TOXICOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE EGFR PROTEIN INHIBITOR (IRESSA 1) USING TOPKAT
HTML Full TextTOXICOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE EGFR PROTEIN INHIBITOR (IRESSA 1) USING TOPKAT
- Ravikumar*1, Rebecca L. Jeyanthi 2, Suresh Xavier 1 and Rachel L. Ananthi 3
Department of Bioinformatics, Sathyabama University 1, Chennai-600 019, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Bharath University 2, Chennai-600 073, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Zoology, Madras Christian College 3, Chennai- 600 059, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has emerged as a key target in non-small-cell lung cancer. EGFR inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer is achieved via small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as erlotinib or Iressa (gefitinib), or monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab. The EGFR is under investigation as a therapeutic target for cancers. Lung cancer cell lines are variably dependent on autocrine stimulation of EGFR since it has a role in signal transduction. We therefore examined the effects of a selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor Iressa 1 which is a synthetic molecule synthesized from a standard Iressa molecule. These compounds after docking with EGFR protein were found to possess good energy score and also highly inhibited the protein molecule indicating that this molecule showed anticancer activity on EGFR. The results of the pharmacokinetic study as well as the investigations pertaining to the ADME properties of Iressa 1 by using ADME tool of TOPKAT (DS 2.5) had shown that Iressa 1 was nontoxic effect to female mouse and female rat (norms as per NTP carcinogenicity). Moreover, as per the FDA carcinogenicity value, it was found to be nontoxic to both male rat and male mouse. The pharmacokinetic results showed normal absorption rate, solubility, heptotoxicity, CYP2D6 and PPB values.
Keywords: |
EGFR, TOPKAT, PPB, BBB, Iressa 1, ADME
INTRODUCTION: The activities of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been identified as key drivers in the process of cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, and dedifferentiation 1. It is present on the surface of many types of cancer cells. It has been shown that the EGFR-mediated drive is increased in a wide variety of solid tumors including lung cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, and tumors of the head and neck. Heightened activity at the EGFR is caused by an increase in the concentration of ligand around the cell, an increase in receptor numbers or receptor mutation can lead to an increase in the drive for the cell to replicate.
It has been postulated that agents designed to block EGFR will inhibit signal transduction, resulting in multiple antitumor mechanisms, as well as enhancing chemotherapy and radiotherapy antitumor effects.
Lung cancer is usually caused by smoking or exposure to second-hand smoke. Researchers estimate that more than 90% of lung cancer in men and at least 70% in women are caused by cigarette smoking 2. Normally, there is a thin layer of mucus and thousands of tiny hairs (cilia) lining the inside of our breathing tubes within our lungs. The mucus and cilia act as a natural cleaning system for our lungs 3.
The EGFR is a transmembrane receptor with an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a helical trans-membrane domain, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain 4.
Activation of EGFR by epidermal growth factor (EGF) and other ligands (amphiregulin, TGF-a) which bind to its extracellular domain is the first step in a series of complex signaling pathways which take the message to proliferate from the cell membrane to the genetic material deep within the cell nucleus 5. EGF is a small mitogenic protein that is thought to be involved in mechanisms such as normal cell growth, oncogenesis, and wound healing.
Iressa works by blocking (inhibiting) signals within the cancer cells, which prevents a series of chemical reactions that cause the cell to grow and divide. It is known as a signal transduction inhibitor. The receptors allow epidermal growth factor (a particular protein present in the body) to attach to them. When the epidermal growth factor (EGF) attaches to the receptor, it causes tyrosine kinase to trigger chemical processes inside the cell to make it grow and divide.
Iressa attaches itself to the EGF receptor inside the cell, which blocks the activation of tyrosine kinase, and switches off the signals from the EGFR. It therefore has the potential to stop the cancer cells from growing. It works in a different way to both chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Gefitinib is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It works by binding to the intracellular enzyme (tyrosine kinase) of the EGFR to directly block signals turned on by triggers outside or inside the cell. TOPKAT is a toxicity prediction program.
