VARIOUS MEDICINAL PLANTS: A PROMISING TREATMENT FOR MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM WOUND INFECTION
HTML Full TextVARIOUS MEDICINAL PLANTS: A PROMISING TREATMENT FOR MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM WOUND INFECTION
Ehssan H. O. Moglad * 1, 2, Sara Kamal Abdalla Boon 3 and Hatim T. O. Ali 4, 5
Department of Pharmaceutics 1, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 173 Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Microbiology 2, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants and Traditional Medicine Research Institute, P.O. Box 2404, National Center for Research, Khartoum, Sudan.
Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science 3, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 4, Faculty of Medicine, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 5, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Sudan.
ABSTRACT: Bacteria have proved remarkably developing resistant to a known antibiotic; however, Medicinal plants have manifested notably useful for the control of bacterial infections. This study aimed to isolate and identify the multidrug-resistant bacteria from wound infection, then examine the antibacterial activity of different concentration of the ethanolic extracts of Cymbopogon proximus, Azadirachta indica, and Grewia senegalensis plants against it. One hundred specimens collected from wound infection, isolation and identification done according to standard methods. Antibiotics susceptibility test performed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for: Cotrimoxazole (25 μg) Ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Gentamicin (10 μg), Imipenem (10 μg), Erythromycin (15 μg), Tetracycline (30 μg) Methacillin (5 μg), Ceftazidime (30 μg). 94 isolates showed bacterial growth, 40 (42.6%) isolates were Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) and 54 sample Gram-negative bacteria; 15 (27.8%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 13 (24.1%) Proteus spp, 12 (22.2%) Escherichia coli, 10 (18.5%) Klebsiella pneumonia, 4 (7.4%) Citrobacter freundii. Ethanolic extracts from Sudanese medicinal plants namely Cymbopogon proximus, Azadirachta indica, and Grewia senegalensis, screened for their antimicrobial properties against isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria at different concentrations; 100, 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25 mg/ml using agar disc diffusion and agar well diffusion method. The result revealed that all plants extracts were active against most of the resistant bacteria with MIC ranges from 50-6.25 mg/ml. In conclusion, the number of multidrug-resistant bacteria in wound infection was high, and the tested plant's species have a promising level of activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Therefore, manufacture these extracts at pharmacological form such as topical ointment should also be considered.
Keywords: |
Wound infection, Multidrug-Resistant bacteria, Medicinal plants, Sudan
INTRODUCTION: The term multidrug-resistant's (MDR) applies to the bacterium that is simultaneously resistant to some antimicrobials belonging to different chemical classes 1-3.
Furthermore, Antibiotic resistance is a global challenge that impacts all pharmaceutically used antibiotic.
In recent years' pharmaceutical companies have almost stopped producing new antibiotics which have led researchers to look for alternative antimicrobial. Herbs widely use for the treatment of infectious diseases in many developing countries 4. Therefore, in Sudan, with a high percentage of multidrug-resistant bacteria, we in urgent need to develop a new drug from our traditional medicine.
A wide range of medicinal plant parts use for extract as unprocessed drugs, and they possess various medicinal properties. The secondary metabolism of the plant was found to be a source of various phytochemicals that could directly be used as intermediates for the production of new drugs 5-8.
Nosocomial infection is one of the critical reasons why wound healing may still leading to increased risk of patient morbidity and mortality 9-11. These infections often occur following a break-in healthy skin integrity from either trauma or skin disease; the vast majority of these infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes 1, 11. The problem of microbial resistance is growing, and the outlook for the use of antimicrobial drugs in the future is still uncertain. Therefore, action must be taken to reduce this problem, for example, to control the use of antibiotic, develop research to understand the genetic mechanism of resistance better, and to continue studies to develop new drugs, either synthetic or natural 12, 13.
