QUALITY STANDARDIZATION OF AYURVEDIC FORMULATIONS – SANSHAMANI VATI AND MAHALAXMIVILAS RASA
HTML Full TextQUALITY STANDARDIZATION OF AYURVEDIC FORMULATIONS - SANSHAMANI VATI AND MAHALAXMIVILAS RASA
Priyanka Patil, Madhuree Gawhankar, Shivcharan Bidve and Santosh Yadav *
Shree Dhootapapeshwar Limited, Veer Savarkar Chowk, Panvel, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT: Purpose: Sanshamani Vati (SHV) is useful in all types of Jwara, and Mahalaxmivilas Rasa (MLVR) is the best drug in various cardiovascular and respiratory disorders. To maintain the enormous trust in Ayurveda, it’s necessary to ascertain the quality, efficacy & safety of Ayurvedic formulations on scientific lines using modern techniques. Present work attempts have been made to standardize the traditional Ayurvedic formulations - SHV and MLVR with modern techniques. Method: The formulations were standardized for physicochemical, Elemental and phytochemical screening. The XRD profiling was done for MLVR. Also the authentication of RM used in SHV was done using HPTLC. The validation of the methods for Elemental and phytochemical assays was performed as per ICH guidelines. Results: The Physico-chemical and phyto-chemical screening of Sanshamani Vati, and Mahalaxmivilas Rasa Tablets was done. The HPTLC profile confirms the presence of Berberine at Rf 0.25 ± 0.02 in SHV and Myristicin at Rf 0.50 ± 0.02 in MLVR. The elemental content of Gold (Au), Iron (Fe), Mercury (Hg) & Copper (Cu) in MLVR was estimated by ICP-OES. HPTLC Densitogram confirms the presence of authenticated Tinospora cordifolia RM in SHV. The XRD profile confirms the absence of free toxic metals – Hg & As. Conclusion: The present work will help understand therapeutic value concerning the quality parameters of the formulations. The standardization parameters presented in this research may serve as a standard reference to set the quality parameters for Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmivilas Rasa.
Keywords: Sanshamani Vati, Mahalaxmi vilas rasa, HPTLC, ICP-OES, XRD, Ayurveda
INTRODUCTION: Ayurveda is the world's oldest medical system believed to deal wide range of infections without causing any side effects 1. This traditional Indian medicine network is entrusted since human existence and plays a vital role in combating and catering to global healthcare needs 2.
Recent studies affirmed that about 70-80% of people, including developing countries, now rely on herbal medicines for their primary healthcare compared to modern allopathic drugs 3.
In India, the Ministry of Ayush (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha & Homeopathy) and an advisory coronavirus committee has also published some guidelines and recommendations with preventive management steps as per Ayurvedic practices through boosting immunity and several Ayurvedic medicines for symptomatic management of Coronavirus infection during the pandemic 4, 5. In Ayurveda, it is mentioned that the Rasayana Chikitsa or therapy promotes and rejuvenates physical as well as mental health of the body and produces resistance against diseases. As per modern science, the Rasayana therapy enhances immune responsiveness of an organism against pathogens by activating the immune system with immunomodulatory agents of plant origin 6. In Ayurvedic Rasayana, many medicinal plants are valued for their therapeutic potential with immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antidepressant activities and have been scientifically proven with promising effect based on the recommendation by Ministry of AYUSH, Govt of India 7, 8.
In Ayurveda, "Rasayana botanicals” such as Shatavari (Asparagus racemosus), Guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia) and Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) known to modulate the immune system and possess antiviral activities are used for rejuvenation by boosting the immune system and alleviating disease condition 9-14. With reference to Bhavprakash Nighantu (an Ayurvedic text), Guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia) is categorized as “Rasayana” 15 and used for its anti-inflammatory 16, 17, 24, immunomodulatory 17-20, anti-allergic 20, antipyretic 20, antidiabetic 17, 20, 21 properties. Sanshamani vati i.e. Guduchi Ghan (concentrated form of decoction) Vati an Ayurvedic preparation, is used as adjuvant in various hospital trials against COVID-19 due to its anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and immuno-modulation properties 22-25.
In-silico studies also confirmed that the phytochemical compounds of Guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia), Berberine and Sitosterol found as most powerful inhibitors against COVID-19 26, 27. Tinospora cordifolia is the accepted botanical source for Guduchi in Indian Ayurveda system. Despite of this fact, Tinospora crispa is used as substitute and sometimes as adulterant to Tinospora cordifolia in the formulations due to their similarities 27. Many cases reveal that Tinospora crispa might have the negative effect of inducing hepatotoxicity 29. To avoid such circumstances, a system must be developed to confirm Tinospora cordifolia species in the formulation instead of Tinospora crispa. In addition to Rasayan botanicals, the Ayurvedic rasa-aushadhis are also having qualities such as instant effectiveness, requirement in very small dosage and abundant therapeutic utility 30. These Rasa-aushadhis have been used to treat chronic ailments since time immemorial 29. Mahalaxmivilas Rasa, a herbo-mineral-metallic preparation, comes under the Khalviya Rasayana (A preparation method of Rasa-aushadhis) 30. It has broader therapeutic activity in Urdhwa Jatrugata rogas (Upper Respiratory Disorders), kasa (Cough), Pinasa (Chronicrhinitis/sinusitis), Gala Roga (Diseases of throat), Atisara (Diarrhoea), Nasa Roga (Disease of nose), Netraroga (Eye disorder), Mukha Roga (Disease of mouth) 30, 31. The Rasa-aushadhis are the Formulations made by mercury and incinerated metals and minerals 30. Mercury is an extremely hazardous heavy metal known for its toxicity to human health 32. It undergoes extensive detoxification procedures before being used in any formulation. The toxicity of Mercury is seen mainly due to its elemental and organic form and not due to inorganic form. Inorganic mercury is considered to be the least toxic among the different forms of mercury 33-34.
