THE ORAL CAPSULE- THE MOST APPROPRIATE DOSAGE FORM FOR CROTON MEMBRANACEUS
HTML Full TextTHE ORAL CAPSULE- THE MOST APPROPRIATE DOSAGE FORM FOR CROTON MEMBRANACEUS
M. T. Bayor*, R. Johnson and S. Y. Gbedema
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana
ABSTRACT:Recent studies have provided relevant scientific support for the use of C. membranaceus root in the treatment of prostate cancers. In the current study, we formulated both liquid and solid oral dosage forms from the ethanol extract of C. membranaceus root and investigated their physicochemical properties, release effects and suitability in comparison with the currently used aqueous decoctions and directly powdered plant material, in order to determine the most appropriate and suitable dosage form that will maximize the benefits of therapy with this species. The prepared solution from the ethanol extract had characteristics similar to the aqueous decoction, but unlike the later, it maintained its specifications and stability throughout the period of study. However, the use of large volumes, convenience and suitability for long term use, will limit their application. The assessed properties of the prepared tablets and capsules met all the specifications required for good quality and they can be used in simple and convenient doses of one tablet or capsule, three times a day, in place of unstable decoctions and large volume solutions. The in vitro release profile of the capsules was however, better (98.8±1.3 % after 45 minutes) and significantly higher (P<0.01) than that of the tablets (85.2±1.6 %), and with the protection of the extract from light and masking of unwanted color and taste as added advantages, the oral capsules should be the preferred choice of solid dosage form for C. membranaceus. The capsules of the direct plant material had active content (2.8±1.4 mg) and in vitro cumulative release after 45 minutes (42.0±2.6 %) lower and significantly different (P<0.01) from those of the tablets and capsules prepared with the extract. The results strongly support the assertions that the formulation of suitable and appropriate herbal remedies from plant extracts may be more desirable, advantageous and therapeutically more beneficial than incorporating the direct plant materials, and that the oral capsule of C. membranaceus root extract will ensure compliance and maximize therapeutic outcomes.
Keywords:C. membranaceus,
Aqueous decoction, Root extract, Oral capsule, Prostate cancer |
INTRODUCTION: The use of the root of Croton membranaceus (Euphorbiaceae) in the treatment of prostatic hypertrophy is well known in Ghana 1. It is used at the Centre for Scientific Research into Plant Medicine (CSRPM), Mampong-Akwapem, for the treatment and management of prostate enlargement and related cancers. In earlier studies, we revealed significant cytotoxic activity of the extract on human cancer cells 2, and of compounds isolated from this species, against human prostate cancer (PC-3) cells 3, which provided relevant scientific support for the use of C. membranaceus in the treatment of cancers.
The dosage forms currently employed are; the aqueous root decoctions, which are required in large volumes and are bitter and unstable, and the oral capsule of the directly powdered plant material, with uncertain drug release properties. In the current study, we investigated various formulations of the root extract of this species against the current dosage forms in order to determine a suitable and standard formulation that will maximize the benefits from the use of the plant in treating cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant material: The roots of C. membranaceus were collected in November 2009, at Mampong-Akwapem, Ghana, and authenticated at CSRPM and a voucher specimen (CSRPM/09/CM/02) was placed in their herbarium. The plant material was oven dried at 50oC and comminuted into coarse powder for extraction.
Extraction: The powdered C. membranaceus root was extracted in batches of 500 g each with 2.5 L of ethanol (96 %) using a Soxhlet extractor. The extracts obtained were pooled and concentrated to a syrupy mass under reduced pressure before drying completely over silica gel in a vacuum chamber at room temperature. This produced a dark brown extract (extractive value 3 %w/w) which was stored in refrigerator until used further.
Preparation of the formulations:
Liquid dosage forms: Locally and at the CSRPM, 3 %w/v aqueous decoctions of powdered C. membranaceus root are prepared and used in doses of a tumblerful (100 ml), every eight hours for the treatment of prostate hypertrophy.