Three Sudanese medicinal plants, namely Cymbopogon proximus, Azadirachta indica, and Grewia senegalensis may possess antibacterial activity because it used traditionally for the treatment of many infectious and chronic diseases. Consequently, this study aimed to: firstly, verify the antibacterial activity of that plant against multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from wound infection. Secondly, to isolate and identify the pathogenic bacteria from wound infection, thirdly, evaluate in-vitro susceptibility pattern of bacteria isolated from wound specimen against multidrug, besides, to determine the prevalence of resistant bacteria in wound infection. Fourthly, compare between the antibacterial activity of selected plants extracts on Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) pathogenic bacteria with determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of these plants extracts and compare their activity with the standard used antibacterial agent in Sudan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The Study Area, Collection, and Identification of Samples: This study was a descriptive and cross-sectional study carried out in Omdurman Military Hospital and Jabir Abulaiz Hospital in Khartoum State, Sudan. During the period from February to July 2018, which studied the occurrence of patients admitted with a symptom of chronic diseases of wound infections in 100 patients, samples collected under the aseptic condition, then cultured on Blood agar and McConkey's ager. Then Inoculated plates were incubated both aerobically and facultative an aerobically at 37 °C for 18-24 h 14. Isolation and identification were done according to gram stain and biochemical tests 15, 16.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test: Susceptibility testing performed on all bacterial isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method using: Cotrimoxazole (25 μg) Ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Gentamicin (10 μg), Imipenem (10 μg), Erythromycin (15 μg), Tetracycline (30 μg) Methacillin (5 μg), Ceftazidime (30 μg). This method performed on Mueller-Hinton agar (Himedia, India) following the performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) 2017.
Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Medicinal Plants: Ethanolic extracts of Grewia senegalensis whole plant, Azadirachta indica leaves and Cymbopogon proximus whole plant obtained from medicinal and aromatic plant and Traditional Medicine Research Institute, National Center for Research, Khartoum, Sudan.
Plants extracts diluted into different concentration as follows: 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 mg/ml. The new subculture of the selected multidrug-resistant bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Citrobacter spp) standard bacteria used as a control. Bacteria Isolated from the clinical sample inoculated into 3.0 ml of sterile normal saline. Inoculum density compared with McFarland stander solution using agar disc diffusion assay. Minimum Inhibition Concentration (MICs) determined by broth media using the tube method incubated overnight at 37 °C.
Data Analysis: The data analysed by a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software programme version 20. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Chi-square test was used to correlate between antimicrobial growth inhibition zone and various medicinal plants, a P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Out of the 94 positive culture for bacterial growth, 40 were Gram-positive (42.6%), and 54 were Gram-negative (57.4%). Identify and isolated bacteria showed: Staphylococcus aureus was most abundant 40 (42.6%), 22 of S. aureus was found resistant to methicillin and considered as MRSA, while 54 Gram-negative follow by P. aeruginosa 15 (27.7%), Proteus mirabilis 8 (14.8%), Proteus vulgaris 5 (9.2%), E. coli 12 (22.2%), K. pneumonia 10 (18.5%) and Citrobacter freundii 4 (7.4%).
Only multi-drug resistant isolated bacteria; which showed resistant to three antibiotic or more tested for their sensitivity to selected medicinal plants extracts. These include 22 Staphylococcus aureus, 11 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 Proteus mirabilis, 5 Escherichia coli, and 5 Klebsiella pneumonia as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1: ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITIES OF SELECTED ANTIBIOTICS AGAINST CLINICAL STRAINS ISOLATED FROM WOUND INFECTIONS
No. of isolates showing resistance to an antibiotic | ||||||||||
Isolated bacteria |
Methicillin | Penicillin | Ceftazidime | Imipenem | Erythromycin | Tetracycline | Gentamycin | Cotrimoxazole | Ciprofloxacin | Total |
Staphylococcus aureus | 22 | 24 | 25 | - | 24 | - | - | 18 | 1 | 40 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | - | - | - | 0 | - | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 15 |
Proteus mirabilis | - | - | - | 0 | - | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
Proteus vulgaris | - | - | 8 | 0 | - | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
Escherichia coli | - | - | 12 | 0 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 12 |
Klebsiella pneumonia | - | - | - | 0 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
Citrobacter freundi | - | - | - | 0 | - | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
The Activity Ethanolic Extracts of Tested Plants on Wound Isolates:
Cymbopogon proximus: The antimicrobial test showed the strong inhibited against that growth of multidrug-resistant bacteria studies, which showed activity in all tested concentrations. The Cymbopogon proximus was effective against 17 Staphylococcus aureus, 9 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 3 Proteus mirabilis, 3 Escherichia coli and 5 Klebsiella pneumonia.