Considering the therapeutic effect of Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmi vilas rasa, the attempt of present work has been made to characterize and validate the formulations with modern techniques and to prove their safety of the formulations. The present work will help understand therapeutic value concerning the quality parameters of the formulations.
METHODS AND MATERIALS:
Chemicals: The Ayurvedic formulations Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmivilas Rasa Tablets were procured from Shree Dhootapapeshwar limited stockiest. Batch codes designated were Sample-1, Sample-2 and Sample-3 for each of three batches of these formulations. The manufacturing details of these batches are tabulated in Table 1. Myristicin of purity 98.0% (CAS No. CC60706) was procured from Natural Remedies Private Limited and Berberine of purity 98.0% (CAS No. 633658) was procured from Sigma Aldrich for chromatographic evaluations. The Certified reference standards of Elements Gold (Au) NIST SRM® 3121, Iron (Fe) NIST SRM® 3126a, Copper (Cu) NIST SRM® 3114 and Mercury (Hg) NIST SRM® 3133from Merck with the concentration of 1000 PPM were used for Elemental analysis. All other chemicals and reagents (Butanol, Ethyl acetate, Methanol, Glacial acetic acid, Toluene, Formic acid, Hexane, Hydrochloric acid and Nitric acid) used in analysis were of Analytical grade of Merck.
TABLE 1: MANUFACTURING DETAILS OF MAHALAXMIVILAS RASA AND SANSHAMANI VATI
Product Name | Mahalaxmivilas Rasa | Sanshamani Vati |
Manufacturing Reference | Rasayogsagar 2/235 | Ayurved Sar Sangrah |
Ingredients | Suvarna Bhasma 1 Part Abhrak Bhasma 16 Parts Shuddha Parad 2 Parts Shuddha Gandhak 8 Parts Vang Bhasma 4 Parts Tamra Bhasma 1 Part Shuddha Hartala 2 Parts Karpoor 2 Parts Jatiphal 2 Parts Jayapatri 2 Parts Shuddha Dhatturbeej 4 Parts Vruddhdaru Beej 4 Parts |
Each tablet contains: Guduchi Ghana 125 mg |
Organoleptic Evaluation: Organoleptic evaluations like colour, taste and texture of the samples of Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa Tablets were analyzed as preliminary quality check.
Physico-chemical Screening: In Physico-chemical screening, the samples of Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmivilas Rasa Tablets were analyzed for various Physico-chemical Parameters such as Hardness, Friability, Disintegration, weight variation, Loss on Drying (LOD), Ash, Acid Insoluble ash (AIA), Water soluble extractive (WSE) and Alcohol soluble extractive (ASE) as per The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India (API).
HPTLC Instrumentation and Experimental Conditions for Chromatographic Analysis: HPTLC Instrument Camag with Linomat 5, TLC Scanner 4 and Wincat Software was used for chromatographic analysis of Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa Tablets.
A twin trough chamber was used for the development of the HPTLC plate. A photo documentation cabinet fitted with High-Resolution camera was used for capturing images at different wavelengths.
Densitometer TLC Scanner 4 equipped with D2 and Tungsten (W) lamp was used to obtain spectra for the quantitative determination of the compound. The solvent systems, wavelengths and lamps used for estimation of Berberine and Myristicin, which gave good resolution are tabulated in Table 2.
TABLE 2: CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
# | Marker | Extraction solvent | Extraction technique | Solvent System | Visualization | Lamp Used | λmax |
1 | Berberine | Methanol | Reflux on water bath | Butanol : Ethyl Acetate : Glacial acetic acid : Water (3 : 5 : 1 : 1) v/v |
Under UV at 366 nm | Mercury (Hg) | 366 nm |
2 | Myristicin | n-Hexane: Chloroform (1:1) | Cold maceration | Toluene : Ethyl Acetate (9.8 : 0.2) v/v | After derivatization with Anisaldehyde sulfuric acid reagent | Deuterium (D2) lamp | 212 nm |
Authentication of Tinospora cordifolia used in Sanshamani Vati: The Methanolic extract of stem of Tinospora cordifolia, Tinospora crispa & three batches of Sanshamani vati were applied on TLC plate and the plate was then developed in the mobile phase (Hexane: chloroform: Methanol: Formic acid:: 4: 4: 2: 0.1 v/v/v/v). After spraying with Anisaldehyde sulfuric acid reagent, the plate was Visualize for band, and heated at 110°C for 5 min. The retention factor (RF values) and color of the bands were noted.
Elemental Analysis by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES): The samples of Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa Tablets were digested in a MARS 6 microwave digestion system (CEM corp., USA) equipped with Teflon closed vessels (Easy Prep Plus vessel) for safe operation under 800 psi. The instrumental conditions used for digestion of samples are given in Table 3. After completion of digestions, elemental content (Au, Fe, Hg & Cu) were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) using a Perkin Elmer model AVIO 200 with Syngestic software. The instrumental conditions of ICP-OES used for Elemental analysis are given in Table 4.