TOPKAT uses Kier & Hall electrotopological states (E-states) as well as shape, symmetry, MW, and logP as descriptors to build statistically robust Quantitative Structure Toxicity Relationship (QSTR) models for over 18 endpoints. TOPKAT runs on PCs under Windows 95/98/NT.
TOPKAT will validate its assessments via a univariate analysis of the descriptors, a patented multivariate analysis of the fit of the query structure in Optimum Prediction Space, and by similarity searching in descriptor space. In the present study we examined the toxicological effects of a selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor Iressa 1 on normal mice and rats.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Receptor:- EGFR Protein:
PDB ID: - 1 MOX:
Crystal Structure of Human EGFR (Residues 1-501) in complex with Tgf-Alpha [Transferase GROWTH FACTOR, EC: 2.7.1.112]. Figure 1 indicates the structure of the EGFR protein molecule.
- Taxonomy: Homosapiens
- Proteins: 4
- Chemicals: 8
modified: 2007/11/02; MMDB ID: 24621
- Active Site:
GLU2, GLU3, LYS4, VAL6, VAL36, GLU60, GLN81, ARG84, GLU221, SER222, ASP223, CYS224, LEU225, VAL226, CYS227, LYS229, PHE230, ARG231, GLU232, GLU233, ALA234, THR235, CYS236, ALA265, THR266.
FIG. 1: PROTEIN MOLECULE
Standard ligand (Iressa) for EGFR: Iressa (Gefitinib or ZD1893) is a selective, reversible selective EGFR-TKI (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) 6, 7. EGFR is a 170kD member of the erbB family of membrane receptor tyrosine kinase. EGFR or its ligands are frequently expressed at high levels in epithelial tumours, such as head-and neck squamous cell carcinomas and non-small-cell lung cancer 6, 8.
Activation of this receptor initiates signalling through a variety of downstream pathways, including those involving PI3K/Akt, Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and STAT3 that are important for a variety of cellular processes involved in the promotion of tumor growth, including proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis[6].
The mechanism of the clinical antitumor action of gefitinib is not fully understood [8]. Gefitinib acts completively at the ATP-binding site of the EGFR on the surface of cancer cell to inhibit ligand-induced tyrosine phosphorylation, thereby blocking ligand-induced activation of the receptor and downstream pathways [6,8]. p63, a homologue of the human p53 tumour-suppressor gene, is overexpressed in a significant amount in a number of tumours, for example head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
It also possesses oncogenic properties, including the potential to increase cell proliferation and antagonize apoptosis. A study conducted in SCC-012 cells demonstrates a dose-dependent decrease in p63 protein and messenger RNA levels over the course of gefitinib treatment4. Levels of phosphorylated MAPK decreased and p27KIP-1 levels increased after the treatment. It was also found an increase in G1-phase cells and a decrease in S-phase cells consistent with growth arrest. Therefore, gefitinib was shown to downregulate p63 expression at the messenger RNA level, which that p63 is a downstream target of EGFR signalling 9. The structure of Iressa molecule is shown in Figure 2.
FIG. 2: IRESSA (LIGAND)
Iressa 1: Iressa 1 molecule was used as an inhibitor for EGFR and it was synthesized and modified from standard Iressa molecule. The structure of Iressa 1 is shown in Figure 3.
FIG. 3: IRESSA 1 (LIGAND)
Ligand –Molecular formula - C22H24ClFN4O3
TOPKAT analysis: It calculates the predicted absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) properties for collections of molecules such as synthesis candidates, vendor libraries, and screening collections. The calculated results were used to eliminate compounds with unfavorable ADMET characteristics and evaluate the proposed structural refinements, designed to improve ADMET properties like aqueous solubility, blood brain barrier penetration, plasma protein binding, CYP2D6 binding, Hepatotoxicity and Filter sets of small molecules for undesirable function groups based on published SMARTS rules prior to synthesis.
