SYNTHESIS AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SOME NOVEL SCHIFF BASES OF CEPHALEXIN
HTML Full TextReceived on 24 October, 2013; received in revised form, 10 December, 2013; accepted, 16 February, 2014; published 01 March, 2014
SYNTHESIS AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SOME NOVEL SCHIFF BASES OF CEPHALEXIN
N.T. Arun*1 and B. Gowramma 2
Anna University – BIT Campus 1, Trichy -24, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JSS College of Pharmacy 2, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT: Cephalexin remain as one of the most versatile class of compounds against microbes and therefore, are useful substructures for further molecular exploration. A novel series of Schiff bases of cephalexin were synthesized. Thus condensation of 5-thia-1-azabicyclo [4.2.0] oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, 7-[(amino phenyl acetyl) amino]-3-methyl-8-oxo, monohydrate with appropriate aldehydes afforded the Schiff bases. The purity of the compounds was determined by TLC. With elemental analysis and spectral data the structure of the synthesized compounds were elucidated. All the synthesized compounds were subjected for the screening of antimicrobial activity against 3 bacteria and two pathogenic fungi. Most of the synthesized compounds were found to possess moderate antibacterial and antifungal activity.
Keywords: |
Cephalexin, Schiff base, Spectral data, Elemental analysis
INTRODUCTION:The wide use of antibiotics in man and animals and their extensive use in areas other than the treatment and prophylaxis of disease have resulted in a serious problem of drug resistance.
More and more bacterial strains have become resistant to available drugs. Preparation of different synthetic derivatives of antibiotics based on structure-activity relationship has been one of the best approaches. A relation between the structure of the complexes and their anti-bacterial activity can be observed.
Cephalexin nucleus was reported to have significant antibacterial and antifungal activities
Cephalexin is employed in infections (caused by penicillin resistant Staphylococci, Klebisella species), respiratory tract infections (acute and chronic bronchitis & infected bronchiectasis) and ear, nose & throat infections (acute and chronic) and urinary tract infections resistant to penicillin and sulphonamides.
So it has been planned to synthesize some newer Schiff bases of Cephalexin. Since antimicrobial activities (antibacterial and antifungal) had not been reported so far to our titled compounds, these activities can be evaluated 1-9.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Solvents and chemicals of laboratory and analytical were purchased from S.D. Fine Chemicals Ltd., India, reagents were purified and dried according to the procedure given in Vogel’s text book of practical organic chemistry.
All the glassware were washed with distilled water and dried at 110oC before commencing and during the reaction.
Chemistry: The reaction sequence for the different title compounds is outlined in the scheme. The Cephalexin (5 mmol) dissolved in methanol (50 ml) was mixed with the substituted aldehyde dissolved in methanol (50 ml). To this potassium hydroxide (0.1% in methanol) was added to adjust the pH of the solution between 7-8 and the mixture was refluxed for 30 minutes (approx.). A clear solution was obtained. The Schiff base was isolated by pouring the clear solution into crushed ice and the resulting solid was filtered and crystallized from DMF (60%) 10-11.
The crystalline product was dried under vacuum and kept in a desiccator till further use. The physical and analytical characteristics of the synthesized compounds were presented in Table 1. The purity of the compounds was determined by TLC and the structures of all the derivatives were confirmed by spectral data 12and elemental analysis and they were in full agreement with the proposed structures.
TABLE 1: PHYSICAL AND ANALYTICAL DATA OF SCHIFF BASES OF CEPHALEXIN
Compound | R | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Melting point | Percentage yield | Rf value |
C7H6 | C23H21N3O4S | 435.50 | 156-161 | 65 | 0.68 | |
|
C9H8 | C25H23N3O4S | 461.53 | 125-130 | 96 | 0.50 |
C5H4O | C21H19N3O5S | 425.46 | 85-90 | 68 | 0.65 | |
C8H8O | C24H23N3O5S | 465.52 | 110-115 | 80 | 0.70 | |
C7H5Cl | C23H20ClN3O4S | 469.94 | 125-130 | 85 | 0.64 | |
C7H6O | C23H21N3O5S | 451.49 | 120-125 | 78 | 0.71 | |
C8H8O2 | C24H23N3O6S | 481.52 | 170-185 | 65 | 0.73 | |
C9H11N | C25H26N4O4S | 478.56 | 185-195 | 62 | 0.64 |
Biological Screening: The synthesized compounds were subjected to antimicrobial screening by cup plate method. The zone of inhibition was measured in millimeters 10.
The antibacterial activity was checked in nutrient agar medium against Bacillus subtilis (gram +ve), Klebisella pneumonia (gram -ve) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (gram –ve) bacteria at the concentration of 25, 50 and 100 µg/well. The activity was determined after incubation for 24h at 37oC by the comparison of inhibition of growth of bacteria by measured concentrations of the compounds (I-VIII) with that of the activity produced by known concentration of the standard drugs (gentamycin and tetracycline) using methanol as both the solvent and the control.