TABLE 3: CEM MARS 6 MICROWAVE DIGESTION SYSTEM OPERATING PARAMETERS
Instrumental Parameters | Gold (Au) | Iron (Fe) | Copper (Cu) | Mercury (Hg) |
Acid used for Digestion | Aquaregia (HCl : HNO3 :: 3 :1) |
HCL | Aquaregia (HCl : HNO3 :: 3 :1) |
Aquaregia (HCl : HNO3:: 3 :1) |
Method | Au | Fe | Cu | Hg |
Temperature | 170°C | 170°C | 190°C | 170°C |
Pressure | 650 psi | 650 psi | 650 psi | 650 psi |
Ramp Time | 15 min | 20 min | 20 min | 20 min |
Hold Time | 1 min | 10 min | 15 min | 10 min |
Cooling Time | 15 min | 15 min | 15 min | 15 min |
TABLE 4: ICP-OES OPERATING PARAMETERS
Element | Wavelength | Plasma (L/min) |
AUX (L/min) |
Neb (L/min) |
Power (watts) |
View Dist. |
Plasma View |
Gold (Au) | 242.795 | 10 | 0.2 | 0.60 | 1300 | 15 | Radial |
Iron (Fe) | 238.204 | 10 | 0.2 | 0.60 | 1300 | 15 | Radial |
Copper (Cu) | 327.393 | 10 | 0.2 | 0.60 | 1300 | 15 | Radial |
Mercury (Hg) | 253.652 | 10 | 0.2 | 0.60 | 1300 | 15 | Radial |
Validation of the Method: The Method validation was performed for Phytochemical Quantification by HPTLC and Elemental Analysis by ICP-OES as per standard ICH guidelines, which included linearity, precision, accuracy, LOD and LOQ 35. The linearity of method was performed by plotting calibration curves. Precision was performed by Repeatability and by estimating intraday and interday readings and %RSD relative standard deviation. Accuracy of analytical methods was expressed as % recovery. This was estimated by adding known concentration of standard solution to pre-analyzed sample solution. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were estimated as per formula:
LOD = 3.3 x σ/S and LOQ = 10 x σ/S,
Where σ = Standard deviation, S = Slope.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Profile: X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa was carried out using Rigaku Miniflex 600 X-ray diffract meter with operating at 40 kV and 30 mA. The XRD Pattern was recorded for angle ranging from 30 to 1000 at a scanning rate of 30/ min. and scan step of 0.010. The absence of Mercury & Arsenic in free from was confirmed by matching d-spacing with the standard database ICDD PDF-2 2021 (International Center for Diffraction Data).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Sanshamani Vati, and Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa Tablets were characterized as brownish black to black and Greenish gray to dark gray in colour, respectively with round coated biconvex shape. The Physico-chemical screening of both Sanshamani Vati, and Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa Tablets showed Friability less than 1%, Hardness greater than 1.5 kg/cm2, Disintegration time less than 60 min and Loss on drying (LOD) less than 6 %. Sanshamani Vati Tablets showed Ash content less than 30 %, Acid insoluble ash (AIA) less than 2 %, Water soluble Extractive (WSE) more than 45 % and Alcohol soluble Extractive (ASE) more than 20 % Table 5. All the samples of Sanshamani Vati, and Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa were found to comply with the weight variation test as per API 36. Weight variation is an important factor that is affected by the tooling of the compression machine, head pressure, machine speed and flow properties of the powder, powder or granulate density and particle size. The friability test helps to determine the tablet’s physical strength, which is attributed to the tablet breaking force. The disintegration test is a measure of the time required under specified conditions for the tablets to disintegrate into particles. Loss on drying (LOD) measures the amount of water and volatile matter in a sample when the sample is dried under specified conditions. This is the major factor responsible for the deterioration of the drugs and formulations. Low moisture content is always useful for higher stability of drugs 37-38.
