FORMULATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GASTRORETENTIVE FLOATING MICROBALLOONS OF METFORMIN
HTML Full TextFORMULATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GASTRORETENTIVE FLOATING MICROBALLOONS OF METFORMIN
Akash Yadav* and Dinesh Kumar Jain
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, IPS Academy, Knowledge Village, Rajendra Nagar, A.B. Road, Indore (MP), India
ABSTRACT
Gastroretentive dosage forms have potential for use as controlled drug delivery systems. Multiple unit systems avoid the “all-or-none” gastric emptying nature of single unit system. A controlled release system designed to increase its residence time in the stomach without contact with the mucosa was achieved through the preparation of floating microballoons by the emulsion solvent diffusion technique using acrylic polymers (i.e. Eudragit RS-100 and Eudragit S-100) with drug (metformin) in a mixture of ethanol, dichloromethane and propanol. The effect of various formulation and variables on the internal and external particle morphology, micromeritics properties, in vitro floating behavior, physical state of the incorporated drug, drug loading and invitro drug release was studied. The microparticles were found to be regular in shape and highly porous. The release rate was determined in simulated gastro-intestinal fluids at 37oC. The formulation demonstrated favorable invitro floating and release characteristics. The drug encapsulation efficiency was high. Incorporation of Eudragit RS-100 and Eudragit S-100 in the microballoons proved to be an effective method to achieve the desired release behavior and buoyancy. The designed system, combining excellent buoyant ability and suitable drug release pattern, could possibly be advantageous in terms of bioavailability of metformin
Keywords:
Floating drug delivery system,
Emulsion solvent diffusion method,
Microballoons, Metformin,
Eudragit RS-100,
Eudragit S-100.
INTRODUCTION: Increased gastric retention of drug delivery system in certain situations may be desirable to improve the bioavailability and the therapeutic efficacy of the drugs. Drugs that are absorbed easily in the proximal part of the gastro intestinal (GI) tract, and having short half-life are estimated quickly from the blood circulation. To overcome these problems, orally administered drugs are generally film coated or microencapsulated to prolong the drug release period and drug action. However most of these forms have several physiological problems such as GI transit time, short residence time and incomplete drug release from devices, which leads to low bioavailability. To overcome this problem, several attempts have been made recently to extend GI transit time of the devices. One such method is floating drug delivery systems.
These devices have specific density that is lower than that of the gastric fluids. Most of the floating system is the high variability of the GI transit time. Therefore, a multiple-unit floating system has been worked upon. In the present study, microballoons of metformin were developed using Drug: Eudragit RS-100: Eudragit S-100 in various ratios by emulsion solvent diffusion method. These microballoons were tested for physicochemical properties along with in-vitro floating and the drug release behavior 1, 2.
Preparation of floating hollow microballoons: Microballoons with an internal hollow structure were prepared by solvent diffusion-evaporation method. Equal quantities of two polymers i.e. Eudragit S-100 and Eudragit RS-100 were dissolved in mixture of ethanol, isopropanol and dichloromethane. Then drug was homogeneously dispersed in this polymer solution3, 4. This polymer solution was slowly introduced into poly vinyl alcohol aqueous solution with stirring using a mechanical stirrer equipped with a three blade propeller. The solution was stirred for one hour and microballoons were collected by filtration and washed three times with distilled water, dried and kept in desiccators.5, 6
Fig 1: Scanning Electron microscope (SEM) image of metformin microballoons
Process variables: Various process variables which could affect the preparation properties of the microballoons were identified and studied. The method of preparation was accordingly optimized and validated. Preparation of floating microballoons involves various process variables, out of which the following were selected for the optimization of formulations:
- Solvent ratio
- Drug: polymer ratio
- Emulsifier concentration
- Temperature
- Stirring rate
- Polymer-polymer ratio
Total 15 formulations were designed on the basis of these variables (Table I).
Table 1: The composition, formulation code and variable used in the preparation of floating microballoons
Formulation
Code |
Drug
Polymer Ratio |
Solvent Ratio
{D: E: I} |
Emulsifier Conc. | Temp.
(o C) |
Stirring Rate (rpm) |
MO1 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
MO2 | 1:2 | 5:6:4 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
MO3 | 1:2 | 5:4:2 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
MO4 | 1:2 | 5:2:8 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
MP1 | 1:3 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
MP2 | 1:4 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
MP3 | 1:5 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
ME1 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 0.50 | 30 | 300 |
ME2 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
ME3 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 1.0 | 30 | 300 |
ME4 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 1.25 | 30 | 300 |
MT1 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 10 | 300 |
MT2 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 20 | 300 |
MT3 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 30 | 300 |
MT4 | 1:2 | 5:8:2 | 0.75 | 40 | 300 |
Fig 2: Scanning Electron microscope (SEM) of microballoons cross section
CHARACTERIZATION OF METFORMIN MICROBALLOONS:
Size distribution and morphology: The floating microballoons were examined by optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The size of the microballoons was measured using a photo microscope. (Fig 1 & Fig 2)
Percent yield of microballoons: The prepared microballoons were collected and weighed. The weight of microballoons was divided by the total weight of all the non-volatile components used for the preparation of the microballoons.