Results are expressed in relation to NTP carcinogenicity and FDA carcinogenicity by pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic methods.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The toxicological analysis of Iressa 1 using TOPKAT (DS 2.5) is summarized in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4. The pharmacokinetics results have shown that Iressa 1
molecule is non toxic to female rat and male rat (Norms per NTP carcinogenicity). It was also non toxic to male mouse according to Food and Drug Administration carcinogenicity standards.
TABLE 1: NTP CARCINOGENICITY FDA CARCINOGENICITY
Compound | Male Rat | Female rat | Male mouse | Female mouse |
Iressa 1 | 1.025 | 0.2000 | 0.000 | 1.002 |
TABLE 2: PHARMACOKINETIC STUDIES USING ADMET (DS 2.5)
Compound | BBB LEVEL | ABSORPTION LEVEL | SOLUB LEVEL | HEPATATOXICITY |
Iressa 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
The results have clearly indicated that Iressa 1 is less toxic to the lab animals used in the present study. The absorption rate, solubility, heptotoxicity, CYP2D6 and PPB values were also found to be normal (Table 4).
TABLE 3: BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER
Compound | BBB LEVEL | ABSORPTION LEVEL | SOLUB LEVEL | HEPATATOXICITY |
Iressa 1 | L | G | G | NT |
Note: U-Undefined; G-Good; NT- Non toxic
TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF PHARMACOKINETIC STUDIES USING ADMET (DS 2.5)
PK characters | Ranges |
Absorption rate | good |
Solubility | good |
Heptotoxicity | Non toxic |
CYP2D6 | Non inhibitor |
PPB | No markers flagged and AlogP98 < 4.0 |
CONCLUSION: The current investigation has clearly shown that the compound Iressa 1 has shown good results in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study. Hence it can be used as a drug similar to Iressa. However, more research has to be done to confirm its efficiency.
REFERENCES:
- Thomas J, Lynch, M.D , Daphne W. Bell, Ph.D., Raffaella Sordella, Ph.D., Sarada Gurubhagavatula, M.D., Ross A. Okimoto, B.S., Brian W. Brannigan, B.A., Patricia L. Harris, M.S., Sara M. Haserlat, Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib 2004,Vol 350, 21; 2129-2139.
- Amy C. Anderson; COR1, Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2005 March 1; 61(Pt 3): 258–262.
- Abdel-Meguid, Inhibition of human immunode®ciency virus-1 protease by a C2-symmetric phosphinate, 1993, Biochemistry Vol (32),pp7972-7980.
- Heist RS, Pharmcogenomics, Jan; 2009; 10(1):59 – 68
- Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. T. J., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O.,Journel of computer – Aided molecular Design,March 1999,Volume 13,Issue 2,pp 167-183
- Solomon, B. et al. (2003) EGFR Blockade with ZD1839 (“IRESSA”) potentiates the antitumor effects of single and multiple fractions of ionizing radiation in human A431 squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Mar 1; 55(3):713-23.
- http://www.astrazeneca-us.com/pi/iressa.pdf
- Kris, M. et al. Phase I study of oral ZD1839 (‘Iressa’), a novel inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK): evidence of good tolerability and activity 1999.
- Matheny, KE. et al. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling decreases p63 expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma cells.
How to cite this article:
Ravikumar M, Jeyanthi RL, Xavier S and Ananthi RL: Toxicological Study on the EGFR Protein Inhibitor (IRESSA 1) using TOPKAT. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 3(12); 4769-4772.
Article Information
26
4769-4772
484KB
1181
English
Ijpsr
M. Ravikumar*, Rebecca L. Jeyanthi , Suresh Xavier and Rachel L. Ananthi
No# 154,3rd street Nehru Nagar,Anna Nagar(west),Chennai-600040
ravipharmoo@yahoo.co.in
05 August, 2012
27 September, 2012
24 November, 2012
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.3(12).4769-72
01 December, 2012