Decoction: Based on the traditional preparation and use, 30 g of powdered C. membranaceus root was boiled in 1 L of distilled water for 2 hours, cooled, decanted, the marc pressed and the pooled extract filtered through a 0.45 µm Whatmann filter paper. The product was then made up to 1 L with more water, bottled, labeled, stored in a cool dry place away from light and studied for six months.
Modified decoction: After a careful study of the physicochemical properties of the decoction as prepared above, a similar product was again prepared, but this time sweetened with aspartame (0.01 %w/v) and preserved with a combination of methyl and propyl Paraben (0.1 %w/v), stored in a cool dry place and studied for six months.
Liquid formulation from the ethanol extract: In accordance with the stated dosage of the decoction as; a tumblerful (100 ml), three times a day, and with the extractive value of C. membranaceus in water as 0.56 %w/w, a similar but optimized liquid product (Table 1) was prepared to contain 16.8 mg of the ethanol extract per dose (100 ml). Due to its partial water solubility, the required amount of extract was predissolved in ethanol, diluted with the other ingredients and then made up to volume with water. The total amount of ethanol was 10 %v/v. This formulation was stored in a cool dry place and studied for six months.
TABLE 1: FORMULATION OF A LIQUID PRODUCT FROM THE C. MEMBRANACEUS ROOTS EXTRACT
Ingredient | Quantity |
C. membranaceus root extract | 16.8 mg |
Ethanol | 10 ml |
Aspartame | 10 mg |
Methyl Paraben | 0.08 g |
Propyl Paraben | 0.02 g |
Water upto | 100 ml |
Solid dosage forms: A dose of 500 mg of powdered C. membranaceus root is taken three times a day for prostate hypertrophy and cancers. Therefore, with an extractive value of 3 %w/w in ethanol, 15 mg of extract will be required per dose. As such the tablets and capsules were formulated to contain 15 mg of C. membranaceus root extract per unit.
Tablets: Using a die volume corresponding to a tablet weight of 320 mg, granules for compressing 200 tablets (Table 2) were prepared by the wet method and assessed. After addition of the talc and uniform mixing, the granules were compressed on a single stage Manesty tablet press and the tablets analyzed.
Capsules: For an expected capsule content weight of 250 mg, a granulation for 200 capsules (Table 2) was prepared by the wet method and analyzed. After addition of the glidant (talc), the granules were filled into size 2 hard gelatin capsule shells using a semi-automated capsule filling machine (Model TMP Mini T-50) and the resulting capsules evaluated.
TABLE 2: FORMULATION OF 200 TABLETS (DIE VOLUME, 320 MG) AND 200 CAPSULES (FILL WEIGHT, 250 MG) OF C. MEMBRANACEUS ROOT EXTRACT
Ingredients | Quantity (g) | |
Tablets | Capsules | |
C. membranaceus root extract | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Lactose | 53.96 | 41.5 |
Maize Starch | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Acacia gum (for Mucilage) | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Talc | 0.64 | 0.5 |
Commercial capsules: A random sample of 200 capsules of a commercial product of C. membranaceus root (coded CC1) was also obtained from the Kumasi market for analysis, evaluation and comparison. They were 250 mg capsules with a dosage of two capsules to be taken three times a day.
Analysis and evaluation of the formulations:
Liquid formulations: The organoleptic characteristics (color, odor and taste), solubility, viscosity, pH and stability in terms of active content and microbial growth or load of the formulations were determined and monitored throughout the study period of six months.
Granules:
Angle of repose: The fixed height cone method was used in the determination of the angle of repose. A quantity of each set of granules was used to carefully build a cone through a funnel clamped at a height of 2 cm onto a horizontal surface until the tip of the pile just touched the lower tip of the funnel. The diameter of the resulting cone was measured and the angle of repose calculated from the relationship; θ = tan-1 (h/r), where h and r, are the height and radius of the base of the cone, respectively 4. The determinations were done in triplicate.