TABLE 5: PL GIVE SPACING IN BETWEEN SANSHAMANIVATI & MAHALAXMIVILAS RASA ANALYSIS DATA
Product name | SANSHAMANI VATI | ||
Batch code | Sample - 1 | Sample - 2 | Sample - 3 |
Colour | Brownish black coated tablets | Brownish black coated tablets | Brownish black coated tablets |
Shape | Round convex | Round convex | Round convex |
Friability (% w/w) | 0.001 % w/w | 0.002 % w/w | 0.001 % w/w |
Disintegration Time (min.) | 18 min. | 15 min. | 20 min. |
Hardness (kg/cm2) | 2.7 kg/cm2 | 3.0 kg/cm2 | 2.0 kg/cm2 |
Thickness (mm) | 3.48 mm | 3.40 mm | 3.33 mm |
Diameter (mm) | 6.48 mm | 6.48 mm | 6.6 mm |
Average Weight (mg) | 127 mg | 127 mg | 128 mg |
Weight Variation | Not more than 2 tablets deviate by more than 5% of the average weight and none by more than 10% of the average weight. | ||
Loss on Drying (LOD) (% w/w) | 4.58 % w/w | 7.0 % w/w | 6.26 % w/w |
Ash (% w/w) | 21.54 % w/w | 20.1 % w/w | 14.15 % w/w |
Acid Insoluble Ash (AIA) (% w/w) | 1.47 % w/w | 0.92 % w/w | 1.15 % w/w |
Water Soluble Extractive (WSE) (% w/w) | 76.50 % w/w | 72.81 % w/w | 77.60 % w/w |
Alcohol Soluble Extractive (ASE) (% w/w) | 22.2 % w/w | 21.96 % w/w | 29.7 % w/w |
Phyto-chemical Analysis by HPTLC | |||
Berberine content in ppm | 5 ppm | 5 ppm | 5 ppm |
Product name | MAHALAKSHMI VILAS RASA | ||
Batch code | Sample - 1 | Sample - 2 | Sample - 3 |
Colour | Greenish gray coated tablets | Greenish gray coated tablets | Greenish gray coated tablets |
Shape | Round convex | Round convex | Round convex |
Friability
(% w/w) |
0.006 % w/w | 0.05 % w/w | 0.02 % w/w |
Disintegration Time (min.) | 44 min. | 23 min. | 21 min. |
Hardness (kg/cm2) | 3.0 kg/cm2 | 4.33 kg/cm2 | 4.0 kg/cm2 |
Thickness (mm) | 3.46 mm | 3.56 mm | 3.57 mm |
Diameter (mm) | 6.65 mm | 6.65 mm | 6.67 mm |
Average Weight (mg) | 162.7 mg | 166.3 mg | 158.4 mg |
Weight Variation | Not more than 2 tablets deviate by more than 5% of the average weight and none by more than 10% of the average weight. | ||
Loss on Drying (LOD) (% w/w) |
5.81 % w/w | 4.08 % w/w | 5.16 % w/w |
Elemental Analysis by ICP-OES | |||
Gold (Au) (mg/tab) | 1.50 mg/tab | 1.43 mg/tab | 1.26 mg/tab |
Iron (Fe) (mg/tab) | 3.05 mg/tab | 2.96 mg/tab | 2.71 mg/tab |
Mercury (Hg) (mg/tab) | 2.27 mg/tab | 2.80 mg/tab | 2.23 mg/tab |
Copper (Cu) (mg/tab) | 0.75 mg/tab | 0.86 mg/tab | 0.88 mg/tab |
Phytochemical Analysis by HPTLC | |||
Myristicin content in ppb | 60 ppb | 60 ppb | 60 ppb |
The HPTLC profile confirms the presence of Berberine at Rf 0.25 ± 0.02 And Myristicin at Rf 0.50 ± 0.02 in Sanshamani Vati and Mahalaxmi vilas rasa, respectively. The Herbal RM ingredients Jayapatri & Jayphala (Myristica fragrans) contributed to presence of Myristin and Guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia) to Berberine.
The metal & mineral ingredients of Mahalaxmivilas rasa, Suvarna bhasma, Abhrak Bhasma, Shodhit Parad & Tamra Bhasma contributed to the content of Gold (Au), Iron (Fe), Mercury (Hg) & Copper (Cu) respectively. The contents of Gold (Au), Iron (Fe), Mercury (Hg) & Copper (Cu) in samples of Mahalaxmi vilas rasa were determined by ICP-OES and results were tabulated in Table 5.
Authentication of Tinospora cordifolia used in Sanshamani Vati: As shown in Fig. 1, 2 & 3, the methanolic extracts of Sanshamani Vati and Tinospora cordifolia confirm the presence of similar major bands at Rf 0.26 (greenish blue), 0.36 (light brown), 0.42 (Gray colour), 0.47 (Purple), 0.52 (Light gray colour) and 0.56 (Light purple), whereas the methanolic extract of Tinospora crispa does not show presence of similar band pattern. It confirms the authenticity of raw material used in Sanshamani vati as Tinospora cordifolia.
FIG. 1: HPTLC FINGERPRINT OF, TRACK 1 - TINOSPORA CORDIFOLIA, TRACK 2 TO 4 - SANSHAMANI VATI, TRACK 5 - TINOSPORA CRISPA
FIG. 2: DENSITOMETRIC UV SPECTRA OF SANSHAMANI VATI AND TINOSPORA CORDIFOLIA
FIG. 3: HPTLC DENSITOGRAMS OF TINOSPORA CORDIFOLIA, SANSHAMANI VATI AND TINOSPORA CRISPA AFTER DERIVATIZATION AT 540NM
Method Validation by HPTLC: For development of a successful method the first important step is to optimize the mobile phase. Trials with various solvent system combinations carried out mobile phase optimization. The chamber saturation time was optimized to 20 min at room temperature with relative humidity 38 ± 2%. The chromatographic run was roughly 90 mm, and the distance between two tracks was 15 mm. The optimized chromatographic conditions are given in Table 2.
Specificity: It was observed that other phytochemical constituents present in Sanshamani vati & Mahalaxmivilas rasa did not interfere with the peaks of Berberine and Myristicin, respectively.
Thus the proposed method was proved to be specific. The spectra of standard Berberine and Myristicin corresponded with Sanshamani vati & Mahalaxmi vilas rasa are shown in Fig. 4 & 5.