% yield = weight of microballoons collected / wt. of all non-volatile components used for the preparation x 100
Percent entrapped drug: The prepared microballoons were digested in minimum quantity of ethanol (95%), and then diluted with acetate buffer up to 10 ml. The digested homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for three minutes and the supernatant after suitable dilution was assayed for metformin spectrophotometrically. The percentage drug entrapment is calculated from the equation given below.
% Drug entrapped = Amount of drug in the microballoons (actual content)/ Amount of drug used in formulation (theoretical content) x 100
Determination of physical parameters: Different physical parameters of the microballoons i.e. bulk density of microballoons, true density, porosity and flowability (angle of repose) are also determined (Table 2)
Table 2: Density and porosity of different formulations
Formulation Code | Density | % Porosity | Angle of repose (o) |
MO1 | 0.757 | 53.4 | 30.5 |
ME1 | 0.719 | 47.8 | 29.4 |
ME2 | 0.834 | 60.5 | 32.0 |
ME3 | 0.802 | 57.9 | 31.2 |
ME4 | 0.825 | 59.6 | 31.6 |
MT1 | 0.787 | 56.2 | 30.8 |
MT2 | 0.742 | 51.3 | 30.5 |
MT3 | 0.726 | 48.9 | 29.7 |
MT4 | 0.738 | 50.4 | 30.1 |
In vitro floating test: The floating test of the microballoons was carried out using the dissolution test apparatus method II specified in the USP XX. The unloaded microballoons were spread over the surface of the simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2, which was agitated by a paddle rotated at 100 rpm
After agitation for a previously determined interval, the microballoons that were floating and the ones that settled to the bottom of the flask were recovered separately. After drying, the fraction of the microballoons was weighed; the % buoyancy of the microballoons was calculated by the following equation:
Percent buoyancy = Qf / (Qf + Qs) × 100
Where, Qs is the weight of the settled microballoons, Qf is weight of microballoons that were floating.7 (Table 3 & Fig 3)
Fig 3: % buoyancy of different unloaded formulations in SGF at 37 ± 1oC
Table 3: Percent buoyancy of different unloaded microballoons formulations in SGF (pH 1.2) at 37 ± 0.5oC
Formulation Code | % Buoyancy at different time intervals (hour ) | ||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 24 | ||
MO1 | 95.2 | 91.8 | 90.6 | 85.8 | 80.3 | 78.6 | 72.0 | 56.2 | |
ME1 | 97.1 | 92.8 | 88.0 | 83.6 | 80.1 | 79.8 | 76.7 | 60.9 | |
ME2 | 92.1 | 89.2 | 85.3 | 83.8 | 78.2 | 74.1 | 69.8 | 51.8 | |
ME3 | 95.4 | 92.7 | 88.7 | 84.7 | 79.9 | 77.1 | 71.3 | 54.1 | |
ME4 | 95.0 | 90.3 | 88.2 | 84.3 | 79.6 | 75.2 | 70.0 | 52.6 | |
MT1 | 95.6 | 91.7 | 90.2 | 84.9 | 80.1 | 78.2 | 71.9 | 54.8 | |
MT2 | 96.0 | 91.7 | 89.8 | 84.7 | 80.9 | 79.3 | 72.8 | 58.7 | |
MT3 | 93.6 | 92.7 | 90.2 | 86.2 | 82.1 | 79.7 | 76.3 | 60.1 | |
MT4 | 96.2 | 92.3 | 89.3 | 84.4 | 81.3 | 79.2 | 75.1 | 59.4 | |
In- vitro drug release: The optimized formulations of metformin microballoons were selected for the invitro drug release studies. The drug release studies of microballoons were carried out in dissolution test apparatus II USP XX by the paddle method. Microballoons of metformin were gently spread over the surface of 900 ml of dissolution medium (SGF pH 1.2). The paddle was rotated at 100 rpm and the temperature of dissolution medium was thermostatically controlled at 37 ± 0.5oC. The samples were withdrawn at suitable intervals of time from the dissolution vessel and were assayed after appropriate dilution spectrophotometrically at 233 nm in acidic medium for metformin using Shimadzu 1700 (UV-Visible spectrophotometer) 8 (Table 4 & Fig 4).