Compressibility index and Hausner’s ratio: 50 g of granules were each poured gently into a 200 ml measuring cylinder and the initial volume (Vo) of the granules measured. The cylinder was then tapped from a height of 3 cm until there was no further change in volume and the final volume (Vf) determined. The bulk density (ρbulk) and tapped density (ρtapped) were calculated and used to determine the compressibility (Carr’s) index [(ρtapped – ρbulk) / ρtapped x 100] and Hausner’s ratio (ρtapped / ρbulk) for each set of granules, after triplicate determinations 4.
Tablets and Capsules:
Weight uniformity: A random sample of twenty tablets was individually weighed and the average mass determined. The percentage deviations of the individual masses from the average mass were then calculated. Also, twenty capsules of the prepared and commercial batches were each selected at random. Each capsule was weighed on an analytical balance, carefully emptied of its content, the shells reweighed and the weight of content determined. The collective weight of content, average weight of content per capsule and the deviations (%) of individual content weights from the mean were calculated 5.
Resistance to crushing (Hardness): Ten tablets were randomly selected and each tablet was placed between the jaws of a Monsanto hardness tester with its diameter along the direction of applied force and the force (N) required to just crush the tablets measured 4, 5. The mean crushing force for the tablets, was then determined.
Friability: A random sample of twenty tablets was carefully dedusted and accurately weighed on analytical balance. The sample was then placed in the drum of the Roche’s Friabilator and rotated 100 times, after which the tablets were removed, carefully dedusted and accurately reweighed, and the percentage weight loss determined 5.
Disintegration time: The disintegration time was determined in distilled water at 37±0.5oC. For each test, a tablet/capsule was placed into each of the six tubes of the Erweka disintegration apparatus with discs and operated for 15 minutes 4. Triplicate determinations were conducted for both tablets and capsules.
Content uniformity: Ten tablets or capsules were randomly selected. Each tablet or the content of each capsule was dissolved in 30 ml of 10 %v/v ethanol, filtered through a 0.45 µm Whatmann filter paper, diluted appropriately and assayed spectrophotometrically at 248 nm. The assayed contents were expressed as a percentage of the average content per dosage unit (15 mg).
In vitro dissolution study: The in vitro release of the C. membranaceus root extract from the tablets and capsules was conducted using an Erweka six vessel rotating paddle USP type II apparatus 4, 5, 6. The dissolution medium was 900 ml of 0.1M Hydrochloric acid (pH 1.0), maintained at 37±0.5oC and with a paddle speed of 100 rpm. A dosage unit was placed in each vessel and samples of 20 ml solution were withdrawn at predetermined time intervals (between 5-60 minutes) and replaced with fresh dissolution medium at 37oC. With the commercial product two capsules were placed in each vessel. The samples were filtered through 0.45 µm Whatmann filter paper and diluted appropriately to obtain 0.05 %w/v solutions. With the absorbance measured on a UV/VIS spectro photometer at 248 nm, the concentration of the extract in these solutions was determined using the equation of the calibration curve. The mean cumulative percent release of the extract from the tablets and capsules were then calculated from five replicate determinations.
Statistical analysis: The results were expressed as mean±SEM of at least three replicate determinations and the data subjected to a one-way ANOVA, with levels of significance established at P<0.01, using GraphPad Prism 5 software.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A 3 %w/v aqueous decoction of C. membranaceus root is used locally in doses of a tumblerful (100ml), three times a day in the treatment of prostate hypertrophy and related cancers 1. The preparation of fresh decoctions as and when needed is ideal but practically difficult to achieve. As such non-compliance and inaccurate dosing may arise, leading to poor treatment outcomes. Multiple-dose or large volume preparations, especially in commerce, will require preservation and modification of color and taste. Due to the low extractive value of C. membranaceus root in water (0.56 %w/w) compared to that in ethanol (3 %w/w), the possible formulation of a liquid product from the ethanolic extract of the plant (Table 1) makes economic and commercial sense. However, due to the incomplete aqueous solubility of the extract, predissolution in ethanol was required (with the total amount of ethanol within 10%v/v).