FIG. 4: CHROMATOGRAM AND SPECTRAL DISPLAY OF BERBERINE AT 366NM IN SANSHAMANI VATI
FIG. 5: CHROMATOGRAM AND SPECTRAL DISPLAY OF MYRISTICIN AT 212 NM IN MAHALAXMIVILAS RASA
Linearity: Different concentrations of standards were analyzed to get linearity. Under optimized chromatographic conditions peak areas for the corresponding standard were found proportional to the concentrations of Berberine and Myristicin Fig. 6. The statistical parameters of the linearity such as range, correlation coefficient, slope, intercept, SD of the intercept were presented in Table 5. The linearity graphs are presented in Fig. 6. The limit of detection (LOD) estimated for Myristicin was 21.95 pg/spot and limit of quantification (LOQ) 66.51 pg/spot. Similarly, the limit of detection (LOD) estimated for Berberine was 910.03 pg/spot and limit of quantification (LOQ) 2757.65 pg/spot.
TABLE 6: LINEARITY PARAMETERS OF BERBERINE & MYRISTICIN
Product Name | Sanshamani Vati | mahalaxmivilas rasa |
Marker compound | Berberine | Myristicin |
Linearity range (ng/spot) | 2450-9800 pg | 98 pg - 686 pg |
Correlation coefficient ® | 0.9994 | 0.9999 |
Slope | 0.34 | 5.34 |
Intercept | 234.60 | 237.76 |
LOD | 910.03 pg/spot | 21.95 pg/spot |
LOQ | 2757.65 pg/spot | 66.51 pg/spot |
FIG. 6: LINEARITY GRAPHS OF BERBERINE & MYRISTICIN
Intermediate Precision (Reproducibility): Precision of the method was evaluated for interday analysis. For precision % RSD was found to be <5% for Berberine & Myristicin Table 7A.
TABLE 7(A): INTERDAY PRECISION BY HPTLC
Sanshamani Vati | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | ||||||
Levels | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 |
Berberine - Peak area (pg/4ul) | 2430 | 2410 | 2340 | 2470 | 2400 | 2380 | 2360 | 2330 | 2430 |
% RSD | 1.97 | 1.96 | 2.16 | ||||||
Mahalaxmivilas rasa | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | ||||||
Levels | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 |
Myristicin - (pg/15ul) | 158.35 | 150.21 | 160.08 | 164.76 | 170.59 | 164.27 | 165.63 | 173.29 | 161.88 |
% RSD | 3.37 | 2.11 | 3.48 |
Robustness: The robustness of the methods was determined by analysis of same sample with different analyst. % RSD was estimated to be < 5.00 Table 7B.
TABLE 7(B): DIFFERENT ANALYST PRECISION BY HPTLC
Sanshamani Vati | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | |||||||
Levels | Analyst 1 | Analyst 2 | Analyst 3 | Analyst 1 | Analyst 2 | Analyst 3 | Analyst 1 | Analyst 2 | Analyst 3 | |
Berberine - Peak area (pg/4ul) | 2720 | 2770 | 2840 | 2370 | 2300 | 2280 | 2330 | 2420 | 2400 | |
% RSD | 2.17 | 2.04 | 1.98 | |||||||
Mahalaxmivilas rasa | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | |||||||
Levels | Analyst 1 | Analyst 2 | Analyst 3 | Analyst 1 | Analyst 2 | Analyst 3 | Analyst 1 | Analyst 2 | Analyst 3 | |
Myristicin - (pg/15ul) | 196.74 | 193.58 | 189.46 | 170.59 | 174.31 | 173.29 | 172.65 | 169.94 | 178.19 | |
% RSD | 1.89 | 1.11 | 2.42 | |||||||
Method Precision (Repeatability): 10 Samples with same concentration were quantified under same experimental conditions and % RSD was <5.00 Table 8.
TABLE 8: REPEATABILITY BY HPTLC
Analyte | Amount of Sample (n = 10) | Amount of drug detected (n = 10) | RSD (%) |
Berberine in Sanshamani Vati | 2.8669 g | 2331 pg/4 ul | 4.90 |
Myristicin in Mahalaxmivilas rasa | 1.6377 g | 162.36 pg/15 ul | 1.92 |
Accuracy: By adding known amount of standard analyte in the sample % recovery was measured which was found to be in range from 90 to 110 % Table 9. % RSD for all parameters were below 5% for Berberine in Sanshamani Vati and Myristicin in Mahalaxmivilas rasa, which shows the proposed methods have high level of precision.
TABLE 9: ACCURACY STUDIES OF BERBERINE & MYRISTICIN BY HPTLC
Analyte | Amount of drug
Analyzed (pg) |
Amount of drug added (pg) | Theoretical concentration (pg) | Amount of drug found
(pg) |
% Recovery |
Berberine | 382 | 305 | 687 | 638.33 | 92.92 |
382 | 392 | 774 | 699.33 | 90.35 | |
382 | 457 | 839 | 755.33 | 90.03 | |
Myristicin | 9.03 | 7.19 | 16.22 | 15.46 | 95.31 |
9.03 | 9.03 | 18.06 | 17.67 | 97.82 | |
9.03 | 10.78 | 19.81 | 18.95 | 95.66 |
Method Validation by ICP-OES: The Method validation for Quantification of Elemental Analysis (Au, Fe, Hg & Cu) in Mahalaxmi vilas Rasa by ICP-OES was performed as per standard ICH guidelines, which included linearity, precision, accuracy, LOD and LOQ.
Linearity: Different concentrations of samples were analyzed to get linearity for elemental assay methods under optimized conditions. The statistical analysis of the linearity graph such as linearity range, correlation coefficient, slope, intercept was presented in Table 10.