No inhibition zone was observed in control (i.e., for methanol).
The antifungal activity of the compounds (I-VIII) was assayed against Candida albicans, (NCIM - 3102), Aspergillus niger (NCIM - 1196), Sachromyces cerviaceae (NCIM - 3193) in Sabouraud’s dextrose agar medium with an incubation of 48h at 28oC.
The zone of inhibition was determined at three different concentrations 25, 50 and 100 µg/well of the synthesized compounds (I-VIII). Amphotericin-B was used ad reference standard and methanol was used both as a solvent and as a control. No inhibition zone was observed in control (i.e., for methanol).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: All the synthesized compounds (I-VIII) were first analyzed by performing thin layer chromatography and also the melting point was determined. The structure of the compounds was confirmed with the IR spectral analysis and the analytical data showed satisfactory results.
Then, the synthesized compounds were subjected to antimicrobial screening against three bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Klebisella pneumonia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) shown in Fig. 1-3 & 3 and two fungi (Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger) shown in Fig. 4-5.
ANTIBACTERIAL SCREENING
FIG. 1: BACILLUS SUBTILIS
FIG. 2: KLEBISELLA PNEUMONIA
FIG. 3: PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA
ANTIFUNGAL SCREENING:
FIG. 4: SACHROMYCES CERVIACEAE
FIG. 5: CANDIDA ALBICANS
Among the eight synthesized compounds, Compounds III, IV, V and VII showed good activity, whereas compounds I, II, VI, and VIII showed significant activity against Bacillus subtilis.
Compounds III, IV and V were showed good activity, whereas compounds I, II, VI, VII and VIII showed significant activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Compounds III, IV and V were showed good activity, whereas compounds I, II, VI, VII and VIII showed significant activity against Klebisella pneumonia.
The results of antibacterial activity screening of the tested compounds are depicted in Table 2. The results of antifungal activity of the tested compounds were found somewhat different from the antibacterial activity. In case of antifungal activity, compounds I, III and VI were showed mild activity against Candida albicans. All other titled compounds have not shown any activity against Aspergillus niger. The results of the antifungal of the tested compounds are summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 2: ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF THE SYNTHESIZED COMPOUNDS
Compound | Bacillus subtilis | Klebisella pneumonia | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | ||||||
Concentration (µg/well) | Concentration (µg/well) | Concentration (µg/well) | |||||||
25 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 100 | |
I | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
II | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
III | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
IV | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
V | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
VI | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
VII | + | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
VIII | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Methanol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Tetracycline | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Gentamycin | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Symbols: + good activity, ++ significant activity, – no activity
TABLE 3: ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF THE SYNTHESIZED COMPOUNDS
Compound | Candida albicans | Aspergillus niger | Sachromyces cerviaceae | ||||||
Concentration (µg/well) | Concentration (µg/well) | Concentration (µg/well) | |||||||
25 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 100 | |
I | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ |
II | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + |
III | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ |
IV | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + |
V | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + |
VI | ++ | ++ | ++ | - | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ |
VII | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + |
VIII | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + |
Methanol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Amphotericin-B | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
Symbols: + very mild activity, ++ mild activity, +++ significant activity, – no activity
CONCLUSION: Summarizing a series of novel Schiff bases of cephalexin have been synthesized successfully in appreciable yields and screened for their in vitro antimicrobial activity against bacterial strains (Bacillus subtilis, Klebisella pneumonia & Pseudomonas aeruginosa)and fungal strains (Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger).
It is concluded that the synthesized compounds were found to possess moderate antibacterial and antifungal activity.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION:
Physical measurements: The reactions and the purity of the products were monitored by TLC (Precoated- Merck G254) using Methanol: Chloroform as mobile phase and UV chamber method and iodine as visualizing agents. Further the compounds were purified by recrystallization using suitable solvents. The melting point of the synthesized compounds were determined in open capillaries using Veego VMP-1 Apparatus and expressed in ○C and are uncorrected.
Spectral measurements: The IR spectra of the synthesized compounds were recorded on Shimadzu FT-IR Spectrophotometer using KBr pellets and are expressed in cm-1. The Nuclear magnetic spectra (1H-NMR) of the synthesized compounds were obtained from Bruker DRX-300 (300 MHz FT-NMR) Spectrophotometer using CDCl3 as solvent with TMS as an internal standard.
Analytical data:
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound I showed absorption band at: 1680(C=O), 1494(C=N), 1454 (C-H), 1340 (C=N), 698(Ar-CH), 3288 (OH), 2359 (C-S-C), 1205 (C=O).
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound II showed absorption bandat: 3028 (C-H), 1674 (C-O), 1674 (C=N), 3236 (OH), 1450 (CH-Ar), 1494 (Ar hydrocarbon), 1282 (C-NH), 1124 (C=S), 698 (Ar-CH).