Although, the freshly prepared decoction had an acceptable color, odor and taste for adults (the target group), it developed a bad odor and had a high level of microbial counts (6.0 x 107 cfu per ml) exceeding the USP (2007) and JP (2001) limits for herbal drugs, after 24 hours 5, 7, 8. Preservation maintained the integrity of the decoction, but for only 2 months. The prepared solution of the ethanol extract had characteristics similar to the preserved decoction, but maintained its microbial load for up to 6 months (Table 3) 9.
TABLE 3: ANALYSIS OF THE LIQUID FORMULATIONS
Physicochemical parameters | Decoction | Modified decoction | Liquid formulation of the ethanol extract (solution) |
Color | Greenish yellow | Light greenish yellow | Light yellow |
Odor | Characteristic | Characteristic | Characteristic |
Taste | Characteristic bitter taste | Characteristic bitter taste | Characteristic biting taste |
Solubility | No residue | Clear | No residue |
Viscosity | Very fluid | Fluid | Readily pourable |
pHStability
[initial – final (mg/ml)]
[initial – final (cfu/ml)] - Total aerobic bacteria - E. coli - Salmonella spp. - Mould and Yeast - Enterobacteria and other gram –ve bacteria |
6.0 – 6.4
1.58 – 1.10
3 x 103 – 6 x 107 ------ ------ 1 x 100 – 3 x 105
------ |
6.2 – 6.8
1.62 – 1.40
2 x 102 – 4 x 106 ------ ------ 1 x 100 – 4 x 102
------ |
6.6 – 6.7
1.66 – 1.65
5 x 101 – 6 x 102 ------ ------ ------
------ |
Key: ------ = No growth; cfu/ml = colony forming units per ml
Overall, it is practically possible to formulate a liquid oral dosage form for C. membranaceus for use within a couple of months, but issues of the use of large volumes or bulk, additives, acceptability, convenience and suitability for long term usage, makes considerations of solid dosage forms worthwhile. The formulation of the C. membranaceus root extract into tablets and capsules were investigated (Table 2). The flow properties of the granulations for the tablets and capsules (Table 4) were assessed before tabletting and encapsulation, respectively. The angle of repose, compressibility (Carr’s) index and Hausner’s ratio were used to determine the suitability of the granules 6. Whilst angle of repose is a characteristic related to interparticulate friction or resistance to movement between particles, compressibility index and Hausner’s ratio are indirect measure of bulk density, particle size and shape, surface area and cohesiveness 4, 5.
Measurement of these parameters give qualitative and quantitative assessment of the internal cohesiveness and frictional forces under low levels of external loading, as encountered in mixing, tabletting and capsule filling 10. Angle of repose less than 30o, compressibility (Carr’s) index between 1-15 %, and Hausner’s ratios within 1-1.8, are accepted indicators or characteristics of good to excellent flow properties 4. The tablet and capsule granules had values of angle of repose (21±2.0o; 23±1.0o), Carr’s index (14.2±0.2 %; 13.9±1.3 %) and Hausner’s ratios (1.14±0.01; 1.12±0.02), resp., (Table 4). Therefore, both granulations possessed good flow properties and were suitably appropriate for tabletting and capsule filling.