TABLE 10: LINEARITY PARAMETERS OF ELEMENTAL ASSAY BY ICP-OES
Product Name | mahalaxmivilas rasa | |||
Elemental Assay | Gold (Au) | Iron (Fe) | Mercury (Hg) | Copper (Cu) |
Linearity range | 50 – 250 mg | 50 – 250 mg | 50 – 250 mg | 50 – 250 mg |
Correlation coefficient ® | 0.9998 | 0.9999 | 0.9991 | 0.9991 |
Slope | 0.0121 | 0.0183 | 0.0136 | 0.0088 |
Intercept | 0.076 | 0.007 | 0.05 | -0.118 |
LOD | 4.5 ppb | 4.8 ppb | 0.34 ppm | 7.8 ppb |
LOQ | 15.0 ppb | 16.0 ppb | 1.14 ppm | 26.0 ppb |
The linearity graphs are presented in Fig. 7.
FIG. 7: LINEARITY GRAPHS OF ELEMENTAL ASSAY BY ICP-OES
Intermediate Precision (Reproducibility): Precision of the Elemental assay methods were evaluated for intraday and interday analysis.
For intraday and Interday precision data summarized in Table 11 and% RSD was found to be < 2.00.
TABLE 11(A): INTRADAY PRECISION OF ELEMENTAL ASSAY BY ICP-OES
Elemental assay in Mahalaxmivilas Rasa | Gold (Au) | Iron (Fe) | Mercury (Hg) | Copper (Cu) | |||||
% Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | ||
Sample 1 | Session 1 | 0.91 | 1.28 | 1.89 | 0.31 | 1.42 | 1.07 | 0.47 | 1.24 |
Session 2 | 0.91 | 1.88 | 1.41 | 0.47 | |||||
Session 3 | 0.89 | 1.88 | 1.44 | 0.46 | |||||
Sample 2 | Session 1 | 0.93 | 1.67 | 1.88 | 0.53 | 1.44 | 0.81 | 0.47 | 1.25 |
Session 2 | 0.92 | 1.89 | 1.42 | 0.46 | |||||
Session 3 | 0.90 | 1.90 | 1.44 | 0.46 | |||||
Sample 3 | Session 1 | 0.91 | 1.26 | 1.92 | 0.30 | 1.42 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 1.24 |
Session 2 | 0.93 | 1.92 | 1.42 | 0.47 | |||||
Session 3 | 0.91 | 1.91 | 1.41 | 0.47 |
TABLE 11(B): INTERDAY PRECISION OF ELEMENTAL ASSAY BY ICP-OES
Elemental assay in Mahalaxmivilas Rasa | Gold (Au) | Iron (Fe) | Mercury (Hg) | Copper (Cu) | |||||
% Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | ||
Sample 1 | Day 1 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 1.89 | 0.53 | 1.42 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 1.25 |
Day 2 | 0.92 | 1.87 | 1.42 | 0.47 | |||||
Day 3 | 0.92 | 1.88 | 1.43 | 0.46 | |||||
Sample 2 | Day 1 | 0.93 | 0.62 | 1.86 | 0.54 | 1.43 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 1.26 |
Day 2 | 0.94 | 1.87 | 1.44 | 0.46 | |||||
Day 3 | 0.93 | 1.85 | 1.43 | 0.46 | |||||
Sample 3 | Day 1 | 0.90 | 1.27 | 1.84 | 1.12 | 1.43 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 1.27 |
Day 2 | 0.92 | 1.88 | 1.42 | 0.45 | |||||
Day 3 | 0.90 | 1.87 | 1.43 | 0.46 |
Robustness: The robustness of the methods was determine by analysis of same sample with different analyst. % RSD was estimated to be < 2.00 Table 11(C).
TABLE 11(C): DIFFERENT ANALYST PRECISION OF ELEMENTAL ASSAY BY ICP-OES
Elemental assay in Mahalaxmivilas Rasa | Gold (Au) | Iron (Fe) | Mercury (Hg) | Copper (Cu) | |||||
% Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | % Conc. | % RSD | ||
Sample 1 | Analyst 1 | 0.93 | 1.88 | 1.88 | 0.53 | 1.43 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 1.27 |
Analyst 2 | 0.90 | 1.86 | 1.44 | 0.45 | |||||
Analyst 3 | 0.93 | 1.87 | 1.44 | 0.45 | |||||
Sample 2 | Analyst 1 | 0.91 | 1.88 | 1.86 | 0.31 | 1.44 | 1.62 | 0.45 | 1.29 |
Analyst 2 | 0.91 | 1.86 | 1.44 | 0.44 | |||||
Analyst 3 | 0.94 | 1.87 | 1.40 | 0.45 | |||||
Sample 3 | Analyst 1 | 0.92 | 1.09 | 1.86 | 0.53 | 1.44 | 1.07 | 0.46 | 1.26 |
Analyst 2 | 0.91 | 1.87 | 1.43 | 0.46 | |||||
Analyst 3 | 0.93 | 1.88 | 1.41 | 0.45 |
Method Precision (Repeatability): 10 Samples with same concentration were quantified under same experimental conditions and % RSD was found to be < 2.00 Table 12.
TABLE 12: REPEATABILITY OF ELEMENTAL ASSAY BY ICP-OES
Sample | Elemental assay | Amount of Sample (mg) (n = 10) | Concentration of Element
(% w/w) (n = 10) |
RSD (%) |
Mahalaxmivilas rasa | Gold (Au) | 100 | 0.91 | 1.75 |
Iron (Fe) | 100 | 1.89 | 0.94 | |
Mercury (Hg) | 100 | 1.43 | 1.66 | |
Copper (Cu) | 100 | 0.47 | 1.76 |
Accuracy: By adding a known amount of standard analyte in the sample % recovery was measured, which was found to be in the range from 92 to 105 % Table 13.