Table 4: Invitro drug release profile of metformin from optimized microballoons in SGF (pH 1.2) at λmax 233 nm
Formulation Code | % cumulative drug release (hour ) | |||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 24 | |||
MO1 | 7.2 | 14.0 | 20.3 | 26.6 | 32.2 | 37.2 | 41.3 | 89.6 | ||
ME1 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 10.3 | 11.1 | 11.6 | 12.2 | 21.3 | ||
ME2 | 11.6 | 25.9 | 37.8 | 46.2 | 54.3 | 61.3 | 64.4 | 93.2 | ||
ME3 | 7.6 | 16.9 | 25.7 | 36.8 | 43.9 | 51.4 | 54.8 | 91.3 | ||
ME4 | 8.0 | 20.2 | 32.9 | 41.3 | 48.7 | 56.2 | 60.1 | 92.3 | ||
MT1 | 7.4 | 15.8 | 23.2 | 30.1 | 37.3 | 42.6 | 46.4 | 90.3 | ||
MT2 | 6.8 | 13.6 | 18.4 | 23.1 | 29.0 | 32.1 | 36.2 | 76.9 | ||
MT3 | 6.6 | 11.8 | 14.9 | 20.1 | 22.8 | 26.0 | 29.7 | 56.2 | ||
MT4 | 6.7 | 12.3 | 15.2 | 20.8 | 24.7 | 28.6 | 31.5 | 65.9 | ||
Fig 4: Invitro drug release profile of metformin from optimized microballoons in SGF
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: The present formulation study of metformin was performed in an attempt to prepare floating drug delivery system consisting of floating multiple unit system. Incorporation of Eudragit S-100 and Eudragit RS-100 in the microballoons proved to be an effective method to achieve the desired release behavior and buoyancy. The performance of these formulations was evaluated and the effect of various formulation various formulation variables was studied. The designed system, combining excellent buoyant ability and suitable drug release pattern, could possibly be advantageous in terms of increased bioavailability of metformin. Major advantages of the system include:
- Ease of preparation
- Good buoyancy
- High encapsulation efficiency
- Sustained drug release over several hours.
The developed formulation overcomes and alleviates the drawbacks and limitations of sustained release preparations in the drug-delivery art through the discovery of novel Eudragit RS-100 and Eudragit S-100 based floating microballoons suitable for controlled release of drug for oral administration.
REFERENCES:
- Arora S, Ali J, Ahuja A, Khar RK, Baboota S: Floating drug delivery system: A Review. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech 2005; 6(3): E372-E390.
- Robinson JR, Lee Vincent HL: Controlled Drug Delivery-Fundamentals and Applications, Second edition, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2006:555-580.
- Chien YW: Novel Drug Delivery Systems. Marcel Dekker, Second edition 2005.
- Wise DL: Handbook of Pharmaceutical Controlled Release Technology, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2005:329-344.
- Sato Y, Kawashima Y, Takeuchi H, Yamamoto H: Invitro and invivo evaluation of riboflavin containing micro balloons for a floating controlled drug delivery system in healthy humans, International journal of pharmaceutics 2004; 1:97-107.
- Sato Y, Kawashima Y, Takeuchi H, Yamamoto H: In-vitro evaluation of floating and drug releasing behaviors of hollow microspheres (microballoons) prepared by the emulsion solvent diffusion method, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics 2004; 57:235-243.
- Sato Y, Kawashima Y, Takeuchi H, Yamamoto H: Physicochemical properties to determine the buoyancy of hollow micro sphere (microballoons) prepared by the emulsion solvent diffusion method, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics.2003; 55: 297-304.
- Kawashima Y, Niwa T, Takeuchi H, Hino T, Itoh Y: Preparation of multiple unit hollow microspheres with acrylic resin containing tranilast and their drug release characteristic (in vitro) and floating behavior (in vitro), International journal of controlled release 1991; 16:279-290.
- Jain SK, Agrawal GP, and Jain NK: A novel calcium silicate based microspheres of repaglinide: In vivo investigation, Journal of controlled release 2006; 113:111-116.
- El-Gibaly: Development and in-vitro evaluation of novel floating Chitosan microcapsules for oral use: comparison with Non-floating microspheres, Int. J. Pharmaceutics 2002; 249:7-21.
Article Information
5
38-43
606 kB
1196
English
IJPSR
Akash Yadav* and Dinesh Kumar Jain
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, IPS Academy, Knowledge Village, Rajendra Nagar, A.B. Road, Indore (MP), India
akash.ipsa@gmail.com
29 January, 2010
20 February, 2010
25 February, 2010
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.1(3).38-43
01 March, 2010