drug content, In vitro diffusion study, Viscosity and pH.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Clinical effectiveness of Topical glucocorticoids in the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis is related to their vasoconstrictive, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative effects. Topical preparations are used for the localized effects at the site of their application by virtue of drug penetration into the underlying layers of skin or mucous membranes. Topical delivery includes external topical that are spread, sprayed, or otherwise dispersed on to cutaneous tissues to cover the affected area.
The compositions of the cream formulations were shown in table 1. From the result, it is clearly evident that all the formulations showed good extrudability, spreadability, drug content, viscosity and rheology. The physical characteristics were measured according to the methods described in the experimental part above, listen in table 2.
IR studies indicated that no chemical interaction between drug and excipients took place during prepration cream of CP. Drug content of the formulations for Clobetasol-17-propionate were well within the range between 93 % to 108 %. Viscosity of formulation ranged from 15 to 21 KcP. Rheological behavior of the semisolid is essential to achieve spreading, adherence of the skin, removal from containers and release of the drug from the bases. Selected formulation exhibited plastic behavior with thixotropy indicating the high quality of the developed formulation (Table 3 and fig. 2).
The diffusion data of F7 were treated with different kinetic equations to determine the order of release of Clobetasol-17-propionate and the coefficients of correlation (R2). The n- value for formulation F7 was found to be 1.261, indicating that the mechanism of drug release was super case II transport. This was supported by Korsmeyer-Peppas modal. The studied parameters for formulation, different drug release graphs as zero, first, higuchi, and korsmeyer-peppas modal are shown in fig. 3-6. The skin irritation test on mice shown in table 4, found no irritancy. The developed cream formulations were subjected to the stability study as per ICH guidelines for the period of one month. The stability evaluation data were mentioned in table 5. The studied formulations was found to be stable and do not show any loss of drug content, change in % drug release, viscosity and pH.
TABLE 1: VALUE OF PH, PERCENT DRUG CONTENT, VISCOSITY, SPREADABILITY AND EXTRUDABILITY OF FORMULATION F1-F13.
Formulation | pH± S.D. (n=3) | % Drug content | Viscosity (KcP) | Spreadability
±SD (n=3) |
Extrudability | ||
F1 | 6.40±0.057 | 99.31 | 10.37 | 16.89±0.16 | + | ||
F2 | 5.56±0.015 | 96.43 | 16.70 | 21.28±0.07 | + | ||
F3 | 5.40±0.036 | 97.93 | 15.52 | 23.09±0.02 | + | ||
F4 | 6.12±0.106 | 95.32 | 17.11 | 21.55±0.09 | + | ||
F5 | 6.0±0.149 | 98.40 | 13.53 | 18.94±0.04 | + | ||
F6 | 5.80±0.015 | 97.76 | 15.22 | 17.96±0.20 | ++ | ||
F7 | 5.41±0.011 | 99.62 | 14.37 | 23.09±0.13 | +++ | ||
F8 | 5.31±0.005 | 97.58 | 11.20 | 21.35±0.16 | + | ||
F9 | 5.40±0.130 | 93.56 | 13.87 | 20.98±0.21 | + | ||
F10 | 5.34±0.017 | 95.83 | 14.32 | 17.78±0.34 | + | ||
F11 | 5.11±0.011 | 98.31 | 16.30 | 25.17±0.23 | ++ | ||
F12 | 5.52±0.005 | 100.34 | 20.0 | 16.96±0.26 | ++ | ||
F13 | 5.42±0.017 | 97.34 | 12.43 | 15.67±0.24 | ++ |
Poor (+), Good (++), Excellent (+++)
FIGURE 1: DRUG RELEASE PROFILE OF FORMULATION F1 TO F13
TABLE 2: RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF FORMULATION F7
RPM | Shear rate
(sec-1) |
Shear stress
(dynes/cm2) |
RPM | Shear rate
(sec-1) |
Shear stress
(dynes/cm2) |
||
ASCENDING | 0.3 | 0.0285 | 50.810 | DESCENDING | 1.5 | 0.1427 | 62.986 |
0.5 | 0.0475 | 52.531 | 1.0 | 0.0951 | 58.485 | ||
0.6 | 0.057 | 55.827 | 0.6 | 0.0573 | 54.427 | ||
1.0 | 0.0951 | 59.129 | 0.5 | 0.0475 | 51.427 | ||
1.5 | 0.1427 | 63.121 | 0.3 | 0.0285 | 49.797 | ||
2.0 | 0.1902 | 67.358 | 2.0 | 0.1902 | 67.358 |
TABLE 3: DRUG RELEASE DATA ANALYSIS OF FORMULATION F7
Time (h) | % Drug Release | Log
(% release) |
% drug remained | Log (% remained) | √Time | Log time |
0 | 0 | - | 100 | 2.000 | 0.000 | - |
1 | 4.69 | 0.671 | 95.31 | 1.979 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
2 | 10.04 | 1.002 | 89.96 | 1.954 | 1.414 | 0.301 |
3 | 15.78 | 1.198 | 84.22 | 1.925 | 1.732 | 0.477 |
4 | 22.24 | 1.347 | 77.76 | 1.891 | 2.000 | 0.602 |
5 | 30.49 | 1.484 | 69.51 | 1.842 | 2.236 | 0.699 |
6 | 40.53 | 1.608 | 59.47 | 1.774 | 2.449 | 0.778 |
7 | 53.09 | 1.725 | 46.91 | 1.671 | 2.646 | 0.845 |
8 | 65.64 | 1.817 | 34.36 | 1.536 | 2.828 | 0.903 |
FIGURE 2: RHEOGRAM OF FORMULATION F7
FIGURE 3: ZERO ORDER DRUG RELEASE PROFILE OF F7
FIGURE 4: FIRST ORDER DRUG RELEASE PROFILE OF F7
FIGURE 5: HIGUCHI MODEL DRUG RELEASE PROFILE OF F7
FIGURE 6: KORSMEYER-PEPPAS MODEL DRUG RELEASE PROFILE OF F7
TABLE 4: SKIN IRRITATION TEST FOR FORMULATIONS F1, F7 AND PLACEBO.