TABLE 4: FLOW PROPERTIES OF THE GRANULES
Parameters | Tablet granules | Capsule granules |
Angle of repose (o) | 21 ± 2.0 | 23 ± 1.0 |
Compressibility index (%) | 14.2 ± 0.2 | 13.9 ± 1.3 |
Hausner’s ratio | 1.14 ± 0.01 | 1.12 ± 0.02 |
Results are Mean ± SEM of n = 3
The tablets obtained (Fig. 1) had an average mass of 316±8.2 mg which varied uniformly within 1.2-4.3 %. The mean content of active extract per tablet was 14.5±1.0 mg and no individual tablet varied in active content by less than 85% or more than 115% of this value (Table 5)
fig1: ORAL FORMULATIONS OF C. MEMBRANACEUS ROOT AND ROOT EXTRACT: FROM LEFT TO RIGHT; LIQUID FORMULATION OF THE ETHANOL EXTRACT; COMMERCIAL CAPSULES; PREPARED TABLETS AND PREPARED CAPSULES
These results indicated the prepared tablets were uniform in weight and in active content, which will ensure accurate dosing. With a mean crushing force of 5.5 ± 0.5 Kg and a friability of less than 1%, the tablets will not easily break up and can withstand passage through machines and handling in packaging, storage and transport. The tablets also showed an average disintegration time of less than 5 minutes and a 85.2±1.6 % in vitro cumulative release of extract in 45 minutes (Table 5, Fig. 2), all of which are within acceptable limits 4, 11. Therefore, the prepared tablets have met the required specifications and are of good quality, which can be used in simple and convenient doses of one tablet, three times daily, in place of the large volume unstable decoctions.
TABLE 5: ANALYSIS OF THE TABLETS AND CAPSULES
Parameters | Prepared tablets | Prepared capsules | Commercial capsules (CC1) |
Weight uniformity- Average mass (mg)
- Mass variations (%) Crushing force (N) Friability (% weight loss) Disintegration time (minutes) Content uniformity - Average content (mg) - Content variations (%) |
316 ± 8.2
1.2 – 4.3 53.9 ± 0.5 0.45 ± 0.16 4.15 ± 0.06
14.5 ± 1.0 99.2 – 103.4 |
248 ± 5.6
2.5 – 6.8
5.24 ± 0.34
13.8 ± 1.4 95.6 – 97.8 |
214 ± 2.3
2.8 – 7.6
5. 56 ± 0.35
2.8 ± 1.4 85.8 – 88.2 |
In vitro dissolution after 45 minutes (%) | 85.2 ± 1.6 | 98.8 ± 1.2 | 42.0 ± 2.6 |
Results are Mean ± SEM, n ≥ 3
FIG. 2: THE IN VITRO RELEASE OF C. MEMBRANACEUS ROOT EXTRACT FROM ITS TABLET AND CAPSULE FORMULATIONS
The prepared capsules (Fig. 1) had a mean content mass of 248±5.6 mg with no individual weight deviations up to 10 %. The average active content per capsule was 13.8±1.4 mg, with all individual contents within the limits of 85-115 % of this average (Table 5). The results indicated that the prepared capsules were also uniform in weight and in active content that will ensure dose accuracy and uniformity.
Their disintegration time of less than 6 minutes and in vitro release of 98.8±1.2 % at 45 minutes were also within acceptable limits 4, 5. The release profile of the prepared capsules was however, better and significantly higher (P<0.01) than that of the tablets. As such, in vivo studies are currently underway to correlate in vitro release data. Therefore, with the protection of the extract from light and masking of undesirable color and taste as added advantages, the capsules should be preferable to uncoated tablets as a solid oral dosage form for C. membranaceus.
The commercial capsules (Fig. 2) on the other hand, showed a mean content mass of 214±2.3 mg and individual mass deviations within 2.8- 7.6 %. The average active content per capsule was 2.8±1.4 mg, and although, the individual content of actives were within acceptable limits (85-115 %) of this average, the active content shown was very low and significantly different (P<0.01) from the expected content of 7.5 mg per capsule. Therefore, the doses of such capsules may be uniform but then will be highly inaccurate, and will lead to under dosing, ineffective therapy and drug resistance 12. Also, the commercial capsules disintegrated within acceptable limits (<6 minutes) but exhibited a very low and poor release profile (Table 5; Fig. 2). Their in vitro cumulative release after 45 minutes was only 42.0±2.6%, which is lower and significantly different (P<0.01) from the release profiles of the prepared tablets and capsules.