At the highest concentration applied of 100 mg/ml were exhibited large inhibition zone against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumonia 22 mm in diameter at 100mg/ml, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli 21mm in diameter at 100 mg/ml. The MIC values were as follows: 12.5 mg/ml for Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis, 6.25 mg/ml for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 25 mg/ml for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia ethanol extract of Cymbopogon proximus.
Azadirachta indica: The results showed that extract of neem possesses antimicrobial activity against all tested multidrug-resistant bacteria and the MIC value was as follows: 12.5 mg/ml for Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumonia, 25 mg/ml for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.
TABLE 2: ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITIES OF ETHANOLIC EXTRACTS OF CYMBOPOGON PROXIMUS, AZADIRACHTA INDICA AND GREWIA SENEGALENSIS AGAINST MDR ISOLATED BACTERIA
Tested bacteria and number | Mean inhibition zone in mm at 100mg/ml | P. value | ||
C. proximus | A. indica | G. senegalensis | ||
S. aureus (22) | 18.72 | 17.63 | 12.4 | 0.006 |
P. aeruginosa (11) | 18.27 | 16.64 | 15.64 | 0.055 |
P. mirabilis (5) | 18.80 | 14.60 | 13.60 | 0.935 |
E. coli (5) | 17.40 | 16.00 | 13.8 | 0.799 |
K. pneumonia (5) | 19.00 | 14.46 | 13.40 | 0.938 |
Grewia senegalensis: The antimicrobial effected of ethanolic extract of Grewia senegalensis was showed week activity inhibition against multidrug-resistant bacteria studies and showed activity only in concentration 100 mg/ml Table 2.
DISCUSSION: Multidrug resistance bacteria characterized by the different patterns of resistance found in healthcare-associated, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least three or more antimicrobial, novel development combination therapies for the treatment of MDR bacteria 17, 18. This study showed a high number of multidrug resistance in isolated bacteria; gram-negative bacteria, in particular, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureuswere most abundant which agreed with previous studies 19, 20.
Several drugs of plant, mineral and animal origin described in the Ayurveda for their wound healing properties 21. The current study was carried out to screen the antibacterial activity of Cymbopogon proximus, Azadirachta indica and Grewia senegalensis, ethanolic extract against wound infection bacterial isolates S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Proteus spp, E. coli, and K. pneumonia. The results showed the high activity of ethanolic extract of Cymbopogon proximus; these results ultimately agreed with that obtained by 22. The Azadirachta indica exhibited high antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from some diabetes mellitus patients.
It agreed with reported by 23, 24. Moreover, several compounds derived from plants revealed significant activity against gram-positive bacteria only 25. The result agreed with Samy and Selim, 2011, who reported the activity component of C. proximus to consider as strongly inhibition bacteria growth: piperitone, elemol, α-eudesmol, β-eudesmol, and limonene 22.
The activity of A. indica and G. senegalensis might be due to the secondary metabolites, as it is reported the active antimicrobial compound for A. indica and G. senegalensis leaves alkaloids, glycosides, flavonoids, saponins, tannins and phenolic compound 24.
CONCLUSION: Ethanolic extracts of Cymbopogon proximus, Azadirachta indica, and Grewia senegalensis possessed antibacterial activity against same multidrug-resistant bacteria; which justify their use in Sudanese traditional medicine as wounds healer and for treatment of various infection caused by resistant pathogenic bacteria. The ethanolic extract showed high activity against gram-positive than gram-negative. The efficiency of the antibacterial of ethanolic extract was found to increase by increasing concentration. Based on this study, we recommended that; isolation and purification of the active ingredient in these plants extracts responsible for the antibacterial activity should be done, determination of the toxicity of the active ingredient and Manufacture these extracts at pharmacological form such as topical ointment should be considered. Decrease the antimicrobial-resistant phenomena by increase the patient’s awareness about the impact of improper using of antibiotics.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The author is thankful to the Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan, for their generous support. The author is also thankful to researcher Mr. Yahya Suliman, Department of Taxonomy and photochemistry, Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Research Institute, National Center for Research, for authentication of the plant. The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The author declares no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Godebo G, Kibru G and Tassew H: Multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates in infected wounds at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2013; 12: 1-17.
- Mama M, Abdissa A and Sewunet T: Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South-West Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2014; 13: 14.