Mice tail marking | Group I | Group II | Group IV | |||
Test | Draize score | Test | Draize score | Control | Draize score | |
I | F1 | 0 | F7 | 0 | PL | 0 |
II | F1 | 0 | F7 | 0 | PL | 0 |
III | F1 | 0 | F7 | 0 | PL | 0 |
IIII | F1 | 0 | F7 | 0 | PL | 0 |
IIIII | F1 | 0 | F7 | 0 | PL | 0 |
TABLE 5: STABILITY STUDIES OF FORMULATION F7
Parameters | Storage condition F7 | |
25°C/60 % RH | 40°C/75 % RH | |
Drug content (%) | 99.10 | 98.99 |
% Drug release | 65.87 | 64.38 |
Viscosity (KcP) | 14.02 | 14.34 |
pH | 5.40 | 5.38 |
CONCLUSION: Topical cream formulation of Clobetasol-17-propionate (CP) can successfully be prepared using plain CP. Formulation parameters viz. penetration enhancers greatly affect the topical cream formulations of CP. The order of penetration enhancement effect shown by various penetration enhancers used in the current studies are as follows: Oleic acid > Isopropyl myristate > Polysorbate 80 > Thymol
The developed formulation using CP (F7) showed excellent extrudability and spreadability in addition to desirable pH, drug content, consistency, etc. The selected formulations F7 exhibited better drug release performance. The formulation F7 was observed to be smooth and free from any irritant effect when studied on mice. Formulation F7 showed plastic behaviors with thixotropy and drug release was governed by Korsmeyer-Peppas modal. The stability studies carried out on selected CP cream formulations F7 showed no alteration in drug content, pH, viscosity, etc., hence were stable for the studied period of 6 month.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We thank the Macleods Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. (Research and development center) Mumbai (Maharashtra) India and Shri Ram college of Pharmacy, Ranba, Karnal (Haryana) India for providing the necessary facilities for carrying out the work.
REFERENCES:
- Windersberg S, Leopold CS, Guy RH. Bioavalability and bioequivalence of topical glucocorticoids. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2008; 68:453-466.
- Brazzini B, Pimpinelli N. New and established topical corticosteroids in dermatology. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2002; 3:47-58.
- Fang JY, Fang CI, Sung KC, Chen HY. Effect of low frequency ultrasound on the in vitro percutaneous absorption of Clobetasol 17-propionate. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1999; 191:33-42.
- Banga AK, Bose S, Ghosh TK. Iontophoresis and electroporation: comparisons and contrasts. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1999; 179:1-19.
- Senyigit T, Padula C, Ozer O, Santi P. Different approaches for improving skin accumulation of topical corticosteroids. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2009; 380:155-160.
- Niazi SK. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Formulations: Semisolid products. New York; 2004:42.
- Shahi SR, Somani VG, Shamkuwar PB, Kale MA, Kataria MV. Effect of enhancers on topical delivery of ketorolac tromethamine. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2007; 1:184-185.
- Aejaz A, Azmail K, Sanaullah S, Mohsin A. Studies on aceclofenac solid dispersion in corporated gels: development, characterization and in vitro evaluation. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010; 2:111-115.
- Chakole CM, Shende MA, Khadatkar SN. Formulation and evaluation of novel combined halobetasol propionate and fusidic acid ointment. International Journal of Chem Tech Research. 2009; 1:103-116.
- Tsai JC. Content and transdermal delivery of Clobetasol 17-Propionate from commercial cream and ointments. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2002; 10:7-12.
- Casta P, Lobo JMS. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2001; 13:123-133.
- Bharkatiya M. Designing and characterization of drug free patches for transdermal application. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research. 2010; 2(1):35-39.
- Laithy HM. Novel transdermal delivery of timolol maleate using sugar esters: Preclinical and clinical studies. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2009; 72:239-245.
- Tanwar YS, Chauhan CS, Sharma A. Development and evaluation of carvedilol transdermal patch. Acta Pharmaceutica. 2007; 5:151-159.
How to cite this article:
Kumar P and Bhutan R: Studies on Penetration enhancers incorporated Cream of Clobetasol-17-propionate: Development and in vitro evaluation.Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013; 4(6); 2258-2264. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-232.4(6).2258-64
Article Information
24
2258-2264
468KB
1425
English
IJPSR
Parveen Kumar* and Rubina Bhutani
Pharmacy Department, Shri Ram College of Pharmacy, Ramba, Karnal, Haryana, India
praveenmoond@gmail.com
05 February, 2013
09 March, 2013
20 May, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.4(6).2258-64
01 June, 2013