The commercial capsules appear to be a direct encapsulation of the powdered plant material. As such poor, incomplete dissolution and extraction from the material within the capsules might be amongst the reasons for the low active content and poor release characteristics, compared to the formulations of its extract as in the tablets and capsules prepared in this study. The results therefore, strongly support the assertions that the formulation of suitable and appropriate herbal remedies from plant extracts may be more advantageous, desirable and therapeutically more beneficial than incorporating the direct plant materials.
CONCLUSION: In all, the study demonstrated that the physicochemical parameters and properties of tablets and capsules prepared from the C. membranaceus root extracts (and not the powdered plant material) were all within acceptable limits, hence are appropriate and suitable for use to offer stable and convenient doses of one tablet or capsule, three times daily, instead of large volume unstable decoctions of C. membranaceus used in the treatment of prostatic hypertrophy and related cancers. However, the capsules of the C. membranaceus root extract exhibited the best and most significant (P<0.01) release effects and characteristics and should be the solid oral dosage form of choice for C. membranaceus. In addition to protection of the extract from light and masking of undesirable color, odor and taste, the oral capsule of C. membranaceus root extract, will ensure compliance and maximize therapeutic outcomes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors wish to thank the administrative and technical staff of CSRPM, Ghana, for the collaboration and supply of plant material.
REFERENCES:
- Mshana NR, Abbiw DK, Addae-Mensah I, Adjanouhoun E, Ahyi MRA, Ekpere JA, Enow-Orock EG, Gbile ZO, Noamesi GK, Odei MA, Odunlami H, Oteng-Yeboah AA, Sarpong K, Sofowora A and Tackie AN: Traditional medicine and pharmacopoeia: contribution to the revision of ethnobotanical and floristic studies in Ghana. Organization of African Unity/Scientific, Technical and Research Commission (OAU/STRC), 2000: 223-224.
- Bayor MT, Ayim JSK, Phillips RM, Shnyder SD and Wright CW: The Evaluation of Selected Ghanaian Medicinal Plants for Cytotoxic Activities. Journal of Science and Technology 2007; 27(3): 16-22.
- Bayor MT, Ayim JSK, Marston G, Phillips RM, Shnyder SD, Wheelhouse RT and Wright CW: A Cytotoxic Diterpenoid from Croton membranaceus, the Major Constituent of Anticancer Herbal Formulations used in Ghana. Journal of Natural Products Communications 2008; 3(11): 1875-1878.
- British Pharmacopoeia. Version 11.0. Appendix XII D. System Simulation Ltd, 2007.
- United States Pharmacopoeia 30/National Formulary 25. Convention Inc, 2007: p. 279.
- Ansel HC, Popovich NG and Allen LV: Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delivery systems. Lippincott William and Wilkins Publishers, Sixth Edition 1995.
- Japanese Pharmacopoeia 14. Hirokawa Shoten, Tokyo. Fourteenth Edition 2001: p. 1312.
- Okunlola A, Adewoyin BA and Odeku OA: Evaluation of pharmaceutical and microbial qualities of some herbal medicinal products in south western Nigeria. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2007; 6(1): 661-670.
- Enayatifard R, Asgarirad H and Kazemi-sani B: Microbial quality of some herbal solid dosage forms. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010; 9(11): 1701-1705.
- Jain CP and Naruka PS: Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablets of valsartan. Int. J. Pharm. PharmSci. 2009; 1(1): 219-226.
- Johnson R, Adotey J, Bayor MT and Annan K: Release profile of extracts of Bridelia ferruginea leaf and Canthium glabriflorum stem bark from different absorbents. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2010; 1(8) Suppl: 111-117.
- John JM: Preventing medication errors at home. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2005; 18 (3): 141-44.
Article Information
6
41-48
713KB
1278
English
IJPSR
M. T. Bayor*, R. Johnson and S. Y. Gbedema
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana
10 August, 2010
17 November, 2010
26 December, 2010
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.2(1).41-48
1-January-2011