The 1H-NMR spectrum (DMSO, in δ ppm) of the test compound IIexhibited characteristic proton peaks at: 6.8 (10H, Ar, M), 8.8 (1H, NH, d), 3.9(1H, CH, q), 7.5(3H, CH-CH=CH, s), 2.7(3H, CH3, s), 3.2 (2H,s), 9.7 (1H, COOH,s).
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound III showed absorption band at: 3061(Furan CH-S), 1681(C=O), 1437 (Ar CH), 1012 (Alkane C-C), 744(Ar-CH), 698(Ar-CH).
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound IV showed absorption band at: 2931(Alkane CH), 1678(C=O), 1600 (C=C), 1510 (C-N), 1303(C-N), 1253 (C-O), 1028 (C-S), 835 (C-C), 700 (Ar-CH).
The 1H-NMR spectrum (DMSO, in δ ppm) of the test compound IV exhibited characteristic proton peaks at: 6.7(8H, ArH M), 5.5(1H, CH s), 9.9(1H, COOH, s), 3.7(2H, CH2 s), 3.5 (3H, OCH3, s), 2(3H, CH3 s), 6.7(1H, s), 8.7(1H, OH, d), 8.4(1H, CH, d), 4.9(1H, CH, q).
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound V showed absorption band at: 1681(C=O), 1593(C=C), 1533(C-H), 1301(C-N), 1282 (C-NH), 1051(C-O-C), 698 (Ar-CH).
The 1H-NMR spectrum (DMSO, in δ ppm) of the test compound V exhibited characteristic proton peaks at: 6.5(9H, ArH, M), 5.5(1H, CH, s), 8.8(1H, NH, d), 4.9(1H,CH, q), 8.4(1H, CH, d), 2.5 (3H, CH3, s), 3.3 (2H, CH2 ,s), 10.4 (1H, COOH, s),4(1H, CH, s).
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound VI showed absorption band at: 3246 (NH), 1666 (C=O), 1600 (C-C), 1437(C-H), 1282(C-O), 1240(CH3O), 1030(C-S), 839(C-C), 698(Ar-CH).
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound VII showed absorption band at: 2359(C-S), 1670(C=O), 1591(C-C), 1512 (C-N), 1288 (C-N), 1028 (C-S), 698 (Ar-CH).
IR spectrum (KBr, in cm-1) of the test compound VIII showed absorption band at: 2914(C-H), 1602(N-H), 1550(C-N), 1535(C=N), 1446(C-H), 1064(C=S), 729 (Ar-CH).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This work was carried out in JSS College of Pharmacy, Ooty at Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department of Biotechnology and Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis with the great support rendered by the Principal, HOD’s and faculty members.
REFERENCE:
- Brown, A.G. and S.M. Roberts, (Ed.). Recent Advances in the Chemistry of β-lactam Antibiotics. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London – 1984.
- Anacona, J.R., Synthesis and antibacterial activity of some metal complexes of beta- lactamic antibiotics. J.Coord. Chem., 2001; 54: 355-365.
- K. Yamazaki, Y. Kaneko, K. Suwa, S.Ebara, K. Nakazawa, K. Yasuno, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005; 13 2059-2522.
- A. Latrofa, M. Franco, A. Lopedota, A. Rosato, D. Carone, C. Vitali, IL Farmaco 2005; 60 291-297.
- I. Yalcin,I.Oren, E.Sener, A.Akin, N.Uncarturk, Eur. J. Med. Chem 1992;;. 27 401-406.
- H. Bujdakova, M. Muckova, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents1994; 4 303- 308.
- B. RAjeeva, N. Srinivasulu, S.M. Shantakumar, Eur. J. Med.Chem. 2009; 6 (3) 775-779.
- N. G. Muggleton and H. S. Crofts, Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother., 1968; 353
- Gary A. Thiobodeas, Kelvin T. Patton, Elsevier, 7 2004; 703.
- Duraiswamy, M. Abraham, G.S.Saritha, M.J. Nanjan and B. Suresh. Indian Journal Pharma Sciences, 2003; 286-289.
- Balakrishna Kalluraya, M. Arun, Isloor, M. Ramesh, Chimbalkar, and Shalinishenoy, Indian Journal of heterocyc. chem., 2001; 10, 239-240.
- Pharmacopoeia of India, Vol. II, 1996; A-100, A-108.
How to cite this article:
Arun NT and Gowramma B: Synthesis and biological evaluation of some novel Schiff bases of Cephalexin. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014; 5(3): 1008-14.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(3).1008-14
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
44
1008-1014
833KB
1187
English
IJPSR
N.T. Arun* and B. Gowramma
Anna University – Bit Campus, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu – 620 024, India
arunyuvant@gmail.com
24 October, 2013
10 December, 2013
16 February, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(3).1008-14
01March2014