TABLE 13: ACCURACY STUDIES OF ELEMENTAL ASSAY BY ICP-OES
Elemental assay | Amount of drug
Analyzed (% w/w) |
Amount of drug added
(% w/w) |
Theoretical concentration
(% w/w) |
Amount of drug found
(% w/w) |
% Recovery |
Gold (Au) | 0.92 | 0.63 | 1.55 | 1.44 | 92.63 |
0.92 | 1.00 | 1.92 | 1.86 | 97.10 | |
0.92 | 1.40 | 2.32 | 2.15 | 92.64 | |
Iron (Fe) | 1.87 | 2.00 | 3.87 | 3.81 | 98.54 |
1.87 | 3.50 | 5.37 | 5.26 | 97.89 | |
1.87 | 4.97 | 6.84 | 6.68 | 97.61 | |
Mercury (Hg) | 1.40 | 2.00 | 3.40 | 3.26 | 96.04 |
1.40 | 3.00 | 4.40 | 4.60 | 104.54 | |
1.40 | 4.50 | 5.90 | 5.98 | 101.36 | |
Copper (Cu) | 0.46 | 2.06 | 2.52 | 2.50 | 99.13 |
0.46 | 3.85 | 4.31 | 4.11 | 95.52 | |
0.46 | 5.49 | 5.95 | 5.64 | 94.79 |
X-ray Diffraction (XRD): The XRD profile of Mahalaxmivilas rasa (MLVR) confirms absence of free Mercury (Hg) and Arsenic (As) when compared with XRD spectras of Mercury (Hg) and Arsenic (As) in standard database ICDD PDF-2 2021 (International Center for Diffraction Data).
FIG. 8: XRD SPECTRA COMPARISON SHOWING THE ABSENCE OF Hg & As IN MLVR
CONCLUSION: To maintain the enormous trust in Ayurveda, it’s necessary to ascertain the quality, efficacy & safety of Ayurvedic preparations on scientific lines using modern techniques. Present work attempts have been made to characterize and validate the formulations with modern techniques such as High-Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) and Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). The present work will be helpful to understand therapeutic value with respect to the quality parameters of the formulations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: We thank our Shree Dhootapapeshwar Limited research team, Ms. Shruti Jadhav and Ms. Vanita Singhvi for their dedicated analytical skill and contribution to the project.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: There are no conflicts to declare.
REFERENCES:
- Kanika Khanna: Herbal immune-boosters: Substantial warriors of pandemic Covid-19 battle. Phytomedicine. 2020.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153361
- Ravishankar B and Shukla VJ: Indian systems of medicine: a brief profile. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 2007; 4(3): 319–337.
- Hamilton, A.C. Medicinal plants, conservation and livelihoods. Biodiver. Conserv 2004; 13(8): 1477–1517.
- Ministry of AYUSH, Govt of India. Guidelines for Ayurveda practitioners for COVID 19. https://www.ayush.gov.in/ayush-guidelines.html.
- Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, 2020. Ayurveda's Immunity Boosting Measures for Self-care during COVID 19 Crisis.
- Chakraborty Shubhrajyoti: Immunomodulatory Herbs in Ayurveda and COVID 19: A review article. A journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical sciences, 2020. ISSN 2456-3110
- Agarwal S and Singh VK: Immunomodulators: a review of studies on Indian medicinal plants and synthetic peptides. Part I: medicinal plants Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 1999; 65: 179-204.
- Rajeshwari Singh & Sumeet Goel & Pascale Bourgeade & Lotfi Aleya & Devesh Tewari: Ayurveda Rasayana as antivirals and immunomodulators: potential applications in COVID-19. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021; 28: 55925–55951.
- Patwardhan B & Gautam M: Botanical immunodrugs: scope and opportunities REVIEWS 2005; 10.
- Rajeshwari Singh, Sumeet Goel, Pascale Bourgeade, Lotfi Aleya & Devesh Tewari. Ayurveda Rasayana as antivirals and immunomodulators: potential applications in COVID-19. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021; 28: 55925–55951.
- Balkrishna A, Pokhrel S, Singh J & Varshney A: Withanone from Withania somnifera May Inhibit Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Entry by Disrupting Interactions between Viral S-Protein Receptor Binding Domain and Host ACE2 Receptor. Virol J 2020; doi:10.21203/RS.3.RS-17806/V1
- Niraj S and Varsha S: A review on scope of immuno-modulatory drugs in Ayurveda for prevention and treatment of Covid-19. Plant Science Today 2020; 7(3): 417–423. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2020.7.3.831
- Ghosh S & Saha S: Tinospora cordifolia: One plant, many roles. Anc Sci Life 2012; 31(4): 151–159.
- Patwardhan B, Chavan-gautam P, Gautam M, Tillu G & Chopra A: Ayurveda rasayana in prophylaxis of COVID-19. Current Science 2020; 25(118): 8.
- Bhava Mishra: Varanasi: Chaukhambha Bharti Academy; Bhava Prakasha Nighantu, Part-1, Guduchyadi Varga, Commentary by Chunekar KC 2008; 228.