- Tanwar J, Das S and Fatima Z: Multidrug Resistance: An Emerging Crisis. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases 2014; 7.
- Qureshi AI and Cohen RD: Mesalamine delivery systems: do they really make much difference? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005; 57(2): 281-02.
- Khan UA, Rahman H and Niaz Z: Antibacterial activity of some medicinal plants against selected human pathogenic bacteria. Eur J Microbio Immuno (Bp) 2013; 3(4): 272-74.
- Vu TT, Kim H and Tran VK: In-vitro antibacterial activity of selected medicinal plants traditionally used in Vietnam against human pathogenic bacteria. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2016; 16: 32.
- Sharma A, Flores-Vallejo RDC and Cardoso-Taketa A: Antibacterial activities of medicinal plants used in Mexican traditional medicine. Journal of Ethno-pharmacology 2017; 208: 264-29.
- Durant-Archibold AA, Santana AI and Gupta MP: Ethnomedical uses and pharmacological activities of most prevalent species of genus Piper in Panama: A review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2018; 217: 63-82.
- Branski LK, Al-Mousawi A and Rivero H: Emerging infections in burns. Surgical Infec 2009; 10(5): 389-97.
- Zhang C, Gong YL and Luo XQ: [Analysis of distribution and drug resistance of pathogens from the wounds of 1 310 thermal burn patients]. Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese Journal of Burns. 2018; 34(11): 802-08.
- Dou Y and Zhang Q: [Analysis of distribution and drug resistance of pathogens of burn patients during 9 years]. Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese Journal of Burns 2018; 34(3): 153-59.
- Paphitou NI. Antimicrobial resistance: action to combat the rising microbial challenges. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2013; 42S: S25-28.
- Moro ML and Gagliotti C: Antimicrobial resistance and stewardship in long-term care settings. Future Micro-biology. 2013; 8(8): 1011-25.
- Copeland-Halperin LR, Kaminsky AJ and Bluefeld N: Sample procurement for cultures of infected wounds: a systematic review. Journal of Wound Care 2016; 25(4): S4-6, s8-10.
- Carter GR: 4 - Isolation and Identification of Bacteria from Clinical Specimens. In Carter GR, Cole JR, (Eds). Diagnostic Procedure in Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology (Fifth Edition). San Diego: Academic Press 1990: 19-39.
- Muckle CA: Diagnostic Procedures in Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology 5th Can Vet J 1992; 33(6): 360-60.
- Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A and Carey RB: Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pan drug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2012; 18(3): 268-81.
- van Duin D and Paterson DL: Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in the Community: Trends and Lessons Learned. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 2016; 30(2): 377-90.
- Biswas S, Brunel JM and Dubus JC: Colistin: an update on the antibiotic of the 21st Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy 2012; 10(8): 917-34.
- Li J, Nation RL and Turnidge JD: Colistin: the re-emerging antibiotic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2006; 6(9): 589-01.
- Tan HT, Rahman RA and Gan SH: The antibacterial properties of Malaysian tualang honey against wound and enteric microorganisms in comparison to Manuka honey. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2009; 9: 34.
- Selim SA: Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil and methanol extract of the Egyptian lemongrass Cymbopogon proximus Grasas y Aceites 2011; 62: 1.
- Subapriya R and Nagini S: Medicinal properties of neem leaves: a review. Current Medicinal Chemistry Anti-Cancer Agents 2005; 5(2): 149-46.
- Gupta SC, Prasad S and Tyagi AK: Neem (Azadirachta indica): An Indian traditional panacea with modern molecular basis. Phytomedicine: International Journal of Phytotherapy and Phytopharmacology 2017; 34: 14-20.
- Tegos G, Stermitz FR and Lomovskaya O: Multidrug pump inhibitors uncover remarkable activity of plant antimicrobials. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2002; 46(10): 3133-41.
How to cite this article:
Moglad EHO, Boon SKA and Ali HTO: Various medicinal plants: a promising treatment for multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from wound infection. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(2): 839-43. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(2).839-43.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
42
839-843
706
892
English
IJPSR
E. H. O. Moglad *, S. K. A. Boon and H. T. O. Ali
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
e.moglad@psau.edu.sa
05 May 2019
24 August 2019
01 September 2019
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(2).839-43
01 February 2020