- Amrit Godbole: The effect of cordifolia and Z. officinale in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research (eIJPPR) 2019; 9(4): 1-9.
- Tiwari P, Nayak P, Prusty SK and Sahu PK: Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of Tinospora cordifolia: A Review. Free Radicals and Antioxidants 2018; 9(1): 70-8.
- Dissanayake KGC, Perera WPRT and Premasinghe N: Immunomodulatory efficiency of Tinospora cordifolia against viral infections. World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2020; 6(5): 22-28.
- Vidya H R, Manasa R, Santosha D U, Shivananjappa M and Shekhara Naik R: Immunomodulatory activity of Tinospora cordifolia. IP J Nutr Metab Health Sci 2022; 5(3): 103-108.
- Sajith KS and Hafiz Farhan: Pharmacological effects of Tinospora cordifolia: (Giloy) in human body. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2022; 11(7): 07-10.
- Bindurani LGP. Ram, Anoop Singh, Komal J Gade and Sachin A Fegade: Antidiabetic Potential of Tinospora cordifolia (Guduchi) and Momordica charantia (Karela) in Alloxan Induced Rats. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences-IJPBSTM 2019; 9(3): 411-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/ijpbs.2019.9.3.53
- The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India. Part I. 1st ed. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health and FW 2001; 53–5.
- Dhama K, Sachan S and Khandia R: Medicinal and Beneficial Health Applications of Tinospora cordifolia (Guduchi): A Miraculous Herb Countering Various Diseases/Disorders and its Immunomodulatory Effects. Recent Pat Endocr Metab Immune Drug Discov. 2017; 10(2): 96-111. doi:10.2174/1872214811666170301105101
- Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University. Samta Ayurveda Prakoshtha, India. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04480398. Efficacy and Safety of Guduchi Ghan Vati for Covid-19 Asymptomatic Patients. 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04480398
- Sumanlata, Suman A and Sharma RK: Evaluation of anti-inflammatory and antipyretic effect of aqueous extract of Tinospora cordifolia in rats. International Journal of Research and Review 2019; 6(8): 340-346.
- Ambrish Kumar Srivastava, Abhishek Kumar and Neeraj Misra: On the Inhibition of COVID-19 Protease by Indian Herbal Plants: An In Silico Investigation. 2020. arXiv: 2004; 03411 [q-bio.OT]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.03411
- Papia Chowdhury: In-silico investigation of phytoconstituents from Indian medicinal herb ‘Tinospora cordifolia (giloy)’ against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) by molecular dynamics approach. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2021; 39(17): 6792-6809, DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1803968
- Anjana J, Seema Pradeep, Shiva Manjunatha MP, Anjali Asok and Akshatha M Bhat: A Comparitive Evaluation of Species of Guduchi (Tinospora Cordifolia (Wilid.) Meirs Ex Hook. F & Thoms., Tinospora Malabarica Meirs Ex Hook, Tinospora Crispa Meirs.) w.r.t Satwa. Ayushdhara 2018; 5(3): 1682-1687.
- Wei-Te Huang, Ching-Yeh Tu, Fen-Yu Wang and Sheng-Teng Huang: Literature review of liver injury induced by Tinospora crispa associated with two cases of acute fulminant hepatitis. Complement Ther Med 2019; 42: 286-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.11.028. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
- Srikanth N: Chemical characterization of an Ayurvedic herbo-mineral preparation- Mahalaxmivilas Rasa. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine 10, 2019, 262-268.
- Sharma S. Hindi commentary by Pt. Kashinath Shastri on Rasatarangini; Taranga 10, verse 21-22. 11th ed. Varanasi: Motilal Banarasidas Publications 1979; 225-6.
- Mitra S, Arka Jyoti Chakraborty and Abu Montakim Tareq: Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: Novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. Journal of King Saud University Science 2022; 34: 101865.
- Balali-Mood M, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z, Khazdair MR and Sadeghi M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol 2021; 12: 643972. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643972
- Mercury and Health. 31 March 2017. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mercury-and-health
- International Conference on Harmonization, ICH Q2 (R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, ICHSecretariat, Geneva, 2005.
- The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part-II, Volume-III, First Edition 2010 (Formulations), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, Department of Ayurveda, Yoga – Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha & Homeopathy (AYUSH).
- Prakash Itankar, Dhanashri B. Nagulwar and Balaji Bhatlawande: Physical, Phytochemical and Chromatographic Evaluation of Triphala Guggul Tablets. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research (eIJPPR) 2015; 4 (6): 306-309. ISSN 2249-6084
- Thakur KS: Quality Standardization of a traditional Ayurvedic formulation Panchamrut Loha Guggul Tablet. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm 2017; 8(4): DOI: 10.7897/2277-4343.084213.
How to cite this article:
Patil P, Gawhankar M, Bidve S and Yadav S: Quality standardization of an ayurvedic formulations - Sanshamani vati and Mahalaxmivilas rasa. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2023; 14(6): 3084-95. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.14(6).3084-95.
All © 2023 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
48
3084-3095
984 KB
520
English
IJPSR
Priyanka Patil, Madhuree Gawhankar, Shivcharan Bidve and Santosh Yadav *
Shree Dhootapapeshwar Limited, Veer Savarkar Chowk, Panvel, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
santosh.yadav@sdlindia.com
19 October 2022
19 December 2022
30 April 2023
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.14(6).3084-95
01